Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:26:31 +0400
From:      Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>
Cc:        Karim Fodil-Lemelin <fodillemlinkarim@gmail.com>, jfv@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: igb diver crashes in head@241037
Message-ID:  <20121121062631.GJ67660@glebius.int.ru>
In-Reply-To: <CAFOYbckbEPr3B=Kj5kiW16QKj5a6hWeTo%2BiU=vRpfy2jqXvd4w@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <50AA8F24.7080604@gmail.com> <20121120111833.GC67660@FreeBSD.org> <CAFOYbckbEPr3B=Kj5kiW16QKj5a6hWeTo%2BiU=vRpfy2jqXvd4w@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  Jack,

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:19:54AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
J> > I'd suggest the following code:
J> >
J> >                 if (m)
J> >                         drbr_enqueue(ifp, txr->br, m);
J> >                 err = igb_mq_start_locked(ifp, txr, NULL);
J> >
J> > Which eventually leads us to all invocations of igb_mq_start_locked()
J> > called
J> > with third argument as NULL. This allows us to simplify this function.
J> >
J> > Patch for review attached.
J> >
J> >
J> Yes Gleb, I already have code in my internal tree which simply removes an
J> mbuf
J> pointer form the start_locked call and ALWAYS does a dequeue, start
J> similarly
J> will always enqueue. I just have been busy with ixgbe for a bit and have
J> not gotten
J> it committed yet.

  Since ixgbe work is performance tuning and this patch closes a kernel crash,
I'd ask to preempt the ixgbe job with this patch. :)

  Or you can approve my patch and I will check it in.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121121062631.GJ67660>