From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 1 01:32:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191CE106564A for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2011 01:32:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83888FC13 for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2011 01:32:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5575 invoked by uid 399); 1 Jan 2011 01:32:44 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO doug-optiplex.ka9q.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 1 Jan 2011 01:32:44 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4D1E843A.8080404@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:32:42 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101210 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Lach References: <30565803.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <30565803.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster: $PACKAGESITE difference with pkg_add? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 01:32:45 -0000 On 12/31/2010 15:46, Jakub Lach wrote: > > Hello. > > According to portmaster man: > > portmaster will respect the PACKAGESITE and PACKAGEROOT > (by default http://ftp.freebsd.org) variables. portmaster attempts > to use both of these variables in the same way that pkg_add(1) does. > > However, on PRERELEASE system portmaster will hunt for nonexistent > PRERELEASE packages, while pkg_add will just use STABLE ones. > > Any thoughts? Thanks, this was fixed in svn version r216866. It will be in the upcoming ports version 3.6. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/