From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 24 13:05:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17F416A465 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:05:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789F043D62 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:05:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAOD5HTx076143; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:05:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id jAOD5GBA076140; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:05:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:05:16 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20051124023928.GA13075@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20051124140503.A75939@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20051124013438.T8326@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20051124023928.GA13075@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: so much clock interrupts?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:05:24 -0000 >> 540 534 99 pdwak 2000 cpu0: >> time >> 16825 pdpgs 2000 cpu1: >> time >> >> >> on FreeBSD 5.3 live CD i have 100 not 2000 times per second >> >> isn't it too much?! > > No, it's just a consequence of HZ=1000 instead of HZ=100. I've so why 2000 not 1000? 2000 on each processor!