Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 06 Oct 2021 19:25:34 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ruby@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 258108] devel/ruby-gems: Update to 3.2.26 (Fixes for Ruby 3.0)
Message-ID:  <bug-258108-21402-TRG9U4jHEK@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-258108-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-258108-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D258108

--- Comment #6 from mikeg@bsd-box.net ---
The crazy long list of bundler orphans are expected(ish) per my second QA n=
ote
- I pulled these from the package in favor of the current status quo of "If=
 you
want bundler install sysutils/rubygem-bundler." since that was more current
that what's packaged with gem.
(The stuff it's staging under /wrkdir is also an artifact of building Bundl=
er.)

If you think it makes sense to install the Bundler that comes with gems ins=
tead
to quiet the poudriere I can re-patch to pack Bundler and mark the two port=
s as
conflicting - that might need a dependencies audit though.

I could also have the Makefile clean all of this up in a post-install if you
think that's sensible, seemed dirty to me though. If I could get it to stop
building Bundler entirely it should be a clean packing list.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-258108-21402-TRG9U4jHEK>