Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:08:20 -0700
From:      Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
To:        Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: Remove single MASTER_SITE warning in portlint?
Message-ID:  <CAF6rxg=iV4UWfajYMQFCdWPqPrGX2BX8Eq8BhiAprAuGUE9OAQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <53AD060E.9080601@freebsd.org>
References:  <53AD060E.9080601@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26 June 2014 22:50, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Apparently there was some discussion on IRC about this.  A PR (Bugzilla) has
> been opened requesting the portlint warning about only a single MASTER_SITE
> to be done away with.
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191079
>
> This was added before my time with portlint, and I could go either way on
> it.  We do have a list of CDN MASTER_SITE aliases to avoid warning for silly
> things.  But the question remains: do we need this warning at all?

+1 to killing it.  There are many ports for which there is only a
single upstream location.  Larger ports with better upstream
infrastructure typically already have multiple MASTER_SITES.

It adds noise when looking for "ports with portlint issues".

-- 
Eitan Adler



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxg=iV4UWfajYMQFCdWPqPrGX2BX8Eq8BhiAprAuGUE9OAQ>