Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 07 Jul 2000 21:13:14 -0600
From:      Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
To:        Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>
Cc:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com>, Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>, Dann Lunsford <dann@greycat.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: No port of Opera? (Was: ((FreeBSD : Linux) :: (OS/2 : Windows)))
Message-ID:  <4.3.2.7.2.20000707211017.04804550@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20000707155808.J10303@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
References:  <20000707211621.C35215@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20000706225433.0475b4d0@localhost> <Your <4.3.2.7.2.20000706193313.04a8ca40@localhost> <54201.962945434@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20000706225433.0475b4d0@localhost> <20000707082704.Z35215@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20000707003817.04760d40@localhost> <20000707211621.C35215@daemon.ninth-circle.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:58 PM 7/7/2000, Will Andrews wrote:

>We could document which Linux syscalls should be changed into what BSD
>syscalls, to ease the job of porting.

"Porting kits" are good if they are well supported. A badly supported one
can drive vendors away. Microsoft offered a porting kit that allowed Windows
apps to be ported to OS/2, but it was so bad that it actually discouraged
and delayed ports. (Micrografx did a good one, so Microsoft bludgeoned them
into dropping it by threatening to destroy their business. This shows that
they thought it was a real threat.)

--Brett



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20000707211017.04804550>