Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:35:53 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kernel printf %i? Message-ID: <20000710173553.J25571@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007102015280.1115-100000@green.dyndns.org>; from green@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 08:17:11PM -0400 References: <20000710150556.I25571@fw.wintelcom.net> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007102015280.1115-100000@green.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> [000710 17:17] wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > any objections: > > Can you give me a good reason for it? To act like the libc printf() isn't > a good reason, I mean do you think it will actually help anyone in ways > that %d doesn't? Are you noticing tons of submissions of kernel code that > have %i and don't work correctly or something? > > I just don't get it :-/ I was annoyed when I used %i and it didn't work. POLA. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000710173553.J25571>