Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 00:36:11 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> To: Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> Cc: Chris Pepper <pepper@reppep.com>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MFC definition? Message-ID: <20020514213611.GA23785@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <20020514162424.GB42702@electricjellyfish.net> References: <200205141431.g4EEVeC71650@freefall.freebsd.org> <p05111906b906e8903002@[129.85.219.160]> <20020514162424.GB42702@electricjellyfish.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2002-05-14 12:24, Garrett Rooney wrote: >On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 12:20:04PM -0400, Chris Pepper wrote: >>At 7:31 AM -0700 2002/05/14, <keramida@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>>State-Changed-From-To: open->patched >>>State-Changed-When: Tue May 14 07:31:01 PDT 2002 >>> >>>Committed to CURRENT. I'll handle the MFC. >> >>Thanks. I looked in various places, but couldn't find a >>definition for MFC. Is it "Move From CURRENT"? > > it's "Merge From -CURRENT", and it's already defined in the FAQ: > http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/misc.html#DEFINE-MFC Oh boy. Ain't it nice? To go out for a coffee, and stay offline for a while to return and see that +inbox is quickly filling up. Thanks to all who speedily replied. On a related sidenote, when I'm closing PRs I should probably spare the Submitter the acronyms :) Chris, MFC is 'Merged from CURRENT' as others have pointed out. The normal thing would be to include in the commit message a line like the following: MFC after: 1 week or something similar. This is not what I did though, since I want to ask the RE team (Release Engineers) for the merge .. we are now in a ``code freeze'' for the release of 4.6-RELEASE :-) -- Giorgos Keramidas - http://www.FreeBSD.org keramida@FreeBSD.org - The Power to Serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020514213611.GA23785>