Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:52:27 -0400
From:      David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Bruce Simpson <bms@incunabulum.net>
Cc:        freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG, bde@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Boost.Math svn/branches/release regressions flagged
Message-ID:  <20090706215227.GA26491@zim.MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <4A5264C0.1050509@incunabulum.net>
References:  <4A5200CF.600@incunabulum.net> <20090706205409.GA25996@zim.MIT.EDU> <4A5264C0.1050509@incunabulum.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I will try to take a look when I have time.  I'd be somewhat
surprised if this is a regression in FreeBSD, though, since
nothing that test_next or float_distance depend on (namely frexp
and ldexp) have changed recently.

On Mon, Jul 06, 2009, Bruce Simpson wrote:
> David Schultz wrote:
> >What architecture is this, and how new is the regression?
> >  
> 
> This is i386, RELENG_7, tracking the Boost release branch (with their 
> regression test run.py script) as of yesterday.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-standards@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-standards-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090706215227.GA26491>