From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 9 15:55:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C22106567E for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 15:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D848FC15 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 15:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3156899bkv.13 for ; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 08:55:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=YVR3YjRaCSZ1O6HoPqk1SiLKE8nXr8ktZxMbgXv3gjQ=; b=ZUCiNhthCX/AqZjCOINtdPNMizi91gG2QH7t/eFi2NQuU3efuZlQzoezv71tQKE1IG 0vVQMeiQUviH3yR0KX9XfIWmwPolJKJZKYKPPwqi/Tf1Pc2cFNY+r0tNSf+XtsAhfRGB KtzdzBpOzR5JasaP1dG/yKTPJVsio/rFfv9Zxoct+TQoprcoSai2eyPnzl0WcSkRgEvK C9X33JOhFGHCD/b1Dqa1ma2n2Uh5WHXObEl9PEYsmysQNzPn7UWUL8z/fO1LOFQ7SK3s C9KjjcDlWVuQf/hDxi8INXLo63nZgTyG1+gSKy/U/w9mikNrmuO1yh/+OhpESuBFT+Rl bfcg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.154.214 with SMTP id p22mr7732201bkw.115.1339257323579; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 08:55:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 08:55:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 08:55:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 16:55:23 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Kevin Oberman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: Firefox and firefox-remote options issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 15:55:25 -0000 On Jun 9, 2012 4:52 PM, "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > > After upgrading a system from 8 to 9 I am reinstalling all ports. > Unfortunately, neither www/firefox nor www/firefox-remote is handling > options correctly. I'm just guessing that it is related to optionsng. > > The options dialog always comes up with the default options showing. > If I modify these, they are not being stored and the port seems to > build without the selected options. Worse, when I used portmaster to > install firefox-remote, I was queried for options at the start and > again before the install and then the install failed because the build > had not built the option I specified. I have never seen this sort of > behavior and it appears to be only these two ports. Neither has > converted to optionsng. > > The re-install of all ports will be running for a while as there are > about 700 ports still to be installed, but after it finishes I will > try to figure out what is going wrong, but I'll have to admit that my > make experience is fairly basic. > > Any idea why these two ports seem to be failing to process options correctly? > --, Does the file /var/db/ports/firefox/options exist? Can you put it up somewhere? Chris