From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jul 26 15: 1:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EC237B405; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 15:01:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA47576; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 00:01:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Mike Smith Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: moving struct module out of kern_module.c References: <200107222019.f6MKJBI01159@mass.dis.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 27 Jul 2001 00:01:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200107222019.f6MKJBI01159@mass.dis.org> Message-ID: Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Smith writes: > > Currently, struct module is defined in kern_module.c and opaque to the > > rest of the kernel. I'd like to move the definition out into module.h > > so linprocfs can access it. Any objections? > Why? I wanted to implement proc/modules and proc/syms, but right now I'm not sure they're meaningful at all (and I don't know of anything that requires them), so never mind. If it comes up again I'll write accessor functions. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message