Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:37:15 -0700 (PDT) From: KAYVEN RIESE <kayve@sfsu.edu> To: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfce4 broke after pkgdb -Ff Message-ID: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0705171135570.25365@libra.sfsu.edu> In-Reply-To: <44irarz7fs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <464B114C.5080703@net4.in> <464B1D6A.1040809@samsco.org> <Pine.SOC.4.64.0705160849530.8669@libra.sfsu.edu> <44tzubr4u6.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <Pine.SOC.4.64.0705170901570.25365@libra.sfsu.edu> <44irarz7fs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Please don't top-post. > > KAYVEN RIESE <kayve@sfsu.edu> writes: > >> so the "-r" option will be the significant difference for the portupgrade >> comamnd, just verifying > > Yes. Otherwise, you may end up with some of the ports that depend on > pango being unable to use the new version. > > Make sure you look through the UPDATING file to see if there are any > other issues you need to take special action for at the same time. > this guy seems to disagree jnielsendotnet:Try what I asked in my first reply (deleting and reinstalling pango manually), and see if you can get any error messages from xfce. If portupgrade -f is failing portupgrade -fr isn't likely to succeed either. Ricardo's comment (in your parallel thread on the freebsd-stable mailing list) about the gettext upgrade is probably relevant as well.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOC.4.64.0705171135570.25365>