From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jan 17 06:39:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA01399 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sat, 17 Jan 1998 06:39:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lsd.relcom.eu.net (ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net [193.124.23.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA01391; Sat, 17 Jan 1998 06:39:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net) Received: (from ache@localhost) by lsd.relcom.eu.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA06817; Sat, 17 Jan 1998 17:39:15 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 17:39:12 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= X-Sender: ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net To: Eivind Eklund cc: Eivind Eklund , Satoshi Asami , gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: amanda port, empty PATCH_STRIP= lines causes trouble In-Reply-To: <19980117152958.42977@follo.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 17 Jan 1998, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > I talk about not yet released -stable, not about older 2.2 installations > > which have their own patch / bsd.port.mk > > No. They don't have their own bsd.port.mk - we've been telling them > to upgrade to the newest bsd.port.mk all the time. IMHO, we should as > far as possible in making the active ports collection work on all > versions of 2.2 (or at least provide a painless way of making it > work). Well, personally I don't deal with 2.2 so can't know all pitfails there. What I want initially was fixing -current bsd.port.mk only. >From the picture you show I see that we need different bsd.port.mk in -current and -stable, or runtime check in bsd.port.mk which can cause slowdown (maybe not so big) -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/