Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:30:31 -0400 From: Chris Buechler <cbuechler@gmail.com> To: "Luiz Gustavo S. Costa" <luizgustavo@luizgustavo.pro.br> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rdr + reply-to, some solution ? Message-ID: <AANLkTinvSgcZSZ2iL8aTZctZ-gO7VuMlNQz8R_5ozzLh@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilsfgvw5MY98y2QxW_D5KuaUVqTPkRDFXKmy_Gl@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimQDT9IOfmNxAJSzGRj3TCmtKNso8hqLXFQebLr@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikwp2exi_fDniASauaPpEGX8FfgahZwRTlDmLUj@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTilsfgvw5MY98y2QxW_D5KuaUVqTPkRDFXKmy_Gl@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Luiz Gustavo S. Costa <luizgustavo@luizgustavo.pro.br> wrote: > hi Chris ! how are you? > > as it says here in Brazil: "I eat ball" :). > > pass in $if_int reply-to ($if_ext2 $gw_ext2) proto tcp from any to > 192.168.1.100 port 80 > > but still, the combination does not work > Then that's not the rule that's matching the traffic. Presuming it worked previously when that rule wouldn't match the traffic, there must be some other rule matching. You may need 'quick' there as well depending on the rest of your ruleset and your intent.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinvSgcZSZ2iL8aTZctZ-gO7VuMlNQz8R_5ozzLh>