Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:06:15 -0400
From:      Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
To:        Kenji M <kenji@kenjim.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Running FreeBSD/PostgreSQL on high-end dual Xeon box
Message-ID:  <40C10067.20303@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040604205244.GA228@kenjim.com>
References:  <20040603214253.GA93387@kenjim.com> <F6C48A69-B5AE-11D8-9C6A-003065ABFD92@mac.com> <20040604205244.GA228@kenjim.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kenji M wrote:
> I had been considering the same setup, but it might make sense just
> to use 3 disk RAID5 with hot spare ready.  The new RAID controller
> implementation might not buy us much by using 0+1 vs. 5.
> 
> Any thoughts?

I doubt many databases recommend RAID-5; using RAID 0+1 is likely to be a 
better choice.

-- 
-Chuck



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40C10067.20303>