From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 3 10:50:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393261065675 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:50:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A438FC14 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p83AoBve015162 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:50:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p83AoBXp015159; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:50:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:50:11 GMT Message-Id: <201109031050.p83AoBXp015159@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Chris Rees Cc: Subject: Re: ports/160379: Update port: security/maia Fix for out-of-sync patches and dependencies. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chris Rees List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:50:11 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/160379; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Chris Rees To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, ek@purplehat.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/160379: Update port: security/maia Fix for out-of-sync patches and dependencies. Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 11:49:00 +0100 Hey, It looks as though you have planned to remove the WRKSRC line and incorporate that into the tarball -- that breaks Rule 1 of hosting tarballs -- never, never, EVER change the tarball and keep the same name! I'm going to put the WRKSRC= line back in, but feel free to remove it next time you update to the latest svn; that would be an appropriate time to fix it. Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.