Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 16:36:53 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com.au> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/gated/patches patch-aa Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970602163219.1306A-100000@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <199706021227.UAA24133@spinner.dialix.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2 Jun 1997, Peter Wemm wrote: > Nah, this was on my todo list for some time. Somebody suggested it to me > months ago (it might have been Bruce, or perhaps Jordan or Satoshi), back > when /var/run was being entirely cleaned at boot - as it should IMHO. If > something wants the file to stay around, it should't store it there. Hmm. As I understand you think that gated/innd/etc. must be fixed to store pid file at /var/db/ instead, so I need to restore /var/run cleaning in /etc/rc... This method have one disadvantage, each port/port upgrade which produce .pid file must be explicitly checked that it test/not test for .pid file presence at startup... I am not shure, which solution is better variant... Do you have any additional arguments/ideas? -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970602163219.1306A-100000>