Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Aug 2004 03:13:41 +0200
From:      Thomas Moestl <t.moestl@tu-bs.de>
To:        Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files.sparc64
Message-ID:  <20040815011340.GA2374@timesink.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040815023509.E31182@newtrinity.zeist.de>
References:  <200408150011.i7F0B0lO063891@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040815001834.GJ991@funkthat.com> <20040815023509.E31182@newtrinity.zeist.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2004/08/15 at 02:35:09 +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 05:18:34PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > Marius Strobl wrote this message on Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 00:11 +0000:
> > > marius      2004-08-15 00:11:00 UTC
> > > 
> > >   FreeBSD src repository
> > > 
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     sys/conf             files.sparc64 
> > >   Log:
> > >   sio(4), which never really worked on sparc64, was removed in favour of
> > >   uart(4) in sparc64/conf/GENERIC revision 1.63 about 9 months ago. Remove
> > >   its source files here, too.
> > 
> > Hmmm... are you sure?  sio worked fine for me on my sparc64 system..
> > 
> > I did have troubles when OFW and sio tried to share sio0, but then
> > I just didn't use sio0....
> > 
> > In fact, I've been meaning to commit the sio module framework I have
> > back when I loaded it to work on my system...
> > 
> 
> AFAIK, it only really ever worked with tmm's patches at
> http://people.freebsd.org/~tmm/sio-s64-*
> but which he stopped updating after uart(4) was commited which was better
> suited to work on sparc64. Therefor sio(4) was removed from the sparc64
> GENERIC kernel and sio_ebus.c deleted. I thought these two sio(4) files
> in files.sparc64 were just a leftover. Thomas?

The patches mostly contained changes to get console support and EBus
sio(4)s to work. As far as I know, ISA sio(4)s worked with an
unpatched driver, as long as console support was not required (I
haven't tested that recently, though).

	- Thomas

-- 
Thomas Moestl	<t.moestl@tu-bs.de>	http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0015675/
		<tmm@FreeBSD.org>	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tmm/
OpenPGP fingerprint: 1C97 A604 2BD0 E492 51D0  9C0F 1FE6 4F1D 419C 776C



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040815011340.GA2374>