From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 26 19:36:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: multimedia@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5491C16A4DA; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:36:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from centrmmtao02.cox.net (centrmmtao02.cox.net [70.168.83.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9670D43D55; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:36:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by centrmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060826193628.YIQM22014.centrmmtao02.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:36:28 -0400 Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([24.255.149.218]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id EjcR1V0064iy4EG0000000 Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:36:25 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:37:06 -0500 To: "Roman Bogorodskiy" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060825205238.GA2637@underworld.novel.ru> <20060825223213.GC2637@underworld.novel.ru> <20060825231827.GF2637@underworld.novel.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20060825231827.GF2637@underworld.novel.ru> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.01 (Linux) Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with audio/faad X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:36:30 -0000 On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:18:27 -0500, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > michael johnson wrote: > >> it's probably the way faad is setup to build then, since it >> is rather unique vs. many other ports (except faac) Ahh, I see.... that PATCH_DEPENDS and post-patch target.. I dont like it. Why not remove PATCH_DEPENDS and use pre-configure? Will it works? >> I've seen this on my own tinderbox and I just assumed >> it was NO_CDROM in the past. > > Hm. Is it possible to fix it somehow? Try to remove PATCH_DEPENDS, then rename that post-patch target to pre-configure. Cheers, Mezz > Roman Bogorodskiy -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - multimedia@FreeBSD.org