From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 24 21:49:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4EF37B401 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 21:49:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D82643FB1 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 21:49:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 198v9U-000NVn-TM; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 05:49:36 +0100 Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h3P4naPe082348; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 05:49:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h3P4nak2082347; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 05:49:36 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 05:49:35 +0100 From: Jonathon McKitrick To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Message-ID: <20030425044935.GG81840@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20030422132906.GB64101@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <444r4qmp6n.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20030422172549.GA65023@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Spam-Score: -15.1 (---------------) X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *198v9U-000NVn-TM*s.fbNzNicsw* cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Code layout and debugging time X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 04:49:43 -0000 On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 11:42:05PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: : That is way too much, and bde would have your nads for breakfast if : you committed anything like that. Who is bde, again? : Simply put, too much whitespace is just as bad as no whitespace at : all. Imagine reading a book where every sentence is a separate : paragraph; paragraph breaks become worthless because they no longer : serve to group sentences together. True, yet a lot of the kernel code and driver code does just that: extensive commenting, even when it only means one line of code. jcm -- Consulting: If you aren't part of the solution, there is a lot of money to be made in prolonging the problem.