From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sat Feb 23 18:15:16 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5410151FF85 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 18:15:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) Received: from mail.kronometrix.org (mail.kronometrix.org [95.85.46.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.kronometrix.org", Issuer "mail.kronometrix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AFCD9717D for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 18:15:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.191] (213-216-249-17.bb.dnainternet.fi [213.216.249.17]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.kronometrix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x1NIEtSl068914 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 23 Feb 2019 18:14:56 GMT (envelope-from sparvu@kronometrix.org) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.kronometrix.org: Host 213-216-249-17.bb.dnainternet.fi [213.216.249.17] claimed to be [192.168.1.191] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\)) Subject: Re: RBPI3B+ FreeBSD 12 ZFS From: Stefan Parvu In-Reply-To: <20190223141648.GR93368@cicely7.cicely.de> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 20:14:50 +0200 Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8BD4B1FF-76C5-423F-9C32-F0D47FD0A604@kronometrix.org> References: <5D976A97-9800-4A9F-A155-F3BD998AFB4C@kronometrix.org> <19ed5715-f1f1-6c5d-5dc6-e9c5225e5445@denninger.net> <1ED1A0A0-C569-433C-9341-30C40BC4CBF7@kronometrix.org> <20190223141648.GR93368@cicely7.cicely.de> To: ticso@cicely.de X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8AFCD9717D X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sparvu@kronometrix.org designates 95.85.46.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sparvu@kronometrix.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.99 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.90)[0.903,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kronometrix.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.56)[-0.555,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.97)[0.969,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.kronometrix.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(0.48)[asn: 14061(2.47), country: US(-0.07)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:95.85.0.0/18, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 18:15:16 -0000 >=20 > Exactly that's the reason why I'm using ZFS. > Especially with fragile cards. > It also is quite a bit faster on cards as it tends to write more = linear > to them and faster writes usually also mean that the cards won't wear > out as fast as with slow write patterns. Right. That was my first initial idea to see how ZFS will work using = Transcend, SanDisk=20 vs UFS.=20 How did you get started with ZFS/RBPi ? I suppose you started with = vanilla UFs image and then made that to use a zfs pool ? Is there anywhere documented how = one would=20 start using ZFS on RBPI3 because I think there are no ready images using = ZFS. Right ? Thanks, Stefan=