Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:50:07 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why 7.0 is so late ? Message-ID: <20071019125006.GB2893@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <18199.57028.210903.451591@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20071017133352.GE67677@pcjas.obspm.fr> <47161B5D.9050002@pacific.net.sg> <20071017165423.G89276@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <13413b8f0710170920t5e5a03f9tcd703e6239db0296@mail.gmail.com> <20071017192628.GA1238@kobe.laptop> <20071018180902.GB28392@demeter.hydra> <20071018190507.GB57252@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <18199.57028.210903.451591@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2007-10-18 18:31, Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> wrote: >Jerry McAllister writes: >>> I'd much rather that a RELEASE version is as stable as it can >>> reasonably be made than that it arrives "on time". >> >> Yup. I think that is the way all of us feel. > > I don't think many will argue, at least not loudly. However ... many > also have bad memories of 5.0, and the grim\\\\ firm desire to never > let that happen again. Indeed. That's one of the most important driving forces between trying to push major releases out with a period of "around 18 months" ;)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071019125006.GB2893>