From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 07:36:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2906237B401; Sat, 2 Aug 2003 07:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vimes.aminor.no (vimes.aminor.no [213.187.177.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B5443F3F; Sat, 2 Aug 2003 07:36:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@aminor.no) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (rincewind.eivind [192.168.0.2]) by vimes.aminor.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67D378D2C; Sat, 2 Aug 2003 16:36:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 16:37:52 +0200 From: Eivind Olsen To: current@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <1324937.1059842272@[192.168.0.2]> In-Reply-To: <20030802090052.GA25338@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <1079.192.168.0.3.1059811884.squirrel@webmail.aminor.no> <20030802090052.GA25338@rot13.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.3 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline cc: grog@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: vinum bug? (Re: Yet another crash in FreeBSD 5.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 14:36:48 -0000 [Sending to current@freebsd, and Kris copied in Greg so I'll also do that] --On 2. august 2003 02:00 -0700 Kris Kennaway wrote: >> db> trace >> g_dev_strategy(c2156024,c2153800,0,cfb528d0,c2099eca) at >> g_dev_strategy+0x29 launch_requests(c299bf00,0,10000,ffffffff,47) at >> launch_requests+0x448 vinumstart(c5ada2d0,0,c22ab000,cfb5294c,c02e5bc6) >> at vinumstart+0x2b2 vinumstrategy(c5ada2d0,0,c09719b0,40,0) at >> vinumstrategy+0xa6 > Looks like a problem in vinum. The other backtrace was the same, right? Basically the same, yes. Some differences (and many similarities) in the addresses that were referenced. And also almost the same output from the "trace" command (I see that my first example is missing the dofilewrite() between vn_write() and write() but that might just be because I've forgotten to write down that line (I wrote all this down by hand). So, it looks like it's the same crash again (well, it does look like that to my untrained eye). -- Regards / Hilsen Eivind Olsen