Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 18:33:29 -0700 From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Standardized make options (or no doesn't always mean no) Message-ID: <3D02B069.5863B2B9@FreeBSD.org> References: <20020608210159.B87326@espresso.q9media.com> <3D02AB11.F373AB4@FreeBSD.org> <3D02ACE0.9DAB0822@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote: > How about "FOO=false" and "FOO=true" and "NO_FOO: undefined variable"? Hysterical raisins. BLAH=anythingatall has always meant, "BLAH is true," (or more properly, BLAH is defined) regardless of the value. Your way would make more sense, but that's a battle I'm not willing to fight. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D02B069.5863B2B9>