From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jul 27 09:31:10 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA11658
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 09:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA11646
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 09:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from sef@localhost) by kithrup.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id JAA23528; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 09:31:06 -0700
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 1997 09:31:06 -0700
From: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@Kithrup.COM>
Message-Id: <199707271631.JAA23528@kithrup.com>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SVR4.2MP source code has become available recently?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970725230002.1028p-100000.kithrup.freebsd.hackers@trifork.gu.net>
Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In article <Pine.BSF.3.96.970725230002.1028p-100000.kithrup.freebsd.hackers@trifork.gu.net> you write:
>I've hear rumors that the source code for SCO UnixWare 2.1.x
>is now available from SCO for $500 for educational
>institutions.
>
>Isn't this interesting as a reference?  How do you think?

No.  Under no circumstances should you use it as a reference.  This is
dangerous.

Unless, of course, you don't want to do any FreeBSD development, or, if
you do, you want to get yourself and/or Jordan Hubbard sued for some
intellectual property violation (e.g., copyright or trade secret).