Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:47:01 -0500 From: "Will Saxon" <WillS@housing.ufl.edu> To: "Dan Nelson" <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: network tuning Message-ID: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED8CBBC03@bragi.housing.ufl.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Nelson [mailto:dnelson@allantgroup.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:04 PM > To: Will Saxon > Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: network tuning >=20 > That's consistent with a dual-CPU box. The CPU states are for the > system as a whole, but the CPU usages in the process listing are > per-process. A single CPU-heavy process will cause its=20 > process line to > hit 100% CPU, but that will only force the User percentage to 50%, > since there is antoher CPU sitting idle. Aha, didn't realize this. We were all kind of wondering if that was = all-cpu or just the one cpu. Well, there isn't a faster processor = available on that platform so we will have to just build something = better, or find something multithreaded. Thanks for the pointers! I appreciate the help. -Will To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED8CBBC03>