From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 00:10:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580FE106564A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:10:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D568FC1B for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC64509DA for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:10:03 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from nyi.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nyi.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FYltvzYmuUx3 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:10:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7470A509D4; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:10:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20090111001001.7470A509D4@nyi.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:10:01 +0000 (GMT) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2008-12-21 - 2009-01-10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:10:05 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 01:11:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562FE106566B for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:11:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from will.rutherdale@utoronto.ca) Received: from mail.vex.net (smaug.vex.net [208.76.104.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA7E8FC19 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:11:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from will.rutherdale@utoronto.ca) Received: from [192.168.110.8] (unknown [207.35.13.79]) by mail.vex.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2E0F81707F for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:11:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <49694724.6090705@utoronto.ca> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:11:00 -0500 From: William Gordon Rutherdale User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14ubu (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4968EDAF.40108@utoronto.ca> <3a142e750901101153x66d0099dxa871dce07df32175@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3a142e750901101153x66d0099dxa871dce07df32175@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Cannot get ethernet off the ground X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:11:03 -0000 I have to use paper-sneakernet because - no network connectivity yet - tried plugging in a memory stick; it flashed but nothing showed up with the 'mount' command Here are the last two entries from the 'pciconf -lv' command, which look relevant to the problem. I had to write them down on paper and walk over to this room to type them. Please pardon any typos: none2@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x2abf103c chip=0x816810ec rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' device = 'RTL 8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC' class = network subclass = ethernet fwohci0@pci:1:5:0: class=0x0c0010 card=0x2a6f103c chip=0x581111c1 rev=0x70 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Lucent/Agere Systems (Was: AT&T MicroElectronics)' device = 'FW322 1394A PCI PHY/Link Open Host Ctrlr I/F' class = serial bus subclass = FireWire It sounds like I have both an ethernet adapter and firewire. Some part of FreeBSD recognises both. However the network configuration recognises the firewire and not the ethernet adapter as available for networking. This is despite the network adapter actually being connected by CAT5 to a live network. Question 0. Is there a way to get ifconfig to recognise the ethernet adapter? Question 1. Is it possible that FreeBSD 7.1 would do a better job? Question 2. How can I mount and write stuff to my memory stick on this OS? -Will Paul B. Mahol wrote: > On 1/10/09, William Gordon Rutherdale wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I have just installed FreeBSD on a machine and am having trouble getting >> basic ethernet connectivity working. >> >> I know that the interface works because it functioned fine with the old >> virus software called 'Vista' on that connection. >> >> The ifconfig utility tells me that the machine recognises something >> called fwe0 with an ethernet address of 02:1e:8c:9a:3b:96. However >> dmesg tells me this is a 'Fake Ethernet' address. >> >> I used ifconfig (as root) to set the ip address and netmask for fwe0, >> but am unable to ping another machine on the network. I have not tried >> installing FreeBSD before but have installed other operating systems in >> the past including various versions of Linux. >> >> Is it possible that FreeBSD is not recognising the ethernet device >> properly at boot time, and giving it the wrong driver? Or is there a >> simpler step I missed? >> >> What steps can I take to get this interface working? >> >> -Will >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > fwe is ethernet emulation driver for firewire. > post output of pciconf -lv. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 01:41:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7B8106564A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:41:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928868FC1D for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:41:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so11572003rvf.43 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:41:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-disposition:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9StHfz7r3e307ugMf/v6irw+YkEviDQfNWoFzEQX/ys=; b=dNb+0w9PJeTAuVM0e59104HXBp0C8uIbOanADNpK/0DaS99Ah1tEBEixetSkASJCTj ZGOvouQzV4MSd01MH4tJm2E91mz0hFRyahNlSEzpiW3ddxrR4fX3LLgVgGSBX8Ut8maI cpSpbd3kKshr85N3AYFvW+iDYtCV8ntojRdCA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-disposition :message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=j6ENzyZtkjSeVVWCY2xlzafQjxFEwm+xftRKs4IiRRaA8ddfSq3HSOHWaF27VsqQTv GR2E4SHW5FUkygtVvGBrfmb2YD9GENE74sxPCsAFqdhGYTTPheepdOcQX0a6L7z9wRRH jxxio65zvXtngtVbjL6rKtngg7ktCBUFasA4c= Received: by 10.141.62.7 with SMTP id p7mr13600969rvk.159.1231638083211; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:41:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from sniper (71-221-160-162.bois.qwest.net [71.221.160.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g31sm9301862rvb.4.2009.01.10.17.41.22 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:41:22 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Falanga To: FreeBSD Questions Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:37:50 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901101837.50363.af300wsm@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Odd behavior after upgrading to 7.0-p7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:41:24 -0000 Hi, I installed 7.0 i386 and all was working great. I upgraded to p7 and now when I end my X session, I have kdm loading, it doesn't bring me to a login prompt. It dumps me on console 0 and I have to kill the kdm-bin process to return to a kdm login. This didn't happen before upgrading to p7. What would have changed that would not prevent this? Thanks, Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 02:23:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF01106566C for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:23:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com (mail-ew0-f21.google.com [209.85.219.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E954D8FC12 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:23:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so12268809ewy.19 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:23:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bxwJIJ4oR6TcNnYrMZZZmWMIbEj3ccGknEm/tsGxBdk=; b=jKBOCC4u+Bmbs8solPcWBT0s7KNdY67uqOT8d8HC4pLwFyUXAKPoDGKXZGZalUmyQb NmVrrNmr4nSSXyaoGJN6wgHbRKKjRmLJtDElDL07unS4PLKKoy4LkrYMGl78WwVQKP+V f5c1HNQ4tP6XD6zlbM0KeoW0Kyd9GAaHGfJcM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qe++NFlWY3V1mwDJGemQZNGcLRBWaKgm4KsdW/EjcbfrINi8E78ELkSGaH3gsrFQg0 f/OXOK0UGtRSadaPW8JZIjdsaW1oprxCT62i5shJIK4g2t/OgMorAwfVQr7YOWGFTkmW jHqrctxmZUsUO7lA14W1TSLE4HXl7FQdhDXro= Received: by 10.210.78.7 with SMTP id a7mr32271285ebb.4.1231640609838; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:23:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c22sm59885187ika.8.2009.01.10.18.23.27 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:23:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:23:25 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090111022325.3e252ce7@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <49690095.8030101@onetel.com> References: <4967C511.3060100@comcast.net> <20090109231748.GA3715@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20090110033633.77e00a1e@gumby.homeunix.com> <49690095.8030101@onetel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Mounting /c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:23:31 -0000 On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:09:57 +0000 Chris Whitehouse wrote: > Why not as a matter of curiosity? It has its limitations (eg max file > size) but it's very cross platform. ntfs is much more robust than fat32, if you crash windows or pull the plug, you are more likely to lose data with fat32. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 03:03:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06C21065670 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:03:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A0F8FC13 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:03:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LLqcC-000525-Q3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:03:52 +0000 Received: from pool-141-156-171-233.esr.east.verizon.net ([141.156.171.233]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:03:52 +0000 Received: from nightrecon by pool-141-156-171-233.esr.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:03:52 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:04:13 -0500 Lines: 46 Message-ID: References: <4968EDAF.40108@utoronto.ca> <3a142e750901101153x66d0099dxa871dce07df32175@mail.gmail.com> <49694724.6090705@utoronto.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-141-156-171-233.esr.east.verizon.net Sender: news Subject: Re: Cannot get ethernet off the ground X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@verizon.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:03:57 -0000 William Gordon Rutherdale wrote: > I have to use paper-sneakernet because > - no network connectivity yet > - tried plugging in a memory stick; it flashed but nothing showed up > with the 'mount' command > > Here are the last two entries from the 'pciconf -lv' command, which look > relevant to the problem. I had to write them down on paper and walk > over to this room to type them. Please pardon any typos: > > none2@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x2abf103c chip=0x816810ec > rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' > device = 'RTL 8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > This may be supported by the "re" driver. Run your ifconfig setup commands against "re0" and see what happens. This should be present in the GENERIC kernel, if you have a custom kernel with it removed just kldload the module. You should also be able to grep "re" out from your dmesg. [snip] > > Question 1. Is it possible that FreeBSD 7.1 would do a better job? Sometimes with these adapters not every chipID makes it into the driver code. Usually this takes care of itself as time goes on, eg "newer is better". If you are just starting out with a new machine and a fresh install you might want to consider 7.1-RELEASE. [snip] >> >> fwe is ethernet emulation driver for firewire. >> post output of pciconf -lv. >> >> [snip] -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 06:21:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152831065672 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (aristotle.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951858FC16 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:21:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0B6MMTo005814 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:22:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:21:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:21:42 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20090111062139.GA56182@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 22 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: Subject: Pre-idea question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:21:55 -0000 people, first, the idea i have that could earn some cash very likely is not new; it is text-to-speech, but in a certain way. here's my question since recently i heard a computerized voice speaking so very normally, at first i thought it was human. thus: how advanced are some of these commercial apps? i used ktts/lttsd to read me lon sci/tech articles, and even my own stff. ktts is about 60-65% of the way there, but next to the pay-for applications, ktts is in the dark ages. anybody know? gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org First update of http://transfinite.thought.org/ab/ in seven months. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 07:42:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8709E106566C for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:42:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A088FC08 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:42:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0B7gM2i025109; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:42:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n0B7gJF1025106; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:42:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:42:19 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: William Gordon Rutherdale In-Reply-To: <4968EDAF.40108@utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <20090111084136.K25093@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <4968EDAF.40108@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot get ethernet off the ground X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:42:30 -0000 > > The ifconfig utility tells me that the machine recognises something called > fwe0 with an ethernet address of 02:1e:8c:9a:3b:96. However dmesg tells me > this is a 'Fake Ethernet' address. fwe is firewire emulated ethernet - you may connect 2 computers using firewire cable. it's wrong interface, if there are no others - your ethernet card is not detected From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 07:49:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFDA106564A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:49:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from thenetnow.com (constellation.thenetnow.com [65.39.193.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962C48FC0C for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:49:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=GRANTLAPTOP) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LLv4q-0000wx-Lt for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:49:44 -0500 Message-ID: <2971BFA91BAE482E9A59C9F05E31B9D3@GRANTLAPTOP> From: "Grant Peel" To: Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:49:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: gname X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:49:46 -0000 Wow, After a fresh install of FreeBSD 6.4, (with Xorg) I tried installing = Gnome, and I get a "stop" during build, Filesystem Full! Is Gname really that big? or did I miss doing something? Doing a du -h -d1 on /usr shows" ... 7.0G ports. 1.8G local df -h shows: ... /dev/ad8s1e 9.7G(total) 9.6G(used) ... 108% (usr) ... Again, is gname really that big? -Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 08:33:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DA51065670; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from mail18.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail18.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483EE8FC12; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c122-106-215-175.belrs3.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.215.175]) by mail18.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0B8X1HO027655 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:33:01 +1100 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0B8X0nW007399; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:33:00 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n0B8X0mE007395; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:33:00 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:33:00 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Kamlesh Patel Message-ID: <20090111083300.GC7054@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <468090.72533.qm@web45413.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yVhtmJPUSI46BTXb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <468090.72533.qm@web45413.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:33:04 -0000 --yVhtmJPUSI46BTXb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2009-Jan-09 00:05:47 -0800, Kamlesh Patel wrote: >How do i recover the system from this error. I can't reload the loader.old If you press any key during the first spinner, you should get a prompt similar to the following: >> FreeBSD/i386 BOOT Default: 0:ad(0,a)/boot/loader boot: You can then enter the name of the program you wish to run - eg /boot/loader.old (or directly load /boot/kernel/kernel) See the following for a more complete description: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dboot&apropos=3D0&sektion=3D0&man= path=3DFreeBSD+7.1-RELEASE&format=3Dhtml --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --yVhtmJPUSI46BTXb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklprrwACgkQ/opHv/APuIfTrACgvDIfkZzzdTJkznYWKfqeVj4R JzgAn1B05lz+K8r+NtxrA/3bXfHHt3/V =HVuo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yVhtmJPUSI46BTXb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 09:11:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC916106566C for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:11:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raasdnil@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AE48FC1B for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:11:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raasdnil@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so11707885rvf.43 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:11:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=cnUKfha02K6AMxd8dOO+/tDsFvfB9XIecW9bd/B5BOw=; b=tFqmqLsZLEM+V+Gw7CRhAL5lkuxKxj0U5kIwv7Op8ftdEj6oqbhq4EDo440bHEage3 +1LdQMYz9FPl8d5LefTcLyLrSGqQHLcq9pLALW96YYGkOI0fEeFcL6npqxTnmd47twz5 4ZFlaLU2zdL/DRpZf3oWZ0iRILyjEG1185Ftg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=wJk+wKdEFknQU2x+hHTwpahyLNQIDg7VJ1nsax4wtFjGCgNgd+y54rsjE/dcKhwBu9 Z3vrNXNzMvucsnAjy6639pmWRXLwVgaw2U7Iy3glaCzSE93QyYpUvsuL0aH6z4NKkmZo qpw4bAvqhzA7x0Ukklw8PAo/eSwnabb8mtFxA= Received: by 10.141.209.6 with SMTP id l6mr1357249rvq.2.1231663133934; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:38:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.162.8 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:38:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <57a815bf0901110038t24071058m134d438339888b5b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:38:53 +1100 From: "Mikel Lindsaar" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Linux binary execution performance hit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:11:57 -0000 Hi list, Question, what sort of performance hit does FreeBSD 7.0 have on running linux binaries? The program in question is Ruby, I'm looking at putting ruby compiled on a linux box over onto a FreeBSD system so I can take advantage of the Oracle Instant client. But will look at other options if this is going to be a lot slower. Mikel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 09:15:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B72C106564A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068768FC1F for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:15:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0B9FXqb025264; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:15:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n0B9FXKo025261; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:15:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:15:33 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Mikel Lindsaar In-Reply-To: <57a815bf0901110038t24071058m134d438339888b5b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090111101445.Y25260@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <57a815bf0901110038t24071058m134d438339888b5b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux binary execution performance hit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:15:41 -0000 > > Question, what sort of performance hit does FreeBSD 7.0 have on > running linux binaries? > > The program in question is Ruby, I'm looking at putting ruby compiled > on a linux box over onto a FreeBSD system so I can take advantage of > the Oracle Instant client. But will look at other options if this is > going to be a lot slower. > no it won't be much slower. linux programs's speed under FreeBSD is comparable to same under linux. it's not "emulation" in strict sense, rather second ABI. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 09:20:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8691065689 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f20.google.com (mail-bw0-f20.google.com [209.85.218.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873B48FC14 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:20:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so4649104bwz.19 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:19:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=S+KlEdpaK3Td+b6OSoJFwkbiaK5P000JK24fO6we24I=; b=X7GsJ3UBjOV+deIw03oF0MORiQXlpoZKKzDJv7FTc3nZEwWGDmAz96O9O8wxJZeNdV scvxJwDFZwylZTi1mC1z3sTm7f/9/TDONr318kUZxhHAR6n9EaypWJ4LNxhHfoSj7pl2 Cp4/pqZ38J7Xr8RqapO0ukr01QoV+dTFs8X4A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=F2zAN2JkX0aQd+/6/GC5hVN1wSUv8IoTH8cbiDbRYlTtIfQW46gA3VtWdTdHjNltma UEPbMAUe/zhkUhpYJim4lcIUvp1BalYkVEQ29BQ2F7LkqLqDrvF2yxa08HUTj1FsJsiX WvHQ9FFXjkOofvFQKuq4YhdNx+yL2N1GY+6zA= Received: by 10.223.112.132 with SMTP id w4mr20021227fap.67.1231665599400; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:19:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.115.1 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:19:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3a142e750901110119w1703629fufc554aa1ffc44b73@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:59 +0100 From: "Paul B. Mahol" To: aryeh.friedman@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <49693688.3030108@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <49693688.3030108@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: does IPI_PREEMPTION in the kernel config do anything X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:20:01 -0000 On 1/11/09, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > For the last year I have been using IPI_PREEMPTION in my kernel config > and I know back then it helped quite a bit on the performence of my dual > core... now I am setting a 4 core machine using 7.1pl1 (i386) [on the > dual core I {and will continue} to use -current] and was just wondering > if IPI_PREEMPTION actually maeans anything anymore IPI_PREEMPTION is used only with 4bsd scheduler. -- Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 10:58:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2661065670 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:58:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F748FC0A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:58:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0BAwCM6062044; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:58:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0BCCDBA89; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:58:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:58:11 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: William Gordon Rutherdale Message-ID: <20090111105811.GA33194@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <4968EDAF.40108@utoronto.ca> <3a142e750901101153x66d0099dxa871dce07df32175@mail.gmail.com> <49694724.6090705@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49694724.6090705@utoronto.ca> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot get ethernet off the ground X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:58:14 -0000 --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 08:11:00PM -0500, William Gordon Rutherdale wrote: > I have to use paper-sneakernet because > - no network connectivity yet > - tried plugging in a memory stick; it flashed but nothing showed up=20 > with the 'mount' command It won't mount automatically, unless you have the automounter configured. If you want to mount USB drives as a normal user, you have to run the command 'sysctl vfs.usermount=3D1' as root. To make this change permanent, put 'vfs.usermount=3D1' in /etc/sysctl.conf. Next, you have to make a directory to mount it. I would suggest /mnt/$USER (where $USER is your username). Make sure that _you_ own that directory. Next, you'll need read/write access to the devices. I would suggest to create a group called usb, and make yourself a member of this group. See pw(8). With that done, you chould add a rule to /etc/devfs.rules. See the EXAMPLES in devfs.rules(5). If all of that is sorted, you should see one or more /dev/daXsY devices appear when you plug in the USB drive, X and Y being numbers, e.g. /dev/da0s1. This means first slice [s1] on the first da(4) device [da0= ]. To mount this device if it is formatted as FAT partition do: mount_msdosfs -m 644 -M 755 -l -o noatime -o sync -o noexec -o nosuid \ /dev/da0s1 /mnt/$USER > none2@pci0:2:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x2abf103c chip=3D0x816810ec=20 > rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'Realtek Semiconductor' > device =3D 'RTL 8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC' > class =3D network > subclass =3D ethernet This should be recognized by the re(4) driver. This driver is present in the generic kernel. Are you running a custom kernel? ('uname -i' can tell you the name of the kernel you are running) If so, try running 'kldload if_re.ko'. The device should then show up as /dev/net/re0. If this works, you'll have to load the module on the next boot, by adding 'if_re_load=3D"YES"' to /boot/loader.conf. You will also have to configure the device in etc/rc.conf. This is covered in the handbook. You can find the english version at [1]. It is also available on the FreeBSD site. If you are running the GENERIC kernel and it does not recognize this chip, try upgrading to the latest release. If that doesn't work, you should probably file a problem report with send-pr(1). Roland [1: file:///usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html] =20 --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklp0MMACgkQEnfvsMMhpyW2YQCgjlQvL8ZNDMj6SQpJnM+M3b35 U24An1TJCAgzgNkoYRwOkYhda4/S9QAV =S/rp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 12:34:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BA11065670 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "") Received: from stdin.stderror.at (stdin.stderror.at [83.65.196.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70ACD8FC0A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "") Received: from steve.stderror.at (83-65-196-94.work.xdsl-line.inode.at [83.65.196.94]) by stdin.stderror.at (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ADF535C2F; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:34:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:34:37 +0100 Message-ID: <861vvaowbm.wl@stderror.at> From: Toni Schmidbauer To: francklarchange@free.fr In-Reply-To: <49692C49.1000800@free.fr> References: <496903FE.6020507@free.fr> <86vdsmeu3p.wl@stderror.at> <200901102218.58365.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> <86tz86ep78.wl@stderror.at> <49692C49.1000800@free.fr> User-Agent: Wanderlust Emacs Organization: stderror.at X-WWW-Home-Page: http://stderror.at X-PGP-Fingerprint: 53F2 28AE 8070 83E0 AFEC 0ABC BBF9 A34A 3ED1 3287 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:34:11 -0000 At Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:16:25 +0100, Franck Royer wrote: > Thanks for all this infos. I have another question about the zfs kernel > module : is it still in the GENERIC kernel in the release 7.1 ? Or do I > need to include it and recompile the kernel before the first reboot ? the module is included in the standard kernel, you just have to tell the boot loader to load it on startup (/boot/loader.conf): zfs_load="YES" and if your root filesystem is zfs vfs.root.mountfrom="zfs:rpool/root" toni -- Don't forget, there is no security | toni at stderror dot at -- Wulfgar | Toni Schmidbauer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 12:39:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C3C106566B for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from will.rutherdale@utoronto.ca) Received: from mail.vex.net (smaug.vex.net [208.76.104.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9168FC18 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from will.rutherdale@utoronto.ca) Received: from [192.168.110.8] (unknown [207.35.13.79]) by mail.vex.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 38DEB17015 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:39:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4969E869.4070307@utoronto.ca> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:39:05 -0500 From: William Gordon Rutherdale User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14ubu (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4968EDAF.40108@utoronto.ca> <3a142e750901101153x66d0099dxa871dce07df32175@mail.gmail.com> <49694724.6090705@utoronto.ca> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Cannot get ethernet off the ground X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:39:08 -0000 Is there an easy way to tell whether the new 7.1 release will officially support my hardware? I looked at this url: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.1R/relnotes.html#PROC and cannot easily tell from there. There must be something in the boot code (or drivers) that looks at the signature (maybe device name and manufacturer) and decides whether it knows the card. If I could find either documentation or some configuration or source code file to look at, then I could have an idea before actually trying it whether freebsd 7.1 actually will recognise this driver on its own. By the way, two other cards were not recognised. That's why it labelled it 'none2'. There was also a none0 and a none1. However those cards are lower priority for my application. -Will Michael Powell wrote: > William Gordon Rutherdale wrote: > > >> I have to use paper-sneakernet because >> - no network connectivity yet >> - tried plugging in a memory stick; it flashed but nothing showed up >> with the 'mount' command >> >> Here are the last two entries from the 'pciconf -lv' command, which look >> relevant to the problem. I had to write them down on paper and walk >> over to this room to type them. Please pardon any typos: >> >> none2@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x2abf103c chip=0x816810ec >> rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' >> device = 'RTL 8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC' >> class = network >> subclass = ethernet >> >> > > This may be supported by the "re" driver. Run your ifconfig setup > commands against "re0" and see what happens. This should be present > in the GENERIC kernel, if you have a custom kernel with it removed > just kldload the module. You should also be able to grep "re" out > from your dmesg. > > [snip] > >> Question 1. Is it possible that FreeBSD 7.1 would do a better job? >> > > Sometimes with these adapters not every chipID makes it into the driver > code. Usually this takes care of itself as time goes on, eg "newer is > better". > > If you are just starting out with a new machine and a fresh install > you might want to consider 7.1-RELEASE. > [snip] > >>> fwe is ethernet emulation driver for firewire. >>> post output of pciconf -lv. >>> >>> >>> > [snip] > > -Mike > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 12:49:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDF9106564A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sroberts@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from fizeau.zen.co.uk (fizeau.zen.co.uk [212.23.8.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0272D8FC14 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sroberts@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from [212.23.3.141] (helo=smarthost02.mail.zen.net.uk) by fizeau.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LLzUk-0005LT-Ra for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:32:47 +0000 Received: from [82.68.31.182] (helo=thor.vickiandstacey.com) by smarthost02.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LLzUg-0001MW-UE; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:32:43 +0000 Received: from thor.vickiandstacey.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.vickiandstacey.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0BCTlcj056682; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:29:48 GMT (envelope-from sroberts@thor.vickiandstacey.com) Received: (from sroberts@localhost) by thor.vickiandstacey.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n0BCTkKm056680; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:29:46 GMT (envelope-from sroberts) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:29:46 +0000 From: Stacey Roberts To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Message-ID: <20090111122946.GA1484@thor.vickiandstacey.com> Mail-Followup-To: perryh@pluto.rain.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <49589883.lhmPNVeBMeI7aDqo%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <49618959.ytDnPW+y0ehAb8CV%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49618959.ytDnPW+y0ehAb8CV%perryh@pluto.rain.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Originating-Smarthost02-IP: [82.68.31.182] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FIXED: vpnc connects, but does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stacey@vickiandstacey.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:49:27 -0000 Hi perryh! Glad to hear that you managed to get your problem fixed.., I also have this problem, the difference being that mine **USED to** work, but now it suddenly stoped working. I tried adding the line to my conf file as you did, but for me, the problem remains: Appears to connect and authenticate successfully to my office's VPN concentrator Once (apparently) connected, I can't access any resources on the company network (mail / servers, etc), nor can I ping anything.., Wondering if you can point me to where you found the info on the various options I can try to continue debugging this problem, please. The FW guys at the office aren't exactly forthcoming where non-MS windows is concerned, you see.., Thanks. Regards, S Roberts On Sun, 04 Jan 2009, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > I have installed vpnc to connect to an employer's Cisco VPN > > system, and it seems to make the connection, but after connecting > > I can't ping the gateway nor anything beyond it ... > > It turned out the only problem was the absence of > > NAT Traversal Mode cisco-udp > > in vpnc.conf. (Presumably not all configurations of the Cisco 3000 > will need that, else it would be the default, but it seems to be > correct for the one involved here.) > > I never did figure out why that kept the interface from responding > to a ping of its own address :( > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 14:01:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1775F106566C for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:01:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19378FC0A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:01:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0BE11FD042670; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:01:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 85779BA89; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:00:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:00:58 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: William Gordon Rutherdale Message-ID: <20090111140058.GA57235@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <4968EDAF.40108@utoronto.ca> <3a142e750901101153x66d0099dxa871dce07df32175@mail.gmail.com> <49694724.6090705@utoronto.ca> <4969E869.4070307@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4969E869.4070307@utoronto.ca> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot get ethernet off the ground X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:01:04 -0000 --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 07:39:05AM -0500, William Gordon Rutherdale wrote: > Is there an easy way to tell whether the new 7.1 release will officially= =20 > support my hardware? I looked at this url: =20 > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.1R/relnotes.html#PROC Look at this manual page for the re(4) driver: [http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/= man.cgi?query=3Dre&apropos=3D0&sektion=3D4&manpath=3DFreeBSD+7.1-RELEASE&fo= rmat=3Dhtml] This seems to match what you see with pciconf: > >> none2@pci0:2:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x2abf103c chip=3D0x816810ec > >> rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 > >> vendor =3D 'Realtek Semiconductor' > >> device =3D 'RTL 8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC' > >> class =3D network > >> subclass =3D ethernet This driver is part of the GENERIC kernel. So it should be recognized by 7.1-RELEASE. Try downloading the bootonly CD-image and booting from it. I've used realtek devices in the past (cheap rl(4) based cards) but wasn't really impressed. One one of those cards, download speed was OK, but upload maxed out @ 200 kB/s. :-( Better get a card based on an Intel PRO/100 chip [fxp(4) driver] or 3COM 3c905 [xl(4) driver]. If you need gigabit, try Intel PRO/1000 [em(4)]. > and cannot easily tell from there. There must be something in the boot= =20 > code (or drivers) that looks at the signature (maybe device name and=20 > manufacturer) and decides whether it knows the card.=20 Drivers try to probe for the card. If they get a good reaction, the device is enabled. =20 > If I could find either documentation or some configuration or source=20 > code file to look at, then I could have an idea before actually trying=20 > it whether freebsd 7.1 actually will recognise this driver on its own. Look at /usr/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklp+5oACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUmYQCgsS8bqbmeq8j8q2lujOT5RhE9 DfsAmwaQs8eFD0AbD8IMo3/TopkueQHC =Ucxt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 15:30:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE12106566C for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:30:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBA88FC0C for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D9D3480B for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:30:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-76-26-198-188.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [76.26.198.188]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78938EC9D for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:30:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1LM2H8-0007H0-00 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:30:54 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:30:54 -0500 From: stan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090111153054.GA27872@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20090104010332.GA25704@teddy.fas.com> <20090110152235.GA16911@the-grills.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090110152235.GA16911@the-grills.com> X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 10:25:19 up 244 days, 16:47, 1 user, load average: 0.13, 0.05, 0.01 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: Re: PHP setup question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:30:56 -0000 On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 09:22:36AM -0600, Kelly D. Grills wrote: > On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 08:03:32PM -0500, stan wrote: > > > > I am trying to get the ampcache port working on a 7.1 machine. > > Just wondering if you've resolved the problems you had with this. > I installed amapche on an Ubuntu mahcine, and folowed the same procedure (except for quoting the rss variables). Once again when I went to write the config file, I had to download it to the machine that I was running the web browser on. Once I did that, and located the appropriate place on the Ubuntu machine, everything worked as expected. I am building a music catalog as we speak on that machine. This leads me to suspect that there is something wrong with the way I am seting it up on the FreeBSD machine. Going through the _exact_ same procdure as on the Ubuntu machine results in the following when I try to procedd to step 3 in the web installer. Error: Config file detected, Ampache is already installed (displayed in the browser). Can we idntify exactly what causes this error message? If so, maybe I cna check that on the FreeBSD machine. I really need this to work on the FreeBSD machine, as it is where the music is stored, and it's the web serer accessible from outside. Thanks, -- One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 16:04:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31CD10656C4 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:04:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jos@webrz.net) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (webrz.xs4all.nl [82.95.248.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BF58FC26 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:04:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jos@webrz.net) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F8D50A75 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:51:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.10.10.27] (protometheus.webrz.net [10.10.10.27]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E67A508ED for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:51:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <496A158A.6060703@webrz.net> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:51:38 +0100 From: Jos Chrispijn Organization: Koudekerke, Zeeland (NL) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <49670974.2060202@esiee.fr> <44sknr2ozn.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44sknr2ozn.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP @triton.webrz.net Subject: Re: 7.1 : watchdog bge0 timeout ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:04:56 -0000 [Lowell Gilbert] Uit een eerder bericht van 10-1-2009 15:51 :: > Could be hardware trouble, I suppose. > I know FreeBSD can detect hardware probs better than other OS'es; but why didn't 6.x detect this malfunction then? I believe Murphy and his law, but for mee it seems a little bit too accidentally L-) regards, Jos Chrispijn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 16:52:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F3B1065673 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8F38FC1B for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:52:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0BGqaTm097581; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:52:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0AFB7BA9A; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:52:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:52:36 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: William Gordon Rutherdale Message-ID: <20090111165235.GA62524@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <4968EDAF.40108@utoronto.ca> <3a142e750901101153x66d0099dxa871dce07df32175@mail.gmail.com> <49694724.6090705@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49694724.6090705@utoronto.ca> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot get ethernet off the ground X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:52:39 -0000 --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 08:11:00PM -0500, William Gordon Rutherdale wrote: > I have to use paper-sneakernet because > - no network connectivity yet > - tried plugging in a memory stick; it flashed but nothing showed up=20 > with the 'mount' command >=20 > Here are the last two entries from the 'pciconf -lv' command, which look= =20 > relevant to the problem. I had to write them down on paper and walk=20 > over to this room to type them. Please pardon any typos: >=20 > none2@pci0:2:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x2abf103c chip=3D0x816810ec=20 > rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'Realtek Semiconductor' > device =3D 'RTL 8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC' > class =3D network > subclass =3D ethernet There seems to have been some breakage of the re(4) and rl(4) drivers in the 7.1 release cycle. See [http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D13= 0011] You should try to get the files mentioned in the abovementioned link on your machine, and rebuild your kernel. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklqI9MACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWOswCfRE3hhJOI94wqi1Jh8oogB54i m88An198b+YyPZ71CYePkeLrNomdP4BH =wjAU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 18:26:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F647106566C for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:26:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from edu-smtp-02.edutel.nl (edu-smtp-02.edutel.nl [88.159.1.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC7E8FC13 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:26:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from Rena.FStaals.net (unknown [88.159.208.104]) by edu-smtp-02.edutel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805BC121BA9; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:04:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <496A349D.7030104@gmx.net> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:04:13 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Peel References: <2971BFA91BAE482E9A59C9F05E31B9D3@GRANTLAPTOP> In-Reply-To: <2971BFA91BAE482E9A59C9F05E31B9D3@GRANTLAPTOP> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gname X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:26:36 -0000 Grant Peel wrote: > Wow, > > After a fresh install of FreeBSD 6.4, (with Xorg) I tried installing Gnome, and I get a "stop" during build, Filesystem Full! > > Is Gname really that big? or did I miss doing something? > > Well it is big, but since you are installing from a clean system all the gnome dependencies will also have to install their dependencies and so on. So basically you have to install a *lot* of ports which may take quite some space/time if you do not clean up nicely. Use 'make install clean' or 'make install distclean' to install your ports (if you didn't allready) that will order the make process to remove the files it uses during it's build (and distclean also cleans the downloaded distfiles in the distfiles dir ) > Doing a du -h -d1 on /usr shows" > > ... > 7.0G ports. > 1.8G local > > Check inside ports what is taking up the most space, most likely your distfiles dir is huge as well as the build directories inside a lot of ports itself. You can manually remove the distfiles for ports you allready installed from /usr/ports/distfiles. If that does not help enough also remove some of the work directories for the ports you installed allready but are not cleaned by make yet and resume your build. (so if for example you see gnome-session is allready installed ( pkg_info -Ex gnome ) remove /usr/ports/x11/gnome-session/work/ ) Regards, -- - Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 18:35:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24F4106566B for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:35:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlilly@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67BC8FC0C for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:35:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlilly@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so11827754rvf.43 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:35:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=seViHvskVfgqsINl6fLd33O43p8rEi8Z8vWQU7aR8W8=; b=nUthPeeI1/i8MSP63NEl6ihkHvbiaL5oWOqT+5e3KjchsJ3LTCzx+0Uc2lD0zC+w0A 2mKd+oGrmV+1DwUsfIxEOPTCVGEG7borIkduShwxzcYXCsaIbfoOkVX/JP4v6NpVvwdx ONsikA9gCOC+RfF+Ml/4m1Syolh3LdN86BRGY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Sb6NjDPh2KPdahKqrxsssIrKl6t4XYMbdAPY3iUDr2WNk+IbPHFrvvsWu9X88OPFdp hqAsayeDKY04CUJq9hiPrQo1pmjLFhdvXL8+pDPi9rLsHtUe0MS1GbbjPtrkLz0nCpue zHkdEifCW5r2yhsBv/ubskSB5bLOFIMjhJDhY= Received: by 10.142.71.16 with SMTP id t16mr11719661wfa.273.1231697179798; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:06:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.170.17 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:06:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:06:19 -0800 From: "mojo fms" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Mounting a partition from freebsd 6.2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:35:26 -0000 I was working on an upgrade to 6.3 from 6.2 and I lost power during the install which hosed most of my system. Instead of trying to really recover it I decided to just rebuild. I have a backup of my /etc and /usr/local/etc on a different drive that should be fine, it was just mounted under /mnt normally and used for backups. My problem is that I installed 7.1 and was careful not to erase any data on that drive, but my only options for a partition to mount is /dev/ad2s1. When I try to mount that it gives me "mount: /dev/ad2s1 : Operation not permitted", what can I do to get the data off of it? I only really care about my /etc information but it would be nice to get all of the information off of it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 19:37:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19A11065672 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miklosovic.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900DB8FC08 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miklosovic.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so4273535ywe.13 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:37:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=zFN/mt8kjc9AiD2I5idWZgx8dtPUVSwmiejijz51enY=; b=bU+Caye/0eT0Ch5iZhzKGx2tIPfyBxOgiypd4x3tydGxmmZvd89cknTOSWGgw38KQq PMg86teqc47oe94Elc3zcASrPT0HUL/kNx9Sn3PquZG8bFX+TaSqLASYL5AoV5bCrypx bWJdlCWgF2sd6JaXBQc+SNesioyX8mm+c9Wxk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=RcrRz2DNEFwp6SsQUgUIyXuO2QVPbA95kyBZG0bpQPWz90wumi9JoItw9s5YbocGcx oSj7lfxyGYNYFLr+J/0tRfZeVtwK4BpBlhZnM4nChm/L/Ji3Nog5QFzZvhvE3tL0x9UW dYwhu1irbntbD2L0zCT0A1TbRhUQhXP1pgXdo= Received: by 10.150.182.17 with SMTP id e17mr8819123ybf.80.1231702621302; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:37:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.26.10 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:37:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:37:01 +0100 From: "Stefan Miklosovic" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: creating own CVSup server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:37:03 -0000 Hi all, I decided to set up my own CVSup server just for my local network. After reading all related stuff I should find, I have solid knowledge about this issue but one thing disturbed my mind. My pc, server which I will mirroring from, is also downloading source tree from another server (cvsup.at.freebsd.org) to /usr/src directory. I will download my src tree once a week. When I am going to set up cvsup server on my own, cvsup-mirror asks me, where I want to download files I just purchased. Default directory is "/home/ncvs". My question is, can be downloading directory /usr/src ? Which reason should I place downloading files to /home/ncvs for? Does it matter ? Can I serve my own src tree for other computers? Does it have to be stored twice? thank you From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 19:51:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFB41065676 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:51:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miklosovic.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f11.google.com (mail-gx0-f11.google.com [209.85.217.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58EF8FC18 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:51:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miklosovic.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so2253237gxk.19 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:51:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=lagTr+43Il/3akIanb/dJs8Ac53li6XCsSN9pdCRLjc=; b=ZPh8bJRTsXX/lT+2HE9J+fWvYLaZ5zMtdB9rYHu9ePJjEdAtMK3CGXpxVyhxGXnoFe peoDcDraQEQRUcR951vskYV5ezCXQuJ210uW4K2tM30pSQWKj3mg4u/xjVS+TDhKfJCP ldgiUyRoRf9GYRo0/dFwQ8TqrlE3X/3Tc16lM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=uZ66d7bQiavVXKzI+uxJM26MUBbzQ8iOWrxxyReY67j6rYOya0G6v6z5CzIIOwgm0U EWe3x/PNcjtx/F48gq3mbR8ma4t3VFP2Oi5Ia4xR3h1msBQEYhw69DUUeEWWCC6b4T8S yNeZ3QeeZdBCGniu+YXxfmmpRGb5Hp83/hRzw= Received: by 10.151.42.10 with SMTP id u10mr8832520ybj.205.1231703476932; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:51:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.26.10 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:51:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:51:16 +0100 From: "Stefan Miklosovic" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: creating own CVSup server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:51:19 -0000 Hi, me again, I also havent noticed, that there is a choice among -current or -stable. If I want to mirror just -stable (this is possible with cvsup stable-supfile), can I? thank you again On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Stefan Miklosovic < miklosovic.freebsd@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I decided to set up my own CVSup server just for my local > network. After reading all related stuff I should find, I have > solid knowledge about this issue but one thing disturbed my mind. > > My pc, server which I will mirroring from, is also downloading > source tree from another server (cvsup.at.freebsd.org) to /usr/src > directory. I will download my src tree once a week. > When I am going to set up cvsup server on my own, cvsup-mirror > asks me, where I want to download files I just purchased. Default > directory is "/home/ncvs". > > My question is, can be downloading directory /usr/src ? > Which reason should I place downloading files to /home/ncvs for? > Does it matter ? Can I serve my own src tree for other computers? > Does it have to be stored twice? > > thank you > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 20:04:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EC0106566B for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:04:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f11.google.com (mail-gx0-f11.google.com [209.85.217.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E4F8FC19 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com) Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so2256489gxk.19 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:04:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=+S5pRLaDeC++7++XKMIryxzl8by0JQ5MJ7cFk8hekB4=; b=Rz55anmi2BMZbzvnmkcjy+xSySMIn4J2PpdWEwgjemT6do7DCAMvy01SKnKychmsPF oQmZ+J32R6z20he22RpAvCs9dG8EtZlEZ3ffg9VFxX4sdTR76pgM0DF9+zpR9a4LOjbB mbrLRRp0jPwiaIZwMEdzeoo9MC2v7iWzl23dc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=cqoGNt5/sAvMl44d/Qc/9bJEZM3BAw+ZMq6yKOFDJDZQBqAaE1DclwlSjfDcduaKpk OLQ6ICVbgiwim0t6n8ctYurI0XE1cykpqxcNJvFsVCb9vFa5yD6WVUNScUbQ29Z0SV4L GEV15IiZyDJ/lT4OAs/gl0+WNvy7D8I3ibW64= Received: by 10.150.134.21 with SMTP id h21mr870224ybd.118.1231704296325; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:04:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.133.7 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:04:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <59adc1a0901111204xaf7fbd1v58f6fde0ec1c4e52@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:04:56 +0200 From: "Dimitar Vasilev" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <59adc1a0901062205l2bdaaa4enf6f08c0b6cd7f539@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <59adc1a0901062205l2bdaaa4enf6f08c0b6cd7f539@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: setfib+pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:04:57 -0000 2009/1/7 Dimitar Vasilev > Hello, > > I'd like to ask on the best options for using setfib and pf in a non-BGP > environment. I will run 2 uplinks, with VLANs for internal networks and want > to fail over external links if one of them fails. > Currently pf supports to the best of my knowledge: > > a) rtable - this means i can create the routing tables with setfib and then > use pass from .... rtable N( N >1 <16) or give out directly network ranges > b) route-to - pass in/out on X from ... route-to > c) packet tagging - i can tag networks and use standalone or through > routing tags. Anyone aware if is it ok to use /etc/gateways without running > routed or how can i label routes alternatively? > d) pass in from route N(192.168.1.1 from example) to... - saw this on > http://www.mail-archive.com/pf@benzedrine.cx/msg07220.html and requires > BGP to make tags speak anything but network numbers. > e) use the vlan id's > > I'd much appreciate if someone thinks with me for the best options of using > the setfib features along with pf. > Thanks! > Best regards, > Dimitar Vassilev > > Hi, could someone confirm which of the features above are working with setfib? Seeking for the laziest and most efficient ways. If no answer received, I will try all of them 2-3 weeks later when my gear arrives. Thanks. Best regards, Dimitar Vassilev From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 21:44:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DE11065675 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:44:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MatthewDa@datacom.co.nz) Received: from mailak.datacom.co.nz (mx01.datacom.co.nz [202.175.132.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D488FC1B for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:44:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MatthewDa@datacom.co.nz) Received: from dnzakex1.datacom.co.nz (Not Verified[202.27.76.7]) by mailak.datacom.co.nz with ESMTP Gateway id ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:43:56 +1300 Received: from dnzwgex1.datacom.co.nz ([172.30.0.108]) by dnzakex1.datacom.co.nz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:43:31 +1300 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:43:31 +1300 Message-ID: <46562C5EECFA8C47AADDF029EE11D73D0804F92C@dnzwgex1.datacom.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <4966AF9E.8030703@ibctech.ca> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: issue with extra top level domain appened to mail Thread-Index: Aclx/fjJ4eN+D7vPSPe6Ea065eQwbQCL1lmQ References: <46562C5EECFA8C47AADDF029EE11D73D0804F921@dnzwgex1.datacom.co.nz> <897A0E62-7897-4360-87ED-53A45ACD83AC@mac.com> <46562C5EECFA8C47AADDF029EE11D73D0804F923@dnzwgex1.datacom.co.nz> <16BD78F6-FF90-4D44-BECE-DD0F8FAB965F@mac.com> <46562C5EECFA8C47AADDF029EE11D73D0804F926@dnzwgex1.datacom.co.nz> <4966AF9E.8030703@ibctech.ca> From: "Matthew Davidson [DATACOM]" To: "Steve Bertrand" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2009 21:43:31.0795 (UTC) FILETIME=[A5A59230:01C97435] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: issue with extra top level domain appened to mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:44:08 -0000 Yes it does have the feel of a wayward '.' but... get this... If I rename my box to 'matdav.datacom.com', email comes thru from root@matdav.datacom.com If I rename my box to 'matdav.datacom.nz', email comes thru from root@matdav.datacom.nz If I rename my box to 'matdav.datacom.com.au', email comes thru from root@matdav.datacom.com.au If I rename my box to 'matdav.datacom.govt.nz', email comes thru from root@matdav.datacom.govt.nz BUT.. If I rename my box to 'matdav.datacom.co.nz', email comes thru from root@matdav.datacom.co.nz.co.nz If I rename my box to 'matdav.datacom.org.nz', email comes thru from root@matdav.datacom.org.nz.org.nz If I rename my box to 'matdav.telecom.co.nz', email comes thru from root@matdav.telecom.co.nz.co.nz I see the same issue with 6.3/6.4. I've not tested 6.2, but 6.1 I don't see this issue. I'm hoping someone may have the seen the same issue, or take the time to build a box and replicate this to confirm it's not just me being a plonka. For now I'll just have to rename my 6.3+ boxes to hostname.datacom.com to work around it. Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 21:47:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EAFD106564A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:47:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6238FC1E for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:47:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id h3so1864643nfh.33 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:47:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B7yRCRbMZa65lvvCH6xxHzbkvmlCqFswXZgyQqV7+g8=; b=tVz29Y2wYb/sibFGn8uTCGtlBEWWa4vfeA/laGOoNAcDeL3w2vubQ1r8uS9qW2W/Ye LKaf5B+FW8SkB2hke3gF6WDERpj2QuPRYTfTu/UfoplsVVNOpV1aGVDYL12dLMDJK+5k Rp7EV0LgPG9M5a0gE2g2qu4fUfVYRifkwjSz0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Zwp07YebxM0OYC7pklWpTrHI5Mo0f3mbs3OEXvbfRTi7RV5Ovt+S7zy54pKsR0Pt6h YrSoK51+tsWEbEyKQYXYKEu/UaMCjIcY/mydcm05O1l1mHwT/zuT65FtCKT2TjSVleGU wNbE7gZFghN5XTcx6eZkOrwgflYPzkH9MpATU= Received: by 10.210.16.10 with SMTP id 10mr32517485ebp.7.1231710462567; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:47:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b36sm71175133ika.15.2009.01.11.13.47.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:47:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:47:36 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090111214736.5c0fb0b0@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <2971BFA91BAE482E9A59C9F05E31B9D3@GRANTLAPTOP> References: <2971BFA91BAE482E9A59C9F05E31B9D3@GRANTLAPTOP> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: gname X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:47:44 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:49:37 -0500 "Grant Peel" wrote: > Wow, > > After a fresh install of FreeBSD 6.4, (with Xorg) I tried installing > Gnome, and I get a "stop" during build, Filesystem Full! > > Is Gname really that big? or did I miss doing something? > > Doing a du -h -d1 on /usr shows" > > ... > 7.0G ports. > 1.8G local > The problem is that when you install something for the first time you end up with a lot of cruft in the ports tree because all the work directories for the dependencies get left-behind. When you later update Gnome with portupgrade (or whatever) the tool cleans as it goes. If you have portupgrade installed I would run portsclean -CD, and start again. If /usr is on a separate partition, and you have a lot of space elsewhere then I would suggest you either symlink /usr/ports there or set WRKDIRPREFIX. Some desktop ports need huge amounts of temporary space to build - it doesn't make much sense to allocate it under /usr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 23:17:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1704C106566B for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:17:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from will.rutherdale@utoronto.ca) Received: from mail.vex.net (smaug.vex.net [208.76.104.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50A18FC0A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:17:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from will.rutherdale@utoronto.ca) Received: from [192.168.110.8] (unknown [207.35.13.79]) by mail.vex.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7152C17017 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:17:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <496A7E0F.4060301@utoronto.ca> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:17:35 -0500 From: William Gordon Rutherdale User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14ubu (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4968EDAF.40108@utoronto.ca> <3a142e750901101153x66d0099dxa871dce07df32175@mail.gmail.com> <49694724.6090705@utoronto.ca> <20090111165235.GA62524@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20090111165235.GA62524@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Cannot get ethernet off the ground X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:17:38 -0000 Well isn't that just great. I'm using the amd64 version, don't know if this makes a difference. The link says the poster expects it will be fixed before 7.1-RELEASE is out. (Posting date was in late December.) I just tried the FreeBSD 7.1 bootonly and the configure window at least listed the device, which is an improvement over before. Now if it only lists it but the driver doesn't work, then I still will have a communication problem where I can't easily get the correct file to the machine. I'll just try installing 7.1 for now and see how it looks. Thanks for the heads up anyway. -Will Roland Smith wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 08:11:00PM -0500, William Gordon Rutherdale wrote: > >> I have to use paper-sneakernet because >> - no network connectivity yet >> - tried plugging in a memory stick; it flashed but nothing showed up >> with the 'mount' command >> >> Here are the last two entries from the 'pciconf -lv' command, which look >> relevant to the problem. I had to write them down on paper and walk >> over to this room to type them. Please pardon any typos: >> >> none2@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x2abf103c chip=0x816810ec >> rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' >> device = 'RTL 8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC' >> class = network >> subclass = ethernet >> > > There seems to have been some breakage of the re(4) and rl(4) drivers in > the 7.1 release cycle. See [http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=130011] > > You should try to get the files mentioned in the abovementioned link on > your machine, and rebuild your kernel. > > Roland > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 23:45:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D0D106567F for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:45:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401398FC1B for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:45:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0BNjXH2060418; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:45:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3A692BA8F; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:45:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:45:33 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: William Gordon Rutherdale Message-ID: <20090111234532.GA86733@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <4968EDAF.40108@utoronto.ca> <3a142e750901101153x66d0099dxa871dce07df32175@mail.gmail.com> <49694724.6090705@utoronto.ca> <20090111165235.GA62524@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <496A7E0F.4060301@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496A7E0F.4060301@utoronto.ca> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot get ethernet off the ground X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:45:36 -0000 --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 06:17:35PM -0500, William Gordon Rutherdale wrote: > Well isn't that just great. >=20 > I'm using the amd64 version, don't know if this makes a difference. It shouldn't really. AFAIK the code for the network interface drivers is architecture independant. On amd64 I also had some troubles with re(4) based cards, but I had an old xl(4) based card lying around, and with the upgrade to 7.1 the age(4) chip on my mobo also became usable. So I ditched the re(4) based card. > I just tried the FreeBSD 7.1 bootonly and the configure window at least= =20 > listed the device, which is an improvement over before. Now if it only= =20 > lists it but the driver doesn't work, then I still will have a=20 > communication problem where I can't easily get the correct file to the=20 > machine. The network configuration of sysinstall only shows devices that actually show up in /dev/net. That means that the driver was at least able to initialize the hardware. So chances are that it works. As I've mentioned before I had upload speed troubles with re(4) based cards, but I don't know if rl(4) based cards have/had the same problems. Copying large files with nc(1) over a cross-cable link between two machines will rapidly show you if you can max out the link. > I'll just try installing 7.1 for now and see how it looks. That's probably the best solution. It is always best to upgrade to the latest released version before asking questions about hardware support, because updating is probably the first advice you'd get. =20 > Thanks for the heads up anyway. You're welcome. :-) =20 Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklqhJwACgkQEnfvsMMhpyU1nACfSZY8Ck0tT5bEsFJCnRDObd6U loIAoJpC444anXrgRMzOdCvPW8N+4tce =e45B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 01:02:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD867106564A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:02:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458328FC1D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:02:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979CD34805 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:02:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-76-26-198-188.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [76.26.198.188]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEC0F97E for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:02:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1LMBCa-00023j-00 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:02:48 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:02:48 -0500 From: stan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090112010248.GA7770@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20090104010332.GA25704@teddy.fas.com> <20090110152235.GA16911@the-grills.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090110152235.GA16911@the-grills.com> X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 19:57:51 up 245 days, 2:20, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: Re: PHP setup question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:02:51 -0000 On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 09:22:36AM -0600, Kelly D. Grills wrote: > On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 08:03:32PM -0500, stan wrote: > > > > I am trying to get the ampcache port working on a 7.1 machine. > > Just wondering if you've resolved the problems you had with this. I played witht his a bit more this weekend, and had a friend of mine look at it. he points out that after you put the config file in place, and you get the "File Not Found" error from the web browser that teh URL that it is pointing at is http://beachcave.net/update.php. This is wrong, if you manually enter http://beachcave/net/ampache/update.php you get to a pahe that shows some diagnostices. The first item on that page that _does not_ show OK is Ampache.cfg.php Configured? [ ERROR ] I am wondiering if I ahve somethinf set up incorectly here. What should I look for? BTW, I did install amapche on an Ubuntu system, and get it configured and working, so my problem must have something to do witht eh configuration on the FreeBSD system, right? -- One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 01:08:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2822C106566C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from will.rutherdale@utoronto.ca) Received: from mail.vex.net (smaug.vex.net [208.76.104.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33258FC08 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:08:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from will.rutherdale@utoronto.ca) Received: from [192.168.110.8] (unknown [207.35.13.79]) by mail.vex.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 867151709E for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:08:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <496A9800.40205@utoronto.ca> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:08:16 -0500 From: William Gordon Rutherdale User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14ubu (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4968EDAF.40108@utoronto.ca> <3a142e750901101153x66d0099dxa871dce07df32175@mail.gmail.com> <49694724.6090705@utoronto.ca> <20090111165235.GA62524@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <496A7E0F.4060301@utoronto.ca> <20090111234532.GA86733@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20090111234532.GA86733@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Cannot get ethernet off the ground X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:08:19 -0000 I'm afraid it's gone from bad to worse. The 7.1 system may have recognised the ethernet adapter, but it seemed to fail writing to the hard drive. I got this during installation: Progress Extracting GENERIC into /boot directory... Message Write failure on transfer! (wrote -1 bytes of 1425408 bytes) /mtrt: write failed, filesystem is full. ------------- I think I allocated decent size partitions for /, /var, swap, /tmp, /usr. I made multiple attempts. Kept getting errors. I may just have to fall back on Ubuntu, just to get something running on this machine. -Will Roland Smith wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 06:17:35PM -0500, William Gordon Rutherdale wrote: > >> Well isn't that just great. >> >> I'm using the amd64 version, don't know if this makes a difference. >> > > It shouldn't really. AFAIK the code for the network interface drivers is > architecture independant. On amd64 I also had some troubles with re(4) > based cards, but I had an old xl(4) based card lying around, and with > the upgrade to 7.1 the age(4) chip on my mobo also became usable. So I > ditched the re(4) based card. > > > >> I just tried the FreeBSD 7.1 bootonly and the configure window at least >> listed the device, which is an improvement over before. Now if it only >> lists it but the driver doesn't work, then I still will have a >> communication problem where I can't easily get the correct file to the >> machine. >> > > The network configuration of sysinstall only shows devices that actually > show up in /dev/net. That means that the driver was at least able to > initialize the hardware. So chances are that it works. As I've mentioned > before I had upload speed troubles with re(4) based cards, but I don't > know if rl(4) based cards have/had the same problems. Copying large > files with nc(1) over a cross-cable link between two machines will > rapidly show you if you can max out the link. > > >> I'll just try installing 7.1 for now and see how it looks. >> > > That's probably the best solution. It is always best to upgrade to the > latest released version before asking questions about hardware support, > because updating is probably the first advice you'd get. > > >> Thanks for the heads up anyway. >> > > You're welcome. :-) > > Roland > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 02:08:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7C51065677 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:08:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C7E8FC17 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:08:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FE920F9F5 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:08:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:08:21 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: 112OxHS3HI18GyKuGxP0iyGjaPtKUULsKQn8z2gCg844 1231726100 Received: from hagrid.ewd.goldmark.org (n114.ewd.goldmark.org [72.64.118.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB70C48C00 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:08:20 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <7740275E-77AA-45C1-B95E-C1F62D2AAB29@goldmark.org> From: Jeffrey Goldberg To: "mail.list freebsd-questions" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:08:18 -0600 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Subject: bash versus sh test builtin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:08:22 -0000 The -ne operator for [ in /bin/sh doesn't seem to work as in bash. Also the bash behavior here is what matches /bin/[ most closely. $ /bin/sh $ if [ $UID -ne 0 ] ; then > echo not root > fi [: -ne: unexpected operator $ exit $ echo $SHELL /usr/local/bin/bash [jeffrey@dobby ~/src/mount-rsnap]$ if [ $UID -ne 0 ] ; then > echo not root > fi not root Does anyone have a recommendation of how to run this simple test in / bin/sh and how to write tests reasonably portably? -j -- Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 03:07:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA1B1065672 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:07:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953578FC0A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:07:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan-a.emsphone.com [199.67.51.107]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n0C37InF063618 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:07:19 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0C37Ipt016841 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:07:18 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n0C37HUX016806; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:07:17 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:07:17 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Jeffrey Goldberg Message-ID: <20090112030717.GA57874@dan.emsphone.com> References: <7740275E-77AA-45C1-B95E-C1F62D2AAB29@goldmark.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7740275E-77AA-45C1-B95E-C1F62D2AAB29@goldmark.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.1, clamav-milter version 0.94.1 on email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:07:19 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: "mail.list freebsd-questions" Subject: Re: bash versus sh test builtin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:07:22 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 11), Jeffrey Goldberg said: > The -ne operator for [ in /bin/sh doesn't seem to work as in bash. > Also the bash behavior here is what matches /bin/[ most closely. > > $ /bin/sh > $ if [ $UID -ne 0 ] ; then > > echo not root > > fi > [: -ne: unexpected operator > $ exit > $ echo $SHELL > /usr/local/bin/bash > [jeffrey@dobby ~/src/mount-rsnap]$ if [ $UID -ne 0 ] ; then > > echo not root > > fi > not root > > Does anyone have a recommendation of how to run this simple test in / > bin/sh and how to write tests reasonably portably? UID=$(id -u) if [ $UID -ne 0 ] ; then echo not root fi UID is not a variable set by /bin/sh, which is why the test fails. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_05_03 -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 03:13:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0978106566C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:13:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5D98FC16 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:13:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id n0C3D82N024337 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:13:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id n0C3D8g2024336; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:13:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA06692; Sun, 11 Jan 09 19:11:26 PST Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:13:34 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: stacey@vickiandstacey.com Message-Id: <496ab55e.Ic0zjSbbhqUZJ9Uq%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <49589883.lhmPNVeBMeI7aDqo%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <49618959.ytDnPW+y0ehAb8CV%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20090111122946.GA1484@thor.vickiandstacey.com> In-Reply-To: <20090111122946.GA1484@thor.vickiandstacey.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FIXED: vpnc connects, but does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:13:10 -0000 > I also have this problem, the difference being that mine > **USED to** work, but now it suddenly stoped working. > I tried adding the line to my conf file as you did, but > for me, the problem remains: > Appears to connect and authenticate successfully to my office's > VPN concentrator Once (apparently) connected, I can't access any > resources on the company network (mail / servers, etc), nor can > I ping anything.., Including the IP address of your tun0 interface? (If you can ping that, but nothing beyond, you have a different problem than I had.) > Wondering if you can point me to where you found the info on the > various options I can try to continue debugging this problem, > please. That line came from the output of "vpnc --long-help". Other things to look at are the vpnc(8) manpage, the /usr/local/share/doc/vpnc/README file, and the TODO file in /usr/ports/security/vpnc/work/vpnc-0.4.0. There's more detail of what I think is going on in this thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2009-January/020638.html By the time you get it working again, you will probably have learned more about the workings of vpnc than you really cared to know :) > The FW guys at the office aren't exactly forthcoming where non-MS > windows is concerned, you see.., Not surprising :( Too many security types act as if obscurity helped security, not realizing that it inconveniences only their customers and not their enemies. Any chance they would be willing to say what config change they made on their end about the time it stopped working, without reference to what is running on your end? Another thing to check is whether your ISP changed something. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 03:13:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094381065670 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0BC8FC17 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:13:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id n0C3D9ce024342 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:13:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id n0C3D9A7024341; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:13:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA06706; Sun, 11 Jan 09 19:11:46 PST Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:13:54 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: fbsdlilly@gmail.com Message-Id: <496ab572.u2DH1w2B2JAcv4M+%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting a partition from freebsd 6.2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:13:10 -0000 "mojo fms" wrote: > I was working on an upgrade to 6.3 from 6.2 and I lost power > during the install which hosed most of my system. Instead of > trying to really recover it I decided to just rebuild. I have a > backup of my /etc and /usr/local/etc on a different drive that > should be fine, it was just mounted under /mnt normally and used > for backups. My problem is that I installed 7.1 and was careful > not to erase any data on that drive, but my only options for a > partition to mount is /dev/ad2s1. When I try to mount that it > gives me "mount: /dev/ad2s1 : Operation not permitted", what can > I do to get the data off of it? I only really care about my /etc > information but it would be nice to get all of the information > off of it. Supposing ad2s1 is in fact the slice containing the filesystem in question, and the filesystem was originally made directly on that slice without partitioning it, it should be possible to run dump(8) against it and pipe the output to restore(8). This should work if the slice is readable, even if it cannot be mounted. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 03:41:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3DB1065670 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darren@thebomb.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59AB38FC08 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darren@thebomb.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so11969914rvf.43 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:41:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.101.16 with SMTP id d16mr4226552rvm.277.1231731675934; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:41:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.1.210? (208-106-20-128.dsl.static.sonic.net [208.106.20.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f42sm5750718rvb.5.2009.01.11.19.41.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:41:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <496ABBD5.7000206@thebomb.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:41:09 -0800 From: Darren David Organization: Stimulant User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: How to grow partition size on RAID volume? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:41:16 -0000 Hi all- I need some help figuring out how to expand the existing partition on my RAID volume to take advantage of a new disk I just added -- without newfs'ing the volume and starting from scratch. I added a 4th 750GB disk to my existing 1.5TB 3ware RAID5 volume, in an attempt to bring my total capacity up to ~2.25TB (4x750GB RAID5). I successfully used the 3ware 'tw-cli' utility to perform "Online Capacity Expansion." The controller migrated the existing data across all 4 disks, and it now reports a total volume capacity of 2095.44GB. Now, I'm not quite sure how to get FreeBSD to recognize the extra space. I know that in order to use growfs, I first have to use disklabel to increase the partition size. However, disklabel doesn't like this big RAID volume: # disklabel /dev/da0 disklabel: disks with more than 2^32-1 sectors are not supported and the existing partition doesn't seem to have a label: # disklabel /dev/da0s1 disklabel: /dev/da0s1: no valid label found I'm unsure how to proceed here. CAn anyone shed some light as to how I might proceed? Thanks in advance for any and all help, Darren David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 03:41:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F331065673 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAAD8FC1C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FB420A05A; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:41:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:41:34 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: 2ufNjOYHajEUb8f3gya3TFkEuWGlLns+GTLmSWl13p+B 1231731693 Received: from hagrid.ewd.goldmark.org (n114.ewd.goldmark.org [72.64.118.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8ECB520FCC; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:41:33 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <7813F00E-0F26-4127-B85F-444EA6B8B5A6@goldmark.org> From: Jeffrey Goldberg To: Dan Nelson In-Reply-To: <20090112030717.GA57874@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:41:31 -0600 References: <7740275E-77AA-45C1-B95E-C1F62D2AAB29@goldmark.org> <20090112030717.GA57874@dan.emsphone.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Cc: "mail.list freebsd-questions" Subject: Re: bash versus sh test builtin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:41:35 -0000 On Jan 11, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Dan Nelson wrote: > UID=$(id -u) > if [ $UID -ne 0 ] ; then > echo not root > fi > > UID is not a variable set by /bin/sh, which is why the test fails. Ah. Thank you. I was, as you see, barking up the wrong tree. Thank you for setting me strait on this. Cheers, -j From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 03:53:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E48106566C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@optimis.net) Received: from mail.optimis.net (mail.optimis.net [69.104.191.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6FB8FC12 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@optimis.net) Received: from marvin.optimis.net (marvin.optimis.net [192.168.1.3]) by mail.optimis.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0C3EUWj031223 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:14:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@optimis.net) Received: from marvin.optimis.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marvin.optimis.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0C3ETuU047578 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:14:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@optimis.net) Received: (from george@localhost) by marvin.optimis.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n0C3ETjP047577 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:14:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@optimis.net) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:14:29 -0800 From: George Davidovich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090112031429.GA42596@marvin.optimis.net> References: <7740275E-77AA-45C1-B95E-C1F62D2AAB29@goldmark.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7740275E-77AA-45C1-B95E-C1F62D2AAB29@goldmark.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Subject: Re: bash versus sh test builtin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:53:03 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 08:08:18PM -0600, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: > The -ne operator for [ in /bin/sh doesn't seem to work as in bash. > Also the bash behavior here is what matches /bin/[ most closely. > > $ /bin/sh > $ if [ $UID -ne 0 ] ; then > > echo not root > > fi > [: -ne: unexpected operator > $ exit > $ echo $SHELL > /usr/local/bin/bash > [jeffrey@dobby ~/src/mount-rsnap]$ if [ $UID -ne 0 ] ; then > > echo not root > > fi > not root > > Does anyone have a recommendation of how to run this simple test in / > bin/sh if [ $(id -u) -ne 0 ]; then ... As to why your test isn't working as expected, rewrite your script to read: #!/bin/sh echo $UID and you'll discover that UID is a bash environmental variable. > and how to write tests reasonably portably? That's a different question, and merits a much longer discussion probably better had elsewhere. I'd suggest comp.unix.shell. -- George From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 07:50:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD351065673 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:50:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (ns1.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0138FC17 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0C7ot6u016386 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:50:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:50:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:50:15 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20090112075012.GA2061@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 22 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: Subject: In Brief: idea summary X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:50:22 -0000 hEy guys, Here's my idea, And since I'm publishing on the most open of the open-source list, it'll be hard for anybody to ``steal'', assuming it is _worth_ stealing. People seem to be reading less; fact. Listening more. I'm sure there are a slew onlist who still plop down before the TV after a long day of coding, and so forth. My idea isn't intended for this group. It is for those of us who do read news of the web, sci-tech journals, and even forums. Of course, if you use konq or have firefox set up to read whatever you mouse-swipe, you can listen to the TTS reader while you sort your paper, or other miscellany. If you miss something--at least with festival, you can always back up and re-listen. There are at least two problems with this model as it stands. The first is _if_ the story/article is continued on pages 2,3,4, and 5. Also, when you swipe the text to be read and there is an with a series of "vertical-bar", "vertical-bar". Or more annoying things read. When things get too far off-story, I kill the reader, stop and focus on the page, blow it up so it is easy to read, then read it. It cost major bux to have a professional reader record articles and be stored online. What I have in mind would let the tts software read the story, no "|" or "&&". Shouldn't be that difficult for online site to implement. Am I on to something?? -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org First update of http://transfinite.thought.org/ab/ in seven months. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 07:54:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AD4106564A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:54:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sroberts@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from smarthost03.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost03.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.3.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F218FC14 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sroberts@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from [82.68.31.182] (helo=thor.vickiandstacey.com) by smarthost03.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LMHcm-0000KZ-BV; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:54:16 +0000 Received: from thor.vickiandstacey.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.vickiandstacey.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0C7pIaX031867; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:51:19 GMT (envelope-from sroberts@thor.vickiandstacey.com) Received: (from sroberts@localhost) by thor.vickiandstacey.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n0C7pIKb031865; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:51:18 GMT (envelope-from sroberts) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:51:18 +0000 From: Stacey Roberts To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Message-ID: <20090112075118.GD1484@thor.vickiandstacey.com> Mail-Followup-To: perryh@pluto.rain.com, stacey@vickiandstacey.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <49589883.lhmPNVeBMeI7aDqo%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <49618959.ytDnPW+y0ehAb8CV%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20090111122946.GA1484@thor.vickiandstacey.com> <496ab55e.Ic0zjSbbhqUZJ9Uq%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496ab55e.Ic0zjSbbhqUZJ9Uq%perryh@pluto.rain.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Originating-Smarthost03-IP: [82.68.31.182] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, stacey@vickiandstacey.com Subject: Re: FIXED: vpnc connects, but does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stacey@vickiandstacey.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:54:19 -0000 Hi perryh! Thanks for the reply.., On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > I also have this problem, the difference being that mine > > **USED to** work, but now it suddenly stoped working. > > I tried adding the line to my conf file as you did, but > > for me, the problem remains: > > > Appears to connect and authenticate successfully to my office's > > VPN concentrator Once (apparently) connected, I can't access any > > resources on the company network (mail / servers, etc), nor can > > I ping anything.., > > Including the IP address of your tun0 interface? (If you can ping > that, but nothing beyond, you have a different problem than I had.) > Nope - same as yours.., > > Wondering if you can point me to where you found the info on the > > various options I can try to continue debugging this problem, > > please. > > That line came from the output of "vpnc --long-help". > Other things to look at are the vpnc(8) manpage, the > /usr/local/share/doc/vpnc/README file, and the TODO > file in /usr/ports/security/vpnc/work/vpnc-0.4.0. > > There's more detail of what I think is going on in this thread: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2009-January/020638.html > By the time you get it working again, you will probably have learned > more about the workings of vpnc than you really cared to know :) > > > The FW guys at the office aren't exactly forthcoming where non-MS > > windows is concerned, you see.., > This is great - I had a peek, so will pour over these and see how I get on with further debugging.., Its not TOO bad on my side, as I do have a Linux OS that I have access to that strangely does use vpnc successfully. Will press on with the pointers you've provided here. Thanks for the help! Regards, S Roberts > Not surprising :( Too many security types act as if obscurity > helped security, not realizing that it inconveniences only their > customers and not their enemies. > > Any chance they would be willing to say what config change they made > on their end about the time it stopped working, without reference to > what is running on your end? Another thing to check is whether your > ISP changed something. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 09:10:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59ECB106564A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:10:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DED8FC0A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:10:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id n0C9AowI062110 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:10:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id n0C9AovP062109; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:10:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA07517; Mon, 12 Jan 09 01:00:28 PST Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:02:34 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: stacey@vickiandstacey.com Message-Id: <496b072a.ugr0wDBif8SM2vLD%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <49589883.lhmPNVeBMeI7aDqo%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <49618959.ytDnPW+y0ehAb8CV%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20090111122946.GA1484@thor.vickiandstacey.com> <496ab55e.Ic0zjSbbhqUZJ9Uq%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20090112075118.GD1484@thor.vickiandstacey.com> In-Reply-To: <20090112075118.GD1484@thor.vickiandstacey.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FIXED: vpnc connects, but does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:10:51 -0000 > ... I do have a Linux OS that I have access > to that strangely does use vpnc successfully. That may help quite a bit. You can use something like tcpdump or wireshark on the FreeBSD system to monitor the traffic between the Linux system and the Cisco while connecting and doing something simple like pinging the inside nameserver, then reverse roles and use the Linux system to monitor the traffic between FreeBSD and the Cisco while connecting and attempting to do the same simple thing. You won't be able to see what's inside the IPSEC-encrypted packets, but you can at least see how many of what size are sent in each direction. This may provide some clues as to what is going wrong. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 10:55:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC711065677 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:55:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sroberts@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.3.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE828FC1F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:55:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sroberts@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from [82.68.31.182] (helo=thor.vickiandstacey.com) by smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LMKSX-00046W-T0; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:55:54 +0000 Received: from thor.vickiandstacey.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.vickiandstacey.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0CAqtwg043335; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:52:57 GMT (envelope-from sroberts@thor.vickiandstacey.com) Received: (from sroberts@localhost) by thor.vickiandstacey.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n0CAqoRf043329; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:52:50 GMT (envelope-from sroberts) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:52:50 +0000 From: Stacey Roberts To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Message-ID: <20090112105250.GE1484@thor.vickiandstacey.com> Mail-Followup-To: perryh@pluto.rain.com, stacey@vickiandstacey.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <49589883.lhmPNVeBMeI7aDqo%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <49618959.ytDnPW+y0ehAb8CV%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20090111122946.GA1484@thor.vickiandstacey.com> <496ab55e.Ic0zjSbbhqUZJ9Uq%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20090112075118.GD1484@thor.vickiandstacey.com> <496b072a.ugr0wDBif8SM2vLD%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496b072a.ugr0wDBif8SM2vLD%perryh@pluto.rain.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Originating-Smarthost01-IP: [82.68.31.182] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, stacey@vickiandstacey.com Subject: Re: FIXED: vpnc connects, but does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stacey@vickiandstacey.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:55:58 -0000 Hi perryh! On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > ... I do have a Linux OS that I have access > > to that strangely does use vpnc successfully. > > That may help quite a bit. You can use something like tcpdump or > wireshark on the FreeBSD system to monitor the traffic between the > Linux system and the Cisco while connecting and doing something > simple like pinging the inside nameserver, then reverse roles and > use the Linux system to monitor the traffic between FreeBSD and the > Cisco while connecting and attempting to do the same simple thing. > You won't be able to see what's inside the IPSEC-encrypted packets, > but you can at least see how many of what size are sent in each > direction. This may provide some clues as to what is going wrong. Alas, this is a multi-boot system where the Linux OS is installed - so no chance of that :-( I've just determined that it might not be a problem with vpnc..,as such. I got an ethernet connection to work just now, so it looks as if its just down to now vpnc is handling my wifi interface, for some reason. As I said originally, this **was** working, and now its stopped for some reason. I'm now fairly certain that its not got anything to do with vpnc natively, as I used the same vpnc conf file to successfully access the office over ethernet. I'll keep at it.., Thanks for your assistance! Regards, S Roberts > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 12:21:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14901106566B for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:21:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mx1.esiee.fr (mx1.esiee.fr [147.215.1.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8068FC12 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:21:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1717136839; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:21:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VAMS.dummy (Postfix) with SMTP id E897E3153B; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:21:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from lisa.esiee.fr (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD66A3153B; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:21:52 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <496B35E0.6070103@esiee.fr> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:21:52 +0100 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081003) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jos Chrispijn References: <49670974.2060202@esiee.fr> <44sknr2ozn.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <496A158A.6060703@webrz.net> In-Reply-To: <496A158A.6060703@webrz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.1 : watchdog bge0 timeout ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:21:55 -0000 Jos Chrispijn wrote: > [Lowell Gilbert] Uit een eerder bericht van 10-1-2009 15:51 :: >> Could be hardware trouble, I suppose. >> > I know FreeBSD can detect hardware probs better than other OS'es; but > why didn't 6.x detect this malfunction then? > I believe Murphy and his law, but for mee it seems a little bit too > accidentally L-) > > regards, > Jos Chrispijn Well I have re-install the machine at 6.4 and it runs WITHOUT any trouble with exactly same softwares ( OS + Postfix + Postgrey ) At 7.1 the machine hanged after running few hours ( ~2 ) At 6.4 it runs since 3 days without problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:24:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE971065670 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:24:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEE58FC1A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:24:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LMNhu-00051Z-GV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:24:06 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.238]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LMNhp-0003ag-21 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:23:53 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost.men.bris.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0CENpxU045568 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:23:51 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n0CENmBJ044993 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:23:48 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:23:47 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090112142347.GA22438@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Subject: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgcrypt.so.15" not found, required by "libgs.so.8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:24:08 -0000 I get this error in /var/spool/lpd/: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgcrypt.so.15" not found, required by "libgs.so.8" I use apsfilter, so I guess this must be something to do with ghostscript? Any advice? many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:36:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46C81065676 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcigar@ulb.ac.be) Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be (mxin.ulb.ac.be [164.15.128.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CFF8FC16 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcigar@ulb.ac.be) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah8BAI/iakmkD30E/2dsb2JhbAAI0nmFb4Qy Received: from bebif01.ulb.ac.be (HELO [10.0.0.194]) ([164.15.125.4]) by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2009 15:36:39 +0100 From: Julien Cigar To: Anton Shterenlikht In-Reply-To: <20090112142347.GA22438@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20090112142347.GA22438@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:37:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1231771058.2733.2.camel@frodon.be-bif.ulb.ac.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgcrypt.so.15" not found, required by "libgs.so.8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:36:42 -0000 vim /usr/ports/UPDATING: 20090107: AFFECTS: users of security/libgcrypt AUTHOR: rafan@FreeBSD.org libgcrypt has been upgraded to 1.4.3 which has a shared library version bump. You need to reinstall all ports depending on it. Use something like this: portupgrade -rf libgcrypt portmaster -r libgcrypt should be that .. On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 14:23 +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I get this error in /var/spool/lpd/: > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgcrypt.so.15" not found, required by "libgs.so.8" > > I use apsfilter, so I guess this must be something to do with ghostscript? > > Any advice? > > many thanks > anton > -- Julien Cigar Belgian Biodiversity Platform http://www.biodiversity.be Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Campus de la Plaine CP 257 Bâtiment NO, Bureau 4 N4 115C (Niveau 4) Boulevard du Triomphe, entrée ULB 2 B-1050 Bruxelles Mail: jcigar@ulb.ac.be @biobel: http://biobel.biodiversity.be/person/show/471 Tel : 02 650 57 52 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:39:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DF6106564A; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DBD8FC0A; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFE96D43F; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:39:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 34F1E844A7; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:39:21 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: "Eitan Shefi" References: <5D49E7A8952DC44FB38C38FA0D758EAD0164F6D6@mtlexch01.mtl.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:39:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5D49E7A8952DC44FB38C38FA0D758EAD0164F6D6@mtlexch01.mtl.com> (Eitan Shefi's message of "Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:30:20 +0200") Message-ID: <86hc447fmu.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "/var/log/messages" logs appear in the output of "sysctl -a" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:39:23 -0000 "Eitan Shefi" writes: > I run "sysctl -a | less" why? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:50:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC63F106564A; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:50:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3208FC1C; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:50:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A980E6D44C; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8EFEC844ED; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:50:55 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Peter Jeremy References: <468090.72533.qm@web45413.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <20090111083300.GC7054@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:50:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20090111083300.GC7054@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> (Peter Jeremy's message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:33:00 +1100") Message-ID: <868wpg7f3k.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Kamlesh Patel , hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:50:57 -0000 Peter Jeremy writes: > Kamlesh Patel writes: > > How do i recover the system from this error. I can't reload the > > loader.old > > If you press any key during the first spinner [...] You can then > enter the name of the program you wish to run - eg /boot/loader.old That won't work - he changed the forth code, not the compiled code. > (or directly load /boot/kernel/kernel) That will work. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:08:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21C5106566B for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:08:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C781A8FC14 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:08:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so13841071wfg.7 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:08:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=2Z12Eq4tLJHT/0sexmkGq14zI1O0AFJ8jJlcqq9bDzE=; b=RLEyuSUV00+EXhAxGdJgU2aFmGo58VCLKfz3HIwO35CAQZG7NoAZqgeoHeye8/am2Q gZlJllIuj4ZAKvZqYwCpEMXOliIMo4e6QM+1eRrS3iENUmg1sD6clcjcKbbh1q6TFRw0 dQ9fOYwZC9R84Woyot6xKEbWWV7n8zkTboVcI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=LxY63KSxGO0tsFHW00vg04QwedsprJM8pAzd94TDaCrhnP+2k0b5B2hQhKOJcq7Zph Ck8D4ENYIoHCiL40CUSemy+4g8DQ0gDRZ67J6PKvYYSt3bOJCpD7asOBeDx0uYeFTpgs xEK/MO+EdQIEb9a6UYkGJ0mmjxPSvlNQSY0zE= Received: by 10.142.169.4 with SMTP id r4mr12218356wfe.262.1231772900467; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:08:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.132.16 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:08:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:08:20 -0500 From: "Tsu-Fan Cheng" To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: how should I upgrade all these ports?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:08:21 -0000 Hi, I just csup my port tree this morning (01/12), and realized there is a whole lot ports need my attention (49 of them). I checked out UPDATES and found out that gnome and GTK+ have just been updated. But i don't have gtkmm or gnome-session installed, I wonder if I should still upgrade my ports just as described in the UPDATES. Here is the list: ===>>> New version available: gnomehier-2.3_11 ===>>> New version available: lame-3.98.2_1 ===>>> New version available: libcheck-0.9.6 ===>>> New version available: ORBit2-2.14.16 ===>>> New version available: arts-1.5.10_1,1 ===>>> New version available: atk-1.24.0 ===>>> New version available: cairo-1.8.6,1 ===>>> New version available: consolekit-0.3.0_3 ===>>> New version available: dbus-1.2.4.2 ===>>> New version available: dbus-glib-0.78 ===>>> New version available: esound-0.2.41 ===>>> New version available: fontconfig-2.6.0,1 ===>>> New version available: gamin-0.1.10 ===>>> New version available: gconf2-2.24.0 ===>>> New version available: gio-fam-backend-2.18.4 ===>>> New version available: glib-2.18.4 ===>>> New version available: gnome-doc-utils-0.14.2 ===>>> New version available: gnome-icon-theme-2.24.0_2 ===>>> New version available: gnome-keyring-2.24.1_1 ===>>> New version available: gnome-vfs-2.24.0 ===>>> New version available: gtk-2.14.7 ===>>> New version available: gtk-engines2-2.16.1 ===>>> New version available: gvfs-1.0.3 ===>>> New version available: hal-0.5.11_10 ===>>> New version available: libbonobo-2.24.0 ===>>> New version available: libbonoboui-2.24.0 ===>>> New version available: libgnome-2.24.1 ===>>> New version available: libgnomeui-2.24.0 ===>>> New version available: libgsf-1.14.11 ===>>> New version available: libnotify-0.4.5 ===>>> New version available: librsvg2-2.22.3_1 ===>>> New version available: libsoup-2.24.2.1 ===>>> New version available: libxml2-2.7.2_1 ===>>> New version available: pango-1.22.4 ===>>> New version available: pixman-0.12.0 ===>>> New version available: policykit-0.9_2 ===>>> New version available: policykit-gnome-0.9.2 ===>>> New version available: py25-cairo-1.8.0_2 ===>>> New version available: py25-gobject-2.16.0 ===>>> New version available: py25-gtk-2.13.0_1 ===>>> New version available: py25-libxml2-2.7.2 ===>>> New version available: firefox-3.0.5_1,1 ===>>> New version available: firefox-3.0.a2_5,1 ===>>> New version available: gnome-menus-2.24.2 ===>>> New version available: intltool-0.40.5 ===>>> New version available: libgweather-2.24.2 ===>>> New version available: libwnck-2.24.2 ===>>> New version available: py25-orbit-2.24.0 ===>>> New version available: webkit-gtk2-1.0.1_4 ===>>> 49 have new versions available thank you!! TFC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:20:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17181106568D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:20:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C847C8FC1B for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2009 10:20:55 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.4-GA) with ESMTP id KOG73690; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:20:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2009 10:20:44 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18795.24524.161487.807679@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:20:44 -0500 To: "Tsu-Fan Cheng" In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: FreeBSD Subject: how should I upgrade all these ports?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:20:58 -0000 Tsu-Fan Cheng writes: > I just csup my port tree this morning (01/12), and realized > there is a whole lot ports need my attention (49 of them). I > checked out UPDATES and found out that gnome and GTK+ have just > been updated. But i don't have gtkmm or gnome-session installed, > I wonder if I should still upgrade my ports just as described in > the UPDATES. In short, yes. Many (but not all) of these a) are part of GNOME or b) have a GNOME component in their dependencies. The update procedure is there for a reason. (Advice: make sure you have the latest vesion of UPDATING. Additional useful information was added in the last 24 hours.) Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:28:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981F9106564A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:28:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcigar@ulb.ac.be) Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be (mxin.ulb.ac.be [164.15.128.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B6C8FC13 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcigar@ulb.ac.be) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah8BAI7wakmkD30E/2dsb2JhbAAI0nGFbw Received: from bebif01.ulb.ac.be (HELO [10.0.0.194]) ([164.15.125.4]) by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2009 16:28:42 +0100 From: Julien Cigar To: Tsu-Fan Cheng In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:29:42 +0100 Message-Id: <1231774182.2733.5.camel@frodon.be-bif.ulb.ac.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: how should I upgrade all these ports?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:28:46 -0000 Always read /usr/ports/UPDATING before any upgrade. After that you can use portmaster (the one I use) or portupgrade to upgrade all those outdated ports with a single command : portmaster -avd On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 10:08 -0500, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > Hi, > I just csup my port tree this morning (01/12), and realized there is > a whole lot ports need my attention (49 of them). I checked out > UPDATES and found out that gnome and GTK+ have just been updated. But > i don't have gtkmm or gnome-session installed, I wonder if I should > still upgrade my ports just as described in the UPDATES. Here is the > list: > > ===>>> New version available: gnomehier-2.3_11 > ===>>> New version available: lame-3.98.2_1 > ===>>> New version available: libcheck-0.9.6 > ===>>> New version available: ORBit2-2.14.16 > ===>>> New version available: arts-1.5.10_1,1 > ===>>> New version available: atk-1.24.0 > ===>>> New version available: cairo-1.8.6,1 > ===>>> New version available: consolekit-0.3.0_3 > ===>>> New version available: dbus-1.2.4.2 > ===>>> New version available: dbus-glib-0.78 > ===>>> New version available: esound-0.2.41 > ===>>> New version available: fontconfig-2.6.0,1 > ===>>> New version available: gamin-0.1.10 > ===>>> New version available: gconf2-2.24.0 > ===>>> New version available: gio-fam-backend-2.18.4 > ===>>> New version available: glib-2.18.4 > ===>>> New version available: gnome-doc-utils-0.14.2 > ===>>> New version available: gnome-icon-theme-2.24.0_2 > ===>>> New version available: gnome-keyring-2.24.1_1 > ===>>> New version available: gnome-vfs-2.24.0 > ===>>> New version available: gtk-2.14.7 > ===>>> New version available: gtk-engines2-2.16.1 > ===>>> New version available: gvfs-1.0.3 > ===>>> New version available: hal-0.5.11_10 > ===>>> New version available: libbonobo-2.24.0 > ===>>> New version available: libbonoboui-2.24.0 > ===>>> New version available: libgnome-2.24.1 > ===>>> New version available: libgnomeui-2.24.0 > ===>>> New version available: libgsf-1.14.11 > ===>>> New version available: libnotify-0.4.5 > ===>>> New version available: librsvg2-2.22.3_1 > ===>>> New version available: libsoup-2.24.2.1 > ===>>> New version available: libxml2-2.7.2_1 > ===>>> New version available: pango-1.22.4 > ===>>> New version available: pixman-0.12.0 > ===>>> New version available: policykit-0.9_2 > ===>>> New version available: policykit-gnome-0.9.2 > ===>>> New version available: py25-cairo-1.8.0_2 > ===>>> New version available: py25-gobject-2.16.0 > ===>>> New version available: py25-gtk-2.13.0_1 > ===>>> New version available: py25-libxml2-2.7.2 > ===>>> New version available: firefox-3.0.5_1,1 > ===>>> New version available: firefox-3.0.a2_5,1 > ===>>> New version available: gnome-menus-2.24.2 > ===>>> New version available: intltool-0.40.5 > ===>>> New version available: libgweather-2.24.2 > ===>>> New version available: libwnck-2.24.2 > ===>>> New version available: py25-orbit-2.24.0 > ===>>> New version available: webkit-gtk2-1.0.1_4 > ===>>> 49 have new versions available > > > thank you!! > > TFC > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Julien Cigar Belgian Biodiversity Platform http://www.biodiversity.be Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Campus de la Plaine CP 257 Bâtiment NO, Bureau 4 N4 115C (Niveau 4) Boulevard du Triomphe, entrée ULB 2 B-1050 Bruxelles Mail: jcigar@ulb.ac.be @biobel: http://biobel.biodiversity.be/person/show/471 Tel : 02 650 57 52 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:58:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5023106564A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:58:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C768FC13 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:58:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so12224680rvf.43 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:58:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JU7tCstcZJU3oMS1eEGAtCHPVGAuYC3iW1JC/MgYiYo=; b=CU48pSlWA7dOc/H8KPuUgR51YfVhFVTGwtYxnEhyZT+qxe/WaeEj6/6zpfsVx4oSKv WZafxWOfHEz7SZMCbXWXGcI5sSc4KQoGABbZd+urYjM4p4qSktzVvmSp4itD3WwaQTDM PsRHIMh6GvrOv7ZI+kk0aLhkROdmmMHiu0QO8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=acOk4y0SCoXCTzAhpXF3Pu4Q262chNhCI7K0EAgZY2vPfUK5lEsNsoIcWIrukyEH6C rkRCmHmDmj4NKttmjqS9lQBsGK3nSEFVCr1ps2fYH75xTpTR8wFB5LiQWDOPgsjs5jVq 7444MgmFRuSJgy4HjHygvBsYRswJUtHmpbrhY= Received: by 10.141.44.13 with SMTP id w13mr14641356rvj.18.1231775908154; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:58:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.4.70? (c-76-113-34-1.hsd1.nm.comcast.net [76.113.34.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g22sm35248092rvb.1.2009.01.12.07.58.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:58:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <496B68AC.9090800@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:58:36 -0700 From: Tim Judd User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Miklosovic References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: creating own CVSup server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:58:29 -0000 Stefan Miklosovic wrote: > Hi all, > > I decided to set up my own CVSup server just for my local > network. After reading all related stuff I should find, I have > solid knowledge about this issue but one thing disturbed my mind. > > My pc, server which I will mirroring from, is also downloading > source tree from another server (cvsup.at.freebsd.org) to /usr/src > directory. I will download my src tree once a week. > When I am going to set up cvsup server on my own, cvsup-mirror > asks me, where I want to download files I just purchased. Default > directory is "/home/ncvs". > > My question is, can be downloading directory /usr/src ? > Which reason should I place downloading files to /home/ncvs for? > Does it matter ? Can I serve my own src tree for other computers? > Does it have to be stored twice? > > thank you > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" You are mirroring the CVS source tree, you are not making a subversion server for your own stuff. I've used this cvs mirror utility before. You're mirroring a database, which has metainfo, versioning info, plus a whole lot more. You can't simply dump this database-type of files into /usr/src and get your system to use them. (There won't be a Makefile for example). You need to store them to another location outside /usr/src -- /home/ncvs is a good place since the uid and gid that the cvs will serve as is called 'ncvs' I'd keep progressing forward, leaving the defaults alone. Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 16:22:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2995B106566B for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:22:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from srvdmz13.oekb.co.at (srvdmz13.oekb.co.at [143.245.5.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F6B8FC0A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:22:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from msc01-n1 [143.245.2.187] by srvdmz13.oekb.co.at - SurfControl E-mail Filter (6.0.0); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:22:16 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at ([143.245.9.16]) by MAIL1.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:22:16 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0CGMGZY006403 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:22:16 +0100 Received: (from ej@localhost) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n0CGMGNF006402 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:22:16 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: aurora.oekb.co.at: ej set sender to a@jenisch.at using -f Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:22:16 +0100 From: Ewald Jenisch To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090112162216.GA6391@aurora.oekb.co.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2009 16:22:16.0294 (UTC) FILETIME=[EEF74860:01C974D1] X-SEF-ZeroHour-RefID: fgs=0 X-SEF-7853D99-ADF1-478E-8894-213D316B8FFA: 1 X-SEF-Processed: 6_0_0_39__2009_01_12_17_22_16 Subject: Printing - standard? CUPS? ...?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:22:19 -0000 Hi, For a system set up from scratch (7.1) I'm about to set up printing. Printer: Minolta C351 (basically a networked PS-Printer also capable of color) My requirements: Print from mutt (mail), print text files, print PS-files with the ability to print duplex and 2-up both in color and b/w. Should I go for the standard vanilla FreeBSD lpr that comes with the system or use anything else? If "anything else" - what (CUPS,...?) Please note that I want to print both from gnome (X-win) as well as via the commadline. Thanks in advance for any clue, -ewald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 16:25:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B0F106566C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:25:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08368FC17 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n0CGPKTu018588; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:25:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id n0CGPJhJ018587; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:25:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:25:19 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: RW Message-ID: <20090112162519.GB18474@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4967C511.3060100@comcast.net> <20090109231748.GA3715@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20090110033633.77e00a1e@gumby.homeunix.com> <49690095.8030101@onetel.com> <20090111022325.3e252ce7@gumby.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090111022325.3e252ce7@gumby.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting /c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:25:45 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 02:23:25AM +0000, RW wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:09:57 +0000 > Chris Whitehouse wrote: > > > Why not as a matter of curiosity? It has its limitations (eg max file > > size) but it's very cross platform. > > ntfs is much more robust than fat32, if you crash windows or pull the > plug, you are more likely to lose data with fat32. But, if your MS-Win slice is just there for occasional convenience and is not especially significant, converting NTFS to FAT32 is an easy way to be able to write to it directly from FreeBSD. The alternative is to create a 3rd slice that is FAT32 and use it as a communication stash. FAT32 has its limitations, but it is quite usable under most circumstances if those limitations are not important. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:07:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7012D106566C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00F18FC27 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:07:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0CH7ddP049534; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:07:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 58F31BA89; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:07:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:07:39 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: William Gordon Rutherdale Message-ID: <20090112170739.GA14646@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <4968EDAF.40108@utoronto.ca> <3a142e750901101153x66d0099dxa871dce07df32175@mail.gmail.com> <49694724.6090705@utoronto.ca> <20090111165235.GA62524@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <496A7E0F.4060301@utoronto.ca> <20090111234532.GA86733@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <496A9800.40205@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496A9800.40205@utoronto.ca> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot get ethernet off the ground X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:07:46 -0000 --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 08:08:16PM -0500, William Gordon Rutherdale wrote: > I'm afraid it's gone from bad to worse. >=20 > The 7.1 system may have recognised the ethernet adapter, but it seemed=20 > to fail writing to the hard drive. >=20 > I got this during installation: >=20 > Progress > Extracting GENERIC into /boot directory... >=20 > Message > Write failure on transfer! (wrote -1 bytes of 1425408 bytes) >=20 > /mtrt: write failed, filesystem is full. >=20 > ------------- >=20 > I think I allocated decent size partitions for /, /var, swap, /tmp,=20 > /usr. I made multiple attempts. Kept getting errors. The 'filesystem is full' message might imply that the partition for root is too small. What were the filesystem sizes you chose? There should be an item in the main install menu to start a shell. If you take that option and use the 'df -h' command, you should see the sizes of the mounted partitions. What happens if you just make one giant partition? Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklreNsACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUwXgCgj2K2iQ+iMj9x8rAQwKV7VS09 LUwAoISCykT5pV/Bg5usBJopYQmMPXq+ =zWJi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:42:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A1E106564A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:42:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nealhogan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f15.google.com (mail-gx0-f15.google.com [209.85.217.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE3B8FC1A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:42:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nealhogan@gmail.com) Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so9192129gxk.7 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:42:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=qtGXKJIoI0YEMkLiC9rCbNOE2vwWdVEXTlTB8sFrQk4=; b=DyoUuCkQRg+M7iHl7LvL4oaD9G4N6EkB5HuiDwtC2ITm37UMClwt3ZmOk5OVrZd+65 vR/gpIJnTm31PdPCW09EfeQ6AYWA+kjfmvDIjrlUzo63NUThAZEldXnMRwxMlwT7gkDa wzPJ2ee6h+zhdSF1n1QrE16wIxP2j2r3EpdZQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=fVuTPpImaIxPgJziRBDTqJo0z7VLIKPiAOiJpAEGtgYhfVRjan0sZUD02SdfADjzIY 9IfCXshHCKP+NrtK1mzpk0cR4TsJY7W+V0i9pFQplVH3sO7QBOLOz67I+Yivytjl0ow8 mc9g7fTKhCfvF30vfDIXbDfV6KKBNXsL3nA2g= Received: by 10.150.140.6 with SMTP id n6mr3364198ybd.124.1231782122552; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:42:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.182.2 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:41:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:41:57 -0600 From: "Neal Hogan" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: bwi: no DS tssi no OFDM tssi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:42:25 -0000 Hello, I am attempting to get by broadcom wifi card up and running, am sick of trying to get ndis working, and am attempting to use the bwi driver (originating in dragonflyBSD). I'm hoping others here have tried to do the same and have some pointers. I'm using 7.1-RELEASE (system/source are in-sync) and my card is a BCM94306MP. My dmesg is posted below. Bwi(4) is installed and it recognizes my card (*if_bwi_load-"YES"* is in my /etc/rc.conf and *bwi_v3* and *if_bwi* are loaded). I can send a IP request to my WEP encrypted access point. Yet, it doesn't get an offer and says that *no DS tssi* and *no OFDM tssi* Being new to bwi(4) and have never seen references to DS/OFDM tssi, I'm not sure what info to provide. My research is not leading anywhere helpful. Thanks. Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Sat Jan 10 19:07:15 CST 2009 nph@frege.lambdaserver:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP2400+ (1788.94-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x6a0 Stepping = 0 Features=0x383f9ff AMD Features=0xc0480800 real memory = 468647936 (446 MB) avail memory = 444530688 (423 MB) kbd1 at kbdmux0 ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 850 acpi_timer0: <32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x8008-0x800b on acpi0 acpi_ec0: port 0x62,0x66 on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci_link5: BIOS IRQ 10 for 0.10.INTA is invalid pci0: on pcib0 agp0: on hostb0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 vgapci0: port 0x9000-0x90ff mem 0xe0000000-0xefffffff,0xd0100000-0xd010ffff irq 10 at device 5.0 on pci1 ohci0: mem 0xd0006000-0xd0006fff irq 9 at device 2.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ohci0: [ITHREAD] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: on usb0 uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered pcm0: port 0x8400-0x84ff mem 0xd0007000-0xd0007fff irq 5 at device 6.0 on pci0 pcm0: pcm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcm0: [ITHREAD] isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) bwi0: mem 0xd0004000-0xd0005fff irq 9 at device 9.0 on pci0 bwi0: [ITHREAD] bwi0: regwin: chipcommon (0x800), rev 2, vendor 0x4243 bwi0: BBP: id 0x4306, rev 0x2, pkg 0 bwi0: nregwin 6, cap 0x0000002a bwi0: regwin: 802.11 MAC (0x812), rev 4, vendor 0x4243 bwi0: has TX stats bwi0: MAC: rev 4 bwi0: regwin: pcmcia (0x80d), rev 1, vendor 0x4243 bwi0: regwin: v90 codec (0x807), rev 1, vendor 0x4243 bwi0: regwin: pci (0x804), rev 7, vendor 0x4243 bwi0: regwin: 802.11 MAC (0x812), rev 4, vendor 0x4243 bwi0: ignore second MAC bwi0: bus rev 0 bwi0: pci is enabled bwi0: card flags 0x000f bwi0: 0th led, act 3, lowact 0 bwi0: 1th led, act 5, lowact 0 bwi0: 2th led, act 4, lowact 0 bwi0: 3th led, act 0, lowact 0 bwi0: 802.11 MAC was already disabled bwi0: PHY is linked bwi0: PHY: type 2, rev 1, ver 1 bwi0: PHY: 802.11G attach bwi0: RF: manu 0x17f, type 0x2050, rev 2 bwi0: bus rev 0 bwi0: PHY is linked bwi0: 30bit bus space bwi0: max txpower from sprom: 57 dBm bwi0: invalid antenna gain in sprom bwi0: ant gain 8 dBm bwi0: region/domain max txpower 76 dBm bwi0: max txpower 57 dBm bwi0: sprom idle tssi: 0x003e bwi0: TSSI-TX power map: 71 71 70 70 70 70 70 69 69 69 69 69 68 68 68 67 67 67 66 66 66 66 65 65 65 64 64 64 63 63 63 62 61 61 61 60 59 59 58 57 57 55 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 44 43 42 39 37 35 32 29 26 22 18 14 8 bwi0: idle tssi0: 62 bwi0: bus rev 0 bwi0: locale: 6 bwi0: WARNING: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface bwi0: Ethernet address: 00:90:4b:61:02:45 cbb0: irq 11 at device 10.0 on pci0 cardbus0: on cbb0 pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0 cbb0: [ITHREAD] fwohci0: mem 0xd0009000-0xd00097ff,0xd0000000-0xd0003fff irq 10 at device 12.0 on pci0 fwohci0: [FILTER] fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=1) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:0d:9d:71:9e:43:0c:6a fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 1 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 fwe0: on firewire0 if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:0d:9d:43:0c:6a fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:0d:9d:43:0c:6a fwip0: on firewire0 fwip0: Firewire address: 00:0d:9d:71:9e:43:0c:6a @ 0xfffe00000000, S400, maxrec 2048 sbp0: on firewire0 dcons_crom0: on firewire0 dcons_crom0: bus_addr 0x12bc000 fwohci0: Initiate bus reset fwohci0: BUS reset fwohci0: node_id=0xc000ffc0, gen=1, CYCLEMASTER mode atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x8080-0x808f at device 16.0 on pci0 atapci0: using PIO transfers above 137GB as workaround for 48bit DMA access bug, expect reduced performance ata0: on atapci0 ata0: [ITHREAD] ata1: on atapci0 ata1: [ITHREAD] pci0: at device 17.0 (no driver attached) sis0: port 0x8c00-0x8cff mem 0xd000a000-0xd000afff irq 11 at device 18.0 on pci0 sis0: Silicon Revision: DP83816A miibus0: on sis0 nsphyter0: PHY 0 on miibus0 nsphyter0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto sis0: Ethernet address: 00:0d:9d:43:2b:a7 sis0: [ITHREAD] acpi_button0: on acpi0 acpi_lid0: on acpi0 acpi_acad0: on acpi0 battery0: on acpi0 acpi_tz0: on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbd0: [ITHREAD] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: [ITHREAD] psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FILTER] sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio0: [FILTER] cpu0: on acpi0 powernow0: on cpu0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcefff,0xcf000-0xcf7ff,0xdb000-0xdbfff,0xdc000-0xdffff pnpid ORM0000 on isa0 ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/16 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 ppbus0: [ITHREAD] ppi0: on ppbus0 plip0: on ppbus0 plip0: WARNING: using obsoleted IFF_NEEDSGIANT flag lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppc0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ppc0: [ITHREAD] sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 ums0: on uhub0 ums0: 16 buttons and Z dir. Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1788943467 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) ad0: 95396MB at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: CDRW at ata1-master UDMA33 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a bwi0: bwi_init bwi0: bwi_stop bwi0: bbp atten: 0, rf atten: 3, ctrl1: 2, ctrl2: 65535 bwi0: bus rev 0 bwi0: 802.11 MAC is disabled bwi0: 802.11 MAC was already disabled bwi0: PHY is linked bwi0: bus rev 0 bwi0: PHY is unlinked bwi0: RF calibration value: 0x002a bwi0: bus rev 0 bwi0: PHY is linked firmware_get: failed to load firmware image bwi_v3_ucode4 bwi0: request firmware bwi_v3_ucode4 failed bwi0: bwi_stop -- www.nealhogan.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:13:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710961065672 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58A18FC13 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-03.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0CIEiBg000481; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:14:44 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr (mx-in-05.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.30]) by mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0CIDiq9025959; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:13:44 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl45-26.kln.forthnet.gr [77.49.172.26]) by MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0CIDevT029225; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:13:42 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr header.from=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; sender-id=neutral Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0CIDeoS033896; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:13:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n0CIDbQP033895; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:13:37 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Andreas Davour In-Reply-To: (Andreas Davour's message of "Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:30:29 +0100 (CET)") Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:13:29 +0200 Message-ID: <877i50jsty.fsf@kobe.laptop> References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: temproot location? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:13:48 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:30:29 +0100 (CET), Andreas Davour wrote: > I just did something stupid and deleted my temproot before I had > finished merging some stuff by hand. Can I recreate it, or is it > actually living somewhere in /usr/src before being copied into /var by > mergemaster? Can I find a fresh copy in there somewhere? Every time you rerun mergemaster, it can generate a new temproot and it installs files from /usr/src in the new temproot. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:20:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E67106566B for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:20:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanefbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f20.google.com (mail-bw0-f20.google.com [209.85.218.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E178FC08 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanefbsd@gmail.com) Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so6778792bwz.19 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:20:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=yA17pCzMB8Jvt+LqfEyeJyzRVdC9Uju9rSygzm0zlag=; b=dRuW/6NZvHP7o6K9TeJQdgGEKoP95al5XeucZV7nLCDR3R2zsmS7i03Hrk9Hijs8S2 wLujIOqv2UF3GgvPuKxJbalG6tnL9D242f0CCxFNzdPJGj1ygghNeEfFf9FnwarPxU7h bmtzTrw/LgQSnbS/Xo2d6aNP/SJEJvVBPtKE8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=A7dc/MfRevUIRRWM9A3wW9ngWw76WWghMJvLI29GNWGCKSlNESjUYz1xLUdwA6Et3k aVtMwsr816qfM1ERdR4mVPFXH3cmeLidXNI8EbFhG93Ylct8X7j9ysJPZUoMLzVvUQxv Tl263Jd4cuEuy2aU194nTEEyY3TK+0i2cDGH0= Received: by 10.181.193.15 with SMTP id v15mr10091437bkp.168.1231784429848; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:20:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.181.26.3 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:20:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7d6fde3d0901121020j52e8b6b4saf8ad10b10df4ae1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:20:29 -0800 From: "Garrett Cooper" To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=" In-Reply-To: <868wpg7f3k.fsf@ds4.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <468090.72533.qm@web45413.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <20090111083300.GC7054@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <868wpg7f3k.fsf@ds4.des.no> Cc: Peter Jeremy , Kamlesh Patel , hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:20:32 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Peter Jeremy writes: >> Kamlesh Patel writes: >> > How do i recover the system from this error. I can't reload the >> > loader.old >> >> If you press any key during the first spinner [...] You can then >> enter the name of the program you wish to run - eg /boot/loader.old > > That won't work - he changed the forth code, not the compiled code. > >> (or directly load /boot/kernel/kernel) > > That will work. > > DES Maybe this? - Grab the liveCD (ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/7.0/7.0-RELEASE-i386-liv= efs.iso, or ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-amd64/7.0/7.0-RELEASE-amd64= -livefs.iso). Don't grab the 7.1 ones because they don't boot on all systems (it's in the release notes). - Mount your system. - chroot /wherever/your/install/is/mounted /bin/tcsh - Repeat steps to compile and install kernel Cheers, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:32:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFD9106564A; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f20.google.com (mail-bw0-f20.google.com [209.85.218.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09748FC18; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so6805133bwz.19 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:32:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=JuUx3snZSZCIow0hLbFsquPhm73L6YY3R4zmfT/PqFY=; b=qDPSMn7IWRxtzWYMexQF4EwaWT4dWFTQDOqezDp0CkiAvbngcBHIE0VkjKVnN3DZC6 ZFp6b+gZvy9mt706LBCShRNiJA40BtcxYJjx6sbty2suiJoNpA9iOrxaLkvwnekbL/j0 lWdj79vAnD0TXF8BsVjS+uyU0K54OTCvARfAo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=YzwpEh4A09HeMy4oLwm1eoBv8VbU9oxXHosAhtrv4vqU9uSnDjrG3AE2Y22pDYYLda X19kPEPxw51kDKsyUo69n4Jqk+KgSWiRxxfFpbxZp7METiEp+nEp3MJZA5FXyzy17DeE LI6V9scUyWfjUe2RtdFLN6duJiO6nT3JNykNg= Received: by 10.223.110.144 with SMTP id n16mr1411149fap.63.1231785174233; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:32:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.115.1 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:32:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3a142e750901121032x79da7932se74c5511ec4a837b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:32:54 +0000 From: "Paul B. Mahol" To: "Neal Hogan" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bwi: no DS tssi no OFDM tssi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:32:57 -0000 On 1/12/09, Neal Hogan wrote: > Hello, > > I am attempting to get by broadcom wifi card up and running, am sick of > trying to get ndis working, and am attempting to use the bwi driver > (originating in dragonflyBSD). I'm hoping others here have tried to do the > same and have some pointers. I'm using 7.1-RELEASE (system/source are > in-sync) and my card is a BCM94306MP. My dmesg is posted below. > > Bwi(4) is installed and it recognizes my card (*if_bwi_load-"YES"* is in my > /etc/rc.conf and *bwi_v3* and *if_bwi* are loaded). I can send a IP request > to my WEP encrypted access point. Yet, it doesn't get an offer and says that > *no DS tssi* and *no OFDM tssi* Being new to bwi(4) and have never seen > references to DS/OFDM tssi, I'm not sure what info to provide. My research > is not leading anywhere helpful. Thanks. > > > > > Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Sat Jan 10 19:07:15 CST 2009 > nph@frege.lambdaserver:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP2400+ (1788.94-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x6a0 Stepping = 0 > > Features=0x383f9ff > AMD Features=0xc0480800 > real memory = 468647936 (446 MB) > avail memory = 444530688 (423 MB) > kbd1 at kbdmux0 > ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) > acpi0: on motherboard > acpi0: [ITHREAD] > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 850 > acpi_timer0: <32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x8008-0x800b on acpi0 > acpi_ec0: port 0x62,0x66 on acpi0 > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > pci_link5: BIOS IRQ 10 for 0.10.INTA is invalid > pci0: on pcib0 > agp0: on hostb0 > pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 > pci1: on pcib1 > vgapci0: port 0x9000-0x90ff mem > 0xe0000000-0xefffffff,0xd0100000-0xd010ffff irq 10 at device 5.0 on > pci1 > ohci0: mem > 0xd0006000-0xd0006fff irq 9 at device 2.0 on pci0 > ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > ohci0: [ITHREAD] > usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support > usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting > usb0: on ohci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: on usb0 > uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered > pcm0: port 0x8400-0x84ff mem 0xd0007000-0xd0007fff > irq 5 at device 6.0 on pci0 > pcm0: > pcm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > pcm0: [ITHREAD] > isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) > bwi0: mem > 0xd0004000-0xd0005fff irq 9 at device 9.0 on pci0 > bwi0: [ITHREAD] > bwi0: regwin: chipcommon (0x800), rev 2, vendor 0x4243 > bwi0: BBP: id 0x4306, rev 0x2, pkg 0 > bwi0: nregwin 6, cap 0x0000002a > bwi0: regwin: 802.11 MAC (0x812), rev 4, vendor 0x4243 > bwi0: has TX stats > bwi0: MAC: rev 4 > bwi0: regwin: pcmcia (0x80d), rev 1, vendor 0x4243 > bwi0: regwin: v90 codec (0x807), rev 1, vendor 0x4243 > bwi0: regwin: pci (0x804), rev 7, vendor 0x4243 > bwi0: regwin: 802.11 MAC (0x812), rev 4, vendor 0x4243 > bwi0: ignore second MAC > bwi0: bus rev 0 > bwi0: pci is enabled > bwi0: card flags 0x000f > bwi0: 0th led, act 3, lowact 0 > bwi0: 1th led, act 5, lowact 0 > bwi0: 2th led, act 4, lowact 0 > bwi0: 3th led, act 0, lowact 0 > bwi0: 802.11 MAC was already disabled > bwi0: PHY is linked > bwi0: PHY: type 2, rev 1, ver 1 > bwi0: PHY: 802.11G attach > bwi0: RF: manu 0x17f, type 0x2050, rev 2 > bwi0: bus rev 0 > bwi0: PHY is linked > bwi0: 30bit bus space > bwi0: max txpower from sprom: 57 dBm > bwi0: invalid antenna gain in sprom > bwi0: ant gain 8 dBm > bwi0: region/domain max txpower 76 dBm > bwi0: max txpower 57 dBm > bwi0: sprom idle tssi: 0x003e > bwi0: TSSI-TX power map: > 71 71 70 70 70 70 70 69 > 69 69 69 69 68 68 68 67 > 67 67 66 66 66 66 65 65 > 65 64 64 64 63 63 63 62 > 61 61 61 60 59 59 58 57 > 57 55 55 54 53 52 51 50 > 49 48 47 44 43 42 39 37 > 35 32 29 26 22 18 14 8 > bwi0: idle tssi0: 62 > bwi0: bus rev 0 > bwi0: locale: 6 > bwi0: WARNING: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface > bwi0: Ethernet address: 00:90:4b:61:02:45 > cbb0: irq 11 at device 10.0 on pci0 > cardbus0: on cbb0 > pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0 > cbb0: [ITHREAD] > fwohci0: mem > 0xd0009000-0xd00097ff,0xd0000000-0xd0003fff irq 10 at device 12.0 on > pci0 > fwohci0: [FILTER] > fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=1) > fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. > fwohci0: EUI64 00:0d:9d:71:9e:43:0c:6a > fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 1 ports. > fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. > firewire0: on fwohci0 > fwe0: on firewire0 > if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:0d:9d:43:0c:6a > fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:0d:9d:43:0c:6a > fwip0: on firewire0 > fwip0: Firewire address: 00:0d:9d:71:9e:43:0c:6a @ 0xfffe00000000, > S400, maxrec 2048 > sbp0: on firewire0 > dcons_crom0: on firewire0 > dcons_crom0: bus_addr 0x12bc000 > fwohci0: Initiate bus reset > fwohci0: BUS reset > fwohci0: node_id=0xc000ffc0, gen=1, CYCLEMASTER mode > atapci0: port > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x8080-0x808f at device 16.0 on > pci0 > atapci0: using PIO transfers above 137GB as workaround for 48bit DMA > access bug, expect reduced performance > ata0: on atapci0 > ata0: [ITHREAD] > ata1: on atapci0 > ata1: [ITHREAD] > pci0: at device 17.0 (no driver attached) > sis0: port 0x8c00-0x8cff mem > 0xd000a000-0xd000afff irq 11 at device 18.0 on pci0 > sis0: Silicon Revision: DP83816A > miibus0: on sis0 > nsphyter0: PHY 0 on miibus0 > nsphyter0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > sis0: Ethernet address: 00:0d:9d:43:2b:a7 > sis0: [ITHREAD] > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > acpi_lid0: on acpi0 > acpi_acad0: on acpi0 > battery0: on acpi0 > acpi_tz0: on acpi0 > atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > kbd0 at atkbd0 > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > atkbd0: [ITHREAD] > psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > psm0: [ITHREAD] > psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 > fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 > fdc0: [FILTER] > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on > acpi0 > sio0: type 16550A > sio0: [FILTER] > cpu0: on acpi0 > powernow0: on cpu0 > pmtimer0 on isa0 > orm0: at iomem > 0xc0000-0xcefff,0xcf000-0xcf7ff,0xdb000-0xdbfff,0xdc000-0xdffff pnpid > ORM0000 on isa0 > ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 > ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/16 bytes threshold > ppbus0: on ppc0 > ppbus0: [ITHREAD] > ppi0: on ppbus0 > plip0: on ppbus0 > plip0: WARNING: using obsoleted IFF_NEEDSGIANT flag > lpt0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > ppc0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > ppc0: [ITHREAD] > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > sio1: port may not be enabled > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > ums0: on uhub0 > ums0: 16 buttons and Z dir. > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1788943467 Hz quality 800 > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) > firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) > ad0: 95396MB at ata0-master UDMA100 > acd0: CDRW at ata1-master UDMA33 > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a > bwi0: bwi_init > bwi0: bwi_stop > bwi0: bbp atten: 0, rf atten: 3, ctrl1: 2, ctrl2: 65535 > bwi0: bus rev 0 > bwi0: 802.11 MAC is disabled > bwi0: 802.11 MAC was already disabled > bwi0: PHY is linked > bwi0: bus rev 0 > bwi0: PHY is unlinked > bwi0: RF calibration value: 0x002a > bwi0: bus rev 0 > bwi0: PHY is linked > firmware_get: failed to load firmware image bwi_v3_ucode4 > bwi0: request firmware bwi_v3_ucode4 failed Looks like it either doesnt have such firmware loaded or firmware is not supported for your card. bwi works only with firmware version 3 and not with 4. To get right answer look in current openbsd and dragonfly bwi driver if your BCM94306MP is listed. -- Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:36:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F027106571A; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:36:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95AC8FC22; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:36:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0CIa9nt034407; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:36:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n0CIa9ts034404; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:36:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:36:09 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Neal Hogan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090112193549.T34373@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bwi: no DS tssi no OFDM tssi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:36:23 -0000 > firmware_get: failed to load firmware image bwi_v3_ucode4 > bwi0: request firmware bwi_v3_ucode4 failed > bwi0: bwi_stop looks like here is a problem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 19:23:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB209106564A; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:23:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA6C8FC08; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:23:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BD46D43F; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C313D844EF; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:23:12 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: "Garrett Cooper" References: <468090.72533.qm@web45413.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <20090111083300.GC7054@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <868wpg7f3k.fsf@ds4.des.no> <7d6fde3d0901121020j52e8b6b4saf8ad10b10df4ae1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:23:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <7d6fde3d0901121020j52e8b6b4saf8ad10b10df4ae1@mail.gmail.com> (Garrett Cooper's message of "Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:20:29 -0800") Message-ID: <86k590fhwf.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Peter Jeremy , Kamlesh Patel , hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:23:14 -0000 "Garrett Cooper" writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > Peter Jeremy writes: > > > If you press any key during the first spinner [...] You can then > > > enter the name of the program you wish to run - eg /boot/loader.old > > That won't work - he changed the forth code, not the compiled code. > [...] > - Repeat steps to compile and install kernel which will achieve absolutely nothing, since the bug is in the forth code, not in the kernel or any other compiled code. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 19:34:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969C41065670 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:34:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=7iia/d=5Q=shell.siscom.net=vogelke@siscom.net) Received: from lamorack.siscom.net (lamorack.siscom.net [209.251.2.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690038FC1B for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:34:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=7iia/d=5Q=shell.siscom.net=vogelke@siscom.net) Received: from shell.siscom.net ([209.251.2.80]) by lamorack.siscom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1LMSHv-0002Vx-OL for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:17:27 -0500 Received: by shell.siscom.net (Postfix, from userid 2198) id 9CC39115529; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:24:48 -0500 (EST) Received: by kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil (Postfix, from userid 32768) id 03CFFBE56; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:16:58 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <7740275E-77AA-45C1-B95E-C1F62D2AAB29@goldmark.org> (message from Jeffrey Goldberg on Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:08:18 -0600) Organization: Oasis Systems Inc. X-Disclaimer: I don't speak for the USAF or Oasis. X-GPG-ID: 1024D/711752A0 2006-06-27 Karl Vogel X-GPG-Fingerprint: 56EB 6DBF 4224 C953 F417 CC99 4C7C 7D46 7117 52A0 Message-Id: <20090112191700.03CFFBE56@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:16:58 -0500 (EST) From: vogelke+unix@pobox.com (Karl Vogel) Subject: Re: bash versus sh test builtin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vogelke+unix@pobox.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:34:45 -0000 >> On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:08:18 -0600, >> Jeffrey Goldberg said: J> if [ $UID -ne 0 ] ; then ... J> Does anyone have a recommendation of how to run this simple test in /bin/sh J> and how to write tests reasonably portably? I think your best bet for comparisons like this is to use case. I started doing that back in the days when '[' would start a separate program: case "$UID" in 0) echo am root ;; *) echo not root ;; esac I use "test" for things relating to file access: die() { echo "$@" >& 2 exit 1 } test -f /etc/passwd || die "Your system is seriously hosed" -- Karl Vogel I don't speak for the USAF or my company If men ruled the world #12: Instead of wasting money on an expensive engagement ring, your fiancee would get a giant foam hand that said, "You're #1!" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 20:06:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C861065672 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:06:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f19.google.com (mail-gx0-f19.google.com [209.85.217.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6098FC0C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by gxk12 with SMTP id 12so2442714gxk.3 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:06:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=WyNEOh269GhknSGlvBaX7kQuPPw/lja5YJA871dEJoE=; b=YGiAtreP958jGKp6orNsdzqSaN98DXY/op9tHvIHxkorzGm3H5A0pJbUH7LYwP7+hx Or4qgn6AerKT8hbdDrwxrplf8VBCumg/YIBE4GwPMJjdlyaVmmHG6H3neQdW61pnr/Gz wdWe1yJKoH+KUXn8suOgqf0bGX8gTVuVN8Lnk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=fdUf/b+zpBJ3JrMqmjGzsnLfxLwNdQ/WDRVNxzfBnj9LDj8YDqZNRBvIPO6F1i6rT0 W6zZR1yQY8U+j8rEpeZsNJxiCrh1cv2Vq6WMEpO0WUZkuV233IB25dCms5AUMcCF9QW0 UyaG6hx/bIyg4SDb5Cyk9N0hN+LU0JKuoL6Zg= Received: by 10.151.47.7 with SMTP id z7mr5301309ybj.167.1231788934919; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:35:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.135.5 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:35:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54db43990901121135o2b5db17dlade40ce13daf4e3e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:35:34 -0500 From: "Bob Johnson" To: "Ewald Jenisch" In-Reply-To: <20090112162216.GA6391@aurora.oekb.co.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20090112162216.GA6391@aurora.oekb.co.at> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Printing - standard? CUPS? ...?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:06:03 -0000 I prefer print/apsfilter from ports. To get color postscript printing and duplex printing you may need to change the default configuration, which will probably end up somewhere under /usr/local/etc/apsfilter - Bob On 1/12/09, Ewald Jenisch wrote: > Hi, > > For a system set up from scratch (7.1) I'm about to set up printing. > > Printer: Minolta C351 (basically a networked PS-Printer also capable > of color) > > My requirements: Print from mutt (mail), print text files, print > PS-files with the ability to print duplex and 2-up both in color and > b/w. > > Should I go for the standard vanilla FreeBSD lpr that comes with the > system or use anything else? If "anything else" - what (CUPS,...?) > > Please note that I want to print both from gnome (X-win) as well as > via the commadline. > > Thanks in advance for any clue, > -ewald > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- -- Bob Johnson fbsdlists@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 20:08:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788CF10656CA; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nealhogan@gmail.com) Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD978FC26; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:08:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nealhogan@gmail.com) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so4473227yxb.13 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:08:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=+A1DuP0708SGWJhvI19iCFh770uXQlpDTXik2gwR2xg=; b=Tt4yGB9hMYA+19EsZ0WOBIrNdH14noQyZFt9OwLJeHElg3iA85wtKhNnm7QDHp2tBj vPWS231N5V0U8VoNQhHY9m50Ip5mmugP1ap/J/c+lC2OswCd7m1AS2ZElCxTeOX0hrqV QuPgnOWhteCLDlBjndg1r2z5ENdTT0hjOHero= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=OG5/eq196tzHPPKMPCBKi0qqQMCqZJhGn6RAsxfpc/M+dUdv4ff1dlbhMjHy29S50A N02MsQXSdDLVfQqp/4a7rSUMO7Lx7yoi/38x9ZTjN/fjPYa2harYvtcyIAXXa8kXKlfl SRVFbyc+VCrqJCIsiP/dqMg3NYsFBst9f3opo= Received: by 10.150.57.5 with SMTP id f5mr10983437yba.66.1231790910080; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:08:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.182.2 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:08:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:08:30 -0600 From: "Neal Hogan" To: "Paul B. Mahol" In-Reply-To: <3a142e750901121032x79da7932se74c5511ec4a837b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3a142e750901121032x79da7932se74c5511ec4a837b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bwi: no DS tssi no OFDM tssi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:08:33 -0000 I installed the firmware stuff from the dragonfly bwi(4) man page, yet I have the same issue. Is there a way to tell whether the firmware they provide supports my card? Like I said, I can locate my access point (and others that are around) and ask for an IP . . . it seems as though I'm so close. I'm fairly certain that I have all of the avliable bwi(4) bits installed correctly. I dwonloaded and installed the driver and added *if_bwi_load="YES"* in my loader.conf. I loaded the .ko file (bwi_v3). I downloaded and installed the firmware from dflyBSD and followed their directions. Yet I get no offer. Is the fact that I fail to get an offer indicate the firmware incompatinbility? Anyway, thanks for you help. On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Paul B. Mahol wrote: > On 1/12/09, Neal Hogan wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am attempting to get by broadcom wifi card up and running, am sick > of > > trying to get ndis working, and am attempting to use the bwi driver > > (originating in dragonflyBSD). I'm hoping others here have tried to do > the > > same and have some pointers. I'm using 7.1-RELEASE (system/source are > > in-sync) and my card is a BCM94306MP. My dmesg is posted below. > > > > Bwi(4) is installed and it recognizes my card (*if_bwi_load-"YES"* is in > my > > /etc/rc.conf and *bwi_v3* and *if_bwi* are loaded). I can send a IP > request > > to my WEP encrypted access point. Yet, it doesn't get an offer and says > that > > *no DS tssi* and *no OFDM tssi* Being new to bwi(4) and have never seen > > references to DS/OFDM tssi, I'm not sure what info to provide. My > research > > is not leading anywhere helpful. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project. > > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > > FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > > FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Sat Jan 10 19:07:15 CST 2009 > > nph@frege.lambdaserver:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > > CPU: mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP2400+ (1788.94-MHz 686-class CPU) > > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x6a0 Stepping = 0 > > > > > Features=0x383f9ff > > AMD Features=0xc0480800 > > real memory = 468647936 (446 MB) > > avail memory = 444530688 (423 MB) > > kbd1 at kbdmux0 > > ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, > RF5413) > > acpi0: on motherboard > > acpi0: [ITHREAD] > > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > > Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 850 > > acpi_timer0: <32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x8008-0x800b on acpi0 > > acpi_ec0: port 0x62,0x66 on acpi0 > > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > > pci_link5: BIOS IRQ 10 for 0.10.INTA is invalid > > pci0: on pcib0 > > agp0: on hostb0 > > pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 > > pci1: on pcib1 > > vgapci0: port 0x9000-0x90ff mem > > 0xe0000000-0xefffffff,0xd0100000-0xd010ffff irq 10 at device 5.0 on > > pci1 > > ohci0: mem > > 0xd0006000-0xd0006fff irq 9 at device 2.0 on pci0 > > ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > ohci0: [ITHREAD] > > usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support > > usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting > > usb0: on ohci0 > > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > > uhub0: on usb0 > > uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered > > pcm0: port 0x8400-0x84ff mem 0xd0007000-0xd0007fff > > irq 5 at device 6.0 on pci0 > > pcm0: > > pcm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > pcm0: [ITHREAD] > > isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 > > isa0: on isab0 > > pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) > > bwi0: mem > > 0xd0004000-0xd0005fff irq 9 at device 9.0 on pci0 > > bwi0: [ITHREAD] > > bwi0: regwin: chipcommon (0x800), rev 2, vendor 0x4243 > > bwi0: BBP: id 0x4306, rev 0x2, pkg 0 > > bwi0: nregwin 6, cap 0x0000002a > > bwi0: regwin: 802.11 MAC (0x812), rev 4, vendor 0x4243 > > bwi0: has TX stats > > bwi0: MAC: rev 4 > > bwi0: regwin: pcmcia (0x80d), rev 1, vendor 0x4243 > > bwi0: regwin: v90 codec (0x807), rev 1, vendor 0x4243 > > bwi0: regwin: pci (0x804), rev 7, vendor 0x4243 > > bwi0: regwin: 802.11 MAC (0x812), rev 4, vendor 0x4243 > > bwi0: ignore second MAC > > bwi0: bus rev 0 > > bwi0: pci is enabled > > bwi0: card flags 0x000f > > bwi0: 0th led, act 3, lowact 0 > > bwi0: 1th led, act 5, lowact 0 > > bwi0: 2th led, act 4, lowact 0 > > bwi0: 3th led, act 0, lowact 0 > > bwi0: 802.11 MAC was already disabled > > bwi0: PHY is linked > > bwi0: PHY: type 2, rev 1, ver 1 > > bwi0: PHY: 802.11G attach > > bwi0: RF: manu 0x17f, type 0x2050, rev 2 > > bwi0: bus rev 0 > > bwi0: PHY is linked > > bwi0: 30bit bus space > > bwi0: max txpower from sprom: 57 dBm > > bwi0: invalid antenna gain in sprom > > bwi0: ant gain 8 dBm > > bwi0: region/domain max txpower 76 dBm > > bwi0: max txpower 57 dBm > > bwi0: sprom idle tssi: 0x003e > > bwi0: TSSI-TX power map: > > 71 71 70 70 70 70 70 69 > > 69 69 69 69 68 68 68 67 > > 67 67 66 66 66 66 65 65 > > 65 64 64 64 63 63 63 62 > > 61 61 61 60 59 59 58 57 > > 57 55 55 54 53 52 51 50 > > 49 48 47 44 43 42 39 37 > > 35 32 29 26 22 18 14 8 > > bwi0: idle tssi0: 62 > > bwi0: bus rev 0 > > bwi0: locale: 6 > > bwi0: WARNING: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface > > bwi0: Ethernet address: 00:90:4b:61:02:45 > > cbb0: irq 11 at device 10.0 on > pci0 > > cardbus0: on cbb0 > > pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0 > > cbb0: [ITHREAD] > > fwohci0: mem > > 0xd0009000-0xd00097ff,0xd0000000-0xd0003fff irq 10 at device 12.0 on > > pci0 > > fwohci0: [FILTER] > > fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=1) > > fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. > > fwohci0: EUI64 00:0d:9d:71:9e:43:0c:6a > > fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 1 ports. > > fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. > > firewire0: on fwohci0 > > fwe0: on firewire0 > > if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:0d:9d:43:0c:6a > > fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:0d:9d:43:0c:6a > > fwip0: on firewire0 > > fwip0: Firewire address: 00:0d:9d:71:9e:43:0c:6a @ 0xfffe00000000, > > S400, maxrec 2048 > > sbp0: on firewire0 > > dcons_crom0: on firewire0 > > dcons_crom0: bus_addr 0x12bc000 > > fwohci0: Initiate bus reset > > fwohci0: BUS reset > > fwohci0: node_id=0xc000ffc0, gen=1, CYCLEMASTER mode > > atapci0: port > > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x8080-0x808f at device 16.0 on > > pci0 > > atapci0: using PIO transfers above 137GB as workaround for 48bit DMA > > access bug, expect reduced performance > > ata0: on atapci0 > > ata0: [ITHREAD] > > ata1: on atapci0 > > ata1: [ITHREAD] > > pci0: at device 17.0 (no driver attached) > > sis0: port 0x8c00-0x8cff mem > > 0xd000a000-0xd000afff irq 11 at device 18.0 on pci0 > > sis0: Silicon Revision: DP83816A > > miibus0: on sis0 > > nsphyter0: PHY 0 on miibus0 > > nsphyter0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > > sis0: Ethernet address: 00:0d:9d:43:2b:a7 > > sis0: [ITHREAD] > > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > > acpi_lid0: on acpi0 > > acpi_acad0: on acpi0 > > battery0: on acpi0 > > acpi_tz0: on acpi0 > > atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 > > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > > kbd0 at atkbd0 > > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > atkbd0: [ITHREAD] > > psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > > psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > psm0: [ITHREAD] > > psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 > > fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on > acpi0 > > fdc0: [FILTER] > > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on > > acpi0 > > sio0: type 16550A > > sio0: [FILTER] > > cpu0: on acpi0 > > powernow0: on cpu0 > > pmtimer0 on isa0 > > orm0: at iomem > > 0xc0000-0xcefff,0xcf000-0xcf7ff,0xdb000-0xdbfff,0xdc000-0xdffff pnpid > > ORM0000 on isa0 > > ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 > > ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > > ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/16 bytes threshold > > ppbus0: on ppc0 > > ppbus0: [ITHREAD] > > ppi0: on ppbus0 > > plip0: on ppbus0 > > plip0: WARNING: using obsoleted IFF_NEEDSGIANT flag > > lpt0: on ppbus0 > > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > > ppc0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > ppc0: [ITHREAD] > > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > sio1: port may not be enabled > > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > > ums0: on uhub0 > > ums0: 16 buttons and Z dir. > > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1788943467 Hz quality 800 > > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > > firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) > > firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) > > ad0: 95396MB at ata0-master UDMA100 > > acd0: CDRW at ata1-master UDMA33 > > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a > > bwi0: bwi_init > > bwi0: bwi_stop > > bwi0: bbp atten: 0, rf atten: 3, ctrl1: 2, ctrl2: 65535 > > bwi0: bus rev 0 > > bwi0: 802.11 MAC is disabled > > bwi0: 802.11 MAC was already disabled > > bwi0: PHY is linked > > bwi0: bus rev 0 > > bwi0: PHY is unlinked > > bwi0: RF calibration value: 0x002a > > bwi0: bus rev 0 > > bwi0: PHY is linked > > firmware_get: failed to load firmware image bwi_v3_ucode4 > > bwi0: request firmware bwi_v3_ucode4 failed > > Looks like it either doesnt have such firmware loaded or firmware > is not supported for your card. bwi works only with firmware version 3 > and not with 4. > To get right answer look in current openbsd and dragonfly bwi driver if > your BCM94306MP is listed. > > -- > Paul > -- www.nealhogan.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 20:34:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA47010656C8; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f20.google.com (mail-bw0-f20.google.com [209.85.218.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E048FC23; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:34:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so7037658bwz.19 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:34:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=M9xtz10Ijy61r1JRbc36V5WQyUFhvw8oEPzwrPc6l6o=; b=Zx6/+YM6iUZsWB2R4oYJ/mhWUUzHIm44Zgr48pLl7a6AjyiSXCcZcjN4cBEUOxRhVU xKenjiWFVSRFAoDBocsM/HrtD8BGzpjG0itaJcmq+qBMj25adzla+ecbWVqX+PPkjEel w1vrHwnU+2IBs2EZq0nY8zbU3/PcjO11/TELQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=LHmr+Kx9lOeMnKiIg58nhBJcoCM2AVaWv6Znz2PtnaV+70gHdiDNbyrXqHQQVfW50j Fn0HEgMmhFL9TLqTUSF7yUL2QATm675ZMaFi3L50cXOW2Yo1VRU3Z8q52SJyEX3f7Kgw 2bhpWK+3cY/+35A745uRxhrJOnJhCjlc5sev4= Received: by 10.223.110.144 with SMTP id n16mr1584440fap.63.1231792476509; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:34:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.115.1 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:34:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3a142e750901121234t45a4b15dg91df69f983e9efd6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:34:36 +0000 From: "Paul B. Mahol" To: "Neal Hogan" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3a142e750901121032x79da7932se74c5511ec4a837b@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bwi: no DS tssi no OFDM tssi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:34:40 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Neal Hogan wrote: > I installed the firmware stuff from the dragonfly bwi(4) man page, yet I > have the same issue. Is there a way to tell whether the firmware they > provide supports my card? Like I said, I can locate my access point (and > others that are around) and ask for an IP . . . it seems as though I'm so > close. I'm fairly certain that I have all of the avliable bwi(4) bits > installed correctly. > > I dwonloaded and installed the driver and added *if_bwi_load="YES"* in my > loader.conf. I loaded the .ko file (bwi_v3). I downloaded and installed the > firmware from dflyBSD and followed their directions. Yet I get no offer. Is > the fact that I fail to get an offer indicate the firmware incompatinbility? 9 in BCM94306MP indicates that its supports 80211n and as such certainly it is not supported with bwi(4) and reason is that bwi developers do not plan to add support for 4 version firmware (when last time I played with bwi). > Anyway, thanks for you help. > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Paul B. Mahol wrote: >> >> On 1/12/09, Neal Hogan wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I am attempting to get by broadcom wifi card up and running, am sick >> > of >> > trying to get ndis working, and am attempting to use the bwi driver >> > (originating in dragonflyBSD). I'm hoping others here have tried to do >> > the >> > same and have some pointers. I'm using 7.1-RELEASE (system/source are >> > in-sync) and my card is a BCM94306MP. My dmesg is posted below. >> > >> > Bwi(4) is installed and it recognizes my card (*if_bwi_load-"YES"* is in >> > my >> > /etc/rc.conf and *bwi_v3* and *if_bwi* are loaded). I can send a IP >> > request >> > to my WEP encrypted access point. Yet, it doesn't get an offer and says >> > that >> > *no DS tssi* and *no OFDM tssi* Being new to bwi(4) and have never seen >> > references to DS/OFDM tssi, I'm not sure what info to provide. My >> > research >> > is not leading anywhere helpful. Thanks. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project. >> > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 >> > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >> > FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. >> > FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Sat Jan 10 19:07:15 CST 2009 >> > nph@frege.lambdaserver:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >> > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 >> > CPU: mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP2400+ (1788.94-MHz 686-class CPU) >> > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x6a0 Stepping = 0 >> > >> > >> > Features=0x383f9ff >> > AMD Features=0xc0480800 >> > real memory = 468647936 (446 MB) >> > avail memory = 444530688 (423 MB) >> > kbd1 at kbdmux0 >> > ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, >> > RF5413) >> > acpi0: on motherboard >> > acpi0: [ITHREAD] >> > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) >> > Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 850 >> > acpi_timer0: <32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x8008-0x800b on acpi0 >> > acpi_ec0: port 0x62,0x66 on acpi0 >> > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 >> > pci_link5: BIOS IRQ 10 for 0.10.INTA is invalid >> > pci0: on pcib0 >> > agp0: on hostb0 >> > pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 >> > pci1: on pcib1 >> > vgapci0: port 0x9000-0x90ff mem >> > 0xe0000000-0xefffffff,0xd0100000-0xd010ffff irq 10 at device 5.0 on >> > pci1 >> > ohci0: mem >> > 0xd0006000-0xd0006fff irq 9 at device 2.0 on pci0 >> > ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> > ohci0: [ITHREAD] >> > usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support >> > usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting >> > usb0: on ohci0 >> > usb0: USB revision 1.0 >> > uhub0: on >> > usb0 >> > uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered >> > pcm0: port 0x8400-0x84ff mem 0xd0007000-0xd0007fff >> > irq 5 at device 6.0 on pci0 >> > pcm0: >> > pcm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> > pcm0: [ITHREAD] >> > isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 >> > isa0: on isab0 >> > pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) >> > bwi0: mem >> > 0xd0004000-0xd0005fff irq 9 at device 9.0 on pci0 >> > bwi0: [ITHREAD] >> > bwi0: regwin: chipcommon (0x800), rev 2, vendor 0x4243 >> > bwi0: BBP: id 0x4306, rev 0x2, pkg 0 >> > bwi0: nregwin 6, cap 0x0000002a >> > bwi0: regwin: 802.11 MAC (0x812), rev 4, vendor 0x4243 >> > bwi0: has TX stats >> > bwi0: MAC: rev 4 >> > bwi0: regwin: pcmcia (0x80d), rev 1, vendor 0x4243 >> > bwi0: regwin: v90 codec (0x807), rev 1, vendor 0x4243 >> > bwi0: regwin: pci (0x804), rev 7, vendor 0x4243 >> > bwi0: regwin: 802.11 MAC (0x812), rev 4, vendor 0x4243 >> > bwi0: ignore second MAC >> > bwi0: bus rev 0 >> > bwi0: pci is enabled >> > bwi0: card flags 0x000f >> > bwi0: 0th led, act 3, lowact 0 >> > bwi0: 1th led, act 5, lowact 0 >> > bwi0: 2th led, act 4, lowact 0 >> > bwi0: 3th led, act 0, lowact 0 >> > bwi0: 802.11 MAC was already disabled >> > bwi0: PHY is linked >> > bwi0: PHY: type 2, rev 1, ver 1 >> > bwi0: PHY: 802.11G attach >> > bwi0: RF: manu 0x17f, type 0x2050, rev 2 >> > bwi0: bus rev 0 >> > bwi0: PHY is linked >> > bwi0: 30bit bus space >> > bwi0: max txpower from sprom: 57 dBm >> > bwi0: invalid antenna gain in sprom >> > bwi0: ant gain 8 dBm >> > bwi0: region/domain max txpower 76 dBm >> > bwi0: max txpower 57 dBm >> > bwi0: sprom idle tssi: 0x003e >> > bwi0: TSSI-TX power map: >> > 71 71 70 70 70 70 70 69 >> > 69 69 69 69 68 68 68 67 >> > 67 67 66 66 66 66 65 65 >> > 65 64 64 64 63 63 63 62 >> > 61 61 61 60 59 59 58 57 >> > 57 55 55 54 53 52 51 50 >> > 49 48 47 44 43 42 39 37 >> > 35 32 29 26 22 18 14 8 >> > bwi0: idle tssi0: 62 >> > bwi0: bus rev 0 >> > bwi0: locale: 6 >> > bwi0: WARNING: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface >> > bwi0: Ethernet address: 00:90:4b:61:02:45 >> > cbb0: irq 11 at device 10.0 on >> > pci0 >> > cardbus0: on cbb0 >> > pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0 >> > cbb0: [ITHREAD] >> > fwohci0: mem >> > 0xd0009000-0xd00097ff,0xd0000000-0xd0003fff irq 10 at device 12.0 on >> > pci0 >> > fwohci0: [FILTER] >> > fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=1) >> > fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. >> > fwohci0: EUI64 00:0d:9d:71:9e:43:0c:6a >> > fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 1 ports. >> > fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. >> > firewire0: on fwohci0 >> > fwe0: on firewire0 >> > if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:0d:9d:43:0c:6a >> > fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:0d:9d:43:0c:6a >> > fwip0: on firewire0 >> > fwip0: Firewire address: 00:0d:9d:71:9e:43:0c:6a @ 0xfffe00000000, >> > S400, maxrec 2048 >> > sbp0: on firewire0 >> > dcons_crom0: on firewire0 >> > dcons_crom0: bus_addr 0x12bc000 >> > fwohci0: Initiate bus reset >> > fwohci0: BUS reset >> > fwohci0: node_id=0xc000ffc0, gen=1, CYCLEMASTER mode >> > atapci0: port >> > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x8080-0x808f at device 16.0 on >> > pci0 >> > atapci0: using PIO transfers above 137GB as workaround for 48bit DMA >> > access bug, expect reduced performance >> > ata0: on atapci0 >> > ata0: [ITHREAD] >> > ata1: on atapci0 >> > ata1: [ITHREAD] >> > pci0: at device 17.0 (no driver attached) >> > sis0: port 0x8c00-0x8cff mem >> > 0xd000a000-0xd000afff irq 11 at device 18.0 on pci0 >> > sis0: Silicon Revision: DP83816A >> > miibus0: on sis0 >> > nsphyter0: PHY 0 on miibus0 >> > nsphyter0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >> > sis0: Ethernet address: 00:0d:9d:43:2b:a7 >> > sis0: [ITHREAD] >> > acpi_button0: on acpi0 >> > acpi_lid0: on acpi0 >> > acpi_acad0: on acpi0 >> > battery0: on acpi0 >> > acpi_tz0: on acpi0 >> > atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 >> > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 >> > kbd0 at atkbd0 >> > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> > atkbd0: [ITHREAD] >> > psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 >> > psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> > psm0: [ITHREAD] >> > psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 >> > fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on >> > acpi0 >> > fdc0: [FILTER] >> > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on >> > acpi0 >> > sio0: type 16550A >> > sio0: [FILTER] >> > cpu0: on acpi0 >> > powernow0: on cpu0 >> > pmtimer0 on isa0 >> > orm0: at iomem >> > 0xc0000-0xcefff,0xcf000-0xcf7ff,0xdb000-0xdbfff,0xdc000-0xdffff pnpid >> > ORM0000 on isa0 >> > ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 >> > ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode >> > ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/16 bytes threshold >> > ppbus0: on ppc0 >> > ppbus0: [ITHREAD] >> > ppi0: on ppbus0 >> > plip0: on ppbus0 >> > plip0: WARNING: using obsoleted IFF_NEEDSGIANT flag >> > lpt0: on ppbus0 >> > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port >> > ppc0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> > ppc0: [ITHREAD] >> > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 >> > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> >> > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 >> > sio1: port may not be enabled >> > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on >> > isa0 >> > ums0: on >> > uhub0 >> > ums0: 16 buttons and Z dir. >> > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1788943467 Hz quality 800 >> > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec >> > firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) >> > firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) >> > ad0: 95396MB at ata0-master UDMA100 >> > acd0: CDRW at ata1-master UDMA33 >> > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a >> > bwi0: bwi_init >> > bwi0: bwi_stop >> > bwi0: bbp atten: 0, rf atten: 3, ctrl1: 2, ctrl2: 65535 >> > bwi0: bus rev 0 >> > bwi0: 802.11 MAC is disabled >> > bwi0: 802.11 MAC was already disabled >> > bwi0: PHY is linked >> > bwi0: bus rev 0 >> > bwi0: PHY is unlinked >> > bwi0: RF calibration value: 0x002a >> > bwi0: bus rev 0 >> > bwi0: PHY is linked >> > firmware_get: failed to load firmware image bwi_v3_ucode4 >> > bwi0: request firmware bwi_v3_ucode4 failed >> >> Looks like it either doesnt have such firmware loaded or firmware >> is not supported for your card. bwi works only with firmware version 3 >> and not with 4. >> To get right answer look in current openbsd and dragonfly bwi driver if >> your BCM94306MP is listed. >> >> -- >> Paul > > > > -- > www.nealhogan.net > -- Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 21:15:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E251065673 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:15:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlilly@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D278FC26 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:15:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlilly@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so13996036wfg.7 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:15:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=wjvdkzm7ilvwx6jVWgICDcnhabJTB5q1oMfS0fhEEnE=; b=ExEa9Z2HJzeA5zsQyGdqBAJXkPjRyEk8ZZ63sut44WmafPVq3bnJD5OPiLksIX7snL G+E2j9JZDcd4HV+FAp/jgQrs7Ce6Oth7Z0nU03Rwgjxm2SP6BbxHPvewt+yG36U22dOW y/6wq+5NfRxQA9FNK7ntBg014jFJ2YRQjSPQo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=vtAHiLUegt0ZL06KCqPBmamREbjbJQ+f94rG/hhwqNt831yZgL9cXhth93arHqf0O3 pD0dJcCMMiaVb5jEiKxCMKo8kqd7gFinfyd2UXtThoUkc0JlkmIb+t/gGgTwdKvcjXGJ mbHb7JCMCB+0bGiKS25z4gCI5VlsA/wPgKPbk= Received: by 10.142.246.6 with SMTP id t6mr12532327wfh.265.1231794952661; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:15:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.170.17 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:15:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:15:52 -0800 From: "mojo fms" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <496ab572.u2DH1w2B2JAcv4M+%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <496ab572.u2DH1w2B2JAcv4M+%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Mounting a partition from freebsd 6.2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:15:53 -0000 I can run a check disk on it and it returned that the file system was previously mounted on /mnt/backup and returns that the file system is in good shape. I will have to wait until I get back in front of it to attempt the dump piped to restore. I have never had to recover a drive like that, is there anything specific I should look at for switches or just dump /dev/ad2s1 | restore? On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:13 PM, wrote: > "mojo fms" wrote: > > > I was working on an upgrade to 6.3 from 6.2 and I lost power > > during the install which hosed most of my system. Instead of > > trying to really recover it I decided to just rebuild. I have a > > backup of my /etc and /usr/local/etc on a different drive that > > should be fine, it was just mounted under /mnt normally and used > > for backups. My problem is that I installed 7.1 and was careful > > not to erase any data on that drive, but my only options for a > > partition to mount is /dev/ad2s1. When I try to mount that it > > gives me "mount: /dev/ad2s1 : Operation not permitted", what can > > I do to get the data off of it? I only really care about my /etc > > information but it would be nice to get all of the information > > off of it. > > Supposing ad2s1 is in fact the slice containing the filesystem in > question, and the filesystem was originally made directly on that > slice without partitioning it, it should be possible to run dump(8) > against it and pipe the output to restore(8). This should work if > the slice is readable, even if it cannot be mounted. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 21:55:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E4C106566B for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:55:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7BA8FC17 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:55:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n0CLsdhY019786; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:54:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id n0CLsdMK019785; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:54:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:54:39 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: mojo fms Message-ID: <20090112215439.GA19760@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <496ab572.u2DH1w2B2JAcv4M+%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting a partition from freebsd 6.2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:55:04 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 01:15:52PM -0800, mojo fms wrote: > I can run a check disk on it and it returned that the file system was > previously mounted on /mnt/backup and returns that the file system is in > good shape. I will have to wait until I get back in front of it to attempt > the dump piped to restore. I have never had to recover a drive like that, > is there anything specific I should look at for switches or just dump > /dev/ad2s1 | restore? Use: dump 0af - | restore -rf - > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:13 PM, wrote: > > > "mojo fms" wrote: > > > > > I was working on an upgrade to 6.3 from 6.2 and I lost power > > > during the install which hosed most of my system. Instead of > > > trying to really recover it I decided to just rebuild. I have a > > > backup of my /etc and /usr/local/etc on a different drive that > > > should be fine, it was just mounted under /mnt normally and used > > > for backups. My problem is that I installed 7.1 and was careful > > > not to erase any data on that drive, but my only options for a > > > partition to mount is /dev/ad2s1. When I try to mount that it > > > gives me "mount: /dev/ad2s1 : Operation not permitted", what can > > > I do to get the data off of it? I only really care about my /etc > > > information but it would be nice to get all of the information > > > off of it. Is it already mounted as something? Do a df -k and see what shows up. Was it just /dev/ad2s1 or more like /dev/ad2s1a (or some other partition letter? ////jerry > > > > Supposing ad2s1 is in fact the slice containing the filesystem in > > question, and the filesystem was originally made directly on that > > slice without partitioning it, it should be possible to run dump(8) > > against it and pipe the output to restore(8). This should work if > > the slice is readable, even if it cannot be mounted. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 01:14:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BD5106566B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenthe@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732988FC08 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenthe@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by QMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2oLw1b00e17dt5G57p0wDB; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:00:56 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.112] ([71.224.172.79]) by OMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2p0v1b0071j8Znr3Zp0v0l; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:00:56 +0000 Message-ID: <496BE775.6010805@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:59:33 -0500 From: Jason Lenthe User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090111) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ewald Jenisch References: <20090112162216.GA6391@aurora.oekb.co.at> In-Reply-To: <20090112162216.GA6391@aurora.oekb.co.at> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Printing - standard? CUPS? ...?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:14:12 -0000 Ewald Jenisch wrote: > > Should I go for the standard vanilla FreeBSD lpr that comes with the > system or use anything else? If "anything else" - what (CUPS,...?) > > Please note that I want to print both from gnome (X-win) as well as > via the commadline. > I was looking forward to using CUPS when I built my FreeBSD machine over year ago. I found that CUPS was a snap to set up and worked beautifully by itself. The problem was that certain other software (gtk+ and gnome as I recall) expected /usr/bin/lpr to be the CUPS lpr (the CUPS port normally installs lpr to /usr/local/bin). It was also necessary for some applications to have /usr/local/bin before /usr/bin in your path for certain applications to work. My memory is vague regarding the details, though. I remember seeing something on the internet that recommended setting a flag in the port to install CUPS to /usr/bin. That was too drastic for my tastes, so I decided to just set up FreeBSD printing and be done with it. By all means, give CUPS a try though. Sincerely, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 01:21:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9760106564A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772238FC0A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2009 20:21:32 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.4-GA) with ESMTP id PKA29672; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:21:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2009 20:21:27 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18795.60566.503581.897135@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:21:26 -0500 To: Jason Lenthe In-Reply-To: <496BE775.6010805@comcast.net> References: <20090112162216.GA6391@aurora.oekb.co.at> <496BE775.6010805@comcast.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Ewald Jenisch , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Printing - standard? CUPS? ...?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:21:33 -0000 Jason Lenthe writes: > I remember seeing something on the internet that recommended > setting a flag in the port to install CUPS to /usr/bin. That was > too drastic for my tastes, so I decided to just set up FreeBSD > printing and be done with it. From my /etc/make.conf: # # to make CUPS magically keep working # See: http://www.csua.berkeley.edu/~ranga/notes/freebsd_cups.html # CUPS_OVERWRITE_BASE= yes NO_LPR= true Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 02:42:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD0E106566B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763EE8FC0C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LMZEf-0006Jq-6J for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:42:33 +0000 Received: from ip72-210-64-216.mc.at.cox.net ([72.210.64.216]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:42:33 +0000 Received: from jvk-list by ip72-210-64-216.mc.at.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:42:33 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Joe Kraft Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:44:11 -0500 Lines: 21 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip72-210-64-216.mc.at.cox.net User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 Sender: news Subject: Looking for pointer to VPN / IPSEC info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jvk-list@thekrafts.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:42:38 -0000 I have a personal network behind a FreeBSD firewall running IPFW. It's been working fine for years, but as I'm getting more mobile in my work I'd like to be able to access my network while traveling. At work the problem is solved with an IPSEC VPN client that I run to connect to the appropriate server. As I looked through my normal traveling gear my laptop (Windows XP Pro) and handheld (iPaq 211) both seem to have IPSEC clients built in. Can someone point me to a VPN for dummies documentation so I can set up my firewall to also provide me an access point for me to connect to my home network while I'm travelling? I've looked through the handbook, but it seems to only discuss the old KAME version of IPSEC and also doesn't appear to apply to my situation where the client will have some random IP address. I appreciate any pointers to HOWTO documents, books or other references that might be of use to further my education. Joe. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 04:44:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC141065670 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:44:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF108FC0C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:44:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so12533305rvf.43 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:44:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qUsvMcozPLuiyAzqYM3kZJUll6jST67Fyh6wuz7dTzM=; b=Ad9SMyTvvjtBUnhLui9bLyaLzwk8ZHQGaInRwRhtdJOHTU1j2PHjzqfX3iSPxiH6vy Ya72oIfs5ekssTnNBffU3ZfWInGvBbjRRcjbu1qelyN5jVn/FCgiSdYeTEtek/mM3TzG TCttEKuYzFqjbuQPLQ+R1IAXg8BAr59KkmHfI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=F9C/AmGY9TGYyMbBUsLhrRcaaTLJjOCZr3zQ3N1qGv/iqLIAVaUhtpNhQl3/ycDSlJ gqoDFkfEXfYAPHwJN+fRfDZ59o9aw5wL6/pBzGscCi0y379114MNuEcNFnYnZ/s7eu67 U5CB2NJPi3b0nlqnAGheaVl6vY0Gy1T7WS21g= Received: by 10.141.13.16 with SMTP id q16mr15096354rvi.5.1231821853198; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:44:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.4.70? (c-68-35-57-46.hsd1.nm.comcast.net [68.35.57.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g31sm76184411rvb.4.2009.01.12.20.44.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:44:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <496C1C2A.9030505@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:44:26 -0700 From: Tim Judd User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aggelidis Nikos References: <30fc78250901091029j7a665b16ta260861a92b50002@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <30fc78250901091029j7a665b16ta260861a92b50002@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: weird samba error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:44:13 -0000 Aggelidis Nikos wrote: > hi to all the list, > > i have a question concerning samba and freebsd: > > whenever i use the option username map = /usr/local/etc/samba/smbusers > in my smb.conf > , and i try to connect to samba server like this > > #smbclient //apollo/username > Password: > session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE > > i get this error even though i type the password correctly... > > here is the smb.conf i use: > > $cat /usr/local/etc/smb.conf > [global] > netbios name = apollo > workgroup = PHOME > server string = Freebsd File Server > dns proxy = No > > security = user > encrypt passwords = yes > passdb backend = smbpasswd > smb passwd file = /usr/local/etc/samba/smbpasswd > > #*this options creates all the problems* > #username map = /usr/local/etc/samba/smbusers > > debug timestamp = no > log level = 1 > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 50 > > hosts allow = 192.168.1., 192.168.2., 127. > > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > read only = No > browseable = No > > #cat /usr/local/etc/samba/smbusers > > # Unix_name = SMB_Name1 SMB_Name2 ... > # map_to = map_from > root = administrator > nobody = guest smbguest pcguest > username = username anotherusername > > any idea why this happens?or how i should investigate it more? > > thanks in advance > -nicolas > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I don't have a link, but a friend had similar problems. He searched the list archives and the proposed solution (which worked for him) was username case sensitivity. I think it's the windows side that needs ALL CAPS for the usernames for this mapping to work. Please try that. (and try the opposite if the first doesn't work). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 05:44:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28661106564A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:44:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8FBC8FC12 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:44:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so12555118rvf.43 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:44:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=n+kbU1XEJQSBdYf4FR7jttcF9YXS4IIMSeAMVvsjWWo=; b=QD1UYT5iuv++Zqxbsg8D9rI/2PO3iwtQj4gBwGr8YgWtaQxRm9gFavbmVJOnCwcMYR NYQ5ViqRRR3JjFgBjzt21rV8iKnl29SRZM+As3aezvtiHHnnTog9DFIxVvwsKLhmp6aj ozusLTkMVcK9wslQXrPepaXJIliKU22gv2iO8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fp0uNSNAQDYLL+gtO7vI/qx8xrNx7R2dj1CnNUFN9r0BXKq8kWk9dDI14dtOhmYN5Y 5PZ/M6WsroqAYYw/H/QEcnP6V1+IyvVoZC1DcidFDzA5MsX011D6SE/8bxNkTde606zr n7SbbBEu/yId/mL0AMOX94j0Lkn9x3RIuDUac= Received: by 10.114.193.15 with SMTP id q15mr20024478waf.199.1231825447112; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:44:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.4.70? (c-68-35-57-46.hsd1.nm.comcast.net [68.35.57.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z20sm46258102pod.26.2009.01.12.21.44.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:44:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <496C2A39.5070204@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:44:25 -0700 From: Tim Judd User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rem P Roberti , freebsd general questions References: <4965AFDD.9000002@comcast.net> <4965B542.6060303@boosten.org> <4965B726.6020004@comcast.net> <4965B8E2.5050608@comcast.net> <4965BB00.7040302@boosten.org> <4965BE01.8050709@comcast.net> <4965C487.3070000@boosten.org> <49662509.2060206@comcast.net> <49668513.1080808@gmail.com> <49668B88.6080704@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <49668B88.6080704@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Help with dmesg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:44:08 -0000 Rem P Roberti wrote: > >> if I remember rigth I had the same problem months ago, but I'm not >> really sure how I solved it. >> First try to delete the lines 44 - 49 of yourr's .cf file. then try to >> restart sendmail. >> if that doesn't work try dnl after every line in the .mc file. e.x >> INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clmilter',`S=local:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock,F=, >> T=S:4m;R:4m') dnl >> I think something like that I did and it works. But I'm not so sure. >> >> > > I decided to start from scratch, and got rid of all the files generated > by the "make" command. So now my /etc/mail directory looks just as it > did when I started. Instead of creating a whole new > batch of files I decided to just start by running the "newaliases" > command and here's what I got: > > root@ /etc/mail: newaliases > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: line 48: unknown configuration line " > " > clearly (I think) the problem has nothing to do with the files generated > by "make". Something > appears to be messed up with sendmail.cf (at least according to the > error message), but I don't > see how that is possible. Line 48 in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf is blank! > > Rem > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" The screen doesn't print all characters. 3 examples are 0x00, 0x0a, 0x0d. NULL, and (newline/return). I have a feeling there's a unprintable character in there and sendmail's bawking at it. I don't use sendmail, personally -- too inexperienced and the configuration process confuses me. So in layman terms: Clear all blank and commented lines out of the .cf file For good measure, hexdump the saved file to see if you find any abnormal characters for sendmail. What I'm unsure of, is after clearing the .cf file up, does sendmail have this configuration in memory so it will CONSTANTLY complain until a new config is generated? This, compared to say any other common app that reads it's .conf file at startup and doesn't keep any of it as part of the binary itself. I feel I didn't explain this very well. PLEASE notify me if you feel this is true. I'll try to re-explain myself differently then. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 06:07:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4113E1065672 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:07:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@mi.celestial.com) Received: from dorsai-02.celestial.com (dorsai-02.celestial.com [192.136.111.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D22F8FC12 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:07:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@mi.celestial.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dorsai-02.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7900E20449A3 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:47:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at celestial.com Received: from dorsai-02.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dorsai-02.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bk1P2k3OtvXf for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:47:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com (hayek.celestial.com [192.136.111.12]) by dorsai-02.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D34620242D5 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:47:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1877768D48404; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:47:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mi.celestial.com Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ayn.mi.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nidCVFAVcwCS; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:47:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id DB41268D483FD; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:47:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:47:45 -0800 From: Bill Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090113054745.GA14636@ayn.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 OpenPKG/% (2008-05-17) Subject: Re: Looking for pointer to VPN / IPSEC info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:07:27 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2009, Joe Kraft wrote: >I have a personal network behind a FreeBSD firewall running IPFW. It's been >working fine for years, but as I'm getting more mobile in my work I'd like >to be able to access my network while traveling. > >At work the problem is solved with an IPSEC VPN client that I run to connect >to the appropriate server. As I looked through my normal traveling gear my >laptop (Windows XP Pro) and handheld (iPaq 211) both seem to have IPSEC >clients built in. > >Can someone point me to a VPN for dummies documentation so I can set up my >firewall to also provide me an access point for me to connect to my home >network while I'm travelling? We usually use OpenVPN rather than IPSec as it's generally easier to set up, works from roaming systems behind NAT firewalls, and there are easy-to-use clients for Windows, OS X, Linux, and various other flavors of Unix. OpenVPN uses user-space SSL, and does not require any kernel support. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way Voice: (206) 236-1676 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820 Fax: (206) 232-9186 Currencies do not float, they sink at different rates. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 06:09:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5BB1065674 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5C48FC0C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so12564479rvf.43 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:09:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GF9AzMHyM0bCzc5yw5L6ORRc5tr68+LF0Q/2VcVfAYA=; b=l1CyKKD6GVTA0v/jR7Xd5GwNU2IOrAag+i/HFt3fdaGJgjZW9oDsNpbwZ4/J4DheBQ cNDinRVGHW4fLwQvU72vPsCotNtiE84eCzvkclHPXg3LHYWOr1snHpX47DG3JcidG6OZ FU2f2G0SytZ0mZBtL7kz9gEovaFm/NxSmvhdI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=s0GZjFQAOxVW/28DauuKJUs7ULOXb2ow8No03xkK0MmfwF0Cy92doz0nix4n8njehS awDCJh4gROSjbygh2iyLundQ36AUYL5ecaPvJgPKcvlwVQr1lQW9TJ6Kl0o2UgIAGMi3 i/2j1tgEn2+Y4PFjvq26eQanZehQIKEDx01R8= Received: by 10.114.124.1 with SMTP id w1mr20036508wac.135.1231826993209; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:09:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.4.70? (c-68-35-57-46.hsd1.nm.comcast.net [68.35.57.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y25sm35295585pod.24.2009.01.12.22.09.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:09:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <496C3032.9060003@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:09:54 -0700 From: Tim Judd User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Peel References: <9F57CF00DDE541E69F500E26B652DDED@GRANTPC> <20090107205826.GA93439@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jerry McAllister , FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Replace SCSI Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:09:54 -0000 Not to be presumptious, or rude, but I've read the first part of this thread (a bit late, yes) and I'm just confused. If you're going to go so far as to prep the drive at home, before driving to the NOC, with a unrunnable OS on a labeled disk, it seems silly. I propose: Do a typical install of FreeBSD 6.4/7.1 on this disk. Let it be as full as to boot an operating system (but maybe skip out on the networking blah blah setups). Bring this (verified) bootable disk to the NOC, install it as da0 Move the old, 73GB failing disk to da1 Boot the Dell, maybe running in single-user mode You've got a pristine format (or pristine enough) to restore the filesystems on top of it. Rebooting with da0 again to see if your network settings, startup, apps, etc etc etc all start as appropriate. Only if this method fails, do you use the Fixit CD and "fix it" Am I crazy to think this is the more logical, more straightforward way to perform this migration? If Grant has already done the job, more power to him, but I just found it a little confusing that one would label a drive, format it, and possibly spend more time with the slower CD-ROM based Fixit than running off a nice, new 10k/15k RPM drive to drive everything. If my method above is failing a point, I'd be more than happy to hear your statements and correct my procedures for it. My method above has only one tricky part, is to restore the 'a' partition from olddrive to newdrive. -- and that is probably a piece of cake. Grant, good luck (if you haven't done it yet). --Tim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 06:12:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E121065689 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:12:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@socket.net) Received: from mf5.socket.net (mf5b.socket.net [216.106.26.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C8D8FC12 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:12:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@socket.net) Received: from [10.129.40.202] (216.106.31.239.reverse.socket.net [216.106.31.239]) by mf5.socket.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E458591E8 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:57:16 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: From: Jay Hall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:56:45 -0600 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) Subject: NFS or an alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:12:09 -0000 I am in the process of redesigning my organization's network. And, since we will be using mostly Macintosh OS X clients, I am considering using NFS. However, I will need the ability to perform user/group authentication since users may not always log in from the same PC. Essentially, each user has a home directory which only they, and possibly their secretary, needs to have access to. And, we have directories which groups of people need access to. From the reading I have done this evening, my understanding is NFSv4 will meet all of these needs. Is this correct? And, is there a better way to accomplish this? Thanks, Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 06:21:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB940106566B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:21:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@mi.celestial.com) Received: from dorsai-02.celestial.com (dorsai-02.celestial.com [192.136.111.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9611E8FC13 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:21:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@mi.celestial.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dorsai-02.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE44C20449A3 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:21:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at celestial.com Received: from dorsai-02.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dorsai-02.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id eee3BsXByhh0 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:21:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com (hayek.celestial.com [192.136.111.12]) by dorsai-02.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8525C20242D5 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:21:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582F968D483E5; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:21:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mi.celestial.com Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ayn.mi.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NfpqMFxLmYr0; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:21:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id 2FEFD68614781; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:21:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:21:35 -0800 From: Bill Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090113062135.GA11790@ayn.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 OpenPKG/% (2008-05-17) Subject: Re: NFS or an alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:21:37 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2009, Jay Hall wrote: > I am in the process of redesigning my organization's network. And, > since we will be using mostly Macintosh OS X clients, I am considering > using NFS. However, I will need the ability to perform user/group > authentication since users may not always log in from the same PC. > > Essentially, each user has a home directory which only they, and > possibly their secretary, needs to have access to. And, we have > directories which groups of people need access to. > > From the reading I have done this evening, my understanding is NFSv4 > will meet all of these needs. Is this correct? And, is there a better > way to accomplish this? NFS is only part of the problem. We have done this using OS X, Linux, and FreeBSD clients using openldap for authentication and the amd automounter to handle home directories when there are multiple machines on which user's home directories may be found. When we create the openldap records, we map /home/username to /homes/username to avoid conflict with client machine's local user's directories. We have one system with about 10,000 users with multiple client machines handling mail delivery, pop, and imap to user's Maildir stores with the NFS mounted $HOME directories which has been working without a hitch for several years. In this case the main systems /home directory is NFS mounted to /homes on the client machine, specifying the tcp protocol for maximum reliability. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way Voice: (206) 236-1676 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820 Fax: (206) 232-9186 Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws. -- Mayer Amschel Rothschild From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 06:49:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53358106566B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AA68FC14 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c2so3954795anc.13 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:49:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; bh=d7a/D+BWAkasfocyKvuRxk/NxZHgcKELixw2IfmyXKA=; b=fvD58nMUGinUNpI+nHyXi2T0KZZXvGt0vSpGYJYgiITsNq+l/riDHzzkwqRRgKX5Y0 wed2h655Ly+FpPrhRdzDOoLyhcYv0xr+0WQSAHwg+JQHRFf3j379YF+itNLbeiI9yUVT qoWaOjjfrObM/bjFZ2E/jt3BZAxCsbEvT0lmk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language; b=Olbr2n3UfjFfsoebQAHB9IufDbwcFsYvjRIo/MGxjXzc22vLmWWci0Te6a349OnER/ N1d10D9NtsJVIa6o7OdD6f1dOF0rXTp9QoOpAlgC/yvOE0GZEmwS+3gDPtsYuI7sErAd XifHLihU1Qye6azxbfTYFZ1f0vvuoLnLBd3PA= Received: by 10.65.116.10 with SMTP id t10mr5051524qbm.103.1231829365121; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:49:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from vms1 (206-248-190-95.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.190.95]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p30sm48951410qbp.37.2009.01.12.22.49.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:49:24 -0800 (PST) From: "Ansar Mohammed" To: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:49:12 -0500 Message-ID: <000601c9754b$0b75b430$22611c90$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acl1Swra3T5/RUhhTAGw6tCPg4CI/w== Content-Language: en-us Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Heimdal 0.6.3 in FreeBSD 7.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:49:26 -0000 Is there any chance that a more recent version of heimdal would be = included in a future release of FreeBSD? The current version is pretty archaic.=20 =20 =20 kronos# kadmin -v kadmin (Heimdal 0.6.3) Copyright 1999-2004 Kungliga Tekniska H=F6gskolan Send bug-reports to heimdal-bugs@pdc.kth.se =20 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 08:13:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61270106564A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3928FC16 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id n0D8D9ei072027 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:13:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id n0D8D9AJ072026; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:13:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA10974; Tue, 13 Jan 09 00:04:19 PST Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:06:25 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: fbsdlilly@gmail.com Message-Id: <496c4b81.Lglr2e+9+Rgvmrp3%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <496ab572.u2DH1w2B2JAcv4M+%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20090112215439.GA19760@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20090112215439.GA19760@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting a partition from freebsd 6.2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:13:10 -0000 > > is there anything specific I should look at for switches or > > just dump /dev/ad2s1 | restore? > > Use: dump 0af - | restore -rf - It would be advisable to read the dump and restore manpages first. In 6.1, and I suspect still in 6.2, "restore -r" should be used only when restoring onto an empty filesystem or loading an incremental on top of such a full restore. If the destination (current directory) is not the root of an empty filesystem, you want "restore -x" or "restore -i" instead. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 08:38:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BC1106564A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mx1.esiee.fr (mx1.esiee.fr [147.215.1.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E070A8FC19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:38:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C758136820; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:38:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VAMS.dummy (Postfix) with SMTP id 11AD62B26C; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:38:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from lisa.esiee.fr (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F3D32AC3; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:38:48 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <496C5318.4040805@esiee.fr> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:38:48 +0100 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081003) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jos Chrispijn References: <49670974.2060202@esiee.fr> <44sknr2ozn.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <496A158A.6060703@webrz.net> <496B35E0.6070103@esiee.fr> In-Reply-To: <496B35E0.6070103@esiee.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.1 : watchdog bge0 timeout ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:38:50 -0000 I'm gonna retry installing 7.1 today on a different hardware machine ( an older one ) let's see what happen then. Frank Bonnet wrote: > Jos Chrispijn wrote: >> [Lowell Gilbert] Uit een eerder bericht van 10-1-2009 15:51 :: >>> Could be hardware trouble, I suppose. >>> >> I know FreeBSD can detect hardware probs better than other OS'es; but >> why didn't 6.x detect this malfunction then? >> I believe Murphy and his law, but for mee it seems a little bit too >> accidentally L-) >> >> regards, >> Jos Chrispijn > > > Well I have re-install the machine at 6.4 and it runs WITHOUT any trouble > with exactly same softwares ( OS + Postfix + Postgrey ) > > At 7.1 the machine hanged after running few hours ( ~2 ) > > At 6.4 it runs since 3 days without problem. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Cordialement Frank Bonnet ESIEE Paris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 09:26:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CEC106566B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:26:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C88D8FC1C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:26:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LMfXg-0002Ij-BQ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:26:36 +0000 Received: from ip72-210-64-216.mc.at.cox.net ([72.210.64.216]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:26:36 +0000 Received: from jvk-list by ip72-210-64-216.mc.at.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:26:36 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Joe Kraft Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:28:16 -0500 Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <20090113054745.GA14636@ayn.mi.celestial.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip72-210-64-216.mc.at.cox.net User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 Sender: news Subject: Re: Looking for pointer to VPN / IPSEC info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jvk-list@thekrafts.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:26:41 -0000 Bill Campbell wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009, Joe Kraft wrote: >>I have a personal network behind a FreeBSD firewall running IPFW. It's >>been working fine for years, but as I'm getting more mobile in my work I'd >>like to be able to access my network while traveling. >> >>At work the problem is solved with an IPSEC VPN client that I run to >>connect >>to the appropriate server. As I looked through my normal traveling gear >>my laptop (Windows XP Pro) and handheld (iPaq 211) both seem to have IPSEC >>clients built in. >> >>Can someone point me to a VPN for dummies documentation so I can set up my >>firewall to also provide me an access point for me to connect to my home >>network while I'm travelling? > > We usually use OpenVPN rather than IPSec as it's generally easier > to set up, works from roaming systems behind NAT firewalls, and > there are easy-to-use clients for Windows, OS X, Linux, and > various other flavors of Unix. OpenVPN uses user-space SSL, and > does not require any kernel support. > > Bill Thanks for the pointer, OpenVPN looks great. I don't see support for Windows Mobile clients though, I did find a project to build a client but it didn't seem to be complete though. Joe. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 10:41:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC19E1065670 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:41:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be) Received: from hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be [143.129.75.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C238FC18 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:41:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be) Received: from hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0DAfRCX015637 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:41:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (pdon@localhost) by hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id n0DAfRro015634 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:41:27 +0100 (CET) X-Authentication-Warning: hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be: pdon owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:41:26 +0100 (CET) From: Pieter Donche X-X-Sender: pdon@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be To: "mail.list freebsd-questions" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: mountd, DNS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pieter Donche List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:41:30 -0000 Installed FreeBSD-amd64 and asked to set up NFS server and client during sysinstall. In the boot process, at 'mountd' it takes some time, then: Jan 12 14:36:10 macos mountd[686]: can't get address info for host hmacs.cmi.ua .ac.be Jan 12 14:36:10 macos mountd[686]: bad host hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be, skipping Jan 12 14:36:10 macos mountd[686]: bad exports lists line /home hmacs.cmi.ua.a c.be When adding a line 143.129.75.10 hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be in /etc/hosts (via vi) this messages disappears. I can use NFS. But why is this needed? I can use DNS names for any other host (ssh-ing to them works..) so why not for this at boot time ? of is this normal? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 10:58:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3D11065674 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:58:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yoniy@mellanox.co.il) Received: from mellanox.co.il (mail.mellanox.co.il [194.90.237.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666C18FC1A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:58:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yoniy@mellanox.co.il) Received: from Internal Mail-Server by MTLPINE1 (envelope-from yoniy@mellanox.co.il) with SMTP; 13 Jan 2009 12:58:34 +0200 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:58:32 +0200 Message-ID: <5D49E7A8952DC44FB38C38FA0D758EAD01736127@mtlexch01.mtl.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Using device.hints to determine network device unit number Thread-Index: Acl1beAG6FuxsdXgT3+8lg6M7YA9JQ== From: "Yehonatan Yossef" To: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Eitan Shefi , Oleg Kats , Liran Liss Subject: Using device.hints to determine network device unit number X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:58:39 -0000 Hi,=20 =20 I would like to determine the unit number of my network cards, make the device on pci0:16 appear always as mtnic0 and pci0:9 appear always as mtnic1. =20 # pciconf -l | grep mtnic mtnic0@pci0:19:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x001715b3 = chip=3D0x636815b3 rev=3D0xa0 hdr=3D0x00 mtnic1@pci0:16:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x001715b3 = chip=3D0x636815b3 rev=3D0xa0 hdr=3D0x00 =20 Is it done by /boot/device.hints? if so, how? I've tried: =20 hint.mtnic.0.at=3D"pci0:16" hint.mtnic.1.at=3D"pci0:19" =20 but it doesn't work. They keep switching upon reboot. I'm using FreeBSD 7.0. =20 Thanks Yony =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 11:03:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D79106564A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be) Received: from hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be [143.129.75.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECCD8FC13 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be) Received: from hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0DB3HuW016502 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:03:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (pdon@localhost) by hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id n0DB3HEp016499 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:03:17 +0100 (CET) X-Authentication-Warning: hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be: pdon owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:03:17 +0100 (CET) From: Pieter Donche X-X-Sender: pdon@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be To: "mail.list freebsd-questions" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: 2 networkcards in 1 system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pieter Donche List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:18 -0000 I installed FreeBSD-amd64 on a system which has 2 networkcards and configured 1 networkcard with its IP parameters. Now I want to add the second networkcard, and did: # sysinstall do Post-Install Configuratio Configure additional Netwerk Services Configure additional network interface and selected em1 and gave it its IP parameters (I used the same hostname macos.cmi.ua.ac.be, in the DNS servers here macos.cmi.ua.ac.be is assigned to two IP addresses) (After rebooting, em1 appears in the boot messages with the correct Mac- and IP address.. ) But I get many messages: Jan 13 11:05:25 macos kernel: arp: 143.129.XX.YY is on em0 but got reply from 00:1b:21:UU:VV:WW on em1 Jan 13 11:54.25 macos kernel: arp: 143.129.XX.YY is on em0 but got reply from 03:ba:14:UU:VV:WW on em1 ( 143.129.XX.YY is our gateway or other system, the MAC address is the mac-addres of our gateway or that other system ) Why is this? How to remedy? Or do I need to 'deconfigure' em1? How can I do that? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 11:03:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0CF106567C; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yonyossef.lists@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D2F8FC14; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yonyossef.lists@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 30so233248ugs.39 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:03:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index :x-mimeole; bh=slyDW/xUnTsJKGKiYNFlQ3hh2pMuMxXfH7A23qrkE1A=; b=ssiQAWBxmSkLTwePBONVZkVqcRQ4QdM6caB0IifN+Xyrp+sXbWHA9NtBnGsdiAhJBE l6a/opy93V8sE4XDBHhnLoEgT5OaTWaAp1GWZC5oca/+ho4N1r7BI40sALUglKHPLKR5 CM8CMxeaUKhFMUhk8auZlHLCr7lfTe3dWlGeU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole; b=RrVtrHBUwCcbon1Q8xmmD/3iztlINzUCW4JrHIwOUHlaOMDEIOZGuTgHo2uqI7dW7q q7DH3LznQZku1VF+OJuaBaAHkuz1LNniGC12yq3odiJJ0GdUZxSa4UQfp0v2+qUK0KRC aBUEgFe5aepVR1GMv8w8AxDd2pNEACSAi8vLg= Received: by 10.67.100.10 with SMTP id c10mr1887083ugm.2.1231844613261; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:03:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtllpt03 (bzq-79-180-238-90.red.bezeqint.net [79.180.238.90]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 39sm874112ugb.43.2009.01.13.03.01.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:03:32 -0800 (PST) From: "Yony Yossef" To: , Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:01:43 +0200 Message-ID: <000501c9756e$9563d550$39ed1aac@mtl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Acl1beAG6FuxsdXgT3+8lg6M7YA9JQAABcXg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Eitan Shefi , Oleg Kats , Liran Liss Subject: Using device.hints to determine network device unit number X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:44 -0000 Hi, I would like to determine the unit number of my network cards, make the device on pci0:16 appear always as mtnic0 and pci0:9 appear always as mtnic1. # pciconf -l | grep mtnic mtnic0@pci0:19:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x001715b3 chip=0x636815b3 rev=0xa0 hdr=0x00 mtnic1@pci0:16:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x001715b3 chip=0x636815b3 rev=0xa0 hdr=0x00 Is it done by /boot/device.hints? if so, how? I've tried: hint.mtnic.0.at="pci0:16" hint.mtnic.1.at="pci0:19" but it doesn't work. They keep switching upon reboot. I'm using FreeBSD 7.0. Thanks Yony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 11:10:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1141065673 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:10:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F3B8FC14 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:10:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0DB7wjv012310 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:07:58 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.2/8.12.11) id n0DBAifE093409; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:10:44 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:10:44 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200901131110.n0DBAifE093409@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be In-reply-to: (message from Pieter Donche on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:03:17 +0100 (CET)) References: X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 networkcards in 1 system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:10:49 -0000 Hi, > and selected em1 and gave it its IP parameters > (I used the same hostname macos.cmi.ua.ac.be, in the DNS servers here > macos.cmi.ua.ac.be is assigned to two IP addresses) First I doubt that this will work. You can assign several names to a single IP address in DNS, but you cannot assign several IP to the same name. > (After rebooting, em1 appears in the boot messages with the correct > Mac- and IP address.. ) > > But I get many messages: > Jan 13 11:05:25 macos kernel: arp: 143.129.XX.YY is on em0 but got reply > from 00:1b:21:UU:VV:WW on em1 > Jan 13 11:54.25 macos kernel: arp: 143.129.XX.YY is on em0 but got reply > from 03:ba:14:UU:VV:WW on em1 Let me guess, both NIC are connected to the same network? If so you cannot predict what interface will reply first, so you can send a packet through one interface and get a reply from the other interface. In standard operation, you don't want to have your two NICs connected to the same LAN with and IP in the same subnet. > Or do I need to 'deconfigure' em1? How can I do that? Edit /etc/rc.conf and remove all the lines that start with: ifconfig_em1 Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 11:12:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7735106564A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:12:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f20.google.com (mail-bw0-f20.google.com [209.85.218.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475B88FC18 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:12:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so7943620bwz.19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:12:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=8SaRDjv0y+sMo0cgUUVkRj5j4d6X2KDXbGxosi8USpo=; b=DUtEvmfcruv55ZDhwVvuAi/qMrfhrmNvnUcvfUETZINxvPX6yM66p5rGfnWlMFpm4c yVwnwcTHtRwBGdm0NpGLoLtKU4sNFK80mI3Sffxcdubm9mGViHyzWSehL3WqR8c4jAz2 vH19w9wsUTGz3qh/uRa3ZQazudV7MGJhvCV2s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=D+TTNiuxNoEzyIc401lCrAWlem6OFRXuSuRi1zzLXmjPa0KW5oeWlQcuNOn3VaaCn3 QzUrkLVp9WSfxDe/bwTrHPSUm9FjfkXt0a7pJ8L0A91iyEP6Gvdg3dCMWbV5a9/y09L0 TbSTVPSd4DLXUyoQN/Yz8AF4jNnlEM+tWZEbc= Received: by 10.223.107.9 with SMTP id z9mr22466728fao.1.1231845164131; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:12:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.104.15 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:12:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <991123400901130312g1df4dda3rbace744ef9b944c4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:12:44 +0300 From: "Odhiambo Washington" To: "Pieter Donche" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "mail.list freebsd-questions" Subject: Re: 2 networkcards in 1 system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:12:47 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Pieter Donche wrote: > I installed FreeBSD-amd64 on a system which has 2 networkcards and > configured > 1 networkcard with its IP parameters. > > Now I want to add the second networkcard, and did: > # sysinstall > do Post-Install Configuratio > Configure additional Netwerk Services > Configure additional network interface > and selected em1 and gave it its IP parameters > (I used the same hostname macos.cmi.ua.ac.be, in the DNS servers here > macos.cmi.ua.ac.be is assigned to two IP addresses) > > (After rebooting, em1 appears in the boot messages with the correct > Mac- and IP address.. ) > > But I get many messages: > Jan 13 11:05:25 macos kernel: arp: 143.129.XX.YY is on em0 but got reply > from 00:1b:21:UU:VV:WW on em1 > Jan 13 11:54.25 macos kernel: arp: 143.129.XX.YY is on em0 but got reply > from 03:ba:14:UU:VV:WW on em1 > > ( 143.129.XX.YY is our gateway or other system, the MAC address > is the mac-addres of our gateway or that other system ) > > Why is this? How to remedy? You can add the following two lines to /etc/sysctl.conf: net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2 net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 ...and reboot or type, as root, sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2 sysctl -w net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 > > Or do I need to 'deconfigure' em1? How can I do that? Edit /etc/rc.conf manually, either using ee or vi and comment out the lines you don't want active. You have connected the two network cards to the same switch, yes? don't do that. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently." --Henry Ford From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 11:34:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4764F106566B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:34:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: from mail.procreditbank.bg (mail.procreditbank.bg [193.26.216.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B0798FC13 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:34:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: (qmail 68531 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2009 13:29:43 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO domino.procreditbank.bg) (10.0.0.15) by 192.168.1.3 with SMTP; 13 Jan 2009 13:29:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: To: Pieter Donche MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0.3 September 26, 2007 From: Ivailo Tanusheff Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:07:49 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on DOMINO/BULGARIA/PROCREDITBANK(Release 7.0.2FP2|May 14, 2007) at 13.01.2009 13:07:49, Serialize complete at 13.01.2009 13:07:49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "mail.list freebsd-questions" , owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 networkcards in 1 system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:34:32 -0000 I suppose you use both NICs on a same network - you use common network segment or use common switch/hub. This is an old issue - try to change the segment or use vlans on the switch :) Regards, Ivailo Tanusheff Deputy Head of IT Department ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD Pieter Donche Sent by: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 13.01.2009 13:04 Please respond to Pieter Donche To "mail.list freebsd-questions" cc Subject 2 networkcards in 1 system I installed FreeBSD-amd64 on a system which has 2 networkcards and configured 1 networkcard with its IP parameters. Now I want to add the second networkcard, and did: # sysinstall do Post-Install Configuratio Configure additional Netwerk Services Configure additional network interface and selected em1 and gave it its IP parameters (I used the same hostname macos.cmi.ua.ac.be, in the DNS servers here macos.cmi.ua.ac.be is assigned to two IP addresses) (After rebooting, em1 appears in the boot messages with the correct Mac- and IP address.. ) But I get many messages: Jan 13 11:05:25 macos kernel: arp: 143.129.XX.YY is on em0 but got reply from 00:1b:21:UU:VV:WW on em1 Jan 13 11:54.25 macos kernel: arp: 143.129.XX.YY is on em0 but got reply from 03:ba:14:UU:VV:WW on em1 ( 143.129.XX.YY is our gateway or other system, the MAC address is the mac-addres of our gateway or that other system ) Why is this? How to remedy? Or do I need to 'deconfigure' em1? How can I do that? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 12:03:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3380B1065674 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:03:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luizbcampos@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16C58FC14 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luizbcampos@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c2so3989124anc.13 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:02:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=Y70BVPDQFgjPvyZMYqaNy8KftrmeHzl9XXyOb0b00fI=; b=WGtgBCdXQ2ar9DZEvghuAtut2PkzQZng5LROsLNMgCrCg+1PlKeh8MT2doCj2jV5kH JWDoJwGRHtLHIVT8A+dJn03KtNizwRIhsDF2ofqEzvPltThGZfv3i/KuBbRwIT1pHVO/ VrGafOuC5Je1/bpTmj55xz/qP2V3b2UZrNihI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=NJKYjkawqtcLp5rKJF7dr32UAVwlHdA7x2OKQzYgn+VhpnlmbvX9otWDgAk1gkX8Z3 u/ByVoAQqzVAkyfHtXfoizQhccRCIhloZhd8vu2ljWsEMUEZzj45S4By5GZAUxqBygVJ 8VPMwGKyou7sfjJOnaWVAKB+C1/7jj0ZYZQhA= Received: by 10.100.110.16 with SMTP id i16mr16325828anc.133.1231848179216; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:02:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.250.7 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:02:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:02:59 -0200 From: luizbcampos To: "FreeBSD Questions List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Disk Label Editor problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:03:12 -0000 I installed FreeBSD-7.0amd64 on my 40GB disk and I chose automatic partition at disk label editor. I need to download a 665GB OS but at a given moment the system complains about lack of space on the disk (469GB). It has happened for two times. ad4s1a 512MB* ad4s1b 2015MB SWAP ad4s1d 2031MB* ad4s1e 512MB* ad4s1f 33084MB* Is there any way to correct the problem without reinstalling the OS? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 12:04:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8939E106568F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:04:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp110.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp110.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E90F8FC16 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:04:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 84894 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2009 12:04:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To:Organization:X-Mailer:Face:X-Face:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=YzFzDHP/0mZdy6C5SUYM9dKr+nIa2bgsRJTHQwEo56rW9Y0DpWVrVV2MKHSUVWzI6j8dD3xvZg95yaFFfwSrGhSxSQ43lmb+2kd0pAiBCXuTb2aK8QyO7QxpAmJ+zHbEinyJPpFIjCK5D7b30WScm3s3Ax9pO4qTlE9sqptk1TU= ; Received: from unknown (HELO scorpio) (gesbbb@76.23.177.172 with login) by smtp110.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2009 12:04:22 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: KncsLvwVM1kYs4v2Za1Jmvo5xZOA4oD2riSLt6dMYBqZTdxLwtxDi.BF76OqUY3Zi7C0NYzv2gd._JH4AhKq_QoQvKp5Dl2zFSxD_gXI1BGeLlsjqO8TQkzADaYUioLJ8Vn7OwO8RLik_g6Ai4LilmBHXNEhZoiv__kceaOZAt5Nw7NtzGugn3uA98KQJTwMJnn_qlkiP8QBY1L5IZuBVtu.i0eOQQrufg-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:04:11 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090113070411.1e741238@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20081229105904.523e3494.bsd-unix@embarqmail.com> References: <20081229124558.43cefc56@gumby.homeunix.com> <200812292039.43242.masoom.shaikh@gmail.com> <20081229105904.523e3494.bsd-unix@embarqmail.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/BFl=W6T.+y0z=pA+IMc/1jW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: Re: local copy of handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:04:36 -0000 --Sig_/BFl=W6T.+y0z=pA+IMc/1jW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:59:04 -0500 Randy Pratt wrote: >You might consider using Docsnap. This allows you to maintain all >the FreeBSD documentation with a minimum of effort. > >Docsnap is an rsync repository for easy updating of installed >FreeBSD documentation (/usr/share/doc). > >The first run may take longer but subsequent updates take very >little time. Only the differences in the documents are transferred. >That is the main advantage but you also do not need to install ports >with hefty overhead to build documents. > >Rsync is only utility required (/usr/ports/net/rsync). Typical usage: > > # rsync -rltvz docsnap.sk.FreeBSD.org::docsnap /usr/share/doc/ > >For more information see http://docsnap.sk.freebsd.org/ and possibly >the rsync manual page. I reported last week that this was not working. It still fails with the following error message: ~ # rsync -rltvz docsnap.sk.FreeBSD.org::docsnap /usr/share/doc/ rsync: failed to connect to docsnap.sk.FreeBSD.org: Connection refused (61) rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(124) [receiver=3D3.0.5] I was under the impression that someone was looking into it. Is there any estimated time for the link to be fixed? --=20 Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com Strategy: A long-range plan whose merit cannot be evaluated until sometime after those creating it have left the organization. --Sig_/BFl=W6T.+y0z=pA+IMc/1jW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklsg0QACgkQBvaKIJWWCO0kXwCbBOTZrIySyF5uLdONEG0Hp2Q4 18wAnighaaJh0wMvzRfCfG2Pj6sukK5C =atx9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/BFl=W6T.+y0z=pA+IMc/1jW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 12:18:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D201065678 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:18:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ttdbsd@yahoo.com.au) Received: from n4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (n4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A2898FC16 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:18:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ttdbsd@yahoo.com.au) Received: from [76.13.13.25] by n4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2009 12:04:55 -0000 Received: from [76.13.10.172] by t4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2009 12:04:55 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp113.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2009 12:04:55 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 718647.7019.bm@omp113.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 63371 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Jan 2009 12:04:55 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=GPU0bI2i+MTs/nIrIrs5mi1q495cDo7ma/RM6IrFcG+w404NSVYxWwpKQ6LJCC4aV+v5bftuyaDsvyEAJgIutpQqeNQGvhuj8coSezUHZorEwvgsC6/prrMzxYuO/Fhn1ly0TwhtRSDSN05nzXkuDZFonxSC8irnaPEpWEbW10U=; X-YMail-OSG: j5HG3vYVM1nrScwBq.C_8aWio4No8d9hES9g_Dbb6JuqXgRt9_aau5grAbD6OudHLZvSHowtBjw3fvjdsYUl5xW_reZRP8QZUtDbp2nfndEBhnaJBefYea1dUs1J0Li8pB_WRcyU5yjK5C9Fcn23lclz1yGkiOYBI82Mvg14ihlffNgqr.C6n201TSWtySDbiGaIcans Received: from [203.219.159.120] by web59410.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:04:55 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:04:55 -0800 (PST) From: T D To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <519378.62483.qm@web59410.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Subject: FreeBSD 7.0 Installation error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:18:12 -0000 Hi people,=0A=0AHi people,=0AI am Tom and I have been attempting to install= FreeBSD 7.0 from a dvd.=0AI put the dvd in the drive and boot, the boot sc= reen appears with the options default, acpi disabled, safe mode, etc, I the= n select default.=0AThe hardware probing/detecting scrolls by and then come= s to a halt with the following line:=0A=0AGEOM_LABLE: Lable for provider ac= d0 is is09660/FreeBSD 7.=0A=0AI have also on other boot attempts tried acpi= disabled, safe mode with the same outcome.=0AHave selected single user on = another attempt and sysinstall program boots, after going through setting u= p the hard drive and paritions durring the install of the os the following = error occurs numerous times:=0A=0AWrite failure on transfer!=0A(write 0 byt= es of 1425408 bytes) 100%=0A=0AJust wondering if this has occured to any on= e else and how they got around it.=0ALook forward to replys, thanks=0A=0ATo= m=0A=0A=0A Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarte= r inbox. Take a look http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/smarterinbox From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 14:22:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE9F1065670 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:22:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com (mail-ew0-f21.google.com [209.85.219.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018BE8FC16 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so38333ewy.19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:22:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AKa9FjfE63/Z1E4DX/Ia5vwjAR6jS8hkLn5sxOPOYWs=; b=pZapbS5gQ2V7JkdanpJAvfd5j7TIhb3Ws7blgX8PJh8UrHrBSHG1PrDESmUy3PE8CJ eo9ipOvkRFckXo4DnZ/yJA94QDVrGH3/HZlby+tEYCwrYlXAddaGuwNd5cgTQ0DeH+LQ +cg26HaTIZc0CWKB1MQ87c9aac0/VSJMgG8Yk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pSooE5j4cYefO2l0oR8+2jDvxGEaoyYihUzRUSzDixju+D3w1WwPeXClRrSLeNEu3R 1GRJ6rMdSXM5FPBE0uR1AfFit6hGApU2RcuKD3WbIBGz0Fz5wHp2MFfEsCjIDeu5ovzc uexX2Pk277v/Sd087A61J42CpdtBJfTUuSXqU= Received: by 10.210.114.11 with SMTP id m11mr3616792ebc.147.1231856567286; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:22:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 2sm82187167nfv.66.2009.01.13.06.22.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:22:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:22:43 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090113142243.37b76f83@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Disk Label Editor problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:22:49 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:02:59 -0200 luizbcampos wrote: > I installed FreeBSD-7.0amd64 on my 40GB disk and I chose automatic > partition at disk label editor. I need to download a 665GB OS but at a > given moment the system complains about lack of space on the disk > (469GB). It has happened for two times. I presume that should be 665MB and 469MB > > ad4s1a 512MB* > ad4s1b 2015MB SWAP > ad4s1d 2031MB* > ad4s1e 512MB* > ad4s1f 33084MB* > > Is there any way to correct the problem without reinstalling the OS? You haven't really said what the problem is. What's the output of df -h, and where were you trying to save the file to? Offhand, I would guess you trying to save it to either /tmp or /root which doesn't have enough space. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 14:42:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297311065670 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:42:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B39C68FC16 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 80788 invoked by uid 89); 13 Jan 2009 14:55:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 13 Jan 2009 14:55:29 -0000 Message-ID: <496CA843.4060704@ibctech.ca> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:42:11 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Bertrand , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20090104203319.GA15823@teddy.fas.com> <20090104224540.GA18390@the-grills.com> <20090105215108.GA17430@teddy.fas.com> <20090106034523.GA25207@the-grills.com> <20090107022251.GA31012@teddy.fas.com> <49641B26.3070905@ibctech.ca> <20090107052009.GA3995@teddy.fas.com> <4964BD4A.4060300@ibctech.ca> <20090107213007.GA31144@teddy.fas.com> <49652559.3060804@ibctech.ca> <20090110164036.GA31237@teddy.fas.com> In-Reply-To: <20090110164036.GA31237@teddy.fas.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: PHP setup question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:42:24 -0000 stan wrote: > If you want to see what I have, It's reachable at > http://beachcave/net/ampache/ I can't reach it :) Reply with the proper URL and I'll have a look. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 14:46:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0861065673 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:46:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from thenetnow.com (constellation.thenetnow.com [65.39.193.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991B08FC08 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:46:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=[192.168.1.100]) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LMkX9-000OD9-Ci for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:46:23 -0500 Message-ID: <496CA938.60903@thenetnow.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:46:16 -0500 From: Grant Peel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20090112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD Transition Questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:46:25 -0000 Hi all, Well, over the past few days I have made the transition to FreeBSD (6.4) as the primary OS on my home computer. I am currently running GNOME as a desktop, and it seems to be running well. Indeed, I am using Thunderbird to write this email! I have a couple of questions regarding the transition: 1. Does there exist a port or package, a messenger program, that is compatible with Windoze Live Messenger? i.e. can I log in similar to live messenger and see my contacts and collaborate with them? 2. Can I use any type of pictures for the desktop wallpaper? Where might I find some good wallpaper depicting the FreeBSD Daemon and Logo? 3. How does one add a device to the desktop as an icon? i.e. an external USB drive? TIA, -Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 14:48:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B018210656C2 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:48:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ricardo.meb.jesus@gmail.com) Received: from gate.criticalsoftware.com (gate.criticalsoftware.com [212.13.37.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2058FC17 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:48:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ricardo.meb.jesus@gmail.com) Received: from [192.168.1.160] (unknown [192.168.1.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gate.criticalsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA8BE980B; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:48:54 +0000 (WET) Message-ID: <496CA9D7.1070802@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:48:55 +0000 From: Ricardo Jesus User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: luizbcampos References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Disk Label Editor problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ricardo.m.jesus@criticalsoftware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:48:57 -0000 luizbcampos wrote: > I installed FreeBSD-7.0amd64 on my 40GB disk and I chose automatic > partition at disk label editor. I need to download a 665GB OS but at a > given moment the system complains about lack of space on the disk > (469GB). It has happened for two times. > > ad4s1a 512MB* > ad4s1b 2015MB SWAP > ad4s1d 2031MB* > ad4s1e 512MB* > ad4s1f 33084MB* > > Is there any way to correct the problem without reinstalling the OS? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > The values you point don't add up (40GB HDD but you mention a download of 665GB). Consider maybe adding a new HDD. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:00:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D219106564A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:00:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B068FC1C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:00:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LMkkS-0000QP-6B for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:00:08 -0800 Message-ID: <21437407.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:00:08 -0800 (PST) From: regis505 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: regis505@gmail.com Subject: wireless nic - access point X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:00:09 -0000 I installed a D-Link WDA-2320 (Atheros chipset) wireless nic on my FreeBSD 7.1 system. I configured it as an access point. I read many posts on that topic and I am confused whether I need to bridge the wireless network to the wired network or just let the FreeBSD gateway to manage that. So far, I can connect from a wireless client to the FreeBSD Access Point (I can ping any machines on the wired network) but I cannot go beyond that and I would be very pleased if someone would explain what to do in terms of ipfilter NAT or routing to access the Internet from a wireless client. I have 3 network cards: ath0 (wireless - 10.0.2.0/24), bge0 (wired- 10.0.0.0/24), bce0 (Internet - DHCP). The wired network is behind an ipfilter firewall (10.0.0.1) and wired computers are NATed. Thanks for any hints! - Regis -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/wireless-nic---access-point-tp21437407p21437407.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:36:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35315106564A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:36:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5498FC18 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:36:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n0DFa3LH023225; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:36:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id n0DFa3u5023224; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:36:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:36:03 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Tim Judd Message-ID: <20090113153603.GA23181@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <9F57CF00DDE541E69F500E26B652DDED@GRANTPC> <20090107205826.GA93439@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <496C3032.9060003@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496C3032.9060003@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Jerry McAllister , Grant Peel , FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Replace SCSI Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:36:31 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:09:54PM -0700, Tim Judd wrote: > > > Not to be presumptious, or rude, but I've read the first part of this > thread (a bit late, yes) and I'm just confused. > > If you're going to go so far as to prep the drive at home, before > driving to the NOC, with a unrunnable OS on a labeled disk, it seems silly. > > I propose: > Do a typical install of FreeBSD 6.4/7.1 on this disk. Let it be as > full as to boot an operating system (but maybe skip out on the > networking blah blah setups). > Bring this (verified) bootable disk to the NOC, install it as da0 > Move the old, 73GB failing disk to da1 > Boot the Dell, maybe running in single-user mode > You've got a pristine format (or pristine enough) to restore the > filesystems on top of it. > Rebooting with da0 again to see if your network settings, startup, > apps, etc etc etc all start as appropriate. > > Only if this method fails, do you use the Fixit CD and "fix it" This is good, especially if he wants to upgrade to the next version of FreeBSD at the same time. But IIRC the problem is not that the OS currently on the disk does not work, but that there are some problems with the disk itself - but that it is still readable. It is more about replacing the disk with another presumed more reliable than the current one. So, in that case, it is much easier to take the few minutes to build the disk slice & partitions and then just do the dump/restores than to build everything new and then hand pick the things he wants to save from the old disk. But, if an upgrade is done at the same time - probably a good idea actually - then that hand picking will be done anyway, so might as well do it as you say. I took it straight from his original question rather than from the notion of doing an upgrade along the way. ////jerry > Am I crazy to think this is the more logical, more straightforward way > to perform this migration? If Grant has already done the job, more > power to him, but I just found it a little confusing that one would > label a drive, format it, and possibly spend more time with the slower > CD-ROM based Fixit than running off a nice, new 10k/15k RPM drive to > drive everything. > > If my method above is failing a point, I'd be more than happy to hear > your statements and correct my procedures for it. My method above has > only one tricky part, is to restore the 'a' partition from olddrive to > newdrive. -- and that is probably a piece of cake. > > > Grant, good luck (if you haven't done it yet). > > --Tim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:45:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33AE1065670 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:45:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C59C8FC19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:45:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n0DFjWgs023291; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:45:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id n0DFjWSs023290; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:45:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:45:32 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Message-ID: <20090113154532.GB23181@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <496ab572.u2DH1w2B2JAcv4M+%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20090112215439.GA19760@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <496c4b81.Lglr2e+9+Rgvmrp3%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496c4b81.Lglr2e+9+Rgvmrp3%perryh@pluto.rain.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: fbsdlilly@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting a partition from freebsd 6.2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:46:00 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:06:25AM -0800, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > > is there anything specific I should look at for switches or > > > just dump /dev/ad2s1 | restore? > > > > Use: dump 0af - | restore -rf - > > It would be advisable to read the dump and restore manpages first. > > In 6.1, and I suspect still in 6.2, "restore -r" should be used only > when restoring onto an empty filesystem or loading an incremental on > top of such a full restore. If the destination (current directory) > is not the root of an empty filesystem, you want "restore -x" or > "restore -i" instead. I think he was talking about a full filesystem restore in which case 'restore -rf' would be correct. The man page actually is a tiny bit misleading on the -r. You can use it to restore the whole filesystem in any dedicated space including any directory. But with -r you just cannot specify which part of the filesystem you want to restore, such as a particular directory or file. For that you will need -xf which will work for a full filesystem too in most cases. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:46:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56115106568C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from thenetnow.com (constellation.thenetnow.com [65.39.193.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB9F8FC0C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:46:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=[192.168.1.100]) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LMlTQ-000PlO-0s; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:46:36 -0500 Message-ID: <496CB754.8020502@thenetnow.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:46:28 -0500 From: Grant Peel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20090112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jerry McAllister References: <9F57CF00DDE541E69F500E26B652DDED@GRANTPC> <20090107205826.GA93439@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <496C3032.9060003@gmail.com> <20090113153603.GA23181@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20090113153603.GA23181@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tim Judd , FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Replace SCSI Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:46:39 -0000 Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:09:54PM -0700, Tim Judd wrote: > > >> >> >> Not to be presumptious, or rude, but I've read the first part of this >> thread (a bit late, yes) and I'm just confused. >> >> If you're going to go so far as to prep the drive at home, before >> driving to the NOC, with a unrunnable OS on a labeled disk, it seems silly. >> >> I propose: >> Do a typical install of FreeBSD 6.4/7.1 on this disk. Let it be as >> full as to boot an operating system (but maybe skip out on the >> networking blah blah setups). >> Bring this (verified) bootable disk to the NOC, install it as da0 >> Move the old, 73GB failing disk to da1 >> Boot the Dell, maybe running in single-user mode >> You've got a pristine format (or pristine enough) to restore the >> filesystems on top of it. >> Rebooting with da0 again to see if your network settings, startup, >> apps, etc etc etc all start as appropriate. >> >> Only if this method fails, do you use the Fixit CD and "fix it" >> > > This is good, especially if he wants to upgrade to the next > version of FreeBSD at the same time. > > But IIRC the problem is not that the OS currently on the disk does > not work, but that there are some problems with the disk itself - > but that it is still readable. It is more about replacing the > disk with another presumed more reliable than the current one. > So, in that case, it is much easier to take the few minutes to > build the disk slice & partitions and then just do the dump/restores > than to build everything new and then hand pick the things he wants > to save from the old disk. > > But, if an upgrade is done at the same time - probably a good idea > actually - then that hand picking will be done anyway, so might as > well do it as you say. I took it straight from his original > question rather than from the notion of doing an upgrade along the way. > > ////jerry > > > >> Am I crazy to think this is the more logical, more straightforward way >> to perform this migration? If Grant has already done the job, more >> power to him, but I just found it a little confusing that one would >> label a drive, format it, and possibly spend more time with the slower >> CD-ROM based Fixit than running off a nice, new 10k/15k RPM drive to >> drive everything. >> >> If my method above is failing a point, I'd be more than happy to hear >> your statements and correct my procedures for it. My method above has >> only one tricky part, is to restore the 'a' partition from olddrive to >> newdrive. -- and that is probably a piece of cake. >> >> >> Grant, good luck (if you haven't done it yet). >> >> --Tim >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Hi Jerry, Since you original reply to my email is still my prefered method, could you please resent it (if you have a copy in your sent items mailbox). I am wrestling with Thunderbird (on freebsd) to import all my email folders from OE, with no success). I do understand all the various methods though and thanks to all for the replies! -Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:51:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF401065674 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ricardo.meb.jesus@gmail.com) Received: from gate.criticalsoftware.com (gate.criticalsoftware.com [212.13.37.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1EC8FC19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ricardo.meb.jesus@gmail.com) Received: from [192.168.1.160] (unknown [192.168.1.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gate.criticalsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8EDDE980B; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:51:43 +0000 (WET) Message-ID: <496CB890.4070700@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:51:44 +0000 From: Ricardo Jesus User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Peel References: <496CA938.60903@thenetnow.com> In-Reply-To: <496CA938.60903@thenetnow.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Transition Questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ricardo.m.jesus@criticalsoftware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:51:45 -0000 Grant Peel wrote: > Hi all, > > Well, over the past few days I have made the transition to FreeBSD (6.4) > as the primary OS on my home computer. I am currently running GNOME as a > desktop, and it seems to be running well. Indeed, I am using Thunderbird > to write this email! > > I have a couple of questions regarding the transition: > > 1. Does there exist a port or package, a messenger program, that is > compatible with Windoze Live Messenger? i.e. can I log in similar to > live messenger and see my contacts and collaborate with them? Pidgin is a nice GTK program that works well with Windows Live Message network. > > 2. Can I use any type of pictures for the desktop wallpaper? Where might > I find some good wallpaper depicting the FreeBSD Daemon and Logo? Take a look at http://www.freebsd.org/art.html > > 3. How does one add a device to the desktop as an icon? i.e. an external > USB drive? Take a look at http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/index.html. I'm sure it will answer (or point you to) your Gnome related questions. > > TIA, > > -Grant > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:55:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FEC1065673 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:55:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier@kjsl.org) Received: from cat2.kjsl.com (cat2.kjsl.com [216.129.110.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2C68FC1C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:55:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier@kjsl.org) Received: from cat2.kjsl.com (localhost.kjsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by cat2.kjsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F54D12542A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:39:24 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=kjsl.org; h=message-id: from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version: subject:date; q=dns/txt; s=selector1; bh=cQ7bePlovEcAuM2DEUWSliG bTdI=; b=gB9G7uj97LjYBGxDXafpWZ6IpN0E880bXN09WCqHOuoal2paIHKhm0l Xfu6u2im0WR2I2xg/CHIlfRYfbe2N78IAQbbvM+XtqJ/leS6csl9hw2egooY03hZ yaKhdrrm5SRkOcDA5K8IVj9jOUjFenmg4k4/UjXHJKKbwDpqWghE= Received: from dhcp-64-102-159-44.cisco.com (dhcp-64-102-159-44.cisco.com [64.102.159.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: javier) by cat2.kjsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D06A125429 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:39:24 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: From: Javier Henderson To: FreeBSD Questions List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:38:31 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Subject: unsub X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:55:09 -0000 unsub From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 16:01:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7691065670 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:01:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CAD08FC1F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:01:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n0DG0jwX023434; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:00:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id n0DG0jrW023433; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:00:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:00:45 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: luizbcampos Message-ID: <20090113160045.GD23181@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Disk Label Editor problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:01:12 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:02:59AM -0200, luizbcampos wrote: > I installed FreeBSD-7.0amd64 on my 40GB disk and I chose automatic > partition at disk label editor. I need to download a 665GB OS but at a > given moment the system complains about lack of space on the disk > (469GB). It has happened for two times. > > ad4s1a 512MB* > ad4s1b 2015MB SWAP > ad4s1d 2031MB* > ad4s1e 512MB* > ad4s1f 33084MB* > > Is there any way to correct the problem without reinstalling the OS? Well, if you are really wanting to download a 665-GB image you will need to get some more disk. The largest partition you have there is ad4s1f and that is only 33-GB. I am guessing there is a typo somewhere in your post that will have to be solved first. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 17:03:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AFD1065691 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:03:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF82D8FC24 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan-a.emsphone.com [199.67.51.107]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n0DH3hOx008497 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0DH3hUI012589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n0DH3gPf012588; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:42 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:41 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: michael Message-ID: <20090113170341.GE57874@dan.emsphone.com> References: <496839E2.1020808@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496839E2.1020808@gmail.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.1, clamav-milter version 0.94.1 on email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:43 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: laptop battery + i2c bus reprogramming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:03:46 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 10), michael said: > several of my laptop batteries(L-ION) have an i2c bus to the eeprom > inside the case. is it possible to reprogram or reset a battery i > have repacked from within freebsd or will i need to do this with the > available windows programs? > what i'm asking is if freebsd actually supports sending of data over > the i2c bus from userland. The iic driver seems to provide ioctls for userland manipulation; as long as you know what to send (and assuming the kernel driver finds the i2c chip), it should work. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 17:54:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3731D1065675 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:54:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from thenetnow.com (constellation.thenetnow.com [65.39.193.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FA98FC12 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:54:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=[192.168.1.100]) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LMnTD-0003NB-N4; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:54:31 -0500 Message-ID: <496CD550.5060701@thenetnow.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:54:24 -0500 From: Grant Peel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20090112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ricardo.m.jesus@criticalsoftware.com References: <496CA938.60903@thenetnow.com> <496CB890.4070700@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <496CB890.4070700@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Transition Questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:54:34 -0000 Ricardo Jesus wrote: > Grant Peel wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Well, over the past few days I have made the transition to FreeBSD >> (6.4) as the primary OS on my home computer. I am currently running >> GNOME as a desktop, and it seems to be running well. Indeed, I am >> using Thunderbird to write this email! >> >> I have a couple of questions regarding the transition: >> >> 1. Does there exist a port or package, a messenger program, that is >> compatible with Windoze Live Messenger? i.e. can I log in similar to >> live messenger and see my contacts and collaborate with them? > Pidgin is a nice GTK program that works well with Windows Live Message > network. >> >> 2. Can I use any type of pictures for the desktop wallpaper? Where >> might I find some good wallpaper depicting the FreeBSD Daemon and Logo? > Take a look at http://www.freebsd.org/art.html >> >> 3. How does one add a device to the desktop as an icon? i.e. an >> external USB drive? > Take a look at http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/index.html. I'm sure it > will answer (or point you to) your Gnome related questions. >> >> TIA, >> >> -Grant >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Thanks Richard, A couple of more questions if anyone has the time. 1. I have been searching for a iTunes client. i.e. a player that I can play my iTunes on. Does such a thing exist? Is there an iTunes client that can connect to the iTunes store? 2. I want to import my Oulook express folders to Thinderbird. I know it can be done on windows, but when I try the impirt feature (running Thunderbord on FreeBSD), there is no option to do this. Is there a way? -Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 18:35:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFBF1065674 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:35:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.copeland@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE408FC31 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:35:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.copeland@gmail.com) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so29827qwb.7 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:35:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S9ZG0SKIs1Uhq0b+xfAlWEE7JvR44h4s0fQxH1VqY9U=; b=kYZjzjsR1jKhGqxk8ukRB7JVomx8tM/F1t6zqhhDV8T1lTXZ+5WRiXBRIS4q25ZRKe aUhjg32jjr4cMmxtmeCb3mlgwjEPCgQJZKupkg2FoulvBOv7BibWKBHgjoBRfE9M3Mfs KuFSh3dRxfzP98h2yrqQfGHfde5JWY0z+MOsc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gnMPCuFP313al7l/NZhWKx7tgM0EclxNDZb42i3sNpp5r2OnbySTJh3I1QIm3xHdsT vf9Uf2NG+k7rLFqvQhqxWtFZWmXWPCecPj5iFR/r5QL4AVy9lRTY/l29fr2Lmb6awINp Gb2Zye5e5fEC2rsDOGtty4d1N45vWD4s1zbog= Received: by 10.214.129.12 with SMTP id b12mr20933247qad.184.1231871753389; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:35:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.104? (adsl-074-245-053-043.sip.jax.bellsouth.net [74.245.53.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm3077852ywo.0.2009.01.13.10.35.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:35:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <496CDEFF.1070905@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:35:43 -0500 From: Michael Copeland User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson References: <496839E2.1020808@gmail.com> <20090113170341.GE57874@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20090113170341.GE57874@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: laptop battery + i2c bus reprogramming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:35:55 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jan 10), michael said: > >> several of my laptop batteries(L-ION) have an i2c bus to the eeprom >> inside the case. is it possible to reprogram or reset a battery i >> have repacked from within freebsd or will i need to do this with the >> available windows programs? >> what i'm asking is if freebsd actually supports sending of data over >> the i2c bus from userland. >> > > The iic driver seems to provide ioctls for userland manipulation; as > long as you know what to send (and assuming the kernel driver finds the > i2c chip), it should work. > > I noticed the same things, but I wasn't sure if any of the real ground work had been done. I've been replacing the cells in my batteries for a while now because I get 40-60% more gain from home built compared to new batteries from the manufacturer. I'm just tired of the licensing from the software I was using because it limits how many eeproms you can re flash. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 18:42:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC421065672 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:42:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248228FC19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:42:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay12.apple.com (relay12.apple.com [17.128.113.53]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC234E6DDE2; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:42:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay12.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay12.apple.com (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with ESMTP id ED866464002; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:42:37 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807135-ab448bb0000070cb-32-496ce09df77c Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (cswiger1.apple.com [17.227.140.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay12.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id D218A420002; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:42:37 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: From: Chuck Swiger To: Grant Peel In-Reply-To: <496CD550.5060701@thenetnow.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:42:37 -0800 References: <496CA938.60903@thenetnow.com> <496CB890.4070700@gmail.com> <496CD550.5060701@thenetnow.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD Transition Questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:42:38 -0000 On Jan 13, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Grant Peel wrote: > A couple of more questions if anyone has the time. > > 1. I have been searching for a iTunes client. i.e. a player that I > can play my iTunes on. Does such a thing exist? Mplayer and xine should understand and be able to play unprotected AAC files. A more complete list is available here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Audio_Coding#Other_software_media_players > Is there an iTunes client that can connect to the iTunes store? Not aside from iTunes itself, no. If you are interested in seeing a Linux or BSD version of iTunes, consider filing an enhancement request against https://bugreport.apple.com.... > 2. I want to import my Oulook express folders to Thinderbird. I know > it can be done on windows, but when I try the impirt feature > (running Thunderbord on FreeBSD), there is no option to do this. Is > there a way? Aside from doing the import on Windows? Unix versions of T'bird have no knowledge of Microsoft's PST files, but I suppose you could upload your Outlook email to an IMAP server and then download those messages normally from there. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 18:47:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56BC106566B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:47:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318E58FC0A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0DIlcq0057052; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:47:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 73265BAA7; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:47:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:47:38 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Grant Peel Message-ID: <20090113184738.GA59052@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <496CA938.60903@thenetnow.com> <496CB890.4070700@gmail.com> <496CD550.5060701@thenetnow.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496CD550.5060701@thenetnow.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: ricardo.m.jesus@criticalsoftware.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Transition Questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:47:43 -0000 --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:54:24PM -0500, Grant Peel wrote: > 1. I have been searching for a iTunes client. i.e. a player that I can=20 > play my iTunes on. Does such a thing exist?=20 There are lots of players capabable of playing mp3 in /usr/ports/multimedia/, e.g. audacious, amarok, xmms2, xmms (old). Only iTunes can play restricted (DRM encumbered) aac files. > Is there an iTunes client that can connect to the iTunes store? Not natively. You could try running the windows version of iTunes under the wine emulator (/usr/ports/emulators/wine). =20 > 2. I want to import my Oulook express folders to Thinderbird. I know it= =20 > can be done on windows, but when I try the impirt feature (running=20 > Thunderbord on FreeBSD), there is no option to do this. Is there a way? The /usr/ports/mail/libpst port contains a tool called readpst which can convert them to e.g. mailbox (mbox) format. Thunderbird should be able to import mbox files. =20 Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkls4coACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUfTgCfZKn6jlNBy2KY8/eEK510WB3c OtsAn2ExgzYRd2zgNa927YuX3xSg0r3P =jqEk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 18:48:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED3D106568D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:48:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247738FC2F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:48:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay12.apple.com (relay12.apple.com [17.128.113.53]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091B34E6E189; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:48:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay12.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay12.apple.com (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with ESMTP id E3E8E464004; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:48:38 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807135-a5c3dbb0000070cb-be-496ce206d60c Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (cswiger1.apple.com [17.227.140.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay12.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id C4B8C420004; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:48:38 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <52EE2606-11D3-42E8-BE4C-E287285330CC@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: Jay Hall In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:48:38 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS or an alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:48:39 -0000 On Jan 12, 2009, at 9:56 PM, Jay Hall wrote: > I am in the process of redesigning my organization's network. And, > since we will be using mostly Macintosh OS X clients, I am > considering using NFS. However, I will need the ability to perform > user/group authentication since users may not always log in from the > same PC. > > Essentially, each user has a home directory which only they, and > possibly their secretary, needs to have access to. And, we have > directories which groups of people need access to. Given the above requirements, Samba/CIFS is probably a better match for what you are doing that NFS would be. > From the reading I have done this evening, my understanding is NFSv4 > will meet all of these needs. Is this correct? And, is there a > better way to accomplish this? Note that Apple only ships NFSv3-aware software, and I'm not sure whether FreeBSD supports NFSv4 yet either. There appears to be external work here: http://snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca/nfsv4/ http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/ ...which you might look into. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 18:53:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1949F106567F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:53:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.copeland@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA868FC2A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:53:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.copeland@gmail.com) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so31410qwb.7 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:53:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SSdDEzGpCAj/RkUPpHUdSNc2mVI+kXBLMrYkAkvqjgA=; b=fqS0FRHu9nVamtMpNplJPC2s+P6uNRKqCdNMDczlPATaaVluEt4pvi3V84bJ1mUrjz nA3TsMzoPmt327eb+WD7ss9Z2qigETq03i0lgxvjtHhkf5LCr8uoh4caCpuhGd3xll8Q 42Y+m5uV63lF+Uwx4NDkOEOxNb3TZn0INfLM8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=V+PjvsGalllUO73OiYNtHGjQzFdA6K8ackj/90NpSl3oHqDaOyKJFr+AOKaqBQZpMi J55mU/pO2COGMY/sK80IXECRE6qTAzQZ16IexDfOD0Y7ZAwK5tXaKfbz/7SSzKFvb0Ga zPMUDisq9fnjgaOX/j8sBxDkUYU2o4zfuEwBc= Received: by 10.214.114.20 with SMTP id m20mr27231290qac.107.1231872814195; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:53:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.104? (adsl-074-245-053-043.sip.jax.bellsouth.net [74.245.53.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm3897690ywp.18.2009.01.13.10.53.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:53:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <496CE328.5010200@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:53:28 -0500 From: Michael Copeland User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <52EE2606-11D3-42E8-BE4C-E287285330CC@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <52EE2606-11D3-42E8-BE4C-E287285330CC@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jhall@socket.net Subject: Re: NFS or an alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:53:38 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jan 12, 2009, at 9:56 PM, Jay Hall wrote: >> I am in the process of redesigning my organization's network. And, >> since we will be using mostly Macintosh OS X clients, I am >> considering using NFS. However, I will need the ability to perform >> user/group authentication since users may not always log in from the >> same PC. >> >> Essentially, each user has a home directory which only they, and >> possibly their secretary, needs to have access to. And, we have >> directories which groups of people need access to. > > Given the above requirements, Samba/CIFS is probably a better match > for what you are doing that NFS would be. you could try webdav. apple's "iDisk". i have used this on our corporate network for a while now, and allows mounting from any workstation. > >> From the reading I have done this evening, my understanding is NFSv4 >> will meet all of these needs. Is this correct? And, is there a >> better way to accomplish this? > > Note that Apple only ships NFSv3-aware software, and I'm not sure > whether FreeBSD supports NFSv4 yet either. There appears to be > external work here: > > http://snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca/nfsv4/ > http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/ > > ...which you might look into. > > Regards, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 19:01:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1324106578F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:01:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com (mail-ew0-f21.google.com [209.85.219.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA458FC36 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:01:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so241843ewy.19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:01:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=VEb3TAqvaoGEdfWg6XFbQb8P4CSFmMdDBumlPEMMcCw=; b=Emk9KftgpFKH9sux5RgnLTMSzkcCUmnjHzi2EYEqK7oWTZBiTEsgIep7Yb80iS6XfZ SvTdTWrF7BFwCuzw9pfEqvwxjiMahCynv/+CqcaL+OVxPncujoCDGRRvS/9s860FcUrf 12dhjFMvEuh0UKHS9lfX1vazMRdVeYRRGInhI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Hq6HqLwHKksubqz7oKLHjN/GegGRFgzBxUeIh+KLyTKnEGU5XLRWZCdvZzR3NYKKyC VvVELmyaPjt5TQ+NiDXcFmEHGwWhiLezHwjHfcB8pGDNkr/Syamh/9YAX4QWTExq2GYe n9lPQNn2hqINRPgpUvwYJaV2IU98x+0lUr9bE= Received: by 10.210.127.10 with SMTP id z10mr10380803ebc.95.1231873305145; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:01:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.210.91.8 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:01:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:01:45 -0800 From: "Kurt Buff" To: "Chuck Swiger" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <496CA938.60903@thenetnow.com> <496CB890.4070700@gmail.com> <496CD550.5060701@thenetnow.com> Cc: Grant Peel , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD Transition Questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:01:49 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jan 13, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Grant Peel wrote: >> >> A couple of more questions if anyone has the time. >> 2. I want to import my Oulook express folders to Thinderbird. I know it >> can be done on windows, but when I try the impirt feature (running >> Thunderbord on FreeBSD), there is no option to do this. Is there a way? > > Aside from doing the import on Windows? Unix versions of T'bird have no > knowledge of Microsoft's PST files, but I suppose you could upload your > Outlook email to an IMAP server and then download those messages normally > from there. Outlook != Outlook Express. OE, last I looked, stores its mail in a .mbx file, which isn't compatible with .pst files. Beyond that, I can't say. Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 19:03:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004E21065919 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:03:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com (mail-ew0-f21.google.com [209.85.219.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE01E8FC40 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:03:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so243284ewy.19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=olB91ZfPZt+7o083jPfUZOHjDevI8n97J6P2bP3LQNU=; b=mO4hWYGkC1xRgDF/4pzWkSD6LSTOB/jcWIKxErbuX3KkuxJm93C6n2G5Mla0k11gSe X/gFM/m8bhQVovhZErWJ1BDtFDZTmhKhAQHqujYqT83A9eynSWxbLjtCeoJOOLqI/8fl uX5CFPRMUmXstZStf++RVNfJ9uX2iupaq7wuc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=BQxFN/mnZh4YLYNNIzdnP9s0WR0WsgzyFqaGhsag7YcGM2SHoqI2vHJsxHMTrTflU6 HRR8rGeljH0mTMlCeDpbESjr1U0RRMIKxHONB9sczHYDgj1px164AlUclLwV0bToqWea d8lK+jlPTyHmtYESdrkXRqH2h9+j+392cYnYs= Received: by 10.210.141.17 with SMTP id o17mr2081875ebd.69.1231873399780; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.210.91.8 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:19 -0800 From: "Kurt Buff" To: "Roland Smith" In-Reply-To: <20090113184738.GA59052@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <496CA938.60903@thenetnow.com> <496CB890.4070700@gmail.com> <496CD550.5060701@thenetnow.com> <20090113184738.GA59052@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Cc: ricardo.m.jesus@criticalsoftware.com, Grant Peel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Transition Questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:03:26 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Roland Smith wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:54:24PM -0500, Grant Peel wrote: > >> 2. I want to import my Oulook express folders to Thinderbird. I know it >> can be done on windows, but when I try the impirt feature (running >> Thunderbord on FreeBSD), there is no option to do this. Is there a way? > > The /usr/ports/mail/libpst port contains a tool called readpst which can > convert them to e.g. mailbox (mbox) format. Thunderbird should be able > to import mbox files. Outlook != Outlook Express. libpst might be able to read OE's .mbx files, but I doubt it. Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 19:11:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4401065A6A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@optimis.net) Received: from mail.optimis.net (mail.optimis.net [69.104.191.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0308FC13 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@optimis.net) Received: from marvin.optimis.net (marvin.optimis.net [192.168.1.3]) by mail.optimis.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0DJBnsN007915 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:11:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@optimis.net) Received: from marvin.optimis.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marvin.optimis.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0DJBm0Q068694 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:11:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@optimis.net) Received: (from george@localhost) by marvin.optimis.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n0DJBmOb068693 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:11:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@optimis.net) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:11:48 -0800 From: George Davidovich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090113191148.GA62894@marvin.optimis.net> References: <496CA938.60903@thenetnow.com> <496CB890.4070700@gmail.com> <496CD550.5060701@thenetnow.com> <20090113184738.GA59052@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090113184738.GA59052@slackbox.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Subject: Re: FreeBSD Transition Questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:11:51 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 07:47:38PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:54:24PM -0500, Grant Peel wrote: > > > 2. I want to import my Oulook express folders to Thinderbird. I know > > it can be done on windows, but when I try the impirt feature > > (running Thunderbord on FreeBSD), there is no option to do this. Is > > there a way? > > The /usr/ports/mail/libpst port contains a tool called readpst which > can convert them to e.g. mailbox (mbox) format. Thunderbird should be > able to import mbox files. Never used Outlook Express, but its file format, IIRC, is different than that used by Outlook (.pst). Either way, the best option would be to install Thunderbird on the Windows machine and use Thunderbird there to import the OE mail. The resulting mbox file(s) can then be simply copied over to his FreeBSD box. A randomly-selected HowTo link: http://doc.vic.computerbank.org.au/support/Getting%20mail%20from%20Outlook%20to%20Thunderbird/ Also, given that he's already using Thunderbird, I'd suggest the following be done first: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/thunderbird/dictionaries.html :-) -- George From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 19:24:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B92106567A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:24:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mister.olli@googlemail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723378FC14 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:24:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mister.olli@googlemail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k31so111520fkk.11 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:24:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:reply-to:to :content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=agXKFqSqueSBYkA5hLbgkIjnXXojcAEIl8N5ioYhPYU=; b=A7d/TV+McLXcZMYosDvrVhb0G6fE7pTIOOaQzJU+SmZwiOI4XupeYNtI+HSdXlbD37 CBR7tioXhh8qovTtSnKuZKR1GJeCbzfo53zlBhHsxRK+Ky0AoP8UJbQt0PtNlXPCwVEI qFZg5GWlVDjxHzrPaXKrPpdtBsGtuWaqY4dME= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer; b=cYYngMYcTVq0XdCCZ4UJk/6j3AJilu3bGGhA0qBOx45hVgxJARbG0LyUTa5WB0gAUX 18l12iE0pbXXqnPPitzSx6yWMJUBHwn+d6DSlNoj7AR0s++HerKdbLVKiWFiFmAK1bmZ os9oyXJtjI9Jvi0EF+mKLZyCCecI43tUbDj60= Received: by 10.223.113.3 with SMTP id y3mr22998933fap.71.1231873443721; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:04:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.30.1.100? (vpn-or.studi-planet.com [78.47.172.52]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c28sm22567553fka.34.2009.01.13.11.04.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:04:02 -0800 (PST) From: Mister Olli To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-/F0E39/XpYOEhYcp/1Gw" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:03:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1231873436.24899.85.camel@phoenix.blechhirn.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Cc: Subject: Problems with FreeBSD 8-CURRENT as Xen domU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mister.olli@googlemail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:24:20 -0000 --=-/F0E39/XpYOEhYcp/1Gw Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit hi... I've managed to compile and setup a paravirtualized domU with FreeBSD 8 (SVN snapshot from 'head'). Currently I'm running into two mayor problems: - The system time is not behaving as expected. Example: ======== I fired the domain up at 01:43 in the morning and watch the clock. Time passes normally within the maschine, and the suddenly jumps back to 01:30:. From there on time passes normally up to 15 minutes (the latest time I've seen is 01:44:52). Right now the domain is running for more than 18 hours, and the clock still says: Tue Jan 13 01:32:52 CET 2009 Running 'ntpd' inside the domU doesn't help to solve the problem. If found a lot of hints for linux domU's, which say that you need to set the sysctl 'xen.independent_wallclock' to '1' and run 'ntpd' in the domU to keep time correct. Does 'sysctl machdep.independent_wallclock=1' the same in FreeBSD? (If so, this doesn' work.) - 2-way SMP doesn't work. When I put the line vcpus=2 into my config file, I get the following output during boot, and the domU is destroyed after the reboot by the kernel: ================================================================ # xm create 00_template_8-CURRENT.XENconfig -c Using config file "./00_template_8-CURRENT.XENconfig". Started domain template_8-CURRENT WARNING: loader(8) metadata is missing! Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #3: Thu Jan 8 04:34:03 CET 2009 root@template-8_CURRENT.localdomain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/freebsd8_XEN WARNING: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance. Xen reported: 1600.056 MHz processor. Timecounter "ixen" frequency 1000000000 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor (1600.06-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x662 Stepping = 2 Features=0x383fbff AMD Features=0xc0480800 real memory = 671088640 (640 MB) avail memory = 649625600 (619 MB) gdtpfn=3edd9 pdptpfn=11113 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu=0 irq=0 vector=0 cpu=0 irq=0 vector=1 cpu=1 irq=0 vector=0 cpu=1 irq=0 vector=1 kbd0 at kbdmux0 xenbus0: on motherboard xc0: on motherboard Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec xbd0: 8192MB at device/vbd/768 on xenbus0 xbd0: attaching as ad0 GEOM: ad0s1: geometry does not match label (15h,63s != 255h,63s). xn0: at device/vif/0 on xenbus0 xn0: Ethernet address: 00:16:3e:06:c3:80 [XEN] netfront_backend_changed: newstate=2 Spanic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) XCONS LOCK @ /usr/src/sys/dev/xen/console/console.c:290 cpuid = 1 Uptime: 1s Cannot dump. Device not defined or unavailable. Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort --> Press a key on the console to reboot, --> or switch off the system now. Rebooting... ================================================================ I've attached my kernelconfig file to this mail, if someone sees a failure in it. Any hints on how to solve these 2 problems would be really great. Using FreeBSD in it's current state as domU really rocks. :-))) greetz olli --=-/F0E39/XpYOEhYcp/1Gw Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=freebsd8_XEN Content-Type: text/plain; name=freebsd8_XEN; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit # # XEN -- Kernel configuration for i386 XEN DomU # # $FreeBSD$ cpu I686_CPU ident XEN makeoptions DEBUG=-g # Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols makeoptions MODULES_OVERRIDE="" options SCHED_ULE # ULE scheduler options PREEMPTION # Enable kernel thread preemption #options SCHED_4BSD options INET # InterNETworking #options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols #options SCTP # Stream Control Transmission Protocol options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories #options UFS_GJOURNAL # Enable gjournal-based UFS journaling #options NFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client #options NFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server #options NFSLOCKD # Network Lock Manager #options NFS_ROOT # NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT #options MSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options PSEUDOFS # Pseudo-filesystem framework options GEOM_PART_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. options GEOM_LABEL # Provides labelization options COMPAT_43TTY # BSD 4.3 TTY compat (sgtty) options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 # Compatible with FreeBSD5 options COMPAT_FREEBSD6 # Compatible with FreeBSD6 options COMPAT_FREEBSD7 # Compatible with FreeBSD7 options KTRACE # ktrace(1) support options STACK # stack(9) support options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extensions options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev options AUDIT # Security event auditing # Debugging for use in -current #options KDB # Enable kernel debugger support. #options DDB # Support DDB. #options GDB # Support remote GDB. #options INVARIANTS # Enable calls of extra sanity checking #options INVARIANT_SUPPORT # Extra sanity checks of internal structures, required by INVARIANTS options WITNESS # Enable checks to detect deadlocks and cycles #options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN # Don't run witness on spinlocks for speed options PAE nooption NATIVE option XEN nodevice atpic nodevice isa options MCLSHIFT=12 # To make an SMP kernel, the next two lines are needed options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel device apic # I/O APIC device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard device psm # PS/2 mouse device pci device kbdmux # keyboard multiplexer # Pseudo devices. device loop # Network loopback device random # Entropy device device ether # Ethernet support device tun # Packet tunnel. device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) #device md # Memory "disks" #device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling #device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) # The `bpf' device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! # Note that 'bpf' is required for DHCP. device bpf # Berkeley packet filter --=-/F0E39/XpYOEhYcp/1Gw-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 19:37:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898FA1065670 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from thenetnow.com (constellation.thenetnow.com [65.39.193.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CF08FC1C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=[192.168.1.100]) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LMp5C-0006md-AF; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:37:50 -0500 Message-ID: <496CED86.1090608@thenetnow.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:37:42 -0500 From: Grant Peel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20090112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Buff References: <496CA938.60903@thenetnow.com> <496CB890.4070700@gmail.com> <496CD550.5060701@thenetnow.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD Transition Questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:37:55 -0000 Kurt Buff wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > >> On Jan 13, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Grant Peel wrote: >> >>> A couple of more questions if anyone has the time. >>> 2. I want to import my Oulook express folders to Thinderbird. I know it >>> can be done on windows, but when I try the impirt feature (running >>> Thunderbord on FreeBSD), there is no option to do this. Is there a way? >>> >> Aside from doing the import on Windows? Unix versions of T'bird have no >> knowledge of Microsoft's PST files, but I suppose you could upload your >> Outlook email to an IMAP server and then download those messages normally >> from there. >> > > Outlook != Outlook Express. OE, last I looked, stores its mail in a > .mbx file, which isn't compatible with .pst files. > > Beyond that, I can't say. > > Kurt > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Hi Guys, Looking at the folders on Outlook Express, they are in *.dbx format. Does this help? -Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 19:49:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBB1106566B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f20.google.com (mail-bw0-f20.google.com [209.85.218.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2E08FC17 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:49:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so642699bwz.19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:49:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BqqtQMDLg8yW7ViFPr/1JkyRM1X6b0EnwBTEl4bF200=; b=QnyOWSEZ8lBSVUmZ+JE28HGEkmsMsc3Y5mRbJQP0ovhoKIrTYcsSme4EZSbYGyQvgF psWMohui6Nkf+yJfpKbk0yuUlYslwLaHXZjklzKbcbh5SmdlRMzMj3Hi6OMyeGdOoDIE qYCzJlzI8yPOBmp9oNh3x58jHZIuQan9CT6us= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=F1rEpZepHiAdptPORqYxlktAlxlW+LZ0oBnW8oF2dGXWqFRpoFsLgzDG8tYwr1ptd1 NNqIhlwzT15A2NAkiVibiZaoXEMa0OX3+l2Qeqk/eItKngD2aI28NE5bOO8xV+e9tfNw LroEe0DnGGi++Q2F1qxIYxHvo/OoCJp4am1Q8= Received: by 10.223.108.15 with SMTP id d15mr14530002fap.105.1231874493480; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:21:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ilras.barsh.com ([92.251.20.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b17sm28246448fka.35.2009.01.13.11.21.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:21:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <496CE952.3010900@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:19:46 +0100 From: cwt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <496CA938.60903@thenetnow.com> <496CB890.4070700@gmail.com> <496CD550.5060701@thenetnow.com> <20090113184738.GA59052@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090113191148.GA62894@marvin.optimis.net> In-Reply-To: <20090113191148.GA62894@marvin.optimis.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD Transition Questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:49:26 -0000 George Davidovich wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 07:47:38PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:54:24PM -0500, Grant Peel wrote: >> >> >>> 2. I want to import my Oulook express folders to Thinderbird. I know >>> it can be done on windows, but when I try the impirt feature >>> (running Thunderbord on FreeBSD), there is no option to do this. Is >>> there a way? >>> >> The /usr/ports/mail/libpst port contains a tool called readpst which >> can convert them to e.g. mailbox (mbox) format. Thunderbird should be >> able to import mbox files. >> > > Never used Outlook Express, but its file format, IIRC, is different than > that used by Outlook (.pst). > shoulf be easy to import outlook express into outlook > Either way, the best option would be to install Thunderbird on the > Windows machine and use Thunderbird there to import the OE mail. The > resulting mbox file(s) can then be simply copied over to his FreeBSD > box. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 19:50:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4278106571A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:50:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f21.google.com (mail-gx0-f21.google.com [209.85.217.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624238FC1F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:50:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by gxk14 with SMTP id 14so201539gxk.19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:50:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=HqrqLB8WyvuEp95te3HRvR1yn02S+pHojes7nO609W8=; b=djJerZyfbDDDXGOoII1mOrFVBNBOaiAuyJeGVAjcJdNgGCyG3UcaMVXY3VGb6axT3b ANfS5835gs7Cfold2MARTxYr6zIK8yuZDyVaHNSfAligK7VZOLKAC88WTgZWgtrmsfq/ fceGSiVBy8ICpH1fRutHUE8Ambnp73xYUuK6Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=c7pHPYDLCdhKc21x+BUr0JE0msYSHCy+gacR7bM8KXyqJRDer5n4kA5NuFS/Q1xvER UM5yHhF258rvXwrSmX7h86LG++p0SsvMTrKVlj9BrggUzusvQ1RqWQf0eCDUPCgLZiIy bfQ9S83qnqcJiJake+dt7a6uARH/Zw2H+A7Xk= Received: by 10.142.174.8 with SMTP id w8mr12990396wfe.318.1231876255733; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:50:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.115.3 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:50:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:50:55 -0800 From: "Kurt Buff" To: "Grant Peel" In-Reply-To: <496CED86.1090608@thenetnow.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <496CA938.60903@thenetnow.com> <496CB890.4070700@gmail.com> <496CD550.5060701@thenetnow.com> <496CED86.1090608@thenetnow.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD Transition Questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:50:59 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Grant Peel wrote: > Kurt Buff wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jan 13, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Grant Peel wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> A couple of more questions if anyone has the time. >>>> 2. I want to import my Oulook express folders to Thinderbird. I know it >>>> can be done on windows, but when I try the impirt feature (running >>>> Thunderbord on FreeBSD), there is no option to do this. Is there a way? >>>> >>> >>> Aside from doing the import on Windows? Unix versions of T'bird have no >>> knowledge of Microsoft's PST files, but I suppose you could upload your >>> Outlook email to an IMAP server and then download those messages normally >>> from there. >>> >> >> Outlook != Outlook Express. OE, last I looked, stores its mail in a >> .mbx file, which isn't compatible with .pst files. >> >> Beyond that, I can't say. >> >> Kurt >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > > Hi Guys, > > Looking at the folders on Outlook Express, they are in *.dbx format. > > Does this help? > > -Grant Sorry, my memory led me astray - they are .dbx files. And, unfortunately, that doesn't help. I think the procedure described by George Davidovich is your best bet. Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 19:58:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18B91065673 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:58:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ttdbsd@yahoo.com.au) Received: from n7a.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (n7a.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 866278FC19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:58:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ttdbsd@yahoo.com.au) Received: from [76.13.13.26] by n7.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2009 19:58:25 -0000 Received: from [76.13.10.160] by t3.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2009 19:58:25 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp101.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2009 19:58:25 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 819947.55108.bm@omp101.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 52492 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Jan 2009 19:58:25 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=S5UXFtir76fWiOdpXGAwr1Wnt3MWZo68u2/B0u8qBJwz3J5YzcbnpFPpuDnn0OI6uDc8+UZyq/ycWQTzsJiFoTd4qA5tj5KF4lNIx+9MoPmriaiIp5Yjj1aiHyE/pVpC4xxknwuVe8YGH7MTm7W4LSvOJ12/tU7UGTOCPUs3n8A=; X-YMail-OSG: rQl2inkVM1mVn2JXjjWT6kk0pH8WCdg.H6IBprXOSuM4x0KGa6BWeQ7_x.ZY3pMraEKIenQYAdJ.aBTIdWxEzIQEYFogxYpJVVZCVS.upSu6VgDXLn0Jyyqs6DDzxmhIPzkJHDM2_PBJA3rI9xFI3y6H.tG.H3BngKJbTQ4xD9.3XsYqrwA2xMJsra1O9givVMK_5leH Received: from [203.219.159.120] by web59406.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:58:25 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:58:25 -0800 (PST) From: T D To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <608304.44110.qm@web59406.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0 Installation error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:58:27 -0000 This is a listing of my hardware, I probably should have listed it in my ea= rlier post. Hardware: Motherboard: A7N8X-E Deluxe socket A (462) Chipset: Northbridge: NVIDIA nforce2 spp ultra400 Southbrdige nvidia nforce2 MCP-T memory ddr 184pin (maximum of 3x184) I have kingston kvr400x64c3ak 512mb pc3200 (two pieces)=C2=A0 ram installed= .. on board audio: mcp-t southbridge + realtec alc50 6channel audio codec networking: Marvell 88e8001 gigibit, mcp-t southbridge controller mac + rea= ltec 8201BL phy 1394: mcp-t southbridge ieee 1394a controller + realtec 8801BL phy internal=0Aconnectors: usb2 connectors, games/midi, 2 ide, 20pin atx power,= 2=0Asata, 2 1394, 5 pci, 1 asus propriety wi-fi slot and a couple others. Hard drive is a Western Digital WD2000jb ide caviar 200GB optical drive: asus drw-1604p (jumper cap is on cable select at the moment. However there are five rows of pins, three are cable select, master and sec= ondary, no idea what the other two are) Graphics card is an asus A9600 series AGP ati=20 From=0Awhat I remember seeing fly by on the screen last night the majority = of=0Athe motherboard parts were detected including the rear panel connector= s=0Awhich I did not list (if you want me to list those, let me know). Hope this helps. Thanks Tom --- On Tue, 13/1/09, T D wrote: From: T D Subject: FreeBSD 7.0 Installation error To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: Tuesday, 13 January, 2009, 11:04 PM Hi people, Hi people, I am Tom and I have been attempting to install FreeBSD 7.0 from a dvd. I put the dvd in the drive and boot, the boot screen appears with the optio= ns default, acpi disabled, safe mode, etc, I then select default. The hardware probing/detecting scrolls by and then comes to a halt with the= following line: GEOM_LABLE: Lable for provider acd0 is is09660/FreeBSD 7. I have also on other boot attempts tried acpi disabled, safe mode with the = same outcome. Have selected single user on another attempt and sysinstall program boots, = after going through setting up the hard drive and paritions durring the ins= tall of the os the following error occurs numerous times: Write failure on transfer! (write 0 bytes of 1425408 bytes) 100% Just wondering if this has occured to any one else and how they got around = it. Look forward to replys, thanks Tom =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Stay connected to the people that matter most with a s= marter inbox. Take a look http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/smarterinbox _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " =0A=0A=0A Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter= inbox. Take a look http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/smarterinbox From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 20:15:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20F8106566B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ttdbsd@yahoo.com.au) Received: from n7a.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (n7a.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A647F8FC17 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ttdbsd@yahoo.com.au) Received: from [76.13.13.25] by n7.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2009 20:15:22 -0000 Received: from [76.13.10.176] by t4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2009 20:15:22 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp117.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2009 20:15:22 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 114812.20134.bm@omp117.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 7916 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Jan 2009 20:15:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=xPlCsDQwsDSQuE73U2XbRSSvlRw5CXBsUVDkJSXNWlIUZXXkNqSRkzaaEYJbw9uDwSEuDjfz9mZNUoPpVuRhDfVJHs/zLVvfOFV2Ojb5Xs4KAImSk2z5dm7IdTs0rXCDT1D3k8Ngr12CuQQ2ucoC14iXbFTbQ2K6HpwoJQ5fJU4=; X-YMail-OSG: OEyyCP8VM1nvTtS0bGXjetrSupW4iXNOnDAiT98QNcBKIqPOA2QkW2KRIhRApl1ZuYPRLJMYKYv0JkHqIOlRpHW.vhO32FwgRLfMwj47tbuByNdLX8dEVAIwoJBNbI779gK9lEXgSYR2CqQyPKR8FTPNj4oAQ3uOlVm0kvSqp6MIIcmv_NoAlJDFfoyoWQvOwSx5yHGV.XEcqRg_nvBB9uXSqLs6OFAsYooyeQSf Received: from [203.219.159.120] by web59405.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:15:21 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:15:21 -0800 (PST) From: T D To: T D , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <977656.92471.qm@web59405.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0 Installation error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:15:24 -0000 Hopefully I am posting to the correct list...Or should I be posting to free= bsd-stable? --- On Wed, 14/1/09, T D wrote: From: T D Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0 Installation error To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: Wednesday, 14 January, 2009, 6:58 AM This is a listing of my hardware, I probably should have listed it in my ea= rlier post. Hardware: Motherboard: A7N8X-E Deluxe socket A (462) Chipset: Northbridge: NVIDIA nforce2 spp ultra400 Southbrdige nvidia nforce2 MCP-T memory ddr 184pin (maximum of 3x184) I have kingston kvr400x64c3ak 512mb pc3200 (two pieces)=C2=A0 ram installed= ... on board audio: mcp-t southbridge + realtec alc50 6channel audio codec networking: Marvell 88e8001 gigibit, mcp-t southbridge controller mac + rea= ltec 8201BL phy 1394: mcp-t southbridge ieee 1394a controller + realtec 8801BL phy internal connectors: usb2 connectors, games/midi, 2 ide, 20pin atx power, 2 sata, 2 1394, 5 pci, 1 asus propriety wi-fi slot and a couple others. Hard drive is a Western Digital WD2000jb ide caviar 200GB optical drive: asus drw-1604p (jumper cap is on cable select at the moment. However there are five rows of pins, three are cable select, master and sec= ondary, no idea what the other two are) Graphics card is an asus A9600 series AGP ati=20 From what I remember seeing fly by on the screen last night the majority of the motherboard parts were detected including the rear panel connectors which I did not list (if you want me to list those, let me know). Hope this helps. Thanks Tom --- On Tue, 13/1/09, T D wrote: From: T D Subject: FreeBSD 7.0 Installation error To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: Tuesday, 13 January, 2009, 11:04 PM Hi people, Hi people, I am Tom and I have been attempting to install FreeBSD 7.0 from a dvd. I put the dvd in the drive and boot, the boot screen appears with the optio= ns default, acpi disabled, safe mode, etc, I then select default. The hardware probing/detecting scrolls by and then comes to a halt with the= following line: GEOM_LABLE: Lable for provider acd0 is is09660/FreeBSD 7. I have also on other boot attempts tried acpi disabled, safe mode with the = same outcome. Have selected single user on another attempt and sysinstall program boots, = after going through setting up the hard drive and paritions durring the ins= tall of the os the following error occurs numerous times: Write failure on transfer! (write 0 bytes of 1425408 bytes) 100% Just wondering if this has occured to any one else and how they got around = it. Look forward to replys, thanks Tom =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Stay connected to the people that matter most with a s= marter inbox. Take a look http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/smarterinbox _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Stay connected to the people that matter most with a s= marter inbox. Take a look http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/smarterinbox _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " =0A=0A=0A Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter= inbox. Take a look http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/smarterinbox From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 20:53:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD3A1065676 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97CF8FC1A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:53:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E5EAFBC3C; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:53:45 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:53:44 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <21437407.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <21437407.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901131153.44962.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: regis505 Subject: Re: wireless nic - access point X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:53:47 -0000 On Tuesday 13 January 2009 06:00:08 regis505 wrote: > I installed a D-Link WDA-2320 (Atheros chipset) wireless nic on my FreeBSD > 7.1 system. I configured it as an access point. I read many posts on that > topic and I am confused whether I need to bridge the wireless network to > the wired network or just let the FreeBSD gateway to manage that. > > So far, I can connect from a wireless client to the FreeBSD Access Point (I > can ping any machines on the wired network) but I cannot go beyond that and > I would be very pleased if someone would explain what to do in terms of > ipfilter NAT or routing to access the Internet from a wireless client. I > have 3 network cards: ath0 (wireless - 10.0.2.0/24), bge0 (wired- > 10.0.0.0/24), bce0 (Internet - DHCP). The wired network is behind an > ipfilter firewall (10.0.0.1) and wired computers are NATed. If what you're saying is "I cannot reach the internet", then you're missing a NAT rule for 10.0.2.0/24 to any. If you're unable to ping hosts on the wireless network other then the AP, then apbridge is likely turned off. Otherwise, in pf syntax: pass in on $int_if from $int_if:network to $wire_if:network \ tag WLAN_LAN keep state label "wlan_lan" pass in on $wire_if from $wire_if:network to $int_if:network \ tag LAN_WLAN keep state label "lan_wlan" should be enough to allow traffic from wireless to wire if you're default blocking. I don't know of a real advantage to bridge these, as traffic will go through AP physically regardless. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 21:01:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEEC106566B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastiansetzer@alice-dsl.net) Received: from smtp-out03.alice-dsl.net (smtp-out03.alice-dsl.net [88.44.63.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372978FC1F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastiansetzer@alice-dsl.net) Received: from HSNMST02V05.hsn.alice-dsl.net ([192.168.125.98]) by smtp-out03.alice-dsl.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:47:33 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:47:33 +0100 Message-ID: <67CE2BFC0C158B4C96BC1229798DE50F01FA51F2@HSNMST02V05.hsn.alice-dsl.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: freebsd-update doesn't seem to update to Latest Thread-Index: Acl1wCiWmlyCiQVITdi317FYrXX9cg== From: "Sebastian Setzer" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2009 20:47:33.0173 (UTC) FILETIME=[28940650:01C975C0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: freebsd-update doesn't seem to update to Latest X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:01:02 -0000 Hi, I did a freebsd-update to 7.1-RELEASE as described in the release notes. After that, I installed Openoffice (with pkg_add) and got several = warnings like this one: pkg_add: warning: package 'gnome-vfs-2.22.0_2' requires 'atk-1.22.0_1', = but 'atk-1.20.0' is installed Now I did # pkg_add -r atk pkg_add: package 'atk-1.22.0_1' or its older version already installed so with pkg_add -r I get newer packages than I got with freebsd-update. = Why? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 21:09:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D8710656DE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:09:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A52B8FC12 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:09:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FCCAFBC3C; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:09:22 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:09:22 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20090109075548.GA8216@desmo.3rdrock.kicks-ass.net> In-Reply-To: <20090109075548.GA8216@desmo.3rdrock.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901131209.22109.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: "Alain G. Fabry" Subject: Re: 3945ABG wireless problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:09:24 -0000 On Thursday 08 January 2009 22:55:48 Alain G. Fabry wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having problems with my 3945ABG Wireless card. > > I keep on getting "wpi0: Radio Transmitter is switched off" > > pushing 802.11 button on laptop -> Turning OFF > ------------------------------- > Jan 9 07:59:08 desmo kernel: ugen0: at uhub0 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected > Jan 9 07:59:08 desmo kernel: ugen0: detached That's not the right button or it's mapped wrong. It's an USB related switch and the wpi card doesn't do anything with USB. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 21:32:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD54106566B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demonichandextensions@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s25.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s25.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83838FC17 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:32:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demonichandextensions@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU116-W18 ([65.55.111.136]) by blu0-omc4-s25.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:32:53 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [67.59.9.34] From: brad davison To: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:32:53 +0000 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2009 21:32:53.0459 (UTC) FILETIME=[7DFEBA30:01C975C6] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: updated to 7.1 via cvs source, PAE kernel. server unstable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:32:54 -0000 Hi all=2C =20 Hopefully someone can shed some light on my problem. Over the weekend=2C w= e upgraded our mailserver that was running like a champ w/ FBSD 7.0 and a P= AE kernel (8gb RAM). =20 I didn't use the freebsd-update program=2C because I read that if you're no= t using a GENERIC kernel=2C it wont work. =20 I had changed the standard-supfile like that had RELENG_7_0 to RELENG_7_1 a= nd ran cvsup. =20 I followed the handbook for cleaning out the /usr/src/obj directory=2C rebu= ilt the world and kernel via: =20 # cd /usr/src# make buildworld# make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DPAE# make insta= llkernel KERNCONF=3DPAE =20 then I rebooted into single user mode and performed the: =20 # mount -a -t ufs# mergemaster -p# cd /usr/src# make installworld# mergemas= ter =20 When I did the mergemaster=2C I kept my master.password=2C hosts=2C passwd= =2C rc.conf=2C and make.conf. But for the most part=2C I 'i' installed the= new files. =20 Since then=2C we have had severe server instability after a few hours. The= server completely locks up requiring a hard boot=2C then the fsck_ufs runs= for a while. This is our production mail server=2C and we've been down of= f and on for 2 days. =20 I'm in the process of building a replacement and getting back online with 7= .0 and a GENERIC kernel=2C but what on Earth could have gone on? Did I do = something wrong with using a PAE kernel on 7.1? =20 I'm in single-user mode again running 'fsck -y' and there are TONS of error= s on the /usr volume. =20 The /var/log/messages just shows that the server was restarted=2C and I'm j= ust wondering where to start. =20 =20 _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live=99 Hotmail=AE: Chat. Store. Share. Do more with mail.=20 http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=3DTXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_hm_justgotbetter_expl= ore_012009= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 21:38:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057591065672 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from radek@ceskedomeny.cz) Received: from martinka.starnet.cz (martinka.starnet.cz [92.62.225.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4979C8FC17 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:37:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from radek@ceskedomeny.cz) Received: (qmail 5421 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2009 22:10:27 +0100 Received: from namesti-free-hotspot.nonstoponline.com (HELO localhost) (92.62.226.100) by martinka.starnet.cz with SMTP; 13 Jan 2009 22:10:27 +0100 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:11:17 +0100 From: "Bc. Radek Krejca" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.14) Professional Organization: STARNET, s. r. o. X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1806762015.20090113221117@starnet.cz> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Problems with ixgbe driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Bc. Radek Krejca" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:38:01 -0000 Hello, I have problems with ixgbe driver: 1. build fails In file included from /usr/src/sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe.c:39: /usr/src/sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe.h:87:21: error: tcp_lro.h: No such file or dir= ectory mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DL380-G5. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D130476) new is, that I try to fix it with this (i dont know, if it is correct, but it works): on line 87 in ixgbe.h #include 2. more worse problem - vlans arent working. I can create vlan, I can set it up, but ping is tagged only for upload, download tells me, that ip is on vlan but got reply from ix1. I try to catch it with tcpdump, packtet is deliver to other machine, but back is delivered as not tagged. We still talk about 7.1 release. Yesterday I have 7.0 release, there were vlans working but routing was very slow, so I tried to reinstall to 7.1 :-(. Thank you Radek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 22:00:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F7E1065672 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maddaemon@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f20.google.com (mail-bw0-f20.google.com [209.85.218.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC958FC14 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maddaemon@gmail.com) Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so847049bwz.19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:00:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=B0/P7xvxT+JCWuVXvjyWyXFqUJR1z97e7C5Dp9pAgw0=; b=uvzHc0QwlVTO3r7mW8+VzB1Rr6pvH4i9BNeuEd/KiWkZ3L8EME8cjv2PvNhVA8Hxdk j8szyGxC2TOfxnYu55owbXayyBs/htYkBgdR0yRI6ApSdU+tqcBPimYCIrrPo6UrfOoe 3IS8YkAjUf53p2hOwnR9kr5mHl+397esp5EgE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=owYu5svwfBljTK2mwQgut3GlVLzoD9BW9/m9Rte+34G/gJZUFnlZwK95759CxpWgE9 oZcc0b58wzZ2WjBBWzlJ29AM2UR603OKEgLHleo3N6VejDgZ2MZuqnL16wd9RLDvo4YX LrY5AEv/ZTgCCBFm7qW6XabdEpVsmIKUX4J9A= Received: by 10.103.226.10 with SMTP id d10mr11530978mur.105.1231884042941; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:00:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.103.167.3 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:00:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6c1774c50901131400n481ff98bm895c9afb0a121f51@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:00:42 -0500 From: "maddaemon@gmail.com" To: "Alain G. Fabry" In-Reply-To: <20090109075548.GA8216@desmo.3rdrock.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20090109075548.GA8216@desmo.3rdrock.kicks-ass.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3945ABG wireless problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:00:46 -0000 On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Alain G. Fabry wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm having problems with my 3945ABG Wireless card. > > I keep on getting "wpi0: Radio Transmitter is switched off" > > pushing 802.11 button on laptop -> Turning OFF > ------------------------------- > Jan 9 07:59:08 desmo kernel: ugen0: at uhub0 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected > Jan 9 07:59:08 desmo kernel: ugen0: detached > > pushing 802.11 button again -> Turning ON > ----------------------------------------- > Jan 9 07:59:13 desmo root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x03f0 product 0x171d bus uhub0 > Jan 9 07:59:13 desmo kernel: ugen0: on uhub0 > > ifconfig wpi0 up > ---------------- > Jan 9 07:58:51 desmo kernel: NEWSTATE:INIT > Jan 9 07:58:51 desmo kernel: Resetting the card - clearing any uploaded firmware > Jan 9 07:58:51 desmo kernel: Loading microcode size 0x384 > Jan 9 07:58:51 desmo kernel: firmware status=0xffff0000, val=0x40400000, result=0x40400000 > Jan 9 07:58:51 desmo kernel: Status Match! - ntries = 0 > Jan 9 07:58:51 desmo kernel: microcode alive notification version 10e02 alive 1 > Jan 9 07:58:51 desmo kernel: microcode alive notification version 10e02 alive 1 > Jan 9 07:58:51 desmo kernel: wpi0: Radio Transmitter is switched off > Jan 9 07:58:51 desmo kernel: state changed to 1 > Jan 9 07:58:51 desmo kernel: wpi0: Radio transmitter is switched off > > I notice that I didn't have the license at /usr/share/doc/legal/intel_wpi/LICENSE, so I grabbed it from http://people.freebsd.org/~benjsc/downloads/wpi/20071102-freebsd-wpi.tar.gz > > /boot/loader.conf includes the following > ---------------------------------------- > if_wpi_load="YES" > wlan_load="YES" > wlan_amrr_load="YES" > firmware_load="YES" > wpifw_load="YES" > legal.intel_wpi.license_ack=1 > > What am I doing wrong here....?? These might be of interest to you: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=965 http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.freebsd.mobile/browse_thread/thread/1f9bed1561f5d676?pli=1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 22:20:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61AAA1065674 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:20:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be) Received: from hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be [143.129.75.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F061B8FC1B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:20:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be) Received: from hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0DMKXki021735 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:20:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (pdon@localhost) by hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id n0DMKXnX021732 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:20:33 +0100 (CET) X-Authentication-Warning: hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be: pdon owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:20:33 +0100 (CET) From: Pieter Donche X-X-Sender: pdon@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be To: "mail.list freebsd-questions" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: receiving mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pieter Donche List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:20:36 -0000 Newly installed FreeBSD-7.0. Sending mail to other hosts works. Receiving mail does not: Between host1 (non-freebsd) and host2 (freebsd 7), sending a mail from host1 to host2 (both in domain .domain.topdom) results in message 'Returned mail: see transcript for details": ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 550 5.1.2 ... Host unknown (Name server: mailhost.domain.topdom: host not found) ------------- host1 and host2 are both behind a firewall, but they are in the same zone (so firewall rules do not apply), both are even connected to same switch and their IPs are in the same subnet. Both have fixed IP address (not DHCP) mailhost.domain.topdom does not exist in DNS, but host1 can send mail to other mailservers all over the world. host2(FreeBSD): /etc/nsswitch.conf hosts: files dns /etc/resolv.conf domain domain.topdom nameserver UUU.VVV.WWW.ZZZ (correct ip address of a DNS nameserver) DNS is fully working on host2 (and on host1) According to the FreeBSD handbook I should be able to receive mail ? What can be missing here, how to remedy? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 22:56:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B91510660E9 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:56:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f20.google.com (mail-bw0-f20.google.com [209.85.218.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA658FC08 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:56:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com) Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so915110bwz.19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:56:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=gpLEMqpLRp6p1Ke/b+seIBSZyto8yTbTNVIVMPfIDag=; b=To4J8EOIi0FVMW/D7yJP/vqJgsdtYWqz3USj59rnDzXKmGFP9XqIsg1r8zIQJGlqXb +WePsNqfeBSv9PfZ4MJ3+kUSbEM6HdSRtKJhHjOOBKfflx54N6pCDJEO70BoMlp9MXK5 j1Lv6lR/o/JzUSNmZa6SEfCJqZwhiKUK5L7qQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=KeysSYSbtgW6JS0EtZNncgKz113/keL2NKMFgVoqEuZ7NcZc/bsXryBAJ8I1Ztq2St Rzx352139+lwyh61Bmg8K272yPageKBZOQL/e0ksgNXbb56oIdMN9WObLHZEFbCgjC4M gU/xKznYHO4QgFwZuedsSpxCj13SS/z28oPtY= Received: by 10.181.158.2 with SMTP id k2mr5335158bko.145.1231887367306; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:56:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.181.14.6 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:56:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <28283d910901131456k1a94b322td46cea93406c6df@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:56:07 -0500 From: "matt donovan" To: "brad davison" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: updated to 7.1 via cvs source, PAE kernel. server unstable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:56:16 -0000 T24gVHVlLCBKYW4gMTMsIDIwMDkgYXQgNDozMiBQTSwgYnJhZCBkYXZpc29uIDwKZGVtb25pY2hh bmRleHRlbnNpb25zQGhvdG1haWwuY29tPiB3cm90ZToKCj4KPiBIaSBhbGwsCj4KPiBIb3BlZnVs bHkgc29tZW9uZSBjYW4gc2hlZCBzb21lIGxpZ2h0IG9uIG15IHByb2JsZW0uICBPdmVyIHRoZSB3 ZWVrZW5kLCB3ZQo+IHVwZ3JhZGVkIG91ciBtYWlsc2VydmVyIHRoYXQgd2FzIHJ1bm5pbmcgbGlr ZSBhIGNoYW1wIHcvIEZCU0QgNy4wIGFuZCBhIFBBRQo+IGtlcm5lbCAoOGdiIFJBTSkuCj4KPiBJ IGRpZG4ndCB1c2UgdGhlIGZyZWVic2QtdXBkYXRlIHByb2dyYW0sIGJlY2F1c2UgSSByZWFkIHRo YXQgaWYgeW91J3JlIG5vdAo+IHVzaW5nIGEgR0VORVJJQyBrZXJuZWwsIGl0IHdvbnQgd29yay4K Pgo+IEkgaGFkIGNoYW5nZWQgdGhlIHN0YW5kYXJkLXN1cGZpbGUgbGlrZSB0aGF0IGhhZCBSRUxF TkdfN18wIHRvIFJFTEVOR183XzEKPiBhbmQgcmFuIGN2c3VwLgo+Cj4gSSBmb2xsb3dlZCB0aGUg aGFuZGJvb2sgZm9yIGNsZWFuaW5nIG91dCB0aGUgL3Vzci9zcmMvb2JqIGRpcmVjdG9yeSwKPiBy ZWJ1aWx0IHRoZSB3b3JsZCBhbmQga2VybmVsIHZpYToKPgo+ICMgY2QgL3Vzci9zcmMjIG1ha2Ug YnVpbGR3b3JsZCMgbWFrZSBidWlsZGtlcm5lbCBLRVJOQ09ORj1QQUUjIG1ha2UKPiBpbnN0YWxs a2VybmVsIEtFUk5DT05GPVBBRQo+Cj4gdGhlbiBJIHJlYm9vdGVkIGludG8gc2luZ2xlIHVzZXIg bW9kZSBhbmQgcGVyZm9ybWVkIHRoZToKPgo+ICMgbW91bnQgLWEgLXQgdWZzIyBtZXJnZW1hc3Rl ciAtcCMgY2QgL3Vzci9zcmMjIG1ha2UgaW5zdGFsbHdvcmxkIwo+IG1lcmdlbWFzdGVyCj4KPiBX aGVuIEkgZGlkIHRoZSBtZXJnZW1hc3RlciwgSSBrZXB0IG15IG1hc3Rlci5wYXNzd29yZCwgaG9z dHMsIHBhc3N3ZCwKPiByYy5jb25mLCBhbmQgbWFrZS5jb25mLiAgQnV0IGZvciB0aGUgbW9zdCBw YXJ0LCBJICdpJyBpbnN0YWxsZWQgdGhlIG5ldwo+IGZpbGVzLgo+Cj4gU2luY2UgdGhlbiwgd2Ug aGF2ZSBoYWQgc2V2ZXJlIHNlcnZlciBpbnN0YWJpbGl0eSBhZnRlciBhIGZldyBob3Vycy4gIFRo ZQo+IHNlcnZlciBjb21wbGV0ZWx5IGxvY2tzIHVwIHJlcXVpcmluZyBhIGhhcmQgYm9vdCwgdGhl biB0aGUgZnNja191ZnMgcnVucyBmb3IKPiBhIHdoaWxlLiAgVGhpcyBpcyBvdXIgcHJvZHVjdGlv biBtYWlsIHNlcnZlciwgYW5kIHdlJ3ZlIGJlZW4gZG93biBvZmYgYW5kIG9uCj4gZm9yIDIgZGF5 cy4KPgo+IEknbSBpbiB0aGUgcHJvY2VzcyBvZiBidWlsZGluZyBhIHJlcGxhY2VtZW50IGFuZCBn ZXR0aW5nIGJhY2sgb25saW5lIHdpdGgKPiA3LjAgYW5kIGEgR0VORVJJQyBrZXJuZWwsIGJ1dCB3 aGF0IG9uIEVhcnRoIGNvdWxkIGhhdmUgZ29uZSBvbj8gIERpZCBJIGRvCj4gc29tZXRoaW5nIHdy b25nIHdpdGggdXNpbmcgYSBQQUUga2VybmVsIG9uIDcuMT8KPgo+IEknbSBpbiBzaW5nbGUtdXNl ciBtb2RlIGFnYWluIHJ1bm5pbmcgJ2ZzY2sgLXknIGFuZCB0aGVyZSBhcmUgVE9OUyBvZgo+IGVy cm9ycyBvbiB0aGUgL3VzciB2b2x1bWUuCj4KPiBUaGUgL3Zhci9sb2cvbWVzc2FnZXMganVzdCBz aG93cyB0aGF0IHRoZSBzZXJ2ZXIgd2FzIHJlc3RhcnRlZCwgYW5kIEknbQo+IGp1c3Qgd29uZGVy aW5nIHdoZXJlIHRvIHN0YXJ0Lgo+Cj4KPgo+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCj4gV2luZG93cyBMaXZl4oSiIEhv dG1haWwoUik6IENoYXQuIFN0b3JlLiBTaGFyZS4gRG8gbW9yZSB3aXRoIG1haWwuCj4KPiBodHRw Oi8vd2luZG93c2xpdmUuY29tL2V4cGxvcmU/b2NpZD1UWFRfVEFHTE1fV0xfdDFfaG1fanVzdGdv dGJldHRlcl9leHBsb3JlXzAxMjAwOV9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fCj4gZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc8aHR0cDovL3dpbmRv d3NsaXZlLmNvbS9leHBsb3JlP29jaWQ9VFhUX1RBR0xNX1dMX3QxX2htX2p1c3Rnb3RiZXR0ZXJf ZXhwbG9yZV8wMTIwMDlfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX2ZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnPm1haWxpbmcgbGlzdAo+IGh0dHA6Ly9s aXN0cy5mcmVlYnNkLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2ZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zCj4gVG8g dW5zdWJzY3JpYmUsIHNlbmQgYW55IG1haWwgdG8gIgo+IGZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zLXVuc3Vi c2NyaWJlQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIgo+Cgpjb3VsZCBiZSBkdWUgdG8gUEFFLiBzaW5jZSBQQUUgaXMg a25vd24gbm90IHRvIGJlIHZlcnkgc3RhYmxlLgo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 22:57:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9001C1065D59 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:57:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f20.google.com (mail-bw0-f20.google.com [209.85.218.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DEE8FC16 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:57:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com) Received: by mail-bw0-f20.google.com with SMTP id 13so916411bwz.19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:57:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=EMXQADbd/yeQ7yPYd5klK8ynCfIJX0AACl480Mj3Hi0=; b=C46QsTmV+VKaYFIEUgSUSsPQTXNOxD93bxqmIjH7nKbtzG8tReewjCQ/HbpoBhKHYG xMypI68RnVS7j0FJM2zCC8BNczBcpjuz8juL5biihqOQ8ZuQrtoKOKMYu0T3RN5MfRqD R0yh2/6pTzghYOR9glWVz9EEmsZm/enOQmjIg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=TLOsB2Dswn/J2kodX+PP5FnfKZVZ//KID/qBSAB5HD7CXnhoi5lYv7MfynFyfJfkoW +b69HR3TRcIBnf7o7LhPTL87JU+8FY4z0VFUmCshouNrvhet1R/uLrKx2t3SIgGKyFnL LO5WaqlRsC8wJnNWSA7S2ALOaUWckbVQ7u4ec= Received: by 10.181.58.9 with SMTP id l9mr11538529bkk.214.1231887438318; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:57:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.181.14.6 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:57:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <28283d910901131457p3fbf0fcapa95c8527be01b8bf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:57:18 -0500 From: "matt donovan" To: "Sebastian Setzer" In-Reply-To: <67CE2BFC0C158B4C96BC1229798DE50F01FA51F2@HSNMST02V05.hsn.alice-dsl.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <67CE2BFC0C158B4C96BC1229798DE50F01FA51F2@HSNMST02V05.hsn.alice-dsl.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update doesn't seem to update to Latest X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:57:23 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Sebastian Setzer < sebastiansetzer@alice-dsl.net> wrote: > > Hi, > I did a freebsd-update to 7.1-RELEASE as described in the release notes. > After that, I installed Openoffice (with pkg_add) and got several warnings > like this one: > pkg_add: warning: package 'gnome-vfs-2.22.0_2' requires 'atk-1.22.0_1', but > 'atk-1.20.0' is installed > > Now I did > # pkg_add -r atk > pkg_add: package 'atk-1.22.0_1' or its older version already installed > > so with pkg_add -r I get newer packages than I got with freebsd-update. > Why? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > freebsd=update does not install any packages. you had atk installed before you upgraded you need to update your ports to the correct versions needed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 23:18:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7352E10659D9 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:18:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D918FC19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D23AFBC3C; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:18:45 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:18:45 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200901101837.50363.af300wsm@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200901101837.50363.af300wsm@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901131418.45263.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Andrew Falanga Subject: Re: Odd behavior after upgrading to 7.0-p7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:18:49 -0000 On Saturday 10 January 2009 16:37:50 Andrew Falanga wrote: > I installed 7.0 i386 and all was working great. I upgraded to p7 and now > when I end my X session, I have kdm loading, it doesn't bring me to a login > prompt. It dumps me on console 0 and I have to kill the kdm-bin process to > return to a kdm login. > > This didn't happen before upgrading to p7. What would have changed that > would not prevent this? When using x11/nvidia-driver, recompile it for this new kernel. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 23:21:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CD910656E2 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frederique@isafeelin.org) Received: from progress.isafeelin.org (progress.isafeelin.org [84.244.146.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CD58FC13 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frederique@isafeelin.org) Received: from progress.isafeelin.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by progress.isafeelin.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32DE130D4C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:04:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.15] (s55919a03.adsl.wanadoo.nl [85.145.154.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by progress.isafeelin.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4B2B130D28 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:04:48 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <496D1DED.7050003@isafeelin.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:04:13 +0100 From: Frederique Rijsdijk User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <28283d910901131456k1a94b322td46cea93406c6df@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <28283d910901131456k1a94b322td46cea93406c6df@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: updated to 7.1 via cvs source, PAE kernel. server unstable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:21:57 -0000 matt donovan schreef: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 4:32 PM, brad davison < > demonichandextensions@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Since then, we have had severe server instability after a few hours. The >> server completely locks up requiring a hard boot, then the fsck_ufs runs for >> a while. This is our production mail server, and we've been down off and on >> for 2 days. >> > > could be due to PAE. since PAE is known not to be very stable. > First thing I'd try too. Compile a GENERIC kernel and see if that brings any improvement. If it does, perhaps consider running AMD64 in stead of PAE. Alot more stable. -- FR From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 23:29:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF9C10657B6 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:29:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92658FC14 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:29:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14A5AFBC3C; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:29:07 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Pieter Donche Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:29:07 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901131429.07667.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Subject: Re: receiving mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:29:11 -0000 On Tuesday 13 January 2009 13:20:33 Pieter Donche wrote: > 'Returned mail: see transcript for details": > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- > > > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- > 550 5.1.2 ... Host unknown (Name server: > mailhost.domain.topdom: host not found) > ------------- > > host1 and host2 are both behind a firewall, but they are in the same > zone (so firewall rules do not apply), both are even connected to same > switch and their IPs are in the same subnet. > Both have fixed IP address (not DHCP) > > mailhost.domain.topdom does not exist in DNS, but host1 can send > mail to other mailservers all over the world. MX record for host2.domain.topdom resolves to an unknown mailhost.domain.topdom. See: host -t MX host2.domain.topdom on host1.domain.topdom. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 00:54:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79339106564A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:54:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8358FC12 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:54:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so141851ywe.13 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:54:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; bh=Y6o2+AyhfEfkFfhZNsGjvp+3OdkZQntaXzDODKVti8s=; b=mK2kk/QOFiCFGWgarT4kn1ox2CNueVT95cXgEIIcNSW1x508NRDg2rZEm8kdctgSxI zQ5dkChGlpoRqy0KWSZV4XB3jHFaQH5DEBYeVwdsiqhm9PKFblD2Fvc8FbEAJWHle9x4 uhmNW5ZB0bTTX2XwL0KheDo2VzSkrMvvo5R6M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=WkFgAVkjwGgi+/anSMZl1OhUh6RYHvmLzsB2ul6+UCjNLo1uMykvm94oTqcGMfW90o pFgwR98BcstIS8sg0A82duAY7v5YSFZkC9Wn3MChUnIOAtML5VshbEGjf6gqwPzpQd1E oVh0vLTkVZKH6PrYqZO6r/3vCr+BaXLjwulEI= Received: by 10.100.254.15 with SMTP id b15mr17075897ani.35.1231893068342; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:31:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.100? (CPE-65-29-54-222.wi.res.rr.com [65.29.54.222]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d38sm39582309and.3.2009.01.13.16.31.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:31:07 -0800 (PST) From: Mitja To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:30:59 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901131830.59570.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: FreeBSD-SA-09:03.ntpd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:54:16 -0000 I did as instructions says: b) Execute the following commands as root: # cd /usr/src # patch < /path/to/patch # cd /usr/src/lib/bind # make obj && make depend && make && make install # cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/named # make obj && make depend && make && make install # /etc/rc.d/named restart ...and I got: make: don't know how to make /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp/ntpd/../libparse/libparse.a. Stop Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 01:20:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F04710656EC for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:20:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from aegis.hamla.org (aegis.hamla.org [206.251.255.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8829A8FC1B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:20:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aegis.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4321C5C26 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:22:49 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= x-virus-scanned:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id:subject:from:date :received:received:received; s=aegis; t=1231896169; bh=PgchGmuBv kX1/t6sEkvI+vUgiNSBMI959TUE9jUWaN4=; b=HC0D2reUdfNTX2DEDJeh7IXtP 4cmtWQqbabLOc0b3XVQCOpKQPgLru+PmrRB2TM4jMLj1M4YS0AUWCSYzkYstf5m+ +wUu7/TVcLOEs978Pqc5EgaDjJkXE7O3yexGQAxTpnozbjH1PKr8m+dik1WAOWHu ayP2CuGXbGRvx4tNTU= Received: from aegis.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aegis.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id r9hhksz+eUO6 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:22:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from shepherd.hamla.org (shepherd.hamla.org [74.72.46.40]) by aegis.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0042A5C24 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:22:48 -0500 (EST) Received: by shepherd.hamla.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9EA1E129EF1B; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:20:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:20:38 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090114012038.GD41585@shepherd.hamla.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94, clamav-milter version 0.94 on aegis.hamla.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: receiving mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:20:44 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Pieter Donche wrote: > Between host1 (non-freebsd) and host2 (freebsd 7), sending a mail from > host1 to host2 (both in domain .domain.topdom) results in message > 'Returned mail: see transcript for details": > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- > > > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- > 550 5.1.2 ... Host unknown (Name server: > mailhost.domain.topdom: host not found) > ------------- The MX for host2.domain.topdom is mailhost.domain.topdom; the latter is unreachable by host1, hence the permanent failure. > mailhost.domain.topdom does not exist in DNS, but host1 can send > mail to other mailservers all over the world. The fact that host1 can send mail anywhere else is irrelevant; fix the MX entry or make mailhost.domain.topdom real/reachable from host1. Or remove or adjust the MX entry for host2.domain.topdom so host1 sends mail to host2.domain.topdom instead of its mailhost.domain.topdom. -- Sahil Tandon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 01:24:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B32E106564A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:24:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@coder.cl) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA74A8FC08 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:24:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@coder.cl) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so66100qwb.7 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.214.113.1 with SMTP id l1mr27759895qac.259.1231896293245; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from quake ([200.73.29.57]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm14111618ywc.9.2009.01.13.17.24.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:40 -0800 (PST) From: "Daniel Molina Wegener [Coder.CL]" Organization: DMW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:23:28 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200901131830.59570.lumiwa@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200901131830.59570.lumiwa@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4176162.0vHYFI7ak5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200901132223.36671.dmw@coder.cl> Cc: Mitja Subject: Re: FreeBSD-SA-09:03.ntpd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dmw@coder.cl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:24:54 -0000 --nextPart4176162.0vHYFI7ak5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 13 January 2009 21:30:59 Mitja wrote: > I did as instructions says: > b) Execute the following commands as root: > > # cd /usr/src > # patch < /path/to/patch > # cd /usr/src/lib/bind > # make obj && make depend && make && make install > # cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/named > # make obj && make depend && make && make install > # /etc/rc.d/named restart > > ...and I got: > > make: don't know how to > make > /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp/ntpd/../libparse/libparse.a. > Stop Hi, you can try updating the complete system by using csup(1), take a look at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/cvsup.html I think that this is the better way to upgrade any issue with=20 security advisories. > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > [SNIP] Best regards, =2D-=20 .O. | Daniel Molina Wegener | FreeBSD & Linux ..O | dmw [at] coder [dot] cl | Open Standards OOO | http://coder.cl/ | FOSS Developer --nextPart4176162.0vHYFI7ak5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkltPpAACgkQxyPEFPXO3WEm1wCfT1CZ4WBQR9i0sXlREXaw7meq 3g8AnibeOPhDQr+NVxrYiHdBySOdFHCz =iJkd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4176162.0vHYFI7ak5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 01:30:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9E8106564A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:30:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624258FC19 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:30:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from [66.221.101.252] (really [97.77.40.194]) by cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090114013033.KFAV2046.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@[66.221.101.252]> for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:30:33 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:30:32 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: FreeBSD Questions List Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) X-Munged-Reply-To: To reply - figure it out MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: unsub X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:30:34 -0000 --On January 13, 2009 9:38:31 AM -0600 Javier Henderson wrote: > > unsub Another Criminal Minds fan? Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ****************************************** WARNING: Check the headers before replying From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 02:28:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15701065675 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:28:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.karapetyan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f17.google.com (mail-qy0-f17.google.com [209.85.221.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894708FC13 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:28:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.karapetyan@gmail.com) Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so478440qyk.19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:28:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:from; bh=PIPBRkdHLNuzBcDPd9zLVgkMuFsxCbEsdJvg7nEsGcY=; b=Cyf86K3W0xiET4bMJwgKIald5SOpBkh7fkz0iC/ICmVuKTjaYCYXn/kzUOasbGBtZE UNXLt22CZalzsWHW9gYuCALCiLcout3Pc+St7oeHwiC7V5aATpXqgm6YA82aQtIqKMKf I1JwTOwNgvwuo1+UzruVUFPz8o9vJTPgVq2UE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:from; b=ljarqRrqtUT3xbGetQUqjVEV1Yk1W6Z+PKtQ125cuUkHuzaS7EWlY/tHDJrB1x7ESE vAOWaRTB7VQa2BuLw7KZ+6Lq3SbAQ9HNJLWz84KPDpkJYQ9ZzPbkr2l1izg1xyR7YHVB ruwz29mqWHoNgYPZ6G2/GRjroQVZsu9bEV8fY= Received: by 10.215.13.16 with SMTP id q16mr10545075qai.237.1231900079855; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:27:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (c-98-228-123-204.hsd1.in.comcast.net [98.228.123.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 34sm33855536yxl.59.2009.01.13.18.27.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:27:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:27:56 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090114022756.GC46075@vagrant.hsd1.in.comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200901131830.59570.lumiwa@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200901131830.59570.lumiwa@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) From: David Karapetyan Subject: mythtv ported over to freebsd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:28:02 -0000 Has anyone installed mythtv on a fbsd box? I checked the port makefile, and it stated that the port was broken? Is this true? If so, what are the major issues? On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 06:30:59PM -0600, Mitja wrote: > I did as instructions says: > b) Execute the following commands as root: > > # cd /usr/src > # patch < /path/to/patch > # cd /usr/src/lib/bind > # make obj && make depend && make && make install > # cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/named > # make obj && make depend && make && make install > # /etc/rc.d/named restart > > ...and I got: > > make: don't know how to > make /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp/ntpd/../libparse/libparse.a. Stop > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- -- Best, David Karapetyan http://davidkarapetyan.homeunix.com University of Notre Dame Department of Mathematics 255 Hurley Hall Notre Dame, IN 46556-4618 Phone: 574-631-5706 Cell: 202-460-5173 Fax: 574-631-6579 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 02:45:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3DD106568E for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:45:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from aegis.hamla.org (aegis.hamla.org [206.251.255.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAEF8FC1F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aegis.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D7D5C26 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:47:47 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= x-virus-scanned:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id:subject:from:date :received:received:received; s=aegis; t=1231901267; bh=g6Jo3q5Hi FzevTdARJRZHNQS6FGtL9bComsgHBg1dKk=; b=V0mVWDvbm1QA8NJ5NbHHwGEGY oihv25L+wVtVFGpUv2ksJnz/0BMfAYnF8ruwXlO0JupUE8Ld4ZX74eVNXUSrJohy 8BVhev67tcW/whc7QUpXuHtjxsRX5vYAd/GLLPO6Yp/hSAhqjSV1WpQjccWExpoa asoPVwnzQYFWtyZSyo= Received: from aegis.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aegis.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id XOS8vvf2KotN for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:47:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from shepherd.hamla.org (shepherd.hamla.org [74.72.46.40]) by aegis.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81CE25C24 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:47:47 -0500 (EST) Received: by shepherd.hamla.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 819C712A086C; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:45:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:45:37 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090114024537.GE41845@shepherd.hamla.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94, clamav-milter version 0.94 on aegis.hamla.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: unsub X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:45:39 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On January 13, 2009 9:38:31 AM -0600 Javier Henderson > wrote: >> >> unsub > > Another Criminal Minds fan? ROFL! -- Sahil Tandon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 02:57:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624091065670 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A398FC1A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from phenom.cordula.ws (phenom [192.168.254.60]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A822364F2; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:57:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:57:32 +0100 From: cpghost To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090114025732.GA98196@phenom.cordula.ws> References: <20090102164412.GA1258@phenom.cordula.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090102164412.GA1258@phenom.cordula.ws> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Subject: Re: Foiling MITM attacks on source and ports trees X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:57:36 -0000 On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 05:44:12PM +0100, cpghost wrote: > Any idea? Could this be implemented as a plugin to Subversion (since > it must access previous revisions of files and previously computed > digests)? Given read-only access to the repository, a set of simple > Python scripts or C/C++ programs could easily implement the basic > functionality and cache the results for fast retrieval by other > scripts. But how well will all this scale? Sorry to revive this thread by replying to self, but nothing has materialized out of it (yet). Considering all that has been said up until now, it boils down to this: Issue #1 was signing the list: With or without SSL/TLS certificates, the (compressed) list could be signed by a web-trusted GnuPG Project Key, so let's assume it will be, and deal with the issue of transmission over SSL and how to get a certificate for the server(s) later (if at all). Issue #2 was how to generate the list out of the repository. A script that has (read-only) access to the Subversion repo would first in batch mode compute md5/sha256 checksums for *all* revisions available. It may take some time, but so what? It's only a one-time job, so let it run overnight to checksum the few GBs. The results could be stored in an arbitrary database. Then, another script will have to be hooked into Subversion, so that each commit will have that script compute the md5/sha256 checksums of the additional revisions, and store them in the database as well. This doesn't seem too much of a burden on the server, because even if the commits come in bursts, the number of bytes to commit are very fast checksummed... and saved in the database (I think / hope). It doesn't look like an overly expensive operation. Issue #3 was how to generate the list on-demand. That's a simple database query script, that would select a subset of files, revisions and checksums from the database, compress the result, sign it with the GnuPG Project Key, and return it to the user. This scales well to many concurrent client queries, because the database is independent from the Subversion server and can run on separate hardware -- and even be replicated if need be. Issue #4 was how to get the checksums on the client side. A simple app could connect to the "checksum server" (the app defined in Issue #3) -- or one of its mirrors if need be -- and select a signed list for a specific subrange (say, now up to 24h in the past). It would verify the signature using the public Project Key (obtained through a secure channel -- but let's care about that later when the infrastructure is in place). This app could factor out the tasks of querying the server and checking the signature into a library, that could also be used by an expanded version of csup. The idea is that csup, called with a special flag would verify the checksums of all files downloaded in the current run; while the main app could still check the integrity of a tree fetched 2 months ago, provided it is called with the right time stamp. Issue #5 was how to identify the revisions of files stored locally. That's a tough one, AFAICS. How to solve that one? Ideas? On old trees, its kinda hopeless (but read below); new invocations of a modified csup could save metadata, including revisions numbers somewhere (/var/db/sup perhaps), and use those metadata. For old(er) trees, checksums could be computed locally and sent to the "checksum server" for identification purposes. The server could match the path and checksums obtained through the client, and return a revision number (if any) out of the database. That in turn could be stored post-facto in /var/db/sup, and everything could proceed as above. Soo... implementation should now be easy as pie and require just a few lines of Python or a few more lines of C and a couple of little programs... and of course read-only access to the repository for deployment once it's ready. Or is it not yet? Thanks, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 03:24:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178741065673 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostsniper007@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s29.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s29.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38818FC14 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostsniper007@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([10.12.232.168]) by bay0-omc3-s29.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:12:15 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:12:15 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 76.69.36.107 by COL0-DAV30.phx.gbl with DAV; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:12:11 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [76.69.36.107] X-Originating-Email: [ghostsniper007@hotmail.com] X-Sender: ghostsniper007@hotmail.com From: "Anthony L" To: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:12:16 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2009 03:12:15.0093 (UTC) FILETIME=[E6798250:01C975F5] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:55:43 +0000 Subject: NFS fstab style X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:24:15 -0000 Hi, I've posted this question on a few boards but couldn't get a solid confirmation: Can someone confirm that these two lines are the same -or- if one is preferred over the other ? Code: 192.168.1.8:/temp /tmp_nfs nfs rw,-b,-i 0 0 192.168.1.8:/temp /tmp_nfs nfs rw,bg,intr 0 0 Basically: -b vs bg and -i vs intr Thank you .Anthony.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 04:46:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2A91065674 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:46:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4618FC0C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5584AFBC3C; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:46:32 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:46:32 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200901131830.59570.lumiwa@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200901131830.59570.lumiwa@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901131946.32580.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Mitja Subject: Re: FreeBSD-SA-09:03.ntpd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:46:34 -0000 On Tuesday 13 January 2009 15:30:59 Mitja wrote: > I did as instructions says: > b) Execute the following commands as root: > > # cd /usr/src > # patch < /path/to/patch > # cd /usr/src/lib/bind > # make obj && make depend && make && make install > # cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/named > # make obj && make depend && make && make install > # /etc/rc.d/named restart > > ...and I got: > > make: don't know how to > make /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp/ntpd/../libparse/libparse.a. Stop If your subject is correct, you're confusing two seperate advistories. The 09:03.ntpd is for ntpd. So you'd have to: # cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp/ntpd Either way, if you don't have an up-to-date (as in before patch) buildworld in /usr/obj, you can't rebuild like this, as the Makefiles do not contain targets to build dependencies in other directories. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 07:00:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE1F1065676 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:00:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD1E8FC0C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id n0E70rK3006334 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:00:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id n0E70qUa006333; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:00:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA02343; Tue, 13 Jan 09 22:50:48 PST Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:52:52 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: GhostSniper007@hotmail.com Message-Id: <496d8bc4.y2sAEtGoaGQ1QLWh%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS fstab style X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:00:54 -0000 > Can someone confirm that these two lines are the same > -or- if one is preferred over the other ? > > Code: > 192.168.1.8:/temp /tmp_nfs nfs rw,-b,-i 0 0 > 192.168.1.8:/temp /tmp_nfs nfs rw,bg,intr 0 0 I've never seen the style of line 1 before, no idea whether it would work or not. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 07:13:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BBF1065670 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f20.google.com (mail-bw0-f20.google.com [209.85.218.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A238FC16 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so1315115bwz.19 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:13:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=e355MwWN10X+K7wpRuGl8f8MP2ydGkLzr850Sx1yM7U=; b=sxk91fvPxPP/YrJAbNfhuo+zg1QDAbRYZ5/baRa/kLThPIxsEEkAbgjHp+X2Iiofll 9AE0qYPw7O9jA8mfLGpuschAxpRk/bCsSo3QOsmhY7kq1Ze0U/+QR6MF5Eff+hAwpUTl kZCirGMgKwE+lYN6IaNHSrAo8PrOAo/F60Z0I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=GuX5kxhw1vj3y26hRcMaXmUgdDjxg1GoOfGlrXYa7t71eW0fgxTjDoP1xoZC9Z0IXZ BRg5yZ0j5dnvWNVO5Y03NWQ/9mackEAK6FyMqZPX45QQPA1Q6dM7PBixn9BMtormb/Vb 35kpvS2I7al/DO61wV+9fUgkPQdcXhH/rHrdU= Received: by 10.223.126.69 with SMTP id b5mr13011613fas.54.1231917212690; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:13:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.125.134 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:13:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0901132313ga018517idd21cf7a784aae7f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:13:32 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: "User Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: updating to 7.1 with a small root slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:13:35 -0000 Dear all, I am looking for your advice. Due to a very stupid design decision my / slice is only 256 MB. It seems too little so whenever I compile a new kernel, I need to move the kernel.old to a different slice to install the new one. Then I pray, hope for the best and reboot. However, I read that if I want to update to 7.1 I will need to boot a generic kernel at some point. What option do I have? Even if I install a copy of GENERIC kernel into /boot, it most likely won't fit in the available file space. The problem is the machine's remote so I cannot take it down, replace drives, etc. as I am bound by a hosting contract and frankly I really do not want to do that unless I have no other option. Thoughts? Many thanks! -- Zbigniew Szalbot www.slowo.pl www.fairtrade.net.pl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 07:52:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF4C1065670 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be) Received: from hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be [143.129.75.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E825C8FC19 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:52:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be) Received: from hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0E7pxec001185; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:51:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (pdon@localhost) by hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id n0E7pxud001182; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:51:59 +0100 (CET) X-Authentication-Warning: hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be: pdon owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:51:59 +0100 (CET) From: Pieter Donche X-X-Sender: pdon@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be To: Mel In-Reply-To: <200901131429.07667.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Message-ID: References: <200901131429.07667.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "mail.list freebsd-questions" Subject: Re: receiving mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pieter Donche List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:52:01 -0000 on host1: $ host -t MX macos.cmi.ua.ac.be returns no answer This is the same as with another host on the same subnet, also in the same zone and on the same switch... and which does receive a sent mail --- But, when I try from host1 $ telnet host2.domain.topdom 25 Trying 143.129.75.1... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused Op host2.domain.topdom I see sendmail is running: host2: $ ps -jaxw | grep sendm smmsp 816 1 816 816 0 Is ?? 0:00.02 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) root 812 1 812 812 0 Ss ?? 0:00.01 sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) What's wrong? Why does this not work out of the box ?? On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Mel wrote: > On Tuesday 13 January 2009 13:20:33 Pieter Donche wrote: > >> 'Returned mail: see transcript for details": >> >> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- >> >> >> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- >> 550 5.1.2 ... Host unknown (Name server: >> mailhost.domain.topdom: host not found) >> ------------- >> >> host1 and host2 are both behind a firewall, but they are in the same >> zone (so firewall rules do not apply), both are even connected to same >> switch and their IPs are in the same subnet. >> Both have fixed IP address (not DHCP) >> >> mailhost.domain.topdom does not exist in DNS, but host1 can send >> mail to other mailservers all over the world. > > MX record for host2.domain.topdom resolves to an unknown > mailhost.domain.topdom. > See: host -t MX host2.domain.topdom on host1.domain.topdom. > > -- > Mel > > Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules > and never get to the software part. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 08:09:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBEC1065673; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:09:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yonyossef.lists@gmail.com) Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D687A8FC13; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:09:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yonyossef.lists@gmail.com) Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j71so467074rne.12 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:09:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=/ic+S2d/kcl4K05WCTpx6gzQLUJM5a3PfLtgN2khRL4=; b=nZAcTpGYX3nMI9iuGaOA6KoEcOZJEuJaCDA0VEdmLynxbgMfkjpr/hY477/ufFyPII h6uhmtiaW9a63qbntSJaKKVmRoIZLWxgDghe0P/wXEOW3ESCNdAdaZRGPFNEe0dJG8Ij agr0PxXnJSMvre4xhsIGMwViNtjJBv1fOtdf0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=qELCR3ttjwABDI1YhZ3nWr0Dqf90Kfwiyy5rDDToCe5NLivqZ/av/Mes/DuB9RfZRw UEeB3nJad+AdLnR46VP45htVQIARAQ0qqU6DMbI7cCZb4scPY03ZSaZK+l1S/zCdeoMU EBaIjXMhCw2RcrDhe9CxX9PpVW8JqZ8NH41Ls= Received: by 10.151.85.9 with SMTP id n9mr1405070ybl.150.1231920584041; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:09:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.229.15 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:09:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20def4870901140009y1f007108y92797d5f79ffac08@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:09:44 +0200 From: "Yony Yossef" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: eitans@mellanox.co.il, oleg@mellanox.co.il, liranl@mellanox.co.il Subject: howto determine network device unit number? device.hints? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:09:45 -0000 Hi, I would like to determine the unit number of my network cards, e.g. make the device on pci0:16 be assigned every time with unit number 0 and pci0:19 with unit number 1. Is it done by /boot/device.hints? if so, how? My cards are: mtnic0@pci0:19:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x001715b3 chip=0x636815b3 rev=0xa0 hdr=0x00 mtnic1@pci0:16:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x001715b3 chip=0x636815b3 rev=0xa0 hdr=0x00 So I've tried: hint.mtnic.0.at="pci0:16" hint.mtnic.1.at="pci0:19" but it doesn't work. They keep switching arbitrarily. I'm using FreeBSD 7.0. Thanks Yony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 08:36:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4671065687 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deceased@webmail.vulcano.lt) Received: from mx.infodomus.net (mx.infodomus.net [213.197.186.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E4F8FC12 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:36:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deceased@webmail.vulcano.lt) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mx.infodomus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF8733C6E for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:53:02 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.infodomus.net Received: from mx.infodomus.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (control.vulcano.lt [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EHAwOs7M377N for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:52:59 +0200 (EET) Received: from [192.168.15.3] (78-62-19-17.static.zebra.lt [78.62.19.17]) by mx.infodomus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025A233C67 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:52:58 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <496D9FF1.7030901@webmail.vulcano.lt> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:18:57 +0200 From: Deceased User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070400060607020709080003" Subject: rum0 performance < 1Mbps; ath0 reboots system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:36:23 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070400060607020709080003 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, List, Recently I've set up my non-lcd-wokring HP NX9020 notebook as ADSL gateway and AP on 7.1-release Everything works well except wireless. I have LogiLink WL0025 (RT2573) which users rum(4) driver. I now it's not recomended to use rum cards as hostap, but my ath(4) card works even worse(later on that). IT is a USB stick so if it was connected as USB 1.0 device i would expect that kind of performance, but it's not (i guess :) ) addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel, device uhub0 addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel, device uhub1 addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel, device uhub2 addr 1: EHCI root hub, Intel, device uhub3 addr 2: product 0x0018, vendor 0x13b1, device axe0 addr 3: 802.11 bg WLAN, Ralink, device rum0 Also mind that I'm using USB ethernet adapter on the same USB root hub. I tried to use Netgear WG511T (atheros 5212) (carbus) but it constantly couses IRQ storms with cbb0 device, after I disable acpi it works, but even slower than rum0 card and panics the machine if I remove the card from working machine. Any thoughts would be appreciated. dmesg attached. nbgw# vmstat -i interrupt total rate irq0: clk 44926114 1000 irq1: atkbd0 186 0 irq8: rtc 5749743 127 irq9: uhci2 acpi0 264526 5 irq10: rl0 uhci0 434405 9 irq11: cbb0 uhci1+ 25789037 574 irq12: psm0 136 0 irq14: ata0 646740 14 Total 77810887 1732 --------------070400060607020709080003 Content-Type: text/plain; name="dmesg.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename="dmesg.txt" b3B5cmlnaHQgKGMpIDE5OTItMjAwOSBUaGUgRnJlZUJTRCBQcm9qZWN0Lg0KQ29weXJpZ2h0 IChjKSAxOTc5LCAxOTgwLCAxOTgzLCAxOTg2LCAxOTg4LCAxOTg5LCAxOTkxLCAxOTkyLCAx OTkzLCAxOTk0DQogICAgICAgIFRoZSBSZWdlbnRzIG9mIHRoZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IG9mIENh bGlmb3JuaWEuIEFsbCByaWdodHMgcmVzZXJ2ZWQuDQpGcmVlQlNEIGlzIGEgcmVnaXN0ZXJl ZCB0cmFkZW1hcmsgb2YgVGhlIEZyZWVCU0QgRm91bmRhdGlvbi4NCkZyZWVCU0QgNy4xLVJF TEVBU0UgIzA6IFRodSBKYW4gIDEgMTQ6Mzc6MjUgVVRDIDIwMDkNCiAgICByb290QGxvZ2Fu LmNzZS5idWZmYWxvLmVkdTovdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3JjL3N5cy9HRU5FUklDDQptb2R1bGVf cmVnaXN0ZXI6IG1vZHVsZSB1aHViL3J1bSBhbHJlYWR5IGV4aXN0cyENCk1vZHVsZSB1aHVi L3J1bSBmYWlsZWQgdG8gcmVnaXN0ZXI6IDE3DQpUaW1lY291bnRlciAiaTgyNTQiIGZyZXF1 ZW5jeSAxMTkzMTgyIEh6IHF1YWxpdHkgMA0KQ1BVOiBJbnRlbChSKSBDZWxlcm9uKFIpIE0g cHJvY2Vzc29yICAgICAgICAgMS4zMEdIeiAoMTI5Ni43Ni1NSHogNjg2LWNsYXNzIENQVSkN CiAgT3JpZ2luID0gIkdlbnVpbmVJbnRlbCIgIElkID0gMHg2ZDYgIFN0ZXBwaW5nID0gNg0K ICBGZWF0dXJlcz0weGFmZTlmOWJmPEZQVSxWTUUsREUsUFNFLFRTQyxNU1IsTUNFLENYOCxT RVAsTVRSUixQR0UsTUNBLENNT1YsUEFULENMRkxVU0gsRFRTLEFDUEksTU1YLEZYU1IsU1NF LFNTRTIsU1MsVE0sUEJFPg0KcmVhbCBtZW1vcnkgID0gNTAyMTM2ODMyICg0NzggTUIpDQph dmFpbCBtZW1vcnkgPSA0NzczMjczNjAgKDQ1NSBNQikNCmtiZDEgYXQga2JkbXV4MA0KYXRo X2hhbDogMC45LjIwLjMgKEFSNTIxMCwgQVI1MjExLCBBUjUyMTIsIFJGNTExMSwgUkY1MTEy LCBSRjI0MTMsIFJGNTQxMykNCmFjcGkwOiA8SFAgMzA4ND4gb24gbW90aGVyYm9hcmQNCmFj cGkwOiBbSVRIUkVBRF0NCmFjcGkwOiBQb3dlciBCdXR0b24gKGZpeGVkKQ0KVGltZWNvdW50 ZXIgIkFDUEktZmFzdCIgZnJlcXVlbmN5IDM1Nzk1NDUgSHogcXVhbGl0eSAxMDAwDQphY3Bp X3RpbWVyMDogPDI0LWJpdCB0aW1lciBhdCAzLjU3OTU0NU1Iej4gcG9ydCAweDEwMDgtMHgx MDBiIG9uIGFjcGkwDQphY3BpX2VjMDogPEVtYmVkZGVkIENvbnRyb2xsZXI6IEdQRSAweDFk PiBwb3J0IDB4NjIsMHg2NiBvbiBhY3BpMA0KYWNwaV9hY2FkMDogPEFDIEFkYXB0ZXI+IG9u IGFjcGkwDQpiYXR0ZXJ5MDogPEFDUEkgQ29udHJvbCBNZXRob2QgQmF0dGVyeT4gb24gYWNw aTANCmFjcGlfbGlkMDogPENvbnRyb2wgTWV0aG9kIExpZCBTd2l0Y2g+IG9uIGFjcGkwDQph Y3BpX2J1dHRvbjA6IDxQb3dlciBCdXR0b24+IG9uIGFjcGkwDQpwY2liMDogPEFDUEkgSG9z dC1QQ0kgYnJpZGdlPiBwb3J0IDB4Y2Y4LTB4Y2ZmIG9uIGFjcGkwDQpwY2kwOiA8QUNQSSBQ Q0kgYnVzPiBvbiBwY2liMA0KcGNpMDogPGJhc2UgcGVyaXBoZXJhbD4gYXQgZGV2aWNlIDAu MSAobm8gZHJpdmVyIGF0dGFjaGVkKQ0KcGNpMDogPGJhc2UgcGVyaXBoZXJhbD4gYXQgZGV2 aWNlIDAuMyAobm8gZHJpdmVyIGF0dGFjaGVkKQ0KdmdhcGNpMDogPFZHQS1jb21wYXRpYmxl IGRpc3BsYXk+IHBvcnQgMHgxODAwLTB4MTgwNyBtZW0gMHhlODAwMDAwMC0weGVmZmZmZmZm LDB4ZTAwMDAwMDAtMHhlMDA3ZmZmZiBpcnEgMTAgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDIuMCBvbiBwY2kwDQph Z3AwOiA8SW50ZWwgODI4NXhNICg4NXhHTSBHTUNIKSBTVkdBIGNvbnRyb2xsZXI+IG9uIHZn YXBjaTANCmFncDA6IGRldGVjdGVkIDMyNjM2ayBzdG9sZW4gbWVtb3J5DQphZ3AwOiBhcGVy dHVyZSBzaXplIGlzIDEyOE0NCnZnYXBjaTE6IDxWR0EtY29tcGF0aWJsZSBkaXNwbGF5PiBt ZW0gMHhmMDAwMDAwMC0weGY3ZmZmZmZmLDB4ZTAwODAwMDAtMHhlMDBmZmZmZiBhdCBkZXZp Y2UgMi4xIG9uIHBjaTANCnVoY2kwOiA8SW50ZWwgODI4MDFEQiAoSUNINCkgVVNCIGNvbnRy b2xsZXIgVVNCLUE+IHBvcnQgMHgxODIwLTB4MTgzZiBpcnEgMTAgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDI5LjAg b24gcGNpMA0KdWhjaTA6IFtHSUFOVC1MT0NLRURdDQp1aGNpMDogW0lUSFJFQURdDQp1c2Iw OiA8SW50ZWwgODI4MDFEQiAoSUNINCkgVVNCIGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgVVNCLUE+IG9uIHVoY2kw DQp1c2IwOiBVU0IgcmV2aXNpb24gMS4wDQp1aHViMDogPEludGVsIFVIQ0kgcm9vdCBodWIs IGNsYXNzIDkvMCwgcmV2IDEuMDAvMS4wMCwgYWRkciAxPiBvbiB1c2IwDQp1aHViMDogMiBw b3J0cyB3aXRoIDIgcmVtb3ZhYmxlLCBzZWxmIHBvd2VyZWQNCnVoY2kxOiA8SW50ZWwgODI4 MDFEQiAoSUNINCkgVVNCIGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgVVNCLUI+IHBvcnQgMHgxODQwLTB4MTg1ZiBp cnEgMTEgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDI5LjEgb24gcGNpMA0KdWhjaTE6IFtHSUFOVC1MT0NLRURdDQp1 aGNpMTogW0lUSFJFQURdDQp1c2IxOiA8SW50ZWwgODI4MDFEQiAoSUNINCkgVVNCIGNvbnRy b2xsZXIgVVNCLUI+IG9uIHVoY2kxDQp1c2IxOiBVU0IgcmV2aXNpb24gMS4wDQp1aHViMTog PEludGVsIFVIQ0kgcm9vdCBodWIsIGNsYXNzIDkvMCwgcmV2IDEuMDAvMS4wMCwgYWRkciAx PiBvbiB1c2IxDQp1aHViMTogMiBwb3J0cyB3aXRoIDIgcmVtb3ZhYmxlLCBzZWxmIHBvd2Vy ZWQNCnVoY2kyOiA8SW50ZWwgODI4MDFEQiAoSUNINCkgVVNCIGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgVVNCLUM+ IHBvcnQgMHgxODYwLTB4MTg3ZiBhdCBkZXZpY2UgMjkuMiBvbiBwY2kwDQp1aGNpMjogW0dJ QU5ULUxPQ0tFRF0NCnVoY2kyOiBbSVRIUkVBRF0NCnVzYjI6IDxJbnRlbCA4MjgwMURCIChJ Q0g0KSBVU0IgY29udHJvbGxlciBVU0ItQz4gb24gdWhjaTINCnVzYjI6IFVTQiByZXZpc2lv biAxLjANCnVodWIyOiA8SW50ZWwgVUhDSSByb290IGh1YiwgY2xhc3MgOS8wLCByZXYgMS4w MC8xLjAwLCBhZGRyIDE+IG9uIHVzYjINCnVodWIyOiAyIHBvcnRzIHdpdGggMiByZW1vdmFi bGUsIHNlbGYgcG93ZXJlZA0KZWhjaTA6IDxJbnRlbCA4MjgwMURCL0wvTSAoSUNINCkgVVNC IDIuMCBjb250cm9sbGVyPiBtZW0gMHhlMDEwMDAwMC0weGUwMTAwM2ZmIGlycSAxMSBhdCBk ZXZpY2UgMjkuNyBvbiBwY2kwDQplaGNpMDogW0dJQU5ULUxPQ0tFRF0NCmVoY2kwOiBbSVRI UkVBRF0NCnVzYjM6IEVIQ0kgdmVyc2lvbiAxLjANCnVzYjM6IGNvbXBhbmlvbiBjb250cm9s bGVycywgMiBwb3J0cyBlYWNoOiB1c2IwIHVzYjEgdXNiMg0KdXNiMzogPEludGVsIDgyODAx REIvTC9NIChJQ0g0KSBVU0IgMi4wIGNvbnRyb2xsZXI+IG9uIGVoY2kwDQp1c2IzOiBVU0Ig cmV2aXNpb24gMi4wDQp1aHViMzogPEludGVsIEVIQ0kgcm9vdCBodWIsIGNsYXNzIDkvMCwg cmV2IDIuMDAvMS4wMCwgYWRkciAxPiBvbiB1c2IzDQp1aHViMzogNiBwb3J0cyB3aXRoIDYg cmVtb3ZhYmxlLCBzZWxmIHBvd2VyZWQNCmF4ZTA6IDx2ZW5kb3IgMHgxM2IxIHByb2R1Y3Qg MHgwMDE4LCBjbGFzcyAyNTUvMjU1LCByZXYgMi4wMC8wLjAxLCBhZGRyIDI+IG9uIHVodWIz DQpheGUwOiBBWDg4NzcyLCBidWZzeiAxNTM2LCBib3VuZGFyeSA2NA0KbWlpYnVzMDogPE1J SSBidXM+IG9uIGF4ZTANCnVrcGh5MDogPEdlbmVyaWMgSUVFRSA4MDIuM3UgbWVkaWEgaW50 ZXJmYWNlPiBQSFkgMTYgb24gbWlpYnVzMA0KdWtwaHkwOiAgMTBiYXNlVCwgMTBiYXNlVC1G RFgsIDEwMGJhc2VUWCwgMTAwYmFzZVRYLUZEWCwgYXV0bw0KYXhlMDogV0FSTklORzogdXNp bmcgb2Jzb2xldGVkIGlmX3dhdGNoZG9nIGludGVyZmFjZQ0KYXhlMDogV0FSTklORzogdXNp bmcgb2Jzb2xldGVkIElGRl9ORUVEU0dJQU5UIGZsYWcNCmF4ZTA6IEV0aGVybmV0IGFkZHJl c3M6IDAwOjFkOjdlOjAxOjM3OjgwDQpydW0wOiA8UmFsaW5rIDgwMi4xMSBiZyBXTEFOLCBj bGFzcyAwLzAsIHJldiAyLjAwLzAuMDEsIGFkZHIgMz4gb24gdWh1YjMNCnJ1bTA6IE1BQy9C QlAgUlQyNTczIChyZXYgMHgyNTczYSksIFJGIFJUMjUyOA0KcnVtMDogV0FSTklORzogdXNp bmcgb2Jzb2xldGVkIElGRl9ORUVEU0dJQU5UIGZsYWcNCnJ1bTA6IEV0aGVybmV0IGFkZHJl c3M6IDAwOjFmOjFmOjIzOjhhOmI1DQpwY2liMTogPEFDUEkgUENJLVBDSSBicmlkZ2U+IGF0 IGRldmljZSAzMC4wIG9uIHBjaTANCnBjaTI6IDxBQ1BJIFBDSSBidXM+IG9uIHBjaWIxDQpy bDA6IDxSZWFsVGVrIDgxMzkgMTAvMTAwQmFzZVRYPiBwb3J0IDB4MzAwMC0weDMwZmYgbWVt IDB4ZTAyMDAwMDAtMHhlMDIwMDBmZiBpcnEgMTAgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDAuMCBvbiBwY2kyDQpt aWlidXMxOiA8TUlJIGJ1cz4gb24gcmwwDQpybHBoeTA6IDxSZWFsVGVrIGludGVybmFsIG1l ZGlhIGludGVyZmFjZT4gUEhZIDAgb24gbWlpYnVzMQ0KcmxwaHkwOiAgMTBiYXNlVCwgMTBi YXNlVC1GRFgsIDEwMGJhc2VUWCwgMTAwYmFzZVRYLUZEWCwgYXV0bw0KcmwwOiBFdGhlcm5l dCBhZGRyZXNzOiAwMDpjMDo5Zjo3ZTozZDphZQ0KcmwwOiBbSVRIUkVBRF0NCmNiYjA6IDxU STE0MTAgUENJLUNhcmRCdXMgQnJpZGdlPiBhdCBkZXZpY2UgNS4wIG9uIHBjaTINCmNhcmRi dXMwOiA8Q2FyZEJ1cyBidXM+IG9uIGNiYjANCnBjY2FyZDA6IDwxNi1iaXQgUENDYXJkIGJ1 cz4gb24gY2JiMA0KY2JiMDogW0lUSFJFQURdDQppc2FiMDogPFBDSS1JU0EgYnJpZGdlPiBh dCBkZXZpY2UgMzEuMCBvbiBwY2kwDQppc2EwOiA8SVNBIGJ1cz4gb24gaXNhYjANCmF0YXBj aTA6IDxJbnRlbCBJQ0g0IFVETUExMDAgY29udHJvbGxlcj4gcG9ydCAweDFmMC0weDFmNyww eDNmNiwweDE3MC0weDE3NywweDM3NiwweDE4MTAtMHgxODFmIGF0IGRldmljZSAzMS4xIG9u IHBjaTANCmF0YTA6IDxBVEEgY2hhbm5lbCAwPiBvbiBhdGFwY2kwDQphdGEwOiBbSVRIUkVB RF0NCmF0YTE6IDxBVEEgY2hhbm5lbCAxPiBvbiBhdGFwY2kwDQphdGExOiBbSVRIUkVBRF0N CnBjaTA6IDxzZXJpYWwgYnVzLCBTTUJ1cz4gYXQgZGV2aWNlIDMxLjMgKG5vIGRyaXZlciBh dHRhY2hlZCkNCnBjaTA6IDxtdWx0aW1lZGlhLCBhdWRpbz4gYXQgZGV2aWNlIDMxLjUgKG5v IGRyaXZlciBhdHRhY2hlZCkNCnBjaTA6IDxzaW1wbGUgY29tbXMsIGdlbmVyaWMgbW9kZW0+ IGF0IGRldmljZSAzMS42IChubyBkcml2ZXIgYXR0YWNoZWQpDQphY3BpX3R6MDogPFRoZXJt YWwgWm9uZT4gb24gYWNwaTANCmF0a2JkYzA6IDxLZXlib2FyZCBjb250cm9sbGVyIChpODA0 Mik+IHBvcnQgMHg2MCwweDY0IGlycSAxIG9uIGFjcGkwDQphdGtiZDA6IDxBVCBLZXlib2Fy ZD4gaXJxIDEgb24gYXRrYmRjMA0Ka2JkMCBhdCBhdGtiZDANCmF0a2JkMDogW0dJQU5ULUxP Q0tFRF0NCmF0a2JkMDogW0lUSFJFQURdDQpwc20wOiA8UFMvMiBNb3VzZT4gaXJxIDEyIG9u IGF0a2JkYzANCnBzbTA6IFtHSUFOVC1MT0NLRURdDQpwc20wOiBbSVRIUkVBRF0NCnBzbTA6 IG1vZGVsIEludGVsbGlNb3VzZSwgZGV2aWNlIElEIDMNCmNwdTA6IDxBQ1BJIENQVT4gb24g YWNwaTANCnA0dGNjMDogPENQVSBGcmVxdWVuY3kgVGhlcm1hbCBDb250cm9sPiBvbiBjcHUw DQppY2hzczA6IDxTcGVlZFN0ZXAgSUNIPiBvbiBjcHUwDQppY2hzczA6IGVuYWJsaW5nIFNw ZWVkU3RlcCBzdXBwb3J0DQpwbXRpbWVyMCBvbiBpc2EwDQpvcm0wOiA8SVNBIE9wdGlvbiBS T01zPiBhdCBpb21lbSAweGNkMDAwLTB4Y2RmZmYsMHhkZjAwMC0weGRmZmZmLDB4ZTAwMDAt MHhlM2ZmZiBwbnBpZCBPUk0wMDAwIG9uIGlzYTANCnBwYzA6IHBhcmFsbGVsIHBvcnQgbm90 IGZvdW5kLg0Kc2MwOiA8U3lzdGVtIGNvbnNvbGU+IGF0IGZsYWdzIDB4MTAwIG9uIGlzYTAN CnNjMDogVkdBIDwxNiB2aXJ0dWFsIGNvbnNvbGVzLCBmbGFncz0weDMwMD4NCnNpbzA6IGNv bmZpZ3VyZWQgaXJxIDQgbm90IGluIGJpdG1hcCBvZiBwcm9iZWQgaXJxcyAwDQpzaW8wOiBw b3J0IG1heSBub3QgYmUgZW5hYmxlZA0Kc2lvMDogY29uZmlndXJlZCBpcnEgNCBub3QgaW4g Yml0bWFwIG9mIHByb2JlZCBpcnFzIDANCnNpbzA6IHBvcnQgbWF5IG5vdCBiZSBlbmFibGVk DQpzaW8wIGF0IHBvcnQgMHgzZjgtMHgzZmYgaXJxIDQgZmxhZ3MgMHgxMCBvbiBpc2EwDQpz aW8wOiB0eXBlIDgyNTAgb3Igbm90IHJlc3BvbmRpbmcNCnNpbzA6IFtGSUxURVJdDQpzaW8x OiBjb25maWd1cmVkIGlycSAzIG5vdCBpbiBiaXRtYXAgb2YgcHJvYmVkIGlycXMgMA0Kc2lv MTogcG9ydCBtYXkgbm90IGJlIGVuYWJsZWQNCnZnYTA6IDxHZW5lcmljIElTQSBWR0E+IGF0 IHBvcnQgMHgzYzAtMHgzZGYgaW9tZW0gMHhhMDAwMC0weGJmZmZmIG9uIGlzYTANClRpbWVj b3VudGVyICJUU0MiIGZyZXF1ZW5jeSAxMjk2NzU3NTk3IEh6IHF1YWxpdHkgODAwDQpUaW1l Y291bnRlcnMgdGljayBldmVyeSAxLjAwMCBtc2VjDQphZDA6IDM4MTU0TUIgPEhUUzQyNDA0 ME05QVQwMCBNQTJPQTcyQT4gYXQgYXRhMC1tYXN0ZXIgVURNQTEwMA0KVHJ5aW5nIHRvIG1v dW50IHJvb3QgZnJvbSB1ZnM6L2Rldi9hZDBzMWENCldBUk5JTkc6IC8gd2FzIG5vdCBwcm9w ZXJseSBkaXNtb3VudGVkDQpMb2FkaW5nIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24gZmlsZXMuDQprZXJuZWwg ZHVtcHMgb24gL2Rldi9hZDBzMWINCkVudHJvcHkgaGFydmVzdGluZzoNCiBpbnRlcnJ1cHRz DQogZXRoZXJuZXQNCiBwb2ludF90b19wb2ludA0KIGtpY2tzdGFydA0KLg0Kc3dhcG9uOiBh ZGRpbmcgL2Rldi9hZDBzMWIgYXMgc3dhcCBkZXZpY2UNClN0YXJ0aW5nIGZpbGUgc3lzdGVt IGNoZWNrczoNCi9kZXYvYWQwczFhOiAzNTc2IGZpbGVzLCAxMzc3OTAgdXNlZCwgMTE2MDI1 IGZyZWUgKDMzNTMgZnJhZ3MsIDE0MDg0IGJsb2NrcywgMS4zJSBmcmFnbWVudGF0aW9uKQ0K L2Rldi9hZDBzMWU6IERFRkVSIEZPUiBCQUNLR1JPVU5EIENIRUNLSU5HDQovZGV2L2FkMHMx ZjogREVGRVIgRk9SIEJBQ0tHUk9VTkQgQ0hFQ0tJTkcNCi9kZXYvYWQwczFkOiBERUZFUiBG T1IgQkFDS0dST1VORCBDSEVDS0lORw0KU2V0dGluZyBob3N0dXVpZDogYzBjNmVlMmUtZGEz Mi1kOTExLThhN2UtMDBjMDlmN2UzZGFlLg0KU2V0dGluZyBob3N0aWQ6IDB4NTRjMmI2NDEu DQpNb3VudGluZyBsb2NhbCBmaWxlIHN5c3RlbXM6DQpXQVJOSU5HOiAvdG1wIHdhcyBub3Qg cHJvcGVybHkgZGlzbW91bnRlZA0KV0FSTklORzogL3VzciB3YXMgbm90IHByb3Blcmx5IGRp c21vdW50ZWQNCldBUk5JTkc6IC92YXIgd2FzIG5vdCBwcm9wZXJseSBkaXNtb3VudGVkDQou DQpTZXR0aW5nIGhvc3RuYW1lOiBuYmd3LmFubS5sYW4uDQpuZXQuaW5ldDYuaXA2LmF1dG9f bGlua2xvY2FsOg0KMQ0KIC0+DQowDQoNCnNlY3VyaXR5LmJzZC5zZWVfb3RoZXJfdWlkczoN CjENCiAtPg0KMA0KDQpuZXQuaW5ldC50Y3AuYmxhY2tob2xlOg0KMA0KIC0+DQoyDQoNCm5l dC5pbmV0LnVkcC5ibGFja2hvbGU6DQowDQogLT4NCjENCg0KbmV0LmluZXQudGNwLmRyb3Bf c3luZmluOg0KMA0KIC0+DQoxDQoNCmxvMDogZmxhZ3M9ODA0OTxVUCxMT09QQkFDSyxSVU5O SU5HLE1VTFRJQ0FTVD4gbWV0cmljIDAgbXR1IDE2Mzg0DQogICAgICAgIGluZXQ2IGZlODA6 OjElbG8wIHByZWZpeGxlbiA2NCBzY29wZWlkIDB4NA0KICAgICAgICBpbmV0NiA6OjEgcHJl Zml4bGVuIDEyOA0KICAgICAgICBpbmV0IDEyNy4wLjAuMSBuZXRtYXNrIDB4ZmYwMDAwMDAN CmF4ZTA6IGZsYWdzPTEwODg0MzxVUCxCUk9BRENBU1QsUlVOTklORyxTSU1QTEVYLE1VTFRJ Q0FTVCxORUVEU0dJQU5UPiBtZXRyaWMgMCBtdHUgMTUwMA0KICAgICAgICBldGhlciAwMDox ZDo3ZTowMTozNzo4MA0KICAgICAgICBtZWRpYTogRXRoZXJuZXQgYXV0b3NlbGVjdCAoMTAw YmFzZVRYIDxmdWxsLWR1cGxleD4pDQogICAgICAgIHN0YXR1czogYWN0aXZlDQpydW0wOiBm bGFncz0xMDg4NDM8VVAsQlJPQURDQVNULFJVTk5JTkcsU0lNUExFWCxNVUxUSUNBU1QsTkVF RFNHSUFOVD4gbWV0cmljIDAgbXR1IDE1MDANCiAgICAgICAgZXRoZXIgMDA6MWY6MWY6MjM6 OGE6YjUNCiAgICAgICAgaW5ldCAxMC4xMC4yMy4yNTQgbmV0bWFzayAweGZmZmZmZjAwIGJy b2FkY2FzdCAxMC4xMC4yMy4yNTUNCiAgICAgICAgbWVkaWE6IElFRUUgODAyLjExIFdpcmVs ZXNzIEV0aGVybmV0IGF1dG9zZWxlY3QgbW9kZSAxMWcgPGhvc3RhcD4NCiAgICAgICAgc3Rh dHVzOiBhc3NvY2lhdGVkDQogICAgICAgIHNzaWQgYW5tLWxhbiBjaGFubmVsIDkgKDI0NTIg TWh6IDExZykgYnNzaWQgMDA6MWY6MWY6MjM6OGE6YjUNCiAgICAgICAgYXV0aG1vZGUgT1BF TiBwcml2YWN5IE9GRiB0eHBvd2VyIDUwIHNjYW52YWxpZCA2MCBiZ3NjYW4NCiAgICAgICAg YmdzY2FuaW50dmwgMzAwIGJnc2NhbmlkbGUgMjUwIHJvYW06cnNzaTExZyA3IHJvYW06cmF0 ZTExZyA1DQogICAgICAgIHByb3Rtb2RlIENUUyBkdGltcGVyaW9kIDENCnJsMDogZmxhZ3M9 ODg0MzxVUCxCUk9BRENBU1QsUlVOTklORyxTSU1QTEVYLE1VTFRJQ0FTVD4gbWV0cmljIDAg bXR1IDE1MDANCiAgICAgICAgb3B0aW9ucz04PFZMQU5fTVRVPg0KICAgICAgICBldGhlciAw MDpjMDo5Zjo3ZTozZDphZQ0KICAgICAgICBpbmV0IDE5Mi4xNjguMTUuMjU0IG5ldG1hc2sg MHhmZmZmZmYwMCBicm9hZGNhc3QgMTkyLjE2OC4xNS4yNTUNCiAgICAgICAgbWVkaWE6IEV0 aGVybmV0IGF1dG9zZWxlY3QgKG5vbmUpDQogICAgICAgIHN0YXR1czogbm8gY2Fycmllcg0K U3RhcnRpbmcgcGZsb2cuDQpFbmFibGluZyBwZi4NCkphbiAxMyAyMTo0ODoxNyBwZmxvZ2Rb NDE1XTogW3ByaXZdOiBtc2cgUFJJVl9PUEVOX0xPRyByZWNlaXZlZA0KTm8gQUxUUSBzdXBw b3J0IGluIGtlcm5lbA0KQUxUUSByZWxhdGVkIGZ1bmN0aW9ucyBkaXNhYmxlZA0KcGZjdGw6 DQpwZiBub3QgZW5hYmxlZA0KDQpObyBBTFRRIHN1cHBvcnQgaW4ga2VybmVsDQpBTFRRIHJl bGF0ZWQgZnVuY3Rpb25zIGRpc2FibGVkDQpObyBBTFRRIHN1cHBvcnQgaW4ga2VybmVsDQpB TFRRIHJlbGF0ZWQgZnVuY3Rpb25zIGRpc2FibGVkDQpwZiBlbmFibGVkDQpBZGRpdGlvbmFs IHJvdXRpbmcgb3B0aW9uczoNCiBJUCBnYXRld2F5PVlFUw0KLg0KU3RhcnRpbmcgZGV2ZC4N Cmh3LmFjcGkuY3B1LmN4X2xvd2VzdDoNCkMxDQogLT4NCkMxDQoNCkFkZGl0aW9uYWwgSVAg b3B0aW9uczoNCi4NCk1vdW50aW5nIE5GUyBmaWxlIHN5c3RlbXM6DQouDQpFTEYgbGRjb25m aWcgcGF0aDogL2xpYiAvdXNyL2xpYiAvdXNyL2xpYi9jb21wYXQgL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9saWIN CmEub3V0IGxkY29uZmlnIHBhdGg6IC91c3IvbGliL2FvdXQgL3Vzci9saWIvY29tcGF0L2Fv dXQNCkNsZWFyaW5nIC90bXAgKFggcmVsYXRlZCkuDQpTdGFydGluZyB4ZnMuDQpDcmVhdGlu ZyBhbmQvb3IgdHJpbW1pbmcgbG9nIGZpbGVzOg0KLg0KU3RhcnRpbmcgc3lzbG9nZC4NCnJs MDogbGluayBzdGF0ZSBjaGFuZ2VkIHRvIFVQDQpTdGFydGluZyBtcGQuDQpDaGVja2luZyBm b3IgY29yZSBkdW1wIG9uIC9kZXYvYWQwczFiLi4uDQpXQVJOSU5HOiBhdHRlbXB0IHRvIG5l dF9hZGRfZG9tYWluKG5ldGdyYXBoKSBhZnRlciBkb21haW5maW5hbGl6ZSgpDQpzYXZlY29y ZTogbm8gZHVtcHMgZm91bmQNCkluaXRpYWwgaTM4NiBpbml0aWFsaXphdGlvbjoNCi4NCkFk ZGl0aW9uYWwgQUJJIHN1cHBvcnQ6DQouDQpTdGFydGluZyBuYW1lZC4NCkphbiAxMyAyMTo0 ODoyMSBuYmd3IG5hbWVkWzc1MV06IHRoZSB3b3JraW5nIGRpcmVjdG9yeSBpcyBub3Qgd3Jp dGFibGUNClN0YXJ0aW5nIGRoY3BkLg0KU3RhcnRpbmcgZGJ1cy4NClN0YXJ0aW5nIGhhbGQu DQpTdGFydGluZyBsb2NhbCBkYWVtb25zOg0KLg0KVXBkYXRpbmcgbW90ZA0KLg0KTW91bnRp bmcgbGF0ZSBmaWxlIHN5c3RlbXM6DQouDQpDb25maWd1cmluZyBzeXNjb25zOg0KIGJsYW5r dGltZQ0KLg0KU3RhcnRpbmcgc3NoZC4NClN0YXJ0aW5nIGNyb24uDQpMb2NhbCBwYWNrYWdl IGluaXRpYWxpemF0aW9uOg0KLg0KU3RhcnRpbmcgaW5ldGQuDQpTdGFydGluZyBob3N0YXBk Lg0KQ29uZmlndXJhdGlvbiBmaWxlOiAvZXRjL2hvc3RhcGQuY29uZg0KU3RhcnRpbmcgYmFj a2dyb3VuZCBmaWxlIHN5c3RlbSBjaGVja3MgaW4gNjAgc2Vjb25kcy4NCg== --------------070400060607020709080003 Content-Type: text/plain; name="hostapd.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename="hostapd.txt" aW50ZXJmYWNlPXJ1bTANCg0KbG9nZ2VyX3N5c2xvZz0tMQ0KbG9nZ2VyX3N5c2xvZ19sZXZl bD0wDQpsb2dnZXJfc3Rkb3V0PS0xDQpsb2dnZXJfc3Rkb3V0X2xldmVsPTANCmRlYnVnPTQN CmR1bXBfZmlsZT0vdG1wL2hvc3RhcGQuZHVtcA0KDQpjdHJsX2ludGVyZmFjZT0vdmFyL3J1 bi9ob3N0YXBkDQpjdHJsX2ludGVyZmFjZV9ncm91cD13aGVlbA0Kc3NpZD1hbm0tbGFuDQp3 cGE9MQ0Kd3BhX3Bhc3NwaHJhc2U9WWxtNEFkbHQwTE9Cb2JadHZSSnk2DQp3cGFfa2V5X21n bXQ9V1BBLVBTSw0Kd3BhX3BhaXJ3aXNlPUNDTVANCmllZWU4MDIxeD0wDQo= --------------070400060607020709080003-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 09:56:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5828F106564A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:56:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be) Received: from hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be [143.129.75.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA15A8FC1A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:56:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be) Received: from hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0E9uUbw006192 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:56:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (pdon@localhost) by hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id n0E9uUvr006189 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:56:30 +0100 (CET) X-Authentication-Warning: hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be: pdon owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:56:30 +0100 (CET) From: Pieter Donche X-X-Sender: pdon@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be To: "mail.list freebsd-questions" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: FreeBSD 7, how to recieve internet mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pieter Donche List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:56:31 -0000 On FreeBSD 7, out of the box, one can send mail to internet destinations and can send mail locally from one user to another user on the same FreeeBSD machine But it can't receive mail from internet as it appears .. A sendmail is running freebsd7box># ps -jaxw | grep sendmail smmsp 26649 1 26649 26649 0 Is ?? 0:00.00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) root 26651 1 26651 26651 0 Ss ?? 0:00.04 sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) The machine is listening on port 25 freebsd7box># netstat -na | grep 25 tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.25 *.* LISTEN But telnettting the freebsd box with its own ip address at port 25 from the root account of the box freebsd7box># telnet 143.129.75.1 25 Trying 143.129.75.1... telnet: connect to address 143.129.75.1: Connection refused The only thing that works is freebsd7box># telnet localhost 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. ... How do I make the FreeBSD7 box accept connections to port 25 from all of the internet ?? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 10:23:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8E91065680 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:23:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conover@rahul.net) Received: from pink.rahul.net (pink.rahul.net [192.160.13.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B808FC17 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:23:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conover@rahul.net) Received: from green.rahul.net (green.rahul.net [192.160.13.49]) by pink.rahul.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8772FE6E for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:56:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by green.rahul.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 991C8BE8CB for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:56:15 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 19285 invoked by uid 4199); 14 Jan 2009 09:56:22 -0000 Message-ID: <20090114095622.19284.qmail@rahul.net> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:56:22 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 6.99 under Emacs 20.7.2 From: conover@rahul.net (John Conover) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Knowledge of MAC addresses a security issue? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Conover List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:23:42 -0000 Does knowledge of the internal MAC addresses on a network, (including the routers,) present a security issue? Thanks, John -- John Conover, conover@rahul.net, http://www.johncon.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 11:06:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588C21065675 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CDE8FC2B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:06:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from lack-of-gravitas.thebunker.net (gateway.ash.thebunker.net [213.129.64.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0EB5ou0024670 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:05:58 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk n0EB5ou0024670 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1231931158; bh=ssGKQnt+3LDDIWO9THLv1J9vbmw4uJNiMGKPzXtOyxQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Content-Type: Date:From:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<496DC70D.90401@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20Wed ,=2014=20Jan=202009=2011:05:49=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20 |Organization:=20Infracaninophile |User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.19=20(X11/20090112)|MIME-Versio n:=201.0|To:=20John=20Conover=20|CC:=20freebsd- questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Knowledge=20of=20MAC=20addr esses=20a=20security=20issue?|References:=20<20090114095622.19284. qmail@rahul.net>|In-Reply-To:=20<20090114095622.19284.qmail@rahul. net>|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95.6|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20 charset=3DUTF-8=3B=20format=3Dflowed|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20 7bit; b=O6Vm+ZkBymsk8Hb1L0qrGvqngXC1jG+ZSB3Luirj6jmIVLCUl5UQdjg8kpLrxYyYv cdRZTbEVxU13aM609eUTuJdvj8lBCEDzA7c5CsOmBXMeE5vUsCQNwpvs0XPTrfEbcr ccYilpD1hsNmxK9+oQ+k/nRiub7SgIbr3OCpkOgs= Message-ID: <496DC70D.90401@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:05:49 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Conover References: <20090114095622.19284.qmail@rahul.net> In-Reply-To: <20090114095622.19284.qmail@rahul.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:05:58 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/8863/Wed Jan 14 07:08:56 2009 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Knowledge of MAC addresses a security issue? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:06:18 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 John Conover wrote: | Does knowledge of the internal MAC addresses on a network, (including | the routers,) present a security issue? In a word: yes. With caveats. An attacker with knowledge of the MAC addresses of your equipment *and* access to the same Layer 2 network where that kit is installed can mount easy denial of service or man-in-the-middle type attacks against those servers. Of course, if the attacker has access to the L2 network segment, then it's pretty easy for them to discover MAC addresses just from passing traffic or the ARP cache of whatever device they've compromised. Protecting MAC addresses at that level is basically impossible. Or in other words, don't worry too much about trying to hide MAC addresses inside your network -- it's far more important to ensure that the equipment on that same network segment is *all* locked down well. Any easy targets on a network can act as staging posts through which to mount attacks against the more interesting machines. If the attacker doesn't have access to that L2 network, then their knowing what the MAC addresses are will actually identify equipment manufacturers and possibly even specific hardware variants, which could be invaluable to them in developing an attack. MAC addresses are a somewhat unusual means of doing this sort of reconnaissance, since either you've basically got to have already succeeded in breaking in, or you have to mount a social engineering attack against the sort of technically adept people that know what a MAC address is in order to get hold of them Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. Flat 3 ~ 7 Priory Courtyard PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate ~ Kent, CT11 9PW, UK -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREDAAYFAkltxw0ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzgpQCfcxNMMmS0Hh/x/EqRUzY6OCBv PzkAn0VSMAzlDj94MePtQipuftyW87jd =632b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 12:09:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7322D1065727 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:09:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from millenia2000@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s36.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s36.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521178FC13 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:09:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from millenia2000@hotmail.com) Received: from BAY126-DS1 ([65.55.131.28]) by bay0-omc3-s36.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:09:25 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [69.243.68.197] X-Originating-Email: [millenia2000@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: "Sean Cavanaugh" In-Reply-To: <67CE2BFC0C158B4C96BC1229798DE50F01FA51F2@HSNMST02V05.hsn.alice-dsl.net> To: "Sebastian Setzer" , References: <67CE2BFC0C158B4C96BC1229798DE50F01FA51F2@HSNMST02V05.hsn.alice-dsl.net> X-Unsent: 1 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:09:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2009 12:09:25.0116 (UTC) FILETIME=[F110BBC0:01C97640] Cc: Subject: Re: freebsd-update doesn't seem to update to Latest X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:09:31 -0000 -------------------------------------------------- From: "Sebastian Setzer" Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 3:47 PM To: Subject: freebsd-update doesn't seem to update to Latest > > Hi, > I did a freebsd-update to 7.1-RELEASE as described in the release notes. > After that, I installed Openoffice (with pkg_add) and got several warnings > like this one: > pkg_add: warning: package 'gnome-vfs-2.22.0_2' requires 'atk-1.22.0_1', > but 'atk-1.20.0' is installed > > Now I did > # pkg_add -r atk > pkg_add: package 'atk-1.22.0_1' or its older version already installed > > so with pkg_add -r I get newer packages than I got with freebsd-update. > Why? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > freebsd-update only maintains the base OS. If you want to update the ports use either portmanager or portupgrade From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 12:33:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582EB106566B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AEC8FC21 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LN4vc-0006Jw-7a for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:33:00 -0800 Message-ID: <21455082.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:33:00 -0800 (PST) From: Colin Brace To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: cb@lim.nl Subject: kernel errors: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:33:01 -0000 Hi all, I have an older P4 running FreeBSD 7.0 which I use as a web/file server, WAP, and ADSL gateway. The OS and /usr partition are on 30 GB Seagate Barracuda IDE drive, ad0. In addition, I have added two 500 GB IDE drives which I scavenged from a pair of La Cie external USB enclosures. The one is a Hitachi, ad2, and the other a Maxtor, ad3. I use this for storing a large collection of MP3s and for backing up the home partitions of several Linux clients on my network. I customarily share ad2 via NFS with my Linux clients. Here is where my problem begins: After mounting the NFS share, the Linux client eventually (24-48 hours) runs into to trouble; the share is no longer visible, and this tends to wreak havoc with Gnome. Looking in dmesg on the client, I see this: nfs: server venus not responding, timed out Looking in /var/log/messages on the FreeBSD server, I see the following (here is a week's worth): Jan 8 03:01:10 venus kernel: ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=287 Jan 8 03:06:06 venus kernel: ad3: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=287 Jan 9 03:01:09 venus kernel: ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=287 Jan 9 03:06:13 venus kernel: ad3: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=287 Jan 10 03:01:10 venus kernel: ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=70508479 Jan 10 03:06:07 venus kernel: ad3: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=287 Jan 10 04:02:35 venus kernel: ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=287 Jan 10 19:26:07 venus kernel: ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=49302399 Jan 11 03:01:10 venus kernel: ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=58711199 Jan 11 03:06:14 venus kernel: ad3: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=287 Jan 11 04:02:27 venus kernel: ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=287 Jan 12 03:01:10 venus kernel: ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=287 Jan 12 03:06:13 venus kernel: ad3: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=287 Jan 13 03:01:10 venus kernel: ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=12159 Jan 13 03:06:14 venus kernel: ad3: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=287 Jan 14 03:01:10 venus kernel: ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=287 Jan 14 03:06:14 venus kernel: ad3: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=287 Any ideas on what is going on here? Note that only the two 500 GB data drives cause these errors; there is never a complaint about the 30 GB system drive. The two data drives are still online, and there is no problem accessing them through the server; it is just NFS which can't handle it. FWIW, I've tried using 'soft' as an option in the NFS fstab entry on the clients to no avail Thanks for any suggestions. ----- Colin Brace Amsterdam http://lim.nl -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/kernel-errors%3A-TIMEOUT---READ_DMA-tp21455082p21455082.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 12:48:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99461065673 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:48:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f11.google.com (mail-fx0-f11.google.com [209.85.220.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5702D8FC1A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:48:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so118528fxm.19 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:48:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Lt/3neBpaasFjLK8mN/F9/nhumAPMk4Z39oH2RBRM70=; b=ESPGYquso4srGHJjpPdPs9tp141XIfLcQxNZXCnczZtU2HZ+mmPH/iXBpyzkpdKOqb xVC3Suouu9OFqlPmo5Rkw633JlGLsVmQeKJ+LFpKSYWJunHS0oNVUzEIQvw6vGNAoJLl DWI3ORmWT36Cws/x41Rstle90sdmZLIdNVQ80= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=DG2yMB2oaV6zZn3U03Jf+K3gJTm8G1+9lNuy+wGKXL2tcfG+NuEyAsYoK5kvcKlMsj tAEuT5D9l1D3K78v1Y1e58Y0zPDJWfIeggZ1TDIm/Yg8QAMpnsf4HUiw/uklYEQdvSdR vZfWB9l3KLOfoGqGrbxsx3q1+NsAd2nx+IrTw= Received: by 10.223.115.195 with SMTP id j3mr35138faq.99.1231937304320; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:48:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.115.1 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:48:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3a142e750901140448jf622240r822942bc0b222fb5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:48:24 +0100 From: "Paul B. Mahol" To: Deceased In-Reply-To: <496D9FF1.7030901@webmail.vulcano.lt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <496D9FF1.7030901@webmail.vulcano.lt> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rum0 performance < 1Mbps; ath0 reboots system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:48:26 -0000 On 1/14/09, Deceased wrote: > Hi, List, > > Recently I've set up my non-lcd-wokring HP NX9020 notebook as ADSL > gateway and AP on 7.1-release > > Everything works well except wireless. I have LogiLink WL0025 (RT2573) > which users rum(4) driver. I now it's not recomended to use rum cards as > hostap, but my ath(4) card works even worse(later on that). rum(4) is known to have bad rx signals, eg. it is not complete. Also speed depends on reported tx rate; visible from ifconfig rum0 output. old usb stack have its own limits ... -- Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 12:49:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B994510656FC for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6518FC08 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948F729402; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:49:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-76-26-198-188.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [76.26.198.188]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2DED507; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:49:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1LN5BK-0007q0-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:49:14 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:49:14 -0500 From: stan To: Steve Bertrand Message-ID: <20090114124914.GA29924@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Steve Bertrand , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20090105215108.GA17430@teddy.fas.com> <20090106034523.GA25207@the-grills.com> <20090107022251.GA31012@teddy.fas.com> <49641B26.3070905@ibctech.ca> <20090107052009.GA3995@teddy.fas.com> <4964BD4A.4060300@ibctech.ca> <20090107213007.GA31144@teddy.fas.com> <49652559.3060804@ibctech.ca> <20090110164036.GA31237@teddy.fas.com> <496CA843.4060704@ibctech.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496CA843.4060704@ibctech.ca> X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 07:44:34 up 247 days, 14:07, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.04, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PHP setup question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:49:17 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:42:11AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: > stan wrote: > > > If you want to see what I have, It's reachable at > > http://beachcave/net/ampache/ > > I can't reach it :) > > Reply with the proper URL and I'll have a look. > Sorry, it's http://beachcave.net/ampache/ I just droped teh database, and removed the ampache.cfg.php file, so the error shold be reproducible. -- One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 13:08:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4891065736 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pat@dnelists.com) Received: from dev.champion-auto.com (dev.champion-auto.com [216.55.133.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAE68FC25 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:08:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pat@dnelists.com) Received: from ken-pc (dev.champion-auto.com [127.0.0.1]) by dev.champion-auto.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0ED8ZH8032507 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:08:35 -0800 Message-ID: <26468860.1231938515533.JavaMail.root@dev.champion-auto.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=mail; d=dnelists.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Content-Type; b=k8UVK6rfXm4xF2GWMLAsyAqCFfSQBJa9UnxBjg1bNLa2hU+Ywfv4jN3OGsQer0zOu2WktwMbfi8W 3VqZ4k6CDA== Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:05:35 -0800 (PST) From: Pat Kenedy To: "questions@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: therek.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:08:38 -0000 Pending sale notification: In a few days we plan to offer the domain name THEREK.COM for sale. Because you own the similar domain name THEREK.net, we thought you my be interested in acquiring the preferred DotCom version of this domain. We plan to offer this domain for sale in three days and believe there is likely to be strong interest in this domain name by multiple parties, but since you own a similar version of the domain we wanted to give you the first right of refusal. If You`re interested in this domain: Go to the domain reservation page, here, and indicate your interest in this domain by completing the contact form. When the domain is available for sale, you`ll be the first to hear about it. Again, if you have interest in this domain, you need to RSVP right away at the reservation page located here: http://dnelists.com/buy.php?preorder=1&qefid=2976540&domain=THEREK.COM If you have NO interest: In acquiring the preferred DotCom version of this domain, simply click the "Cancel Notification" link below and we won`t contact you again. Cancel Notifications: http://dnelists.com/mailer/rem.php?email=questions@FreeBSD.org Very best regards,Pat Kenedypat@dnelists.comtel: 303.997.1703LeaderByChoice, INc600 17th Street, Ste 2800 SouthDenver, CO 80202-5428 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 13:44:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580471065673 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:44:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176688FC29 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:44:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-196-14-53.dynamic.qsc.de [92.196.14.53]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058E93C849; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:44:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n0EDiAX0002201; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:44:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:44:10 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Jason Lenthe Message-Id: <20090114144410.6ddf9401.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <496BE775.6010805@comcast.net> References: <20090112162216.GA6391@aurora.oekb.co.at> <496BE775.6010805@comcast.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ewald Jenisch , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Printing - standard? CUPS? ...?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:44:33 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:59:33 -0500, Jason Lenthe wrote: > The problem [with CUPS] was that certain other software (gtk+ and gnome as I recall) > expected /usr/bin/lpr to be the CUPS lpr (the CUPS port normally > installs lpr to /usr/local/bin). It was also necessary for some > applications to have /usr/local/bin before /usr/bin in your path for > certain applications to work. My memory is vague regarding the details, > though. These were the main reasons why I always tried to avoid CUPS. It's a good tool if you're running Gnome anyway, and especially if you've got a "modern" multifunctional device (printer + scanner + fax + coffe maker + god knows what else), you've better support there than under apsfilter. If your printer is PS capable, you can send the PS directly into the printer. FreeBSD's printer spooler should do this fine. Since 4.0, I've always been very comfortable with apsfilter. I've owned office-class laser printers (HP Laserjet 4 then, 4000 duplex today) and they were supported very well, especially because of their ability to "speak" PCL. apsfilter can be easily setup using its SETUP script, /usr/local/share/apsfilter/SETUP which lets you select your setting dialog driven. In opposite to CUPS, it does not interfere with the system's printer commands. One downside I noticed since I was forced to upgrade my home system was that some programs seem to expect (!) the presence of CUPS on a system in order to print, which they didn't do in earlier versions. Yes, I'm talking to you, Gimp! :-) When trying to print something from the Gimp (I think it's called "Gutenprint"), the message /usr/local/bin/lpstat: Unable to connect to server is output to the controlling terminal. It seems that it's not enough that Gimp runs slower with every version update... :-( The strangest thing: cups-base is a dependency to apsfilter! Furthermore, I think apsfilter lost some functionality. I mean, I DIDN't change anything on the printer when I reinstalled my whole system, and I restored all the settings such as they were before, but now, the printer doesn't print duplex anymore. > By all means, give CUPS a try though. CUPS seems to be the way to go, I'll try it on the next reinstall. -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 13:53:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB8C106566B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f20.google.com (mail-bw0-f20.google.com [209.85.218.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4078FC14 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:53:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so1849459bwz.19 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:53:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=DF58NmRnBKItXWattXDGqGaxN3HKfP3xwrvaAn2+Bjk=; b=OpEyWRGUQLKchyjhLt7iAAbz6xXe8olWfv6u9/GPtyU8ORSDieEhwSor8FG7j1kfx6 OdSSbKwZvzFZZ+UQMYHUMjeRehEpm6b1I0bMUP2cQzgMs9anfNDr2VSoiv/VorAYPJs1 Do3SgBsh9Ogw3p6wjjQNtthkur0hwMil/fXlQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=uBzgwr4C7/DhPUiljs/ts+nBi1LiWFC0Cd99RKhmFFyl6fGFjbefhw2q6z1/hIG6H7 gMSVhNrPFrkObVccC+eaAhXJMni1inZXq5J9vLsVWZwLz4/bSOvOa2ThpFmb8CBFGyxs RZbl498o/9JgXQrl4dgxcst0Ntga15daobS1M= Received: by 10.223.110.200 with SMTP id o8mr150751fap.56.1231941209588; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:53:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.125.134 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:53:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0901140553i405b455fv342b8f145e87b02b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:53:29 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: "User Questions" In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0901132313ga018517idd21cf7a784aae7f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0901132313ga018517idd21cf7a784aae7f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: updating to 7.1 with a small root slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:53:31 -0000 Hello, On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:13, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Dear all, > > I am looking for your advice. Due to a very stupid design decision my > / slice is only 256 MB. It seems too little so whenever I compile a Actually it is 242MB > new kernel, I need to move the kernel.old to a different slice to > install the new one. Then I pray, hope for the best and reboot. > However, I read that if I want to update to 7.1 I will need to boot a > generic kernel at some point. What option do I have? I found the problem. My oh my - I had makeoptions DEBUG=-g uncommented. When I commented it out, the new compiled kernel is only 32MB whereas the old one was 128 or so MB. So I am happy about it now. However, I do not have a GENERIC kernel in /boot and I will need it to do nextboot when I upgrade to 7.1. I thought I'd use the procedure described here http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html to compile a generic kernel # cd /usr/src # env DESTDIR=/boot/GENERIC make kernel # mv /boot/GENERIC/boot/kernel/* /boot/GENERIC # rm -rf /boot/GENERIC/boot When I make the GENERIC kernel, I again run out of space (I still have about 60MB free in /). So I guess the system is probably using the same "makeoptions DEBUG=-g" settings for the generic kernel. So my question is where is the kernel conf file based on which the generic kernel is compiled? Is it in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC ? Thank you in advance! -- Zbigniew Szalbot www.slowo.pl www.fairtrade.net.pl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 14:07:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDBD106566B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:07:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pat@dnelists.com) Received: from dev.champion-auto.com (dev.champion-auto.com [216.55.133.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7EB8FC19 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:07:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pat@dnelists.com) Received: from ken-pc (dev.champion-auto.com [127.0.0.1]) by dev.champion-auto.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0ED8ZDd032506 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:08:35 -0800 Message-ID: <6334332.1231938515517.JavaMail.root@dev.champion-auto.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=mail; d=dnelists.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Content-Type; b=UrirwrHuMTfwIUi5fEeKeUqJt+jLI8hkB4+BPQ07iu2yYoRkW8aPlaN/0XV9OccNILBbL5HMQBTw R0B/H82lkQ== Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:05:35 -0800 (PST) From: Pat Kenedy To: "questions@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: therek.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:07:21 -0000 Pending sale notification: In a few days we plan to offer the domain name THEREK.COM for sale. Because you own the similar domain name THEREK.net, we thought you my be interested in acquiring the preferred DotCom version of this domain. We plan to offer this domain for sale in three days and believe there is likely to be strong interest in this domain name by multiple parties, but since you own a similar version of the domain we wanted to give you the first right of refusal. If You`re interested in this domain: Go to the domain reservation page, here, and indicate your interest in this domain by completing the contact form. When the domain is available for sale, you`ll be the first to hear about it. Again, if you have interest in this domain, you need to RSVP right away at the reservation page located here: http://dnelists.com/buy.php?preorder=1&qefid=2976540&domain=THEREK.COM If you have NO interest: In acquiring the preferred DotCom version of this domain, simply click the "Cancel Notification" link below and we won`t contact you again. Cancel Notifications: http://dnelists.com/mailer/rem.php?email=questions@FreeBSD.org Very best regards,Pat Kenedypat@dnelists.comtel: 303.997.1703LeaderByChoice, INc600 17th Street, Ste 2800 SouthDenver, CO 80202-5428 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 14:20:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952F01065693 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:20:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from iguano.centroin.com.br (iguano.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7A88FC1A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:20:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from trex.centroin.com.br (trex.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.136]) by iguano.centroin.com.br (8.14.3/8.14.3/CIP MX HOST) with ESMTP id n0EE9FL9059380 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:09:15 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:09:11 -0200 (BRST) From: scuba@centroin.com.br Sender: mpsouza@trex.centroin.com.br To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Hits: 0.649 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 200.225.63.137 Subject: Time skew X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:20:23 -0000 Hi All, I'm facing some strange behavior with an skew in the system clock. The hardware is a Dell PowerEdge 2950III, running two instances of FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p5 - amd64 over an ESXi hipervisor. To both were allocated 4 processors and 4 GB of RAM, and dmesg for both are identical. I'm using clockspeed to synchronize the clock, but just one of them is delaying the clock a lot. The hardware clock is ok as far as the other virtual machine. Where should I start to investigate? - Marcelo Dmesg is following: Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p5 #0: Mon Nov 3 13:19:30 BRST 2008 root@tst.ciplan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TREX-64 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5410 @ 2.33GHz (2357.36-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x10678 Stepping = 8 Features=0xfebfbff Features2=0x82201> AMD Features=0x20100800 AMD Features2=0x1 usable memory = 4013707264 (3827 MB) avail memory = 3883839488 (3703 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 2 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 3 MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Nov 3 2008 13:19:19) acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 850 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 cpu1: on acpi0 acpi_throttle1: on cpu1 acpi_throttle1: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle1 attach returned 6 cpu2: on acpi0 acpi_throttle2: on cpu2 acpi_throttle2: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle2 attach returned 6 cpu3: on acpi0 acpi_throttle3: on cpu3 acpi_throttle3: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle3 attach returned 6 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 14:25:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C468106566B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:25:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from thenetnow.com (constellation.thenetnow.com [65.39.193.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C018FC0A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:25:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=[192.168.1.100]) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LN6gI-000PiR-Vt for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:25:19 -0500 Message-ID: <496DF5C6.5000100@thenetnow.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:25:10 -0500 From: Grant Peel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20090112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Flash for FreeBSD -> GNOME -> Firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:25:20 -0000 Hi all, Is there a port that emulates Adobe Flash? i.e. Adobe's download site says 'Platform not supported' is there a port or package thats can be used to view Flash content in Firefox? -Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 14:30:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E246106568C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:30:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD968FC0C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:30:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C861EBC3F; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:30:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:30:28 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: scuba@centroin.com.br Message-Id: <20090114093028.9317f122.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time skew X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:30:31 -0000 In response to scuba@centroin.com.br: > > I'm facing some strange behavior with an skew in the system clock. > The hardware is a Dell PowerEdge 2950III, running two instances of > FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p5 - amd64 over an ESXi hipervisor. > To both were allocated 4 processors and 4 GB of RAM, and dmesg for > both are identical. > I'm using clockspeed to synchronize the clock, but just one of > them is delaying the clock a lot. I doubt that clockspeed will ever work for you. VMWare seems to "pause" virtual machines when they're not doing anything in order to allocate CPU for other running VMs. > The hardware clock is ok as far as the other virtual machine. > Where should I start to investigate? For "supported" OS (i.e. Windows/Linux) VMWare provides special programs to keep the clocks in sync. I expect this is because VMWare knows that they mangle the clock in such a way that typical clock management software will never be able to keep it in sync. One problem is that most clock synching software assumes that drift is relatively constant (and clockspeed seems to be the same) but clock drift in a virtual machine is _anything_ but constant. Unfortunately, VMWare has no love for FreeBSD. We've been able to keep clocks in sync by adding a cronjob that runs ntpdate every minute or so. Seems draconian, but it gets the job done. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 14:40:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E081065678 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:40:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from barry.byrne@wbtsystems.com) Received: from hermes.wbtsystems.com (87-198-244-212.ptr.magnet.ie [87.198.244.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581998FC2A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:40:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from barry.byrne@wbtsystems.com) Received: from SUNYA (sunya.wbt.wbtsystems.com [10.12.1.112]) by hermes.wbtsystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 13451F7410; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:40:10 +0000 (GMT) From: "Barry Byrne" To: , References: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:40:35 -0000 Message-ID: <6AE7A3944D9C4376831C8520D021453F@wbt.wbtsystems.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: Acl2U2vRmjrzIM7GRUyfwI7wu1X2gAAAkG1Q X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Cc: Subject: RE: Time skew X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:40:16 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > scuba@centroin.com.br > Hi All, > > I'm facing some strange behavior with an skew in the > system clock. > The hardware is a Dell PowerEdge 2950III, running two > instances of > FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p5 - amd64 over an ESXi hipervisor. > To both were allocated 4 processors and 4 GB of RAM, > and dmesg for > both are identical. > I'm using clockspeed to synchronize the clock, but just one of > them is delaying the clock a lot. > The hardware clock is ok as far as the other virtual machine. > Where should I start to investigate? Marcelo, I've not used the ESXi hypervisor, but do use ESX 3.5 with FreeBSD, and the only way I've sucessfully kept FreeBSD servers in time, is to use either ntpdate or ntpd. Lately, I've found ntpd to be a better solution. Vmware have a KB article on the best way to configure ntpd on a virtual machine: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType= kc&externalId=1339&sliceId=2&docTypeID=DT_KB_1_1&dialogID=14730824&stateId=0 %200%204678302 For what it's worth this is the ntp.conf I use, which gives me no trouble: tinker panic 0 restrict 127.0.0.1 restrict default kod nomodify notrap server time.server.ip Cheers, Barry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 14:44:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E4A106572A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tsairox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f17.google.com (mail-qy0-f17.google.com [209.85.221.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DF98FC4C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:44:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tsairox@gmail.com) Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so811566qyk.19 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:44:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=ub7+J6RuBudrNANF+kJWQELoZm2XoGowCT2xyrcHNHk=; b=aa5rGlmzOC1WnrO/0XXsr7dNjrU07qwrWuAfg2+JWIvoMTS6L0tHbAnENt0U1tQdnO 2IDZrlk3sInRj5ZlJBwVuOyuwqipqQQC+gPpQyP8y56aW/aqM4YRD8jtDL8gxvZSWE6k ExIwE1Smd2dI+FJPw5VHFFYFyGfAzIQBxtzmg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=hDpJsNkAnl/E7g4xQHPYyyN9RYAj/dvWamqvy2BFe+1d/cOLUWCJKcUWGId3VO5Nwx cdQTwUjq6Yt8TNf64SUjk6d41rjhNc76e+s8P+f+W25+DGmhHWsE2UOFGk3Ls3UdMqXP 1P0TiCmzTx9EG9p/AWV1c9M/V/ZQHvJa2sPsM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.215.12.13 with SMTP id p13mr192644qai.82.1231942425381; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:13:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:13:45 -0800 Message-ID: From: tsai To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Installing FreeBSD with Windows XP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:44:47 -0000 Hi all, Is there a tutorial on how to install FreeBSD on a system which already has Windows XP on it? The goal is to have dual-boot with both. Thanks, tsai -- tsai From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 14:54:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC341065672 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:54:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0910.google.com (an-out-0910.google.com [209.85.132.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D138FC1E for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:54:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c25so668467anc.13 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:54:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.18.194 with SMTP id x2mr10453iba.21.1231944870206; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:54:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <00221532cd045f22410460728423@google.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:54:30 +0000 From: af300wsm@gmail.com To: Mel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Andrew Falanga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Re: Odd behavior after upgrading to 7.0-p7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:54:31 -0000 On Jan 13, 2009 4:18pm, Mel wrote: > On Saturday 10 January 2009 16:37:50 Andrew Falanga wrote: > > > > > I installed 7.0 i386 and all was working great. I upgraded to p7 and now > > > when I end my X session, I have kdm loading, it doesn't bring me to a login > > > prompt. It dumps me on console 0 and I have to kill the kdm-bin process to > > > return to a kdm login. > > > > > > This didn't happen before upgrading to p7. What would have changed that > > > would not prevent this? > > > > When using x11/nvidia-driver, recompile it for this new kernel. > > Thanks. I'll do that. Though, to be sure, does this mean I must enter that directory in ports and do a 'make deinstall' and then 'make install clean'? Thanks again, Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 14:58:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8589510656C4 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nealhogan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f21.google.com (mail-gx0-f21.google.com [209.85.217.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A8A8FC13 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:58:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nealhogan@gmail.com) Received: by gxk14 with SMTP id 14so588479gxk.19 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:58:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=tHnfl7nW7Lv8nGr6PFxVRKnyE6ussQC7I+5JZAl75GY=; b=MqPbKs+KopN7+d21H6dvCKWS9L/lbOfbawHsmXvBrLBoAciOIN2FG8koV7Zgbf5J2u ecxZCs8XreZUfsPGiNWY4aeP3tcCvV0Th7aNEgKwfM+JdunZhW+OTOSiaiaOl7ZSAOUs jnav8StPU8sJXafaFofNel7pD4uIFMANxV7qY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=XLAjbdxFaYEQytCijRV8RM3i4vdX7lCyLibDyOCAy8qO9OtYMveb3xRC5Inh5vaid+ 0mCKPb+R5YYDgRzHCyO6y6LmdmRmWtzxM2Vul7jSoMU3a2SUIKmHLYqybOwcXZkik27X p8vRI3mDNwg63nHIJdkdpEmDw7AlYyk2lIFRg= Received: by 10.151.11.17 with SMTP id o17mr2027597ybi.91.1231945088793; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:58:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.182.2 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:58:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:58:08 -0600 From: "Neal Hogan" To: tsai In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing FreeBSD with Windows XP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:58:11 -0000 I used gparted (http://gparted.sourceforge.net/ ) to move the XP partition to make room for fBSD. You make a bootable CD and I found it to be quite simple. Make sure that your XP partition is defragmented before using gparted. Otherwise, gparted will not let you manipulate the partition. Once you make a decent partition for fBSD (mine is around 25G), just follow fBSD's installation docs ( http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/install.html [+]) . Again, it's pretty easy. On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:13 AM, tsai wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there a tutorial on how to install FreeBSD on a system which already has > Windows XP on it? The goal is to have dual-boot with both. > > Thanks, > > tsai > > -- > tsai > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- www.nealhogan.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 15:02:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04DBF10656C3 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:02:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859DE8FC16 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:02:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k31so358231fkk.11 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:02:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bM1ZPCcnbdFYzvL/+XK9b6akzBrtZyHeyATVFfCO8OY=; b=Z4z/w/u1CoPd6/UzqNYOrmAE3MPxIhECX4SHzcGtHDWOlhFwf0i0uNFxgGGlsJ8C8H FmXhHKHkuOhZjqZGH29FTGfisO4MpFlSeq9UQ0QIFDF9fbcRfbFLuttRvWPTbvB/fZud +/UgAyWiIwXRyBiRFqTKf43RqONegyosJ9Q/w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CAllGZgbRHPCMSC9w5qPhwB2TQ8Xx8mofuU+kuzf7pF8pSZ1oZOUkL/jUD6JK3iWFL yhHCyN1zLfN87vJhttbDI3qJ9zTtgC+tZnN21oorZv2EcCqbX5K7zVUrQa0qEtfI9yh6 sF80xbfEv6eyffACVq4yig7sZ4yOIpYX0DaIY= Received: by 10.223.113.194 with SMTP id b2mr220256faq.80.1231945326345; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:02:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ilras.barsh.com ([92.251.20.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm33813493fkx.20.2009.01.14.07.02.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:02:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <496DFE08.2060907@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:00:24 +0100 From: cwt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Peel , FreeBSD Questions List References: <496DF5C6.5000100@thenetnow.com> In-Reply-To: <496DF5C6.5000100@thenetnow.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Flash for FreeBSD -> GNOME -> Firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:02:08 -0000 Grant Peel wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there a port that emulates Adobe Flash? i.e. Adobe's download site > says 'Platform not supported' is there a port or package thats can be > used to view Flash content in Firefox? > > -Grant > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin9 you also need /www/nspluginwrapper then run nspluginwrapper -v -a -i From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 15:11:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6FF106564A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:11:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA118FC1D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:11:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-196-14-53.dynamic.qsc.de [92.196.14.53]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C0C3CD37; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:11:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n0EFBf57002468; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:11:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:11:41 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "Zbigniew Szalbot" Message-Id: <20090114161141.7c06ea02.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0901140553i405b455fv342b8f145e87b02b@mail.gmail.com> References: <94136a2c0901132313ga018517idd21cf7a784aae7f@mail.gmail.com> <94136a2c0901140553i405b455fv342b8f145e87b02b@mail.gmail.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: updating to 7.1 with a small root slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:11:53 -0000 On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:53:29 +0100, "Zbigniew Szalbot" wrote: > When I make the GENERIC kernel, I again run out of space (I still have > about 60MB free in /). So I guess the system is probably using the > same "makeoptions DEBUG=-g" settings for the generic kernel. So my > question is where is the kernel conf file based on which the generic > kernel is compiled? > > Is it in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC ? Yes, it is, and is has the setting "makeoptions DEBUG=-g" included. You could # this setting and build a GENERIC kernel without the debug informations as described in the handbook about how to compile a custom kernel (it doesn't matter if KERNCONF refers to the GENERIC configuration file). -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 15:19:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC67510656C6 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:19:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [220.233.188.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390458FC18 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:19:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0EFJ3BQ011141; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:19:04 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:19:03 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Pieter Donche In-Reply-To: <20090114120027.071B11065714@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20090115014052.B21590@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20090114120027.071B11065714@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7, how to recieve internet mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:19:07 -0000 On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:56:30 +0100 (CET) Pieter Donche wrote: > On FreeBSD 7, out of the box, one can send mail to internet destinations > and can send mail locally from one user to another user on the same > FreeeBSD machine > > But it can't receive mail from internet as it appears .. > > A sendmail is running > freebsd7box># ps -jaxw | grep sendmail > smmsp 26649 1 26649 26649 0 Is ?? 0:00.00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) > root 26651 1 26651 26651 0 Ss ?? 0:00.04 sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) > > The machine is listening on port 25 > freebsd7box># netstat -na | grep 25 > tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.25 *.* LISTEN sendmail is only listening on localhost. > But telnettting the freebsd box with its own ip address at port 25 > from the root account of the box > freebsd7box># telnet 143.129.75.1 25 > Trying 143.129.75.1... > telnet: connect to address 143.129.75.1: Connection refused sendmail is not listening on that address. eg here, when quiet: % netstat -an | grep 25 tcp4 0 0 *.25 *.* LISTEN % sockstat -4 | grep :25 root sendmail 781 3 tcp4 *:25 *:* > The only thing that works is > freebsd7box># telnet localhost 25 > Trying 127.0.0.1... > Connected to localhost. > Escape character is '^]'. > ... That'd be right; it needs to be also listening on an external interface address to receive mail from outside this box .. > How do I make the FreeBSD7 box accept connections to port 25 from all of the > internet ?? % grep sendmail /etc/rc.conf sendmail_enable="YES" cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 15:25:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393BE1065670 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:25:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25208FC2A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:25:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LN7cG-0005J5-MR for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:25:13 +0000 Received: from pool-141-156-171-233.esr.east.verizon.net ([141.156.171.233]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:25:12 +0000 Received: from nightrecon by pool-141-156-171-233.esr.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:25:12 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:25:48 -0500 Lines: 75 Message-ID: References: <94136a2c0901132313ga018517idd21cf7a784aae7f@mail.gmail.com> <94136a2c0901140553i405b455fv342b8f145e87b02b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-141-156-171-233.esr.east.verizon.net Sender: news Subject: Re: updating to 7.1 with a small root slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@verizon.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:25:16 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:13, Zbigniew Szalbot > wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I am looking for your advice. Due to a very stupid design decision my >> / slice is only 256 MB. It seems too little so whenever I compile a > Actually it is 242MB I have one box with only 200MB for /. I had already displaced out GENERIC with highly stripped down kernel which made for space. I did at one point run out of space and the stuff mentioned further down saved the day for me. >> new kernel, I need to move the kernel.old to a different slice to >> install the new one. Then I pray, hope for the best and reboot. >> However, I read that if I want to update to 7.1 I will need to boot a >> generic kernel at some point. What option do I have? > > I found the problem. My oh my - I had > makeoptions DEBUG=-g > uncommented. > > When I commented it out, the new compiled kernel is only 32MB whereas > the old one was 128 or so MB. > > So I am happy about it now. However, I do not have a GENERIC kernel in > /boot and I will need it to do nextboot when I upgrade to 7.1. > > I thought I'd use the procedure described here > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html > to compile a generic kernel > > # cd /usr/src > # env DESTDIR=/boot/GENERIC make kernel > # mv /boot/GENERIC/boot/kernel/* /boot/GENERIC > # rm -rf /boot/GENERIC/boot Never tried any of that. I do the make buildkernel KERNCONF=xxxxxxx. Realize you should not be running out of space on / during this procedure as the build is occurring in /usr/obj. You will only run out of space on / if the make installkernel KERNCONF=xxxxxx won't fit. > When I make the GENERIC kernel, I again run out of space (I still have > about 60MB free in /). So I guess the system is probably using the > same "makeoptions DEBUG=-g" settings for the generic kernel. So my > question is where is the kernel conf file based on which the generic > kernel is compiled? > > Is it in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC ? > Yes - and it has in it by default: makeoptions DEBUG=-g # Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols So if you're not building a developer kernel you can comment this out. I don't remember for sure if this truly matters, or not, but I seem to recall the size of my kernel directories decreased dramatically when I placed STRIP= -s in /etc/make.conf. It seemed a favorable thing to do once upon a time and it's been there ever since. I thought the system variables had migrated to src.conf and the make.conf only applied to ports. In addition I also have in make.conf NO_PROFILE= true and in src.conf is WITHOUT_PROFILE= true. My stripped down kernels are 3.1MB for a 1 NIC driver and 3.4MB for a 2 NIC kernel. Of course, you won't get these small sizes for GENERIC! -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 15:30:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847D31065712 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:30:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikel.king@olivent.com) Received: from mail.olivent.com (mail.olivent.com [69.31.85.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E55C8FC1C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:30:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikel.king@olivent.com) Received: from thoth.techally.com ([204.107.76.235]) (authenticated user mikel@olivent.com) by mail.olivent.com (Kerio MailServer 6.6.2) (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:30:09 -0500 References: Message-Id: <6334D90C-2288-41CF-8384-3E513B739BE6@olivent.com> From: Mikel King To: scuba@centroin.com.br In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:28:55 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time skew X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:30:32 -0000 Marcelo, Try adding either, hint.apic.0.disabled=1 or kern.hz="100" to /boot/loader.conf Reboot the machine and check your time. The first line is the patch originally noted in the VMWare KB the latter is from the FreeBSD handbook on the subject. Regards, Mikel On Jan 14, 2009, at 9:09 AM, scuba@centroin.com.br wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm facing some strange behavior with an skew in the system clock. > The hardware is a Dell PowerEdge 2950III, running two instances of > FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p5 - amd64 over an ESXi hipervisor. > To both were allocated 4 processors and 4 GB of RAM, and dmesg for > both are identical. > I'm using clockspeed to synchronize the clock, but just one of them > is delaying the clock a lot. > The hardware clock is ok as far as the other virtual machine. > Where should I start to investigate? > > - Marcelo > > Dmesg is following: > > Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, > 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights > reserved. > FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p5 #0: Mon Nov 3 13:19:30 BRST 2008 > root@tst.ciplan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TREX-64 > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5410 @ 2.33GHz (2357.36-MHz K8- > class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x10678 Stepping = 8 > > Features > =0xfebfbff OV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS> > Features2=0x82201> > AMD Features=0x20100800 > AMD Features2=0x1 > usable memory = 4013707264 (3827 MB) > avail memory = 3883839488 (3703 MB) > ACPI APIC Table: > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 > cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 2 > cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 3 > MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI > ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > kbd1 at kbdmux0 > ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, > RF5413) > hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Nov 3 2008 13:19:19) > acpi0: on motherboard > acpi0: [ITHREAD] > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 850 > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 > cpu0: on acpi0 > acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 > cpu1: on acpi0 > acpi_throttle1: on cpu1 > acpi_throttle1: failed to attach P_CNT > device_attach: acpi_throttle1 attach returned 6 > cpu2: on acpi0 > acpi_throttle2: on cpu2 > acpi_throttle2: failed to attach P_CNT > device_attach: acpi_throttle2 attach returned 6 > cpu3: on acpi0 > acpi_throttle3: on cpu3 > acpi_throttle3: failed to attach P_CNT > device_attach: acpi_throttle3 attach returned 6 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 15:49:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFFF11065713 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:49:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from srvdmz13.oekb.co.at (srvdmz13.oekb.co.at [143.245.5.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE738FC2B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from msc01-n1 [143.245.2.187] by srvdmz13.oekb.co.at - SurfControl E-mail Filter (6.0.0); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:49:00 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at ([143.245.9.16]) by MAIL1.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:48:59 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0EFmxkc004442 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:48:59 +0100 Received: (from ej@localhost) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n0EFmxOc004441 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:48:59 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: aurora.oekb.co.at: ej set sender to a@jenisch.at using -f Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:48:59 +0100 From: Ewald Jenisch To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090114154859.GA4425@aurora.oekb.co.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2009 15:48:59.0968 (UTC) FILETIME=[9DE39C00:01C9765F] X-SEF-ZeroHour-RefID: fgs=0 X-SEF-7853D99-ADF1-478E-8894-213D316B8FFA: 1 X-SEF-Processed: 6_0_0_39__2009_01_14_16_49_00 Subject: Slow startup of Gnome - error from "gnome-keyring-daemon" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:49:05 -0000 Hi, After installing a new system with 7.1 from scratch, upgrading kernel/system as well as ports to the current version I configured X-win (X -configure) and finally fired up gnome. First of all, Gnome takes a LOT of time to get up - it takes almost 5 minutes (!) till I get the icons for "Computer", "Trash" and the icon for my "home" folder displayed. In /var/log/messages I see tons of the following messages: Jan 14 16:44:17 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: error connecting to D-BUS system bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory Jan 14 16:44:17 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: Scheduling hal init retry Jan 14 16:44:47 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: error connecting to D-BUS system bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory Jan 14 16:44:47 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: Scheduling hal init retry Jan 14 16:45:17 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: error connecting to D-BUS system bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory Jan 14 16:45:17 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: Scheduling hal init retry Jan 14 16:45:47 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: error connecting to D-BUS system bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory Jan 14 16:45:47 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: Scheduling hal init retry I'm pretty sure, both symtoms, i.e. slow startup of gnome and these error messages have something to do with each other... So here are my questions: o) Has anybody out there seen similar problems o) Anything that can be done against this? BTW, I'm running 7.1 with latest kernel & ports (see above) - 64bit (AMD64) architecture Thanks much in advance for any clue, -ewald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 15:51:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D76106574C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:51:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from srvdmz13.oekb.co.at (srvdmz13.oekb.co.at [143.245.5.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D118D8FC1A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:51:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from msc01-n1 [143.245.2.187] by srvdmz13.oekb.co.at - SurfControl E-mail Filter (6.0.0); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:51:16 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at ([143.245.9.16]) by MAIL1.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:51:15 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0EFpFHR004495; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:51:15 +0100 Received: (from ej@localhost) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n0EFpFtR004494; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:51:15 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: aurora.oekb.co.at: ej set sender to a@jenisch.at using -f Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:51:15 +0100 From: Ewald Jenisch To: Jason Lenthe Message-ID: <20090114155115.GB4425@aurora.oekb.co.at> References: <20090112162216.GA6391@aurora.oekb.co.at> <496BE775.6010805@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496BE775.6010805@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2009 15:51:15.0969 (UTC) FILETIME=[EEF3B710:01C9765F] X-SEF-ZeroHour-RefID: fgs=0 X-SEF-7853D99-ADF1-478E-8894-213D316B8FFA: 1 X-SEF-Processed: 6_0_0_39__2009_01_14_16_51_16 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Printing - standard? CUPS? ...?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:51:49 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 07:59:33PM -0500, Jason Lenthe wrote: > > By all means, give CUPS a try though. > Thanks to you all for your hints/suggestions - I'll try to get up CUPS with a possible fallback to print/apsfilter. -ewald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 16:01:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535651065952 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:01:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from icemaca@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f11.google.com (mail-fx0-f11.google.com [209.85.220.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98E28FC27 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:01:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from icemaca@gmail.com) Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so140542fxm.19 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:01:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qwq2cSgD2sZu047+ueZivP+pRhkwa/HderZvy3hS6QU=; b=iYFtpseCabxvycRQJN6mMG18ivOQ/mq1lKuEZU3swEHGy2I+/n/8WrPWlfDPMJIoTz rkMuOnpe98zqyi8Z03htqP2Li5ah3/TKTYGCdm8SKr7FIVHV1JwZJC/pbzm8QxErXR0m db3dLv+YvvTtxbXbYXrxKLgT/WVEHQaEcKawk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FFxqKS5ELEMGE+gdg5wyaBPTKYbj0Ps4+6tbEqjXgWC4DOU/NkXF+fsibzoB2fOQ5P yp1hDaQmZBe+qekehqL0x/xnKJGWNAZ4LXP7VMJnUP7wNSazWIXD3JLLJQBB4ECBW4k1 JPIfHLjVX1CfRfTuAj/06Mb6HdUPal8ILS/fg= Received: by 10.223.112.132 with SMTP id w4mr278561fap.67.1231947575524; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:39:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ilras.barsh.com ([92.251.20.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c28sm23569939fka.34.2009.01.14.07.39.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:39:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <496E06D1.2070706@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:37:53 +0100 From: icemaca User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: kernel configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:01:37 -0000 hello, i am going through the kernel configuration file to build a custom kernel and am not quite sure i understand this part correctly. my cpu is an athlon 64 x2 but i am running i386, so i am assuming that in the config file i state that my cpu is i386, not athlon 64. i ran frebsd amd64 previously, and it had HAMMER i think as the cpu in the config file. this i386 version has cpu I486_CPU cpu I586_CPU cpu I686_CPU Is this correct, and do i need all three? thank you From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 16:04:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092AA10658CB for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:04:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from psteele@maxiscale.com) Received: from arcturus.maxiscale.com (arcturus.maxiscale.com [76.231.178.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA618FC16 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:04:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from psteele@maxiscale.com) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1231949058-205700010000-jLrpzn X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.100.1.25:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from polaris.maxiscale.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcturus.maxiscale.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 2D35E369D3 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:04:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from polaris.maxiscale.com (polaris.maxiscale.com [10.100.1.24]) by arcturus.maxiscale.com with ESMTP id 93JONZKZ2Poygfof for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:04:18 -0800 (PST) X-ASG-Whitelist: Client X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Should swap space be mirrored via geom? Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:04:17 -0800 Message-ID: <2ACA3DE8F9758A48B8BE2C7A847F91F247A1E1@polaris.maxiscale.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Should swap space be mirrored via geom? Thread-Index: Acl2YcB+wSSje52EQz2d5vSxVGDSQQ== From: "Peter Steele" To: X-Barracuda-Connect: polaris.maxiscale.com[10.100.1.24] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1231949059 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at maxiscale.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Should swap space be mirrored via geom? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:04:44 -0000 We have systems setup using geom based mirroring where the drives are partitioned into three slices, one for the OS, one for the swap partition, and one for our application data. We have four hot-swappable SATA drives per system. At present we only have the OS slice mirrored with geom, and our own data partition is definitely not a candidate for mirroring. The swap slice is not mirrored, so we end up with 4x4GB of space on each system (which is probably way more than we need). =20 We have been debating whether or we should mirror the swap partitions as well. I set it up not mirrored based on some articles I read on the net, but we're concerned what might happen to a system if a drive died at a time when the its swap partition contained active pages. My first reaction would be that the applications bound to these pages would crash, something that would not happen if we used swap mirroring. =20 Can anyone shed some light on this? =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 16:27:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F298106568A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:27:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DE5D8FC16 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:27:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 62442 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2009 19:27:19 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.12?) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 14 Jan 2009 19:27:19 +0300 Message-ID: <496E117D.8030306@itlegion.ru> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:23:25 +0300 From: Artem Kuchin Organization: IT Legion User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Blocking very many (tens of thousands) ip addresses in ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:27:22 -0000 I need to block around 150000 ip addreses from acccess the server at all at any port. The addesses are random, they are not nets. These are the spammer i want to block for 24 hours. The list is dynamically generated and regenerated every hour or so. What is the most efficient way to do it? At first i thought doing ipfw rules using 5 ips per rule, that would result in 30000 rules! This will be too slow! I need to something really quick and smart. Like matching the first number from ip (195 from 192.1.2.3), if it does not match - skip, if it does - compare the next one and so on. -- Regards Artem Kuchin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 16:44:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A79F10656D9 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:44:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4B08FC1A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:44:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan-a.emsphone.com [199.67.51.107]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n0EGi5WM062010 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:44:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0EGi5AH018354 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:44:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n0EGi3Ea018351; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:44:03 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:44:03 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Artem Kuchin Message-ID: <20090114164403.GH57874@dan.emsphone.com> References: <496E117D.8030306@itlegion.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496E117D.8030306@itlegion.ru> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.1, clamav-milter version 0.94.1 on email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:44:06 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Blocking very many (tens of thousands) ip addresses in ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:44:08 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 14), Artem Kuchin said: > I need to block around 150000 ip addreses from acccess the server at > all at any port. The addesses are random, they are not nets. These > are the spammer i want to block for 24 hours. The list is dynamically > generated and regenerated every hour or so. What is the most > efficient way to do it? At first i thought doing ipfw rules using 5 > ips per rule, that would result in 30000 rules! This will be too > slow! I need to something really quick and smart. Like matching the > first number from ip (195 from 192.1.2.3), if it does not match - > skip, if it does - compare the next one and so on. Take a look at the ipfw manpage, the LOOKUP TABLES section. You can add/remove entries on the fly if you need to, and for an efficient full replacement, create a file with contents like: table 1 flush table 1 add 1.2.3.4 table 1 add 2.3.4.5 etc, then load it with "ipfw -f file.txt". -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 16:45:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328B8106568D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:45:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C09B48FC30 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:45:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 30744 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jan 2009 16:58:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 14 Jan 2009 16:58:16 -0000 Message-ID: <496E1685.8090605@ibctech.ca> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:44:53 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Artem Kuchin References: <496E117D.8030306@itlegion.ru> In-Reply-To: <496E117D.8030306@itlegion.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Blocking very many (tens of thousands) ip addresses in ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:45:04 -0000 Artem Kuchin wrote: > I need to block around 150000 ip addreses from acccess the server at all > at any port. The addesses are random, they are not nets. > These are the spammer i want to block for 24 hours. > The list is dynamically generated and regenerated every hour or so. > What is the most efficient way to do it? > At first i thought doing ipfw rules using 5 ips per rule, that would > result in 30000 rules! This will be too slow! > I need to something really quick and smart. Like matching the first > number from ip (195 from 192.1.2.3), > if it does not match - skip, if it does - compare the next one > and so on. Use tables. They are efficient, and easy to manipulate. # ipfw table 1 add xx.xx.xx.xx/xx # ipfw deny all from "table(1)" to any It would be best if you allowed only legitimate IP addresses to pass traffic in/out of your network, and then deny all else, but the way your message reads, this is SMTP traffic inbound, so 'allow some, deny the rest' doesn't work too well here. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 17:01:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C2B1065677 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from s2m-is-001.service2media.com (rev-130-102.virtu.nl [217.114.102.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE788FC2F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:01:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox-laptop.localnet ([10.0.1.45] RDNS failed) by s2m-is-001.service2media.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:01:46 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:01:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27-11-generic; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <496E117D.8030306@itlegion.ru> In-Reply-To: <496E117D.8030306@itlegion.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901141801.45996.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2009 17:01:46.0486 (UTC) FILETIME=[C8896160:01C97669] Cc: Artem Kuchin Subject: Re: Blocking very many (tens of thousands) ip addresses in ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:01:49 -0000 On Wednesday 14 January 2009 17:23:25 Artem Kuchin wrote: > I need to block around 150000 ip addreses from acccess the server at all > at any port. The addesses are random, they are not nets. > These are the spammer i want to block for 24 hours. > The list is dynamically generated and regenerated every hour or so. > What is the most efficient way to do it? > At first i thought doing ipfw rules using 5 ips per rule, that would > result in 30000 rules! This will be too slow! > I need to something really quick and smart. Like matching the first > number from ip (195 from 192.1.2.3), > if it does not match - skip, if it does - compare the next one > and so on. Quoting ipfw(8): LOOKUP TABLES Lookup tables are useful to handle large sparse address sets, typically from a hundred to several thousands of entries. There may be up to 128 different lookup tables, numbered 0 to 127. net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_buckets should probably also be increased to efficiently handle 150k IPs. -- Pieter de Goeje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 17:03:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258C7106567B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:03:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mister.olli@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f20.google.com (mail-bw0-f20.google.com [209.85.218.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08A88FC0C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:03:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mister.olli@googlemail.com) Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so2196979bwz.19 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:03:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:reply-to:to :content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=R4EgRFG7AjCGL8w5O6xbYfIG0n2u9/CPkzeE7sDEHWU=; b=lf1lMzr3BeG3etHFDz397CQilNZ2DQcDdg9UORQmdsnMN+hJ9rBEZ2djHX7KFoPFe5 DMfYsXOl4xkE8TsBvJZjUMgUDhzZY5Ku04DvET9+JbFqJFUfgS56D3SIGu/ILcF3kouj UYe7K2dz5jas1NUPIPhnWQKEesvkxSjRgQkTA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=K2QnP02ejn5tuvsboc3YAi+5udYEyACKfgTW18hZCtFcS0Ie5Fjdo4Lvs9Sh+Aha37 jP0L8pzae49B55aMRX47QmuQzEt9nxZdQlBzFBJe0lP7x8LPBtiGKiQXPhgDGb/BkbE0 Orja+lW6J4gAcU31Z0K13DHr6C1UFub1MpacQ= Received: by 10.223.114.74 with SMTP id d10mr376898faq.87.1231952608220; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:03:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.30.1.205? (vpn-or.studi-planet.com [78.47.172.52]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm32802653fkx.2.2009.01.14.09.03.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:03:27 -0800 (PST) From: Mister Olli To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:26:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1231950392.18652.0.camel@phoenix.blechhirn.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: sysctl machdep.independent_wallclock X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mister.olli@googlemail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:03:30 -0000 hi... what is the exact function of this sysctl setting? I couldn't find any documentation on it. greetz olli From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 17:13:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01665106566B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F6318FC13 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 31804 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jan 2009 17:26:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 14 Jan 2009 17:26:29 -0000 Message-ID: <496E1D22.9070106@ibctech.ca> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:13:06 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pieter de Goeje References: <496E117D.8030306@itlegion.ru> <200901141801.45996.pieter@degoeje.nl> In-Reply-To: <200901141801.45996.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Artem Kuchin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocking very many (tens of thousands) ip addresses in ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:13:16 -0000 Pieter de Goeje wrote: > On Wednesday 14 January 2009 17:23:25 Artem Kuchin wrote: >> I need to block around 150000 ip addreses from acccess the server at all >> at any port. The addesses are random, they are not nets. >> These are the spammer i want to block for 24 hours. >> The list is dynamically generated and regenerated every hour or so. >> What is the most efficient way to do it? >> At first i thought doing ipfw rules using 5 ips per rule, that would >> result in 30000 rules! This will be too slow! >> I need to something really quick and smart. Like matching the first >> number from ip (195 from 192.1.2.3), >> if it does not match - skip, if it does - compare the next one >> and so on. > > Quoting ipfw(8): > LOOKUP TABLES > Lookup tables are useful to handle large sparse address sets, typically > from a hundred to several thousands of entries. There may be up to 128 > different lookup tables, numbered 0 to 127. > > net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_buckets should probably also be increased to efficiently > handle 150k IPs. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but if the OP is going to drop all traffic immediately from the 150k IPs, then dyn_buckets shouldn't come into play, as there is no dynamic rule generated. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 16:39:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3867F1065698; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:39:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fazaeli@sepehrs.com) Received: from sepehrs.com (www.sepehrs.com [213.217.59.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE62C8FC1D; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:39:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fazaeli@sepehrs.com) Received: from [192.168.1.180] ([192.168.1.180]) by sepehrs.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n0EGeddx049081; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:10:39 +0330 (IRST) (envelope-from fazaeli@sepehrs.com) Message-ID: <496E11B7.3010608@sepehrs.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:54:23 +0330 From: "H.fazaeli" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yony Yossef References: <20def4870901140009y1f007108y92797d5f79ffac08@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20def4870901140009y1f007108y92797d5f79ffac08@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sepehr-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Sepehr-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Sepehr-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-MailScanner-From: fazaeli@sepehrs.com X-Spam-Status: No X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:20:44 +0000 Cc: eitans@mellanox.co.il, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, oleg@mellanox.co.il, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, liranl@mellanox.co.il Subject: Re: howto determine network device unit number? device.hints? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:39:06 -0000 you may not change unit numbers as they are strictly controlled by kernel. However, on freebsd 5.3+, you may use 'ifconfig name ' to achieve the same affect Yony Yossef wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to determine the unit number of my network cards, e.g. > make the device on pci0:16 be assigned every time with unit number 0 > and pci0:19 with unit number 1. > > Is it done by /boot/device.hints? > if so, how? > > My cards are: > > mtnic0@pci0:19:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x001715b3 chip=0x636815b3 > rev=0xa0 hdr=0x00 > mtnic1@pci0:16:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x001715b3 chip=0x636815b3 > rev=0xa0 hdr=0x00 > > So I've tried: > > hint.mtnic.0.at="pci0:16" > hint.mtnic.1.at="pci0:19" > > but it doesn't work. They keep switching arbitrarily. > I'm using FreeBSD 7.0. > > Thanks > Yony > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > -- Best regards. Hooman Fazaeli Sepehr S. T. Co. Ltd. Web: http://www.sepehrs.com Tel: (9821)88975701-2 Fax: (9821)88983352 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 17:23:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A6710656C7 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:23:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhass88@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF038FC17 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:23:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhass88@gmail.com) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so131022qwb.7 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:23:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9xlFtk3Kbov88Vp+M47mtzzpG1/Egd78qlP8N2wwE0k=; b=ebLbXEeYK4YjtcsECC7SAeyclhDBsMay3QgG9/Sx9yaINoIT84QYVmOHnmRpS5MdpG kppuyU6cD4h8qPYib50v3tUQIxTD8ym8r65AWG0r1PA5j9jcMyRAk14niYqcU2FbfLsM xVnj1h79p6S5XXU0nLVYCI8BifHTkZDcUYi04= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=KxKByQAtjtGSYjjOe1HVv9UKd6hNi6yjmZpYBidCqKQJ4x4MgFavHaElLqcJw3SCjF nFLq2fY4oKaXx5v2h30Nm7Yp0hMEufFhdMQpNW93741CQ69sqcAnV3YpfAxPhBCswvqM QGHFuiUttjPBnEJ2KuOndJjaxremqQHG9xMpI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.214.129.15 with SMTP id b15mr489566qad.354.1231953789542; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:23:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:23:09 -0500 Message-ID: From: Johann Hasselbach To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: freebsd encrypted hard disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:23:12 -0000 I read the "encrypting disk partitions" section of the Handbook. What is the preferred method nowdays, geli or gbde? Is there another method that would be better? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 17:25:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20F4106564A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:25:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593378FC19 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:25:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n0EHOTmA028964; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:24:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id n0EHOT8P028963; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:24:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:24:29 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Zbigniew Szalbot Message-ID: <20090114172429.GA28762@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <94136a2c0901132313ga018517idd21cf7a784aae7f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0901132313ga018517idd21cf7a784aae7f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: updating to 7.1 with a small root slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:25:01 -0000 On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:13:32AM +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Dear all, > > I am looking for your advice. Due to a very stupid design decision my > / slice is only 256 MB. It seems too little so whenever I compile a > new kernel, I need to move the kernel.old to a different slice to > install the new one. Then I pray, hope for the best and reboot. > However, I read that if I want to update to 7.1 I will need to boot a > generic kernel at some point. What option do I have? Probably you mean the / partition. Probably all those partitions are in one slice, but maybe not. Hmmm. 256 MB should be plenty for root, depending on what is in root. What do you leave in root? IF some things like /tmp, /usr or /var are living in the root partition, then they should be in their own. If they or some other big directory is in the way, then move it to your big partition (probably /home) and make a symbolic link (symlink) to it from the root partition. That will leave more room in root and you can get by until the next time you do a complete reinstall (maybe forever) that way. Then, if you want to redo your partitions, you can. By then, the main reason will be because disk sizes have become so large that you want to carve them up differently. > Even if I install a copy of GENERIC kernel into /boot, it most likely > won't fit in the available file space. The problem is the machine's > remote so I cannot take it down, replace drives, etc. as I am bound by > a hosting contract and frankly I really do not want to do that unless > I have no other option. Thoughts? Many thanks! It is easy to move a too big directory to another large partition. Just tar up the directory and untar it in the new place and then make the link. If everything looks to be OK - including files' ownership and permissions, then delete the old directory. Lets say you have a large /home that is a separate partition and that you left /var in root instead of making it its own partition. cd /var tar -cvf /home/var.tar * cd /home mkdir new.var cd new.var tar -xvpf /home/var.tar cd / mv var old.var ln -s /home/new.var var Check out the new.var for files/ownership/permissions cd / rm -rf old.var voila, you have room in root now. Do this to appropriate directories that are too big and really should have their own partition or be in the large partition anyway. Make sure you do not do it to directories that are needed for boot. The main one that may not be obvious is /etc. Don't move it. But also, do not move /bin, /sbin, /boot, /root, /dev, /lib or /libexec Really /tmp, /usr and /var or some directories within them are your only candidates. You might also check to make sure you didn't stash some large junk files in /root and forgot to get rid of them. Anyway, 256 MB should be plenty of space for / slash unless you are putting everything in it. ////jerry > > -- > Zbigniew Szalbot > www.slowo.pl > www.fairtrade.net.pl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 17:26:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF1D1065717 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:26:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919F08FC2F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so261816yxb.13 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:26:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=2XF7ao1WEL6+io/fkLH2o+QLCZLZAaMk6S+MaAqO6U4=; b=gyYgjLTQ+dfz5uO6CSPw27Donzsm0viZlBcWAcTRyHrF6wghEMhxgKuwuvhmwuV37r rYFcRKimrCQMWIf1R/h9tKT5I3jMTxbGv3XvmW3HXS4YLIu9955x3yaBu3jrnfpLpzjP 2CpYESMEjzftgTNcwC2NJU3q54Y2x1yOe/lIw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=vqg5Vrn4NEIuxZ/e1hjwIETDzshTm8cdADiAOJ6tA1hXeTzMldgnIr0AmCgXKyjkzB rmOs0AwgrVaW1GElQc4yVtfoHmH9VqU4qeu/80ZOIokIaEWBN5BLCCyNDeXkSF4dvXNG W3q8R2hNF0hnLJC6IsppOzpPKQxpio7YoF+UI= Received: by 10.65.204.2 with SMTP id g2mr137524qbq.45.1231953965077; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:26:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.183.13 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:26:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0901140926vb3936feh837c11fbc25300d5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:26:05 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20090114161141.7c06ea02.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0901132313ga018517idd21cf7a784aae7f@mail.gmail.com> <94136a2c0901140553i405b455fv342b8f145e87b02b@mail.gmail.com> <20090114161141.7c06ea02.freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: updating to 7.1 with a small root slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:26:07 -0000 Hello, >> Is it in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC ? > > Yes, it is, and is has the setting "makeoptions DEBUG=-g" included. > You could # this setting and build a GENERIC kernel without the > debug informations as described in the handbook about how to > compile a custom kernel (it doesn't matter if KERNCONF refers > to the GENERIC configuration file). Great! I was able to install the generic kernel so I should be safe when going up from 7.0 to 7.1. And I still have some space left in /. $ df -h / Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ar0s1a 242M 194M 29M 87% / Thank you all for the information! Great! Now the scary thing... upgrade the system to 7.1 :) -- Zbigniew Szalbot www.slowo.pl www.fairtrade.net.pl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 17:30:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E29710656BB for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f21.google.com (mail-gx0-f21.google.com [209.85.217.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5362C8FC18 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by gxk14 with SMTP id 14so692885gxk.19 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:30:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=4sf4ZSXifoo8hCvMFnk5U6DdcUWknQEmwPFIi1/G2aI=; b=R4mqcCl7ix1OCu/FNFasdgj+zSIeUfT3DKDwbRkL3nNXKHvoo6oAuBSjhhSze4Jp5V 2IrAVczgEzhXgHbziKcSCTM4DimAsA3vc9a2+ajVw4r21/n9BqDNtodVy2uQfvYPfg2u BTqkzKVUCbcvELihHTpIIisH53C8piDmUmA64= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=rOfZ6AQAdak/IHulnpJodntT9sD/w/pQ9tg0dZymeJkuEsmGwkHGyqNe30EONEtbVY DY8HzffibhwIKziMueyqPKGnkqcVLwwFIrXMqazVacwSgYEy+bvQGuREYdpso/1W5cRO 7EN9v4iXFNvWUwtLXmJpez1DrwFLoAh9o3wyE= Received: by 10.65.240.13 with SMTP id s13mr142524qbr.29.1231954227235; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:30:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.183.13 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:30:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0901140930x2ee25437p54ee00d2479d79f8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:30:27 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: "Jerry McAllister" In-Reply-To: <20090114172429.GA28762@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0901132313ga018517idd21cf7a784aae7f@mail.gmail.com> <20090114172429.GA28762@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: updating to 7.1 with a small root slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:30:29 -0000 Hello Jerry, > Anyway, 256 MB should be plenty of space for / slash unless you > are putting everything in it. My main mistake was that I had makeoptions DEBUG=-g in the kernel config file. That made for a ~130MB kernel so when I compiled and tried to install a new one, it ran out of space (it would be about 260 MB but I only had 242 MB). Many thanks for all you detailed instructions though! -- Zbigniew Szalbot www.slowo.pl www.fairtrade.net.pl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 17:40:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91CC1065673 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62E4F8FC22 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 32665 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jan 2009 17:53:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 14 Jan 2009 17:53:35 -0000 Message-ID: <496E237C.2010606@ibctech.ca> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:40:12 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johann Hasselbach References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd encrypted hard disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:40:22 -0000 Johann Hasselbach wrote: > I read the "encrypting disk partitions" section of the Handbook. What > is the preferred method nowdays, geli or gbde? > > Is there another method that would be better? I don't know what is best, but for quite some time I've used GELI to encrypt my entire hard disk, including the / partition. I then copy /boot to a USB thumb drive with the encryption key so I don't need any portion of the hard disk unencrypted. This setup also allows me to pull the USB key from the machine after it has been booted, taking the encryption key with me. I've never had a problem. pearl# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ar0.elia 504M 377M 87M 81% / devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev /dev/ar0.elie 47G 9.6G 34G 22% /usr /dev/ar0.elif 47G 7.2G 36G 17% /var /dev/ar0.elig 47G 25G 19G 57% /home Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 17:46:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B171510656C2 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:46:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0248FC14 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:46:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0EHjhV0026970; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:45:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B7DD8BA9A; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:45:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:45:43 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20090114174543.GA97086@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20090112162216.GA6391@aurora.oekb.co.at> <496BE775.6010805@comcast.net> <20090114144410.6ddf9401.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090114144410.6ddf9401.freebsd@edvax.de> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: Ewald Jenisch , Jason Lenthe , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Printing - standard? CUPS? ...?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:46:30 -0000 --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:44:10PM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:59:33 -0500, Jason Lenthe wro= te: > > The problem [with CUPS] was that certain other software (gtk+ and gnome= as I recall) > > expected /usr/bin/lpr to be the CUPS lpr (the CUPS port normally > > installs lpr to /usr/local/bin). It was also necessary for some > > applications to have /usr/local/bin before /usr/bin in your path for > > certain applications to work. My memory is vague regarding the details, > > though. When installing cups, I always tell it to overwrite the base tools. I've got the following in /etc/make.conf: =2Eif ${.CURDIR:M*/print/cups*} CUPS_OVERWRITE_BASE=3Dtrue =2Eendif Accompanied by the following setting in /etc/src.conf: WITHOUT_LPR=3Dtrue This will prevent two different versions of the lp* tools being installed. =20 > One downside I noticed since I was forced to upgrade my home system > was that some programs seem to expect (!) the presence of CUPS on > a system in order to print, which they didn't do in earlier versions. > Yes, I'm talking to you, Gimp! :-) When trying to print something > from the Gimp (I think it's called "Gutenprint"), the message >=20 > /usr/local/bin/lpstat: Unable to connect to server >=20 > is output to the controlling terminal. It seems that it's not > enough that Gimp runs slower with every version update... :-( The upside is that gutenprint and cups changing all available printer settings. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkluJMcACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWiPQCfbO9uV2A+oQuvxlsW5nHtK2cS CWUAnj4laISpSGGY7v81JB+4kIo3XBWC =kBFY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 17:49:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875DD1065672 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:49:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3618FC14 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:49:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0EHn7tG061716; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:49:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6EB41BA9A; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:49:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:49:07 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Grant Peel Message-ID: <20090114174907.GB97086@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <496DF5C6.5000100@thenetnow.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wq9mPyueHGvFACwf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496DF5C6.5000100@thenetnow.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Flash for FreeBSD -> GNOME -> Firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:49:10 -0000 --wq9mPyueHGvFACwf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:25:10AM -0500, Grant Peel wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > Is there a port that emulates Adobe Flash? i.e. Adobe's download site=20 > says 'Platform not supported' is there a port or package thats can be=20 > used to view Flash content in Firefox? You could try graphics/gnash Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --wq9mPyueHGvFACwf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkluJZMACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWbrQCdF+R+0EsXYb5IG0C0LaRm3zts d/AAn3+nkpHpY8YXy0+891HIqHqHld+y =ApXx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wq9mPyueHGvFACwf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 17:56:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6A51065673 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from chen.org.nz (ip-58-28-152-174.static-xdsl.xnet.co.nz [58.28.152.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CD48FC12 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 590062840D; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:56:13 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:56:13 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Ewald Jenisch Message-ID: <20090114175613.GC88068@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <20090114154859.GA4425@aurora.oekb.co.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090114154859.GA4425@aurora.oekb.co.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow startup of Gnome - error from "gnome-keyring-daemon" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:56:16 -0000 On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:48:59PM +0100, Ewald Jenisch wrote: > Hi, > > After installing a new system with 7.1 from scratch, upgrading > kernel/system as well as ports to the current version I configured > X-win (X -configure) and finally fired up gnome. > > First of all, Gnome takes a LOT of time to get up - it takes almost 5 > minutes (!) till I get the icons for "Computer", "Trash" and the icon > for my "home" folder displayed. > > In /var/log/messages I see tons of the following messages: > > Jan 14 16:44:17 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: error connecting to D-BUS system bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory > Jan 14 16:44:17 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: Scheduling hal init retry > Jan 14 16:44:47 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: error connecting to D-BUS system bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory > Jan 14 16:44:47 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: Scheduling hal init retry > Jan 14 16:45:17 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: error connecting to D-BUS system bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory > Jan 14 16:45:17 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: Scheduling hal init retry > Jan 14 16:45:47 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: error connecting to D-BUS system bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory > Jan 14 16:45:47 mybox gnome-keyring-daemon[977]: Scheduling hal init retry The obvious question is: Have you got hald running? Make sure your /etc/rc.conf has: gnome_enable="YES" -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Nyuck, nyuck, nyuck" - Curly From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 18:00:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CED1065705 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:00:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5830F8FC1B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0EHxsJB018911; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:59:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B7061BA9A; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:59:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:59:54 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Johann Hasselbach Message-ID: <20090114175954.GC97086@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd encrypted hard disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:00:04 -0000 --oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:23:09PM -0500, Johann Hasselbach wrote: > I read the "encrypting disk partitions" section of the Handbook. What > is the preferred method nowdays, geli or gbde? Geli seems to be the preferred method these days. It is also what I use to encrypt my /home. It works without problems for me. A geli-encrypted device gets the extension .eli. The boot scripts handle it automatically when they see an .eli device in /etc/fstab. Depending on how you configured it you might have to give the passphrase. You can even encrypt your root directory, but in that case I think you'll need an unencrypted partition for /boot. > Is there another method that would be better? Depends on what you define as better. I don't think so. Geli is convenient and seems to work well. On modern machines the performance penalty is slight. It supports well-regarded encryption algorithms like AES and Blowfish. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkluKBoACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUllQCeIbMQa3L3FSZIC6E2U7SNAUMj b7QAoJvVY05xerDYi3ncnRzANbPcqYCC =yHKI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 18:03:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F191065767 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB348FC16 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:03:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so272374ywe.13 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:03:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=dIOQVnzfUe4epf150cotLSS1n/p+1GEep484wLspLCw=; b=VKXARcl0gJ3HrG4wxkBs7FWG+Vt8IpxJzIpXGebKf7MLjvjNRSPBZiUu4ndIhBJHnC 6/TK0zdT2paOwJfGwm0kS7mUBhVHwSxnhq5qhHy0LKFIOugXtwy/vp05T6/MhtX3kH/V dc/3DePLGxUAvSrpZAfYBy9IlCUxr+y4jX8XI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Wi/LD0FuC/Wv6tT4MQfxHGgJ2B6PosdApLUFVE2emSxhdpMsqgGaEWkszPdQAEeUYT IgiE2/EQBbvGPFZ+GH4Pj2bjE8mVJaFhQ8fUa+fDSdUiSM9S3OhIgfrO7vARTb952Uwj 5Ixfg69qXaI0Q8aLfuwAyL9EGTg+UVszp17Q8= Received: by 10.64.151.10 with SMTP id y10mr145673qbd.95.1231956182850; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:03:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.183.13 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:03:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0901141003hf976918vee0e5c6c9262000a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:03:02 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: "User Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Performing installed ports upgrade / leaving some software intact X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:03:06 -0000 Dear all, I am now full into planning the 7.0-RELEASE to 7.1-RELEASE upgrade. I know that at the end of the day it will also mean upgrading all ports (portupgrade -af). I have one port - mailman - which I have customized a lot and do not really want to upgrade it as it will most likely mean I will have to hack a few files again. What options do I have so that I do not break the setup? I am thinking of: 1/ backing up the hacked files and restoring them later (but I will overwrite the newer files with older ones perhaps breaking something). 2/ making them read only (but the end result will be the same and upgrading as root I will overwrite them anyway). And that would be it. My wisdom ends here. Is there any option to survive the ports upgrade? :) If not, I guess I will just have to hack Mailman files again after the upgrade... -- Zbigniew Szalbot www.slowo.pl www.fairtrade.net.pl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 18:13:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D246C10657A9 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874E58FC1C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n0EID2dw029175; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:13:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id n0EID2Qg029174; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:13:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:13:02 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: tsai Message-ID: <20090114181302.GC28762@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing FreeBSD with Windows XP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:13:35 -0000 On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 06:13:45AM -0800, tsai wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there a tutorial on how to install FreeBSD on a system which already has > Windows XP on it? The goal is to have dual-boot with both. The FreeBSD Handbook - free online at the FreeBSD web site - has a whole section on that. It is easy. The machine on which I am typing is dual boot with FreeBSD Win-XP. Basically, you first have to shrink the XP slice (which is called a primary partition in the MS world) to make room for FreeBSD. Probably the best utility for that nowdays is gpartd which is available for free. Just do a little search and then burn a bootable copy of it to a CD. It works with NTFS as well as other MS file system types and some other freeware does not. You can also use the Parition Magic commercial product, but stick with version 7 which works well as long as it is on a hard disk. Version 8 of Partition Magic doesn't work well. Neither of them work with USB connected drives even though Version 8 claims to do so. But, gpartd does also work with USB drives. After shrinking the MS slice, then create a second bootable slice - which they call a primary partition. It may complain a bit about having two primary partitions, but don't worry about that. Also, make sure the MS-XP slice is first on the drive. It gets confused if it is not the first bootable slice on the drive. FreeBSD is happy to boot from wherever you tell it. One small and esotheric exception is that some hardware companies such as Dell and HP, put a diagnostic slice (primary partition) in front of MS-Win on the disk. But they get around it by marking it as a 'hidden' primary partition so MS MBRs do not 'see' it and just ignore it. (But FreeBSD MBRs do see it and usually label it as ??? in the menu, leaving you to ignore it) So, leave that hardware maintenance slice where it is, have the MS-XP slice next followed by the FreeBSD slice and, if you find it useful, an additional small slice that you make in to a FAT32 type. If the MS-XP slice is NTFS, it is handy to have a FA32 type slice around to use to transfer files between MS and FreeBSD. Four or five GB should be plenty depending on your usage. Alternatively, if you have shrunk the MS slice down below the max size for Fat32, then you can just convert the NTFS system to FAT32. I don't remember if gpartd will do that, but Partition Magic (version 7) will do it nicely. That introduces some limitations, plus FAT is not thought to be quite as reliable as NTFS, but I have never had any problem doing that. If you have no need to transfer files between the systems, then it is a moot point and don't bother worrying about this. When you get done with all this, everything will look just the same to the MS-XP machine, except it will have less disk space. FreeBSD will see all those slices. Presuming all those slices I mentioned, they will be identified as follows. /dev/ad0s1 -> Maintenance slice /dev/ad0s2 -> XP slice (either NTFS or FAT32) /dev/ad0s3 -> FreeBSD slice /dev/ad0s4 -> Extra file transfer FAT32 slice Or, without the extras, it would be: /dev/ad0s1 -> XP slice (either NTFS or FAT32) /dev/ad0s2 -> FreeBSD slice That is for ATA or SATA drives. SCSI or SAS drives would be named /dev/da0... Once you have this slice creation done, just boot the sysinstall CD and install FreeBSD to the FreeBSD slice you created. It should see those slices and only write to the one you specify. Make it write the FreeBSD MBR (the MS MBR won't work) and select the option for making the slice bootable, just like you would if installing FreeBSD by itself on the disk. Everything else is just like a normal install. Note: Of course, the total size you have to deal with when you do the partitioning in to a for /, b for swap, d for whatever, etc will be the size of the slice you made for FreeBSD, not the size of the disk itself. Then when you boot, you will see a menu that asks you to select which bootable slice to boot and you specify it using the 'F' keys eg F1, F2, F3 and it should look something like this. F1 - ??? F2 - MS-DOS (or ??? if NTFS) F3 - FreeBSD If you make that extra file transfer FAT32 slice, do not mark that as bootable and it should not show up in the menu. But the maintenance slice will show up as F1 - ??? if you have one. Have fun, ////jerry > > Thanks, > > tsai > > -- > tsai > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 18:13:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C9C106567B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from mgaterz1.oekb.co.at (mgaterz1.oekb.co.at [143.245.5.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766BB8FC17 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from msc01-n1.oekb.co.at (HELO MAIL1.oekb.co.at) ([143.245.2.187]) by mgaterz1.oekb.co.at with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2009 19:13:37 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at ([143.245.9.16]) by MAIL1.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:13:36 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0EIDacN005682; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:13:36 +0100 Received: (from ej@localhost) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n0EIDaEg005681; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:13:36 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: aurora.oekb.co.at: ej set sender to a@jenisch.at using -f Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:13:36 +0100 From: Ewald Jenisch To: Jonathan Chen Message-ID: <20090114181336.GA4487@aurora.oekb.co.at> References: <20090114154859.GA4425@aurora.oekb.co.at> <20090114175613.GC88068@osiris.chen.org.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090114175613.GC88068@osiris.chen.org.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2009 18:13:36.0805 (UTC) FILETIME=[D1AFDD50:01C97673] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow startup of Gnome - error from "gnome-keyring-daemon" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:13:40 -0000 On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 06:56:13AM +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote: > > The obvious question is: > Have you got hald running? > > Make sure your /etc/rc.conf has: > gnome_enable="YES" Hi, Didn't know that I need 'gnome_enable="YES"' in my /etc/rc.conf. At least the handbook doesn't mention it, so coming from earlier releases of FreeBSD I didn't know this. Thanks for the hint! -ewald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 18:15:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5A11065770 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:15:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from mgaterz1.oekb.co.at (mgaterz1.oekb.co.at [143.245.5.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657168FC19 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:15:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from msc01-n1.oekb.co.at (HELO MAIL1.oekb.co.at) ([143.245.2.187]) by mgaterz1.oekb.co.at with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2009 19:15:23 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at ([143.245.9.16]) by MAIL1.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:15:22 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0EIFMjM005693; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:15:22 +0100 Received: (from ej@localhost) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n0EIFMJp005692; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:15:22 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: aurora.oekb.co.at: ej set sender to a@jenisch.at using -f Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:15:22 +0100 From: Ewald Jenisch To: icemaca Message-ID: <20090114181522.GB4487@aurora.oekb.co.at> References: <496E06D1.2070706@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496E06D1.2070706@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2009 18:15:22.0806 (UTC) FILETIME=[10DE5560:01C97674] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:15:26 -0000 On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:37:53PM +0100, icemaca wrote: > > this i386 version has > > cpu I486_CPU > cpu I586_CPU > cpu I686_CPU > Basically you can comment all but I686_CPU since the others are for earlier x86 architectures. -ewald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 18:30:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A170610656E1 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:30:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 386768FC27 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:30:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 34344 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jan 2009 18:44:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 14 Jan 2009 18:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <496E2F4C.6050409@ibctech.ca> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:30:36 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: <94136a2c0901141003hf976918vee0e5c6c9262000a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0901141003hf976918vee0e5c6c9262000a@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Performing installed ports upgrade / leaving some software intact X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:30:48 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Dear all, > > I am now full into planning the 7.0-RELEASE to 7.1-RELEASE upgrade. I > know that at the end of the day it will also mean upgrading all ports > (portupgrade -af). I have one port - mailman - which I have customized > a lot and do not really want to upgrade it as it will most likely mean > I will have to hack a few files again. > > What options do I have so that I do not break the setup? > > I am thinking of: > > 1/ backing up the hacked files and restoring them later (but I will > overwrite the newer files with older ones perhaps breaking something). > 2/ making them read only (but the end result will be the same and > upgrading as root I will overwrite them anyway). > > And that would be it. My wisdom ends here. Is there any option to > survive the ports upgrade? :) > > If not, I guess I will just have to hack Mailman files again after the > upgrade... Can you verify that the original copy of the files you've hacked have indeed been modified in the upgraded version? Perhaps you could download the source for both the new version in ports, and the original version, and find out exactly what, if any changes have been made to your modified files. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 18:58:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F88B1065678 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171938FC12 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so402528fgb.35 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:58:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=X8YIp+qLdsChkAAyDE4BxGVsrrAC9xNSMcxbmGsNpQM=; b=IcooliPP1RLNVnxWiwQnFYFbcyyOldSdYbpenlL44EWy3+SrbZWuMh3kU7eXMzNpHP QaW+dYriYqFjTJf6Y6z/B0cNyHL+jdEMkqUyTM4Iaz7c0M8vg9ezkN15d5qNmA1xDLgB TekoPjQvQwJc7JcyiTROcosAWEw/uEx40Fetc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Rjw6e7RdgDawL6A9punhywKfa3Zd1xpRWMGDK0Ko/WemopV1hTt/JnQ57hlRgT53RB oQw1SatC7yD26jOb3rAqSzs3WKEXBfb4pd9LfqoQz1u24TXRI8VMV6FqT45+rnIowMxK 5ZREt0DG8mLmSH6VthiMSkbGsEN/sLZGD2pqo= Received: by 10.86.91.3 with SMTP id o3mr844966fgb.77.1231958070129; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:34:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.84.16 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:34:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <23ed14b80901141034l16ee0dedp9837e4f1162e253b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:34:30 +0100 From: "Andy Wodfer" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Help! locate.code /tmp: filesystem full X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:58:56 -0000 Hi, I'm getting an error message every week and I can't seem to understand why nor manage to fix it. Here it is: #dmesg [snip] pid 54753 (locate.code), uid 65534 inumber 23557 on /tmp: filesystem full # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ar0s1a 989M 53M 857M 6% / devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev /dev/ar0s1g 48G 8.5G 36G 19% /backup /dev/ar0s1d 989M 44K 910M 0% /tmp /dev/ar0s1f 387G 168G 189G 47% /usr /dev/ar0s1e 7.7G 398M 6.7G 5% /var As you see there's 910MB free space in /tmp. Should be plenty to run the weekly locate script? # uname -a FreeBSD host.domain.com 6.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE #5: Sat Jan 12 03:20:02 CET 2008 root@host.domain.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYOWN i386 Does anyone have a suggestion what I can do to fix this problem? Thanks a lot! Best, Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 19:02:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60648106564A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:02:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bjmccann@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305078FC08 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:02:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bjmccann@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so688357rvf.43 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:02:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=z/K7sGPcaOve14IxHWd3qR/xwqRzVgJP+d4msxzBLU0=; b=O5suINxEBnwgI0YjvlkTyi5CVloCGXFZyq18HAUQqS534S1X+NKjdFvtvxQY0cRlUN Gg5RGwVF/ESd3eDc89RpS555XwUKPymrq9cDZIoNEZmsPRzPfECyeBzP8/f8ouYkmO1o k6HAE+zphxNThtOSjShW81rF4HuJDPbq++QgU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=bYKJdp4Sb/6oLKPlhpmtRebA65a8SP9h6Z1CJbpF+NJ5TeXfC/6UU02Pf0UzIPK0P7 wdW3krLycK//XQ2LW/2Fwzny5e7MPHMxkbwx7rTqpu5hZJrxsehEJs9Fi6GYMgTdq3Ku 6/89Mh2lkwwQ0vwHsn0kj1e9AYrrpzTBq1NyA= Received: by 10.140.204.7 with SMTP id b7mr147470rvg.117.1231959723496; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:02:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.140.19 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:02:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2b5f066d0901141102m59645d64i4bb7a0c6589539de@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:02:03 -0500 From: "Brian McCann" To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <2b5f066d0901090743v494c4c08ufeeec2dec319d0f0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2b5f066d0901081136n257f114akb9ebd628fd6f93a2@mail.gmail.com> <49671922.8040906@snaffler.net> <2b5f066d0901090709m6c1000efi7d411800f16cf732@mail.gmail.com> <2b5f066d0901090743v494c4c08ufeeec2dec319d0f0@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD USB Install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:02:04 -0000 On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Brian McCann wrote: >> >> Well this just got a LOT more frustrating and interesting. I made a >> stick following those directions using a new stick...worked fine, >> booted off of it...did some work on it...somehow the filesystem got >> very corrupted in one of various things I was doing to it (I think it >> was when I accidentially unplugged it before running a sync and >> umount). I figured it'd just be easier to start over and build it >> again from scratch. So...I try to newfs it ("newfs -U -L FreeBSDStick >> /dev/da1s1a", and newfs fails with "cg 0: bad magic number" . Now I'm >> really getting pissed. So...I run a dd ("dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 >> bs=1m"), and do the whole thing over...here's the console output: >> >> umm# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=1m >> dd: /dev/da1: short write on character device >> dd: /dev/da1: end of device >> 3830+0 records in >> 3829+1 records out >> 4016045568 bytes transferred in 4324.380202 secs (928699 bytes/sec) >> umm# fdisk -BI /dev/da1 >> ******* Working on device /dev/da1 ******* >> fdisk: invalid fdisk partition table found >> fdisk: Geom not found: "da1" >> umm# bsdlabel -B -w da1s1 >> umm# newfs -U -L FreeBSDStick /dev/da1s1a >> /dev/da1s1a: 3827.9MB (7839640 sectors) block size 16384, fragment size 2048 >> using 21 cylinder groups of 183.77MB, 11761 blks, 23552 inodes. >> with soft updates >> super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: >> 160, 376512, 752864, 1129216, 1505568, 1881920, 2258272, 2634624, >> 3010976, 3387328, 3763680, 4140032, 4516384, 4892736, >> 5269088, 5645440, 6021792, 6398144, 6774496, 7150848, 7527200 >> cg 0: bad magic number >> >> So now I'm getting seriously ticked off. Anyone have any ideas what >> the heck could be causing this? This thumb drive was working fine >> with FreeBSD! I'm trying a dd on a thumb drive w/o specifying a block >> size / BS...we'll see what that does...but I'm still open to >> suggestions since I'm just about out of ideas. >> >> Thanks! >> --Brian >> >> > > To the list of things tried...add formatting the USB stick with the > HDD Low Level Format Tool > (http://hddguru.com/content/en/software/2006.04.12-HDD-Low-Level-Format-Tool/). > Still no joy... > For those following along at home, I found the cause of my problems. It apparently all came down to the machine I was making the stick on. Any machine that had an Intel SCB2 motherboard in it, would screw it up. I switched to using a different & newer machine, re-did the directions at http://typo.submonkey.net/articles/2006/04/13/installing-freebsd-on-usb-stick-episode-2 , and all my problems with it went away. YAY!!! Thanks to all those who provided input. Long live FreeBSD! --Brian -- _-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_ Brian McCann "I don't have to take this abuse from you -- I've got hundreds of people waiting to abuse me." -- Bill Murray, "Ghostbusters" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 19:02:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E932106564A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:02:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EE58FC17 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:02:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay13.apple.com (relay13.apple.com [17.128.113.29]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B664C69A31; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:02:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay13.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay13.apple.com (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with ESMTP id 8E7A32808C; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:02:43 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 1180711d-ad02ebb000000ff0-ee-496e36d38913 Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (cswiger1.apple.com [17.227.140.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 6170128086; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:02:43 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <2C672D07-3AC3-4BC9-8E91-782B967BF99F@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: Pieter Donche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:02:43 -0800 References: <200901131429.07667.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: "mail.list freebsd-questions" Subject: Re: receiving mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:02:44 -0000 On Jan 13, 2009, at 11:51 PM, Pieter Donche wrote: > on host1: > $ host -t MX macos.cmi.ua.ac.be > returns no answer It is recommended to configure MX records for the domains in DNS, but mail will fall back to using A records if no MX records exist. > But, when I try from host1 > $ telnet host2.domain.topdom 25 > > Trying 143.129.75.1... > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused > > Op host2.domain.topdom I see sendmail is running: > host2: $ ps -jaxw | grep sendm > smmsp 816 1 816 816 0 Is ?? 0:00.02 sendmail: > Queue runner@00:30:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) > root 812 1 812 812 0 Ss ?? 0:00.01 sendmail: > accepting connections (sendmail) > > What's wrong? Why does this not work out of the box ?? Given the security history of sendmail, it's not prudent to enable sendmail by default. Those two processes are the client mqueue runner and probably a daemon listening only on localhost rather than on all interfaces. There is a minimum level of effort required to set up mail properly; at the least, read /etc/mail/README and set: sendmail_enable="YES" ...in /etc/rc.conf. I expect to deal with sendmail for as long as I administer Unix boxes, but alternatives like Postfix in particular would be my preference from a number of standpoints. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 19:18:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91BA1065676 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:18:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D4A8FC22 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:18:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0EJIbxr058210; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:18:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 58927BA9A; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:18:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:18:37 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Zbigniew Szalbot Message-ID: <20090114191837.GA99290@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <94136a2c0901141003hf976918vee0e5c6c9262000a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0901141003hf976918vee0e5c6c9262000a@mail.gmail.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Performing installed ports upgrade / leaving some software intact X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:18:41 -0000 --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:03:02PM +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Dear all, >=20 > I am now full into planning the 7.0-RELEASE to 7.1-RELEASE upgrade. I > know that at the end of the day it will also mean upgrading all ports > (portupgrade -af).=20 Not necessarily. Upgrading all ports is only mandatory after a major version update, e.g. from 6.x to 7.x because of changed shared library versions. A point release should not affect shared library versions. Personally, I like to keep the ports on my desktop updated every other week or so, depending on if I see something interesting on freshports... > I have one port - mailman - which I have customized > a lot and do not really want to upgrade it as it will most likely mean > I will have to hack a few files again. >=20 > What options do I have so that I do not break the setup? > > I am thinking of: >=20 > 1/ backing up the hacked files and restoring them later (but I will > overwrite the newer files with older ones perhaps breaking something). You should merge any differences by hand instead of overwriting them. 'diff -u' is your friend there. > 2/ making them read only (but the end result will be the same and > upgrading as root I will overwrite them anyway). 'chflags schg,sunlnk ' (as root) will do the trick. Even root cannot overwrite these without removing the flags. =20 > And that would be it. My wisdom ends here. Is there any option to > survive the ports upgrade? :) Touch /var/db/pkg/mailman/+IGNOREME. This should make both portmaster and portupgrade leave this port alone. > If not, I guess I will just have to hack Mailman files again after the > upgrade... Or see if you can get your changes comitted upstream. Maybe as OPTIONS?=20 Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkluOo0ACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXSWgCbBderKQH3o7qCVg0N5l/ueXJQ QZwAn10NCUFAsetIzx3KhJYq4AIM13lc =L+RB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 19:27:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E881065670 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f20.google.com (mail-bw0-f20.google.com [209.85.218.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37C68FC17 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so2455583bwz.19 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:27:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PEgQINrqFuE+iVsDlwB0uwPUo8wejdZmqtgGh6AIXiM=; b=jPZAWfmB3ReRpSSy6+wzCdO/eH1rJ7PiXjHKByjXnCXXSIf7bmk722S0BuvfBs8xUJ tsIC7nyeZF3U1pKA+8lP3vw9+RYCX14ZUD8syUevtFKZSy6GoVQs8SWyTEbiWJVMLcJi JYKwgnlx0tjYgz9amCycaIndXiXBSJWQeo8to= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NOTdo+2BKyqVU1R2lyczLpKqOCZYCzp8+vqydWjJHnGjRcOsCr5GUgdqWd49nNZEO/ VALZq8wsxR96BGvdULU14MD6GevU9YsHpdLJQgHvoVMvdskBHYGDDYF7GRi0IvmxJ3Mo oLud3BHOOQjFmPems8//45fkRylyf2kmfgeRc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.116.10 with SMTP id k10mr567897faq.101.1231961221535; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:27:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <23ed14b80901141034l16ee0dedp9837e4f1162e253b@mail.gmail.com> References: <23ed14b80901141034l16ee0dedp9837e4f1162e253b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:27:01 -0500 Message-ID: <4ad871310901141127o509d2480l56233209d79d1694@mail.gmail.com> From: Glen Barber To: Andy Wodfer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Help! locate.code /tmp: filesystem full X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:27:03 -0000 On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Andy Wodfer wrote: > Hi, > I'm getting an error message every week and I can't seem to understand why > nor manage to fix it. Here it is: > [snip] > > # df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ar0s1a 989M 53M 857M 6% / > devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev > /dev/ar0s1g 48G 8.5G 36G 19% /backup > /dev/ar0s1d 989M 44K 910M 0% /tmp > /dev/ar0s1f 387G 168G 189G 47% /usr > /dev/ar0s1e 7.7G 398M 6.7G 5% /var > > As you see there's 910MB free space in /tmp. Should be plenty to run the > weekly locate script? > Have you recently had disk failures? When was your last `fsck' ? What is the output of `du -h /tmp' ? To rule out if 910M is not enough, you could `mv' /tmp to /tmp.bak and do a hard link pointing a new /tmp somewhere with more space, for example /usr/faketmp. I don't know how this will affect fstab or mount, however. -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 19:41:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F200A106566B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:41:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastiansetzer@alice-dsl.net) Received: from smtp-out02.alice-dsl.net (smtp-out02.alice-dsl.net [88.44.60.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9018FC16 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:41:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastiansetzer@alice-dsl.net) Received: from HSNMST02V05.hsn.alice-dsl.net ([192.168.125.98]) by smtp-out02.alice-dsl.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:40:28 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:37:07 +0100 Message-ID: <67CE2BFC0C158B4C96BC1229798DE50F01FA51F4@HSNMST02V05.hsn.alice-dsl.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: freebsd-update doesn't seem to update to Latest Thread-Index: Acl1yl62Nuq8p6MxTSeV1cGZeX5cEQAtR2dl References: <67CE2BFC0C158B4C96BC1229798DE50F01FA51F2@HSNMST02V05.hsn.alice-dsl.net> <20090113220157.GA70336@aleph.cepheid.org> From: "Sebastian Setzer" To: "Erik Osterholm" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2009 19:40:28.0868 (UTC) FILETIME=[F4519040:01C9767F] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: RE: freebsd-update doesn't seem to update to Latest X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:41:54 -0000 Reading the handbook and several pages on the web, i got the impression = that ports are always compiled from source. I should have read the handbook more thorougly, sorry. It mentions = portupgrade -P. -----Original Message----- From: Erik Osterholm [mailto:freebsd-lists-erik@erikosterholm.org] Sent: Tue 1/13/2009 11:01 PM To: Sebastian Setzer Subject: Re: freebsd-update doesn't seem to update to Latest =20 On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:47:33PM +0100, Sebastian Setzer wrote: >=20 > Hi, > I did a freebsd-update to 7.1-RELEASE as described in the release = notes. > After that, I installed Openoffice (with pkg_add) and got several = warnings like this one: > pkg_add: warning: package 'gnome-vfs-2.22.0_2' requires = 'atk-1.22.0_1', but 'atk-1.20.0' is installed >=20 > Now I did > # pkg_add -r atk > pkg_add: package 'atk-1.22.0_1' or its older version already installed >=20 > so with pkg_add -r I get newer packages than I got with = freebsd-update. Why? freebsd-update only updates the base system. It doesn't touch ports. Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 20:06:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097D81065672 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:06:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from chen.org.nz (ip-58-28-152-174.static-xdsl.xnet.co.nz [58.28.152.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9D78FC08 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:06:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2AB932840D; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:06:11 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:06:11 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Ewald Jenisch Message-ID: <20090114200611.GA94765@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <20090114154859.GA4425@aurora.oekb.co.at> <20090114175613.GC88068@osiris.chen.org.nz> <20090114181336.GA4487@aurora.oekb.co.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090114181336.GA4487@aurora.oekb.co.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow startup of Gnome - error from "gnome-keyring-daemon" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:06:13 -0000 On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:13:36PM +0100, Ewald Jenisch wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 06:56:13AM +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote: > > > > The obvious question is: > > Have you got hald running? > > > > Make sure your /etc/rc.conf has: > > gnome_enable="YES" > > Hi, > > Didn't know that I need 'gnome_enable="YES"' in my /etc/rc.conf. This is a shorthand for starting a set of (possibly annoying) services required by GNOME. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Only the meek get pinched. The bold survive." - Ferris Bueller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 20:18:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321B6106564A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179B98FC0C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay14.apple.com (relay14.apple.com [17.128.113.52]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026F84C6C3C5; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:18:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay14.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay14.apple.com (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with ESMTP id D9D2728083; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:18:44 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807134-a4052bb000000ff0-fa-496e48a47edd Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (cswiger1.apple.com [17.227.140.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id AFA2328087; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:18:44 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: From: Chuck Swiger To: Ewald Jenisch In-Reply-To: <20090114181522.GB4487@aurora.oekb.co.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:18:44 -0800 References: <496E06D1.2070706@gmail.com> <20090114181522.GB4487@aurora.oekb.co.at> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: icemaca , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:18:45 -0000 On Jan 14, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Ewald Jenisch wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:37:53PM +0100, icemaca wrote: >> >> this i386 version has >> >> cpu I486_CPU >> cpu I586_CPU >> cpu I686_CPU >> > > Basically you can comment all but I686_CPU since the others are for > earlier x86 architectures. While it is true that you can comment out all but i686 and get a working kernel, you will experience reduced performance. There are a number of low-level assembly routines (cf sys/i386/i386/support.s such as i586_bcopy) that are conditionalized off of I586_CPU only, even though they provide an advantage on i686 platforms also. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 20:21:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9C910656C3 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:21:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DEA8FC20 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:21:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay10.apple.com (relay10.apple.com [17.128.113.47]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659104E94477; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:21:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay10.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay10.apple.com (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with ESMTP id 49B6028050; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:21:25 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 1180712f-ac972bb0000012d3-1c-496e4945b4b1 Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (cswiger1.apple.com [17.227.140.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay10.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 32BD028056; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:21:25 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <7C98E2D0-D084-4B6D-9133-F518D5DFF4E5@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: Peter Steele In-Reply-To: <2ACA3DE8F9758A48B8BE2C7A847F91F247A1E1@polaris.maxiscale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:21:25 -0800 References: <2ACA3DE8F9758A48B8BE2C7A847F91F247A1E1@polaris.maxiscale.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should swap space be mirrored via geom? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:21:27 -0000 On Jan 14, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Peter Steele wrote: > We have been debating whether or we should mirror the swap > partitions as > well. I set it up not mirrored based on some articles I read on the > net, > but we're concerned what might happen to a system if a drive died at a > time when the its swap partition contained active pages. My first > reaction would be that the applications bound to these pages would > crash, something that would not happen if we used swap mirroring. If you don't mirror swap space, and a drive goes out, you're almost certain to experience a kernel panic and not just application failures in userland. Unless you have an urgent need for lots of swap space available, it's much better from the standpoint of system reliability to mirror swap also. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 20:33:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4DE106566B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:33:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9888FC0A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:33:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so427124fgb.35 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:33:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=407hvvRC3ud9e8vg4/4CcQqsjRORnRvsgG8PDwQs03M=; b=JHmbrM+3T8uWDzWM7wSZJrw2ZbCWVyBF9zly9KRYUfvS8zTNP6PPYVC5cDoXK2xbJD WLshoUTF//fL/wCGqJA48bwXv8ZVEFTM60xh3PPQkgnY+8or5KyFDkH8TNGx16kkWE+B 2nVTQG3kMVcYHf92Lw4ZBKBs8z6h480fZGz7M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=oP+38ZHg+5kUCgBHxMB5EnuJCHVY3iH0wvn4zgmjyiJEIIurfweH6Z9rWcUyIQTXoy MMEp+OH2XoTEXDgxaVPFznbraUjzhNAJxTqit4m4/k/4whZEN8kqTc8OyGKSnnbqNJjf BeVN0+7srsNO924xqozMFKar/nBOjrEmnHXEs= Received: by 10.86.3.4 with SMTP id 4mr911002fgc.44.1231965229228; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:33:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.77.16 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:33:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:33:49 +0000 From: Freminlins To: mister.olli@googlemail.com In-Reply-To: <1231950392.18652.0.camel@phoenix.blechhirn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1231950392.18652.0.camel@phoenix.blechhirn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysctl machdep.independent_wallclock X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:33:51 -0000 2009/1/14 Mister Olli > hi... > > what is the exact function of this sysctl setting? I'm guessing it's something to do with Xen, having seen a few references in Linux for xen.machdep.independent_wallclock. Have a look here: http://docs.xensource.com/XenServer/4.0.1/guest/ch04s06.html > > I couldn't find any documentation on it. > > greetz > olli > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 20:44:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D0F1065670 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:44:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f17.google.com (mail-qy0-f17.google.com [209.85.221.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF988FC17 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:44:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so1052440qyk.19 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:44:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=mouwmDrK79ygikK3R8UK0/k0SgRYJda4ESjQCoMlXdw=; b=GYYlbQmzL9pjtBkUkEbYyU3OyNYGpv8uO4ZevnV4WjovlrqzVhvcTq8ZwCR7rPbeej jLA2nPqhOFMI4VvokdQufvUSywGt9TtPU+p1iyk8aSgKwNklDonCkhdr4qovZa8hUBk9 N9twE7sxlsUnsiREFYsohtQmxVnK7Y9Ul1TPQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=co8gzmCSAiqcyu7IFy5TJmCdsvy6AOFgwBTbvGCNyhH0Yx4jvFCw+d/cHqQPBCbh8w 65Q+siojRrISxSMmg9bA/ajXwPyTPf1gzDMOlbfezCwuSGf8235x++nvETvxYYfljyM3 ioskjyZeKRijJ8JEJfgIvMJTbX/Ig6sArGrOk= Received: by 10.214.45.4 with SMTP id s4mr880222qas.173.1231965848010; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:44:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.215.14.1 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:44:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <332f78510901141244y198e7be6qf3b34f306c03f232@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:44:07 +0100 From: t-u-t To: freebsd-quest