Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 09:26:58 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: compiler speeds Message-ID: <199901061626.JAA13931@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199901060903.KAA05333@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> References: <199901060903.KAA05333@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Just a quick comparison of javac, guavac and jikes: > > prova# time javac LgMC.java > 6.489u 0.307s 0:06.82 99.4% 8+1684k 2+2io 0pf+0w > prova# time guavac LgMC.java > 0.514u 0.311s 0:00.89 92.1% 2213+5196k 0+5io 0pf+0w > prova# time jikes -nowarn LgMC.java > 0.310u 0.063s 0:00.38 97.3% 2311+1422k 0+1io 0pf+0w > > class files slightly differ in size. I cannot tell about the quality of > the code. > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 luigi 275 2540 Jan 6 12:01 LgMC.class.guavac > -rw-rw-r-- 1 luigi 275 2563 Jan 6 12:01 LgMC.class.javac > -rw-rw-r-- 1 luigi 275 2564 Jan 6 12:00 LgMC.class.jikes So far I've been using jikes to develop 'production' code, and given that there aren't any significant optimizations in either javac or jikes, I feel pretty safe with it now. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901061626.JAA13931>