From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 10 06:36:38 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0CA3116A4BF; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 06:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u173n10.eastlink.ca [24.224.173.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 91EED43F85; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 06:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from scrappy@hub.org)
Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id AD2F633DB3; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:36:13 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9EE9633C34; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:36:13 -0300 (ADT)
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:36:13 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: David Schultz <das@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030910074717.GA16874@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
Message-ID: <20030910103514.X57860@ganymede.hub.org>
References: <20030612154312.J80219@hub.org>
	<20030623081927.GC27017@nevermind.kiev.ua>
	<20030905015627.GB14776@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
	<20030910074717.GA16874@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: unionfs related patch
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:36:38 -0000



On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, David Schultz wrote:

> Heh.  Never mind, I'm not that forgetful after all.  When I saw your
> link to the patch for -STABLE, I thought I must have missed it. But it
> looks like that was merely a quote of an old email.

Yup, only two major outstanding 'crash triggers' that I know of is the
fifo issue that I put a ticket into GNaTs for last week, and the
union_lookup issue ...