From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 1 15:30:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69940854 for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C35914F5 for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r41FU21s053589 for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:30:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r41FU2fA053588; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:30:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 15:30:02 GMT Message-Id: <201305011530.r41FU2fA053588@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Gleb Smirnoff Subject: Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gleb Smirnoff List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 15:30:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/178116; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Nate Denning Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 19:27:22 +0400 Nate, On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:26:04AM -0600, Nate Denning wrote: N> > do you run any additional network modules: ipfw, pf, netgraph, N> > accept filters, etc? How your system differes from a default N> > installation? N> N> Yes, ipfilter, accf_http and accf_data (accf is for Apache). No ipfw, pf, or netgraph. Output of kldstat: I would suspect ipfilter. :( Is it possible for you to rewrite your rules to ipfw or pf and try running with that? -- Totus tuus, Glebius.