Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:30:19 GMT From: Alex de Kruijff <akruijff@dds.nl> To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/63724 Message-ID: <200604202030.k3KKUJl9090016@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/63724; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alex de Kruijff <akruijff@dds.nl> To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/63724 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:23:14 +0200 On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:56:54PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, 00:42+0200, Alex de Kruijff wrote: > > Maxim, > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 01:05:01AM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > > ipfw rule #31600 counters show packets just do not reach it and all > > > subsequent rules. > > > > Its was not a problem with the ruleset. I used the same ruleset on 4.9 > > as on 5.2. The ruleset also worked when I replaced the queues with > > pipes. I failed to report that one needs to run > > 'net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass=0'. > > > > > We need the whole ipfw ruleset. > > > > I beleave I tested this test case. Did these rules work for you under > > 5.2 or 5.x? If so you can just close it. > > > > As for the counters I could have simply types 'ipfw z; ipfw sh'. > > > > Did the test case worked fine for you? Under 5.2? > > > > > Can you check the problem persists in recent FreeBSD releases? > > > > It works under 6.x. (both 6.0 as 6.1) I don't have a box with 5.x. > > Neither do I. My hunce is that its also fixed in the later 5 releases, so I suggest closing the bug report. Tanks for you time, Alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604202030.k3KKUJl9090016>