Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:30:19 GMT
From:      Alex de Kruijff <akruijff@dds.nl>
To:        freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: kern/63724
Message-ID:  <200604202030.k3KKUJl9090016@freefall.freebsd.org>

Next in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
The following reply was made to PR kern/63724; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alex de Kruijff <akruijff@dds.nl>
To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/63724
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:23:14 +0200

 On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:56:54PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
 > On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, 00:42+0200, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
 > > Maxim,
 > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 01:05:01AM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
 > > > ipfw rule #31600 counters show packets just do not reach it and all
 > > > subsequent rules.
 > >
 > > Its was not a problem with the ruleset. I used the same ruleset on 4.9
 > > as on 5.2. The ruleset also worked when I replaced the queues with
 > > pipes. I failed to report that one needs to run
 > > 'net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass=0'.
 > >
 > > > We need the whole ipfw ruleset.
 > >
 > > I beleave I tested this test case. Did these rules work for you under
 > > 5.2 or 5.x? If so you can just close it.
 > >
 > > As for the counters I could have simply types 'ipfw z; ipfw sh'.
 > >
 > > Did the test case worked fine for you? Under 5.2?
 > >
 > > > Can you check the problem persists in recent FreeBSD releases?
 > >
 > > It works under 6.x. (both 6.0 as 6.1) I don't have a box with 5.x.
 > 
 > Neither do I.
 
 My hunce is that its also fixed in the later 5 releases, so I suggest
 closing the bug report.
 
 Tanks for you time,
 Alex



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604202030.k3KKUJl9090016>