From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Feb 17 12:57:41 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA14081
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 12:57:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cold.org (cold.org [206.81.134.103])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA14075
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 12:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (brandon@localhost) by cold.org (8.8.5/8.8.3) with SMTP id NAA12849 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 13:57:47 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 13:57:46 -0700 (MST)
From: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@cold.org>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: root EDITOR as 'ee' in 2.2??
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970217135738.12801C-100000@cold.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Who's bright idea was it to change the default editor for root in 2.2 to
'ee'?  vi is standard on every unix system i've come across, if I want to
use a different editor I set the EDITOR environment variable myself.  Why
was this change made to /root/.cshrc?

-Brandon Gillespie