Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:53:02 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> To: Karim Fodil-Lemelin <fodillemlinkarim@gmail.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another fragment question / patch Message-ID: <551D65DE.4090808@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: <551017D1.60008@gmail.com> References: <550C3A62.3080403@gmail.com> <550C5F6C.3080302@selasky.org> <550C7D0C.3090603@gmail.com> <550D3675.5030900@selasky.org> <551017D1.60008@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/23/15 14:40, Karim Fodil-Lemelin wrote: > Hi, > > Your patch seems to work as well as mine, albeit completely swinging the > other way now since your copying a lot more from the packet header with > the call to m_dup_pkthdr() (including the M_COPYFLAGS, vlan tags, etc..). > > I think this is fine, one would expect IP fragments to be somewhat very > close to the original packet. > FYI: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/280991 --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?551D65DE.4090808>