Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:32:26 +0100 From: "Simon 'portlint' Schubert" <corecode@corecode.ath.cx> To: Paul Murphy <pnmurphy@cogeco.ca> Cc: markp@FreeBSD.ORG, Yonatan@xpert.com, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/48132: new port: log keystrokes of remote X servers Message-ID: <20030214183226.75f1a8cc.corecode@corecode.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <20030214103226.07ec814b.pnmurphy@cogeco.ca> References: <200302141219.h1ECJwik058765@freefall.freebsd.org> <20030214103226.07ec814b.pnmurphy@cogeco.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=.Bx?jZJ1bvkrWhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lately Paul Murphy told: > I guess it's a bit late to ask now, but is there any _legitimate_ use > for this port? If not, do we want to encourage this sort of thing? > Are ports simply committed because they compile on FreeBSD without > any consideration at to the ethics of them? which ethics? who is to decide upon that? we got security analyzers and port scanners too. and wow, rm is even in the base system and can be used by root to delete user's files! cheers simon -- /"\ http://corecode.ath.cx/#donate \ / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \ Against HTML Mail and News --=.Bx?jZJ1bvkrWhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+TSgtr5S+dk6z85oRAk6tAKDv3PokJzziyR6ajQmklJL6esTWVQCfRqBA oGHjO+Uw0cNtY2oXvByDd/w= =U+Tc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.Bx?jZJ1bvkrWhR-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030214183226.75f1a8cc.corecode>