From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 15 14:45:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0BD16A47B for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:45:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob.middaugh@comcast.net) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.192.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CC943D46 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:45:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob.middaugh@comcast.net) Received: from freebsd (c7147679.state.nj.us[199.20.118.121]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <20060915144458m110090qe4e>; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:44:59 +0000 From: "Bob M." To: Bill Moran In-Reply-To: <20060915083142.15602164.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> References: <3748E46A-16BD-4AD9-8EC3-84B10538F2BB@u.washington.edu> <49B0565D-2C10-43CF-AB15-9CD712EFC074@u.washington.edu> <1158320583.25573.9.camel@freebsd> <20060915083142.15602164.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:46:39 -0400 Message-Id: <1158331599.25573.23.camel@freebsd> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Garrett Cooper , Arindam , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network connectivity between FreeBSD and Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob.middaugh@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:45:02 -0000 On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 08:31 -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Arindam : > > [snip] > > > > >From the FreeBSD box, can you ping the loopback address: 127.0.0.1, if > > > so, can you ping your ip address: 10.0.0.101. If so, can you ping your > > > gateway? Did you set a gateway in /etc/rc.conf? > > > > loopback: Yes I can ping it. > > > > 10.0.0.101: Yes again I can ping it. But I set this as the gateway. I > > just got two home PCs connected to each other over a 5-port switch > > with. 10.0.0.100 and 10.0.0.101 (this one). I set this as the gateway > > because a while later when I hook this to the web, this will be the > > box. And I might add a couple of more boxes to this network at best. > > Don't do that. It may be the cause of your problem -- in any case, > it's incorrect. Leave the system without a gateway if you don't have > one. > > > I did not set a gateway in /etc/rc.conf. I configured the whole thing > > using sysinstall and a couple of times after that using ifconfig (ip > > addr and netmask). > > If you did it via sysinstall, then it was written to rc.conf. > > > > defaultrouter="your gateway ip address" # Set to default > > > gateway (or NO). > > > > But I guess whatever the method, such an entry would have been written > > to rc.conf. > > Yes. > The output of ifconfig shows the duplex setting, you're set to 100 full right now. Can you set the switch port to 100 full, if it's not already. We have issues with our cisco switches being set to auto, they have to be forced to 100 full or we get 0 connectivity between broadcom cards and cisco 4500's. Trying a different card is a good idea if you have one. Helps rule some things out at least. Bob