Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 21:26:39 -0700 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: Steve Wills <steve@mouf.net> Cc: ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ruby 1.9 update patch Message-ID: <20110525212639.18991589.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4DDCEDED.9030603@mouf.net> References: <4DD47A2B.8070905@mouf.net> <4DD583F0.7030308@p6m7g8.com> <4DDCEDED.9030603@mouf.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 25 May 2011 07:54:21 -0400
Steve Wills <steve@mouf.net> mentioned:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thanks for the feedback!
>
> I was attempting to do some run time testing of this and stumbled upon a
> strange issue. It seems that even without my patch (and with it too), if
> you do this:
>
> cd /usr/ports/databases/ruby-bdb
> env RUBY_VER=1.9 make install
>
> on a system without any ruby, it will install Ruby 1.9, then fail to
> install the databases/ruby-bdb port since there will not be a "rdoc"
> binary installed, but only "rdoc19". My patch doesn't make this worse,
> but it doesn't help it either. Should I try to solve this and if so how?
It should use ${RUBY_RDOC} instead of just calling rdoc directly.
This way it will get the correct one.
--
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110525212639.18991589.stas>