From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 23 09:30:30 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C14643F3A for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 09:30:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fnw796r2Xz3D0R for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 09:30:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id f6-20020a1c1f060000b0290175ca89f698so9730432wmf.5 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 02:30:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=6uImUVQ2XBdc2ttOB64al6HdItrLxEDPDHbNRFdLk88=; b=mzK55uO/x/kfw38okdh0ii1AfY4dooDhsoFdlwMGAjyoqxDjP2brgYNgIjSMrbPRN+ VCNMHYVomsF+kEhrGTlzxEHOYijv9162zlYPn6Cb0+OWwZIPYAJ27u2tI17QHzZmvqbM qoL276W1yFCGoCm4NO+tdjp8EzYTB6oGl6tTXBZie/3Kjgi51cbC26vdK0duwxjLicB5 9MaXJlxdjUy1I+AY5DSBJ3xJrbqYaUA13zPuZ0gxn7J6IPGW3KOKaNG9EmttosQdbyhe 0Y06Q9VdBL67XPa5esM9QWoHbdrY3IbYC8dOKuHnvDvDuhm6cJGOe1NVMaan+K0XVCLh Z8RQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=6uImUVQ2XBdc2ttOB64al6HdItrLxEDPDHbNRFdLk88=; b=UcUCZyh3LAuE1z3H7IlFoIZGaulYm0iJiXVTQUZM6czm8Fv0LOZ8i2JQjbVPTSbqBr Wyul1VXoub5QK0tpJKugDCnCRzfAxlt+n2nKXwIGY0gHIDd24Xv6J+btVkuSO4bZhpDF 4icmmcuo4nzKlfel0yujdTVHyXDbawXRkdzHGqIxG2HJ5fakQbqYk2sefQkMSabsostD qmlohB00lenqxyghxPNrL/EN3rIbyFbvdXzItNQ/TLgHjlxYZI8wVBShUdb/FdGUWWpm /6pcPAolwzPbX23/hv33y3drQWfAJoHB+s3QtHK4YXubn1UVC/ZCGSP1D/6IXFsH6j0T BDsg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531PU+HlRlhbntRBM09tH/DvaeWxsraSXcOGCbv6id6cP09w3Xka DY3mTZIjawkv60EoMyH/zyuGZV9fWe04ug== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJym37dc2Xu2rzX+4zDi8NqUhUsjWQeNEnXgaEuHrKb23I6rJYjJwMGYsGBSMcSW7RmpsRkYlQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb45:: with SMTP id v5mr15978346wmj.48.1621762228181; Sun, 23 May 2021 02:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (88-105-96-80.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com. [88.105.96.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o21sm4505362wmr.44.2021.05.23.02.30.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 23 May 2021 02:30:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: kld_list="drm", xf86-video-intel To: Matt K Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <68023ace-7338-5e39-28f9-22bf1ff78365@gmail.com> <849f51ec-86a9-ccd8-8bde-175c27b15270@gmail.com> From: Graham Perrin Message-ID: <4a3b86c6-7343-2fcd-15be-8cb5bf387468@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 10:30:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fnw796r2Xz3D0R X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mzK55uO/; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grahamperrin@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::331 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=grahamperrin@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.72 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::331:from]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[88.105.96.80:received]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.72)[-0.721]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::331:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::331:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 09:30:30 -0000 On 08/05/2021 20:46, Matt K wrote: > … Shouldn't your findings be mentioned in the handbook? By at least a > few words, such as: "if you have problems with > kld_list=radeonkms/i915kms, try kld_list=drm". By-the-book (the FreeBSD Handbook) is, I believe: * more for goodness that is consistent and explicable * less for trial-and-error that leads to goodness without explanation. > Apparently, there are some people with similar problems, so maybe > solving the problem preemptively by documenting it, is the way to go. > I don't know the protocol here, this is my first time contacting the > FreeBSD mailing list. Today it seems that a problem was avoided by _not_ installing xf86-video-intel, which describes as legacy. Matt, would you describe your hardware as legacy? Is your system still freeze-free _with_ xf86-video-intel? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 23 13:06:38 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB6E6479FC for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 13:06:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mefystofel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fp0wY3D08z4RpJ for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 13:06:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mefystofel@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id v14so15354172pgi.6 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 06:06:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Yz7wa19qTLx0C92Rk9I6ISfqYgHsUMCgh2yl/LCHbiA=; b=Q5MQjGRmuXqiv+XePC5RCWq6GSs896WSNOjO+XqK5z40AalXXeRSJGKZ6mm2IK3rve sPhBG5xtK37v7lwEPJzXUfz/cPYMI8vbw1qv64E1jSbIr4nDNxLyanpEUn89Q1FOedL6 OtVKaiRgZ8xZoUoUXZv6qIg7fAXGGJvtwNj2KYPAuqvXV9kVafUc0eRL18XhnWeM0WYX jfU2CBsfbu6ZPsUq78GRZxJoUZ97NF/PIp5NMT0Mf0JdP73JwQMTmIqOLVDUkv9UQCVr l9Nkev55YErl7Vz1FPoxzhuHRZvnec2jDRVmCNlebL6xX+ZUMa1vgOpBI8vEVFqIt400 LPdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Yz7wa19qTLx0C92Rk9I6ISfqYgHsUMCgh2yl/LCHbiA=; b=M62gTgAZHYLRtPehCnGrYrr2WEymSUAGyfJJexQZE+glrt3PlmIorN7ZXl0pdQBpGB c9OZ9uUE7IHhR8gE637pDf0TvPK9MZTHb4UQna9XM9pZH8g6luhB5nkYnnHLf5iKDHQz 5GYRUDThI+YYaUb1SLBCBr4aDD4l96l6lLrnf03jVuMiSrFvf6G+/PkNSa3+wQRweMpi 5M1h3XddCSCcfFBPwM1Ulfum/NXbsGzRqaTVyiM4uhzYNVWNMlY6pw7pJBkKun2iIWWL INeXoItJeZ7dNeP/4oiy4MGx1ZCLvmObkFKOTY6HAenHVFAz4aTiGH/ZmQOQul/Y7BVi lDMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532G0axqmkIdlUUFTWg/vir0nfgGAUdjtBf3/G9Kkgzgz8ZoZd6w Iu/UczrNoyFvTMgF8jQEUZQC4AycHTXm4K/01KQiV6Wc7DtRZQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxv0/n4JPzKVN+nQbEF2EK+Z96N54IGl3Zih6eCnfUXeFyXFHeSa59NeiIWqnZiltT6x83XsKuU1Ahcgm+3n1U= X-Received: by 2002:a63:1965:: with SMTP id 37mr8571805pgz.217.1621775195741; Sun, 23 May 2021 06:06:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Roman Serbski Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 15:06:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Upgrade from 12.2-RELEASE-p2 to 13.0-RELEASE To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fp0wY3D08z4RpJ X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Q5MQjGRm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mefystofel@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mefystofel@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 13:06:38 -0000 Hello, I've just finished upgrading a server running 12.2-RELEASE-p2 to 13.0-RELEASE using "Updating FreeBSD from Source" section from https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/cutting-edge/#makeworld Everything went well except that now, when I try to build a new kernel I get: --- usbdevs.h --- awk -f /usr/src/sys/tools/usbdevs2h.awk /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usbdevs -h --- rpctlscd.h --- RPCGEN_CPP='cpp -target x86_64-unknown-freebsd13.0 --sysroot=/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp -B/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/bin' rpcgen -hM /usr/src/sys/rpc/rpcsec_tls/rpctlscd.x | grep -v pthread.h > rpctlscd.h ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgnuregex.so.5" not found, required by "grep" *** [rpctlscd.h] Error code 1 make[2]: stopped in /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/BSD13TEST 1 error make[2]: stopped in /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/BSD13TEST make[1]: stopped in /usr/src make: stopped in /usr/src The file seems to be present: # find / -name libgnuregex.so.5 -print /usr/lib32/libgnuregex.so.5 # ls -al /usr/lib32/libgnuregex.so* lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 Jan 19 14:49 /usr/lib32/libgnuregex.so -> libgnuregex.so.5 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 83044 Jan 19 14:49 /usr/lib32/libgnuregex.so.5 According to the release notes: The BSD version of grep(1) is now installed by default. The obsolete GNU version that was the previous default has been removed. Any manual steps missed? Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 23 16:36:55 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA6564B0FE for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 16:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from kicp.uchicago.edu (kicp.uchicago.edu [128.135.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Fp5bB53GWz3PdF for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 16:36:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [128.135.52.198]) (Authenticated sender: galtsev) by kicp.uchicago.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D18444E65F for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 11:36:47 -0500 (CDT) From: Valeri Galtsev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\)) Subject: After upgrade to 13.0-RELEASE ipfw locks the boxes Message-Id: <72162DBE-737D-42BA-8010-AA28DA6F2A5F@kicp.uchicago.edu> Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 11:36:47 -0500 To: FreeBSD Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fp5bB53GWz3PdF X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=uchicago.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.135.20.70) smtp.mailfrom=galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.88 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[128.135.20.70:from]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.88)[-0.883]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.41)[0.406]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[128.135.20.70:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:160, ipnet:128.135.0.0/16, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[uchicago.edu : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 16:36:55 -0000 Dear All, as a lazy person, before I start rewriting all my ipfw scripts I decided = to ask somebody=E2=80=99s else wisdom. It is possible that I missed = something I have to do related to ipfw in this particular upgrade: from = 12.2-RELEASE to 13.0-RELEASE I have a bunch of boxes that I have rather similar (though not = identical) ipfw scripts on, these were written a while back (around = 8.x-RELEASE), and were just slightly modified on some occasions. None of = previous upgrades 8 =E2=80=94> 9; 9 =E2=80=94> 10,.. 11 =E2=80=94> 12 = led to any problems as far as ipfw is concerned. I was just rebooting = the machine after kernel upgrade, and after userland upgrade and all pkg = reinstallation, I was testing things as usually, no problem with ipfw. After this upgrade: to 13.0-RELEASE, ipfw effectively locks any remote = access to the box (except for ping). My first guess was I just missed = relevant part in release notes (which I must confess I rarely read = carefully), but I don=E2=80=99t find anything special related to ipfw. I hope, someone points me too obvious =E2=80=9Cpilot error=E2=80=9D I = made. Before I start re-creating ipfw scripts, and testing every line in = them as did when I was learning it when first started playing with ipfw. Thanks in advance for all your answers. Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 23 16:42:41 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421B064B30A for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 16:42:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fp5jr1GNrz3hfr for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 16:42:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 91b862a4; Sun, 23 May 2021 18:42:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 5aec2466; Sun, 23 May 2021 18:42:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c4b378f1; Sun, 23 May 2021 18:42:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 06a975f6 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 23 May 2021 18:42:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 12:42:33 -0400 From: LuMiWa To: Valeri Galtsev Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: After upgrade to 13.0-RELEASE ipfw locks the boxes Message-ID: <20210523124233.0383fb2e@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <72162DBE-737D-42BA-8010-AA28DA6F2A5F@kicp.uchicago.edu> References: <72162DBE-737D-42BA-8010-AA28DA6F2A5F@kicp.uchicago.edu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fp5jr1GNrz3hfr X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[78.46.223.134:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[78.46.223.134:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[78.46.223.134:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 16:42:41 -0000 On Sun, 23 May 2021 11:36:47 -0500 Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Dear All, >=20 > as a lazy person, before I start rewriting all my ipfw scripts I > decided to ask somebody=E2=80=99s else wisdom. It is possible that I miss= ed > something I have to do related to ipfw in this particular upgrade: > from 12.2-RELEASE to 13.0-RELEASE >=20 > I have a bunch of boxes that I have rather similar (though not > identical) ipfw scripts on, these were written a while back (around > 8.x-RELEASE), and were just slightly modified on some occasions. None > of previous upgrades 8 =E2=80=94> 9; 9 =E2=80=94> 10,.. 11 =E2=80=94> 12 = led to any problems > as far as ipfw is concerned. I was just rebooting the machine after > kernel upgrade, and after userland upgrade and all pkg > reinstallation, I was testing things as usually, no problem with ipfw. >=20 > After this upgrade: to 13.0-RELEASE, ipfw effectively locks any > remote access to the box (except for ping). My first guess was I just > missed relevant part in release notes (which I must confess I rarely > read carefully), but I don=E2=80=99t find anything special related to ipf= w. >=20 > I hope, someone points me too obvious =E2=80=9Cpilot error=E2=80=9D I mad= e. Before I > start re-creating ipfw scripts, and testing every line in them as did > when I was learning it when first started playing with ipfw. >=20 > Thanks in advance for all your answers. >=20 > Valeri >=20 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Valeri Galtsev > Sr System Administrator > Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics > Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics > University of Chicago > Phone: 773-702-4247 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" My IPFW start making problems too which I didn't have on previous versions. I am not an expert and I just switch to PF 1 hour ago.=20 --=20 =E2=80=9CThinking is difficult, that=E2=80=99s why most people judge.=E2=80= =9D Carl Jung From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 24 06:40:55 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3F36562CF for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 06:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kilikmatej@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FpSK26jJKz3Ptg for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 06:40:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kilikmatej@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id et19so32995038ejc.4 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 23:40:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=kJ0iO4XLFpnqlg9sHjoSDrMrH5P0XhPSX+XY7G9Cts8=; b=E1/6TL11TQNluKH3bTvWbMQbJPHHWqjLEinP13ledoFSPGdvgzVPBcvHPiMRGzXilX UXSMSYfnEQMKdg8dN6+nd4zKfLTFT0XgVIVrrrYVysA7p2Kv0uSsCUR45hUGok8IchVY QxoazB8SuRPTXW1fe5vU10y01SKpXis6OAU2Ug5sVBgJyBDEASvVT7clsV5jdEod+pcy e69qKptsCA9wulqe3y3Byv7sy++JDLXlBrFLPBArsYalXGdDDAHC1XtNlbOVpwAQbvUe v9tid9TIJyL/Hhx8pPdVNsaXHauh1fBReNb0e7eFdIwXUUx+a8aJHSRo9lddBdCMg1zD wruQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=kJ0iO4XLFpnqlg9sHjoSDrMrH5P0XhPSX+XY7G9Cts8=; b=WrslYjlTi282YMhJXEWg2Fhcn0mrG/ipLin5MPY4nz6EDdCI2ubOfolKJ//JD7BQO3 1H4PhUIRErYOkVFe4fapK0FGew8rmtwyD9sp8/e6d10IEQ1hc8LDjrbkFvjk5bKZMhg2 AEMOU+NJs8aZr3aOdTgMPl1Gk9qWzI4qxRFPtlbFvBmz+hKxXJ9OifuBikwXe1eh31bA iv0flA9S5LXlHSn+pglOeHF3iEOyr0UtIOyYmK4B8/9X6Xm/v6+aXqInivpyKP9gSMSh 8jhYcMlBaq35p1BaZa/oaelqWOgrkQaqVtckkA5Aknj+He6XwiqCccxzgS2TzPaUvb93 IJrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5313YGBhrVPr+H0HPeUImXBoSzseAZpaQozUAIas99ng79burZop MEFWsuzlhssN/hB8LUAmKmM0yP1chec= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwl7GjYqOEMfduT4ECpPD9S8ZbRUfuFoXZsjHS3/K9p1gfJU4WxwwFPo4t52FB0FL/UrXB6ng== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c14b:: with SMTP id dp11mr22005526ejc.351.1621838452976; Sun, 23 May 2021 23:40:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (adsl-dyn143.78-99-217.t-com.sk. [78.99.217.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l22sm1594708ejk.67.2021.05.23.23.40.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 23 May 2021 23:40:52 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: kld_list="drm", xf86-video-intel To: Graham Perrin Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <68023ace-7338-5e39-28f9-22bf1ff78365@gmail.com> <849f51ec-86a9-ccd8-8bde-175c27b15270@gmail.com> <4a3b86c6-7343-2fcd-15be-8cb5bf387468@gmail.com> From: kilikmatej Message-ID: <1bfe3609-6252-d5f1-af93-abb5ddb17d6b@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 08:40:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4a3b86c6-7343-2fcd-15be-8cb5bf387468@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: sk X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FpSK26jJKz3Ptg X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=E1/6TL11; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kilikmatej@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::630 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kilikmatej@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.36 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[78.99.217.143:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::630:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.939]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.43)[-0.425]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::630:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::630:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 06:40:55 -0000 > > Today it seems > that a problem was avoided by _not_ installing xf86-video-intel, which > describes > as legacy. > > Matt, would you describe your hardware as legacy? Is your system still > freeze-free _with_ xf86-video-intel? > Hello, my system works freeze-free. I am able to use both the modesetting driver and also the xf86-video-intel in xorg.conf, freeze-free. But, I am using xf86-video-intel, because that way I can enjoy TearFree, which is not possible with "modesetting". My CPU was launched in Q2/2014. When you say "legacy hardware", something like a needle printer, a floppy disk drive and serial modem pops to mind, not an 8-year old CPU, which is perfectly capable of doing day-to-day work-related actitivities. -- S pozdravom, Matej Kilík tel: 0911 722 931 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 24 14:54:33 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140C563643D for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 14:54:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kldunn@hiwaay.net) Received: from mail.hiwaay.net (mail.hiwaay.net [216.180.158.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FpgGb2NFXz4kWs for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 14:54:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kldunn@hiwaay.net) Received: (qmail 5122 invoked from network); 24 May 2021 14:54:25 -0000 Received: from 50-83-57-148.client.mchsi.com (HELO illiac.kad-hg.org) (kldunn@hiwaay.net@50.83.57.148) by mail.hiwaay.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) SMTP (edfa09a6-bc9f-11eb-b2e2-e388b1081ee1); Mon, 24 May 2021 10:54:25 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 09:54:24 -0500 (CDT) From: Karl Dunn Reply-To: Karl Dunn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Valeri Galtsev Subject: Re: After upgrade to 13.0-RELEASE ipfw locks the boxes Message-ID: <1e9112d7-2b86-568c-86b4-ee44e4cfd6c@illiac.kad-hg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-MagicMail-OS: FreeBSD 9.x or newer X-MagicMail-UUID: edfa09a6-bc9f-11eb-b2e2-e388b1081ee1 X-MagicMail-Authenticated: kldunn@hiwaay.net X-MagicMail-SourceIP: 50.83.57.148 X-MagicMail-RegexMatch: 1 X-MagicMail-EnvelopeFrom: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FpgGb2NFXz4kWs X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kldunn@hiwaay.net has no SPF policy when checking 216.180.158.37) smtp.mailfrom=kldunn@hiwaay.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.87 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[kldunn@hiwaay.net]; FAKE_REPLY(1.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.13)[-0.131]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[hiwaay.net]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[216.180.158.37:from]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.998]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[216.180.158.37:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:395532, ipnet:216.180.158.0/23, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 14:54:33 -0000 On 5/23/21 11:36 AM CDT, Valeri Galtsev wrote: Dear All, as a lazy person, before I start rewriting all my ipfw scripts I decided to ask somebody?s else wisdom. It is possible that I mi ssed something I have to do related to ipfw in this particular upgrade: from 12.2-RELEASE to 13.0-RELEASE I have a bunch of boxes that I have rather similar (though not identical) ipfw scripts on, these were written a while back (arou nd 8.x-RELEASE), and were just slightly modified on some occasions. None of previous upgrades 8 ?> 9; 9 ?> 10,.. 11 ?> 12 led to any problems as far as ipfw is concerned. I was just rebooting the machine after kernel upgrade, and after userland upgrade and all pkg reinstallation, I was testing things as usually, no problem with ipfw. After this upgrade: to 13.0-RELEASE, ipfw effectively locks any remote access to the box (except for ping). My first guess was I just missed relevant part in release notes (which I must confess I rarely read carefully), but I don?t find anything special re lated to ipfw. I hope, someone points me too obvious ?pilot error? I made. Before I start re-creating ipfw scripts, and testing every line in t hem as did when I was learning it when first started playing with ipfw. Thanks in advance for all your answers. Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri: A wild and unlikely guess (because ping works and nothing else does): Interfaces name(s) have changed, e.g. what was em0 is now em1. It might help to post relevant parts (or all) of dmesg, rc.conf and loader.conf, and the (sanitized) ipfw rules. I am on the digest for freebsd-auestions, so I will get your response quicker if you copy me at kdunn@acm.org. -- Karl Dunn kdunn@acm.org From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 24 16:41:18 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA60638781 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 16:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@3dresearch.com) Received: from smtpg.telissant.net (smtpg.telissant.net [104.225.1.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fpjdn63mQz4Tfw for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 16:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@3dresearch.com) Received: from sacada.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpg.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Fpjdg5th3z2D1r6 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 12:41:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at telissant.net Received: from smtpg.telissant.net ([127.0.0.1]) by sacada.3dresearch.com (sacada.3dresearch.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LkeR2TPAjUVI for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 12:41:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from elettra.3dresearch.com (unknown [71.112.242.160]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: elettra@sacada.3dresearch.com) by smtpg.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Fpjdf5vfpz2D1r7 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 12:41:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from elettra.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elettra.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 199BE7EB09 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 12:41:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 12:40:23 -0400 From: Janos Dohanics To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Updating /usr/ports Message-Id: <20210524124023.6372a3383876a1196cf81705@3dresearch.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fpjdn63mQz4Tfw X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of web@3dresearch.com designates 104.225.1.73 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=web@3dresearch.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.51 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ENVFROM_SERVICE_ACCT(1.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:smtpg.telissant.net]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[71.112.242.160:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[104.225.1.73:from]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:104.225.1.0/24, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.71)[-0.709]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.983]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[3dresearch.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[104.225.1.73:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; FROM_SERVICE_ACCT(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 16:41:18 -0000 Hello, The Handbook says "As needed, update /usr/ports after the initial Git checkout: # git -C /usr/ports pull" [root@frigg ~]# portversion -v | grep -c "<" [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 294 packages found - done] 7 [root@frigg ~]# git -C /usr/ports pull [...] 855 files changed, 8990 insertions(+), 7435 deletions(-) [root@frigg ~]# portversion -v | grep -c "<" [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 294 packages found - done] 7 However, you also need to 'make index' which the Handbook does not mention: [root@frigg /usr/ports]# make index [root@frigg /usr/ports]# portversion -v | grep -c "<" [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 294 packages found - done] [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 31205 port entries found .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000.........11000.........12000.........13000.........14000.........15000.........16000.........17000.........18000.........19000.........20000.........21000.........22000.........23000.........24000.........25000.........26000.........27000.........28000.........29000.........30000.........31000.. ..... done] 12 -- Janos Dohanics From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 24 19:35:18 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D904963B414 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 19:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-x229.google.com (mail-oi1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FpnVZ0Q4bz4hBv for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 19:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-x229.google.com with SMTP id w127so24240550oig.12 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 12:35:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=w0vHcdpxfDCsYC5xuQ+3lgYy+eYWcD48DeJ3RGnBOTc=; b=KNl/yApKJZR9cSarjX6A9aROZ0Oz5TDiGbAAFE/9jYbjXqx2vL5V4hhwFCGqFTMHKr 2bm+0ApEYOjfKuzCEInSUcUJE6eoz7QScVja8RaqpdVRc/wD/57P2wRES4Hw5zZrYP44 lwlVqNJQ1J/iVJBgb3VzZHJv4VCy+4ZlFeT76l6bSdgmIgq2oOG7SXBkr0n6l5infcGo 0Yv+V6HMoqHkdjBCqZcRGAEkMXBNj3D9bXxgGmXGRxy2tdYkuWLFH9RqUYEIE9x4Y1qs sQIjur0tn3Tl1bCMrtW9mujec4xn+oFsIrApVc+vCoefB/3DSmBqqEaP8TGWfKojgFoi hIrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=w0vHcdpxfDCsYC5xuQ+3lgYy+eYWcD48DeJ3RGnBOTc=; b=pvYQqgUuXA+bJpwK7SIYTsV1H8EJvbTDTYWXi8Ib2WVk3byknOVpcdn2Nt0QFHWSdG ngN4wCmBPfTo4+GF7U/LGaDZ4N1cRdPHyURry72/nESotsa6GMI4OiXAJmTIdEmeSOGB yZ/KlqNg7EHqe3UKpqzHDNGChsxK3E1fvLPIlLpuE2Ls0OKJZ5XFMgDi2UsyNmO2T8Fu pIlszbCzOmkGjIdjbUzW4E/ODkl+4HnllrphO/eDUNEqWfDUwHSOMZZpvvKLfpwkTF/A 35JyKU9evJ7KkO6t/bZ1MughZD1Q7a8Qcb67XvrYTem+TPeK38s8Qeo7oNBAugWLZ9wv T0fQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531IZu/32DzwCiFvJXmLF7cgcs/WpwIhU6Fj8b5PIJSIBgNoYbc9 Gu434L0r5aAjrSjrbPlU/KBtLflMyijfbjSyjb/tME/Zp8HlDw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzg0ZdHM3Y/PuV5696Pd4gO9SOrRnwGLKkklyb1s0VdUKkIEEX1Un/Z09mJz4TxyFTZcpeGxPg1eWf3I1wsteg= X-Received: by 2002:aca:b605:: with SMTP id g5mr11936066oif.127.1621884916542; Mon, 24 May 2021 12:35:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210524124023.6372a3383876a1196cf81705@3dresearch.com> In-Reply-To: <20210524124023.6372a3383876a1196cf81705@3dresearch.com> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 12:35:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Updating /usr/ports To: Janos Dohanics Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FpnVZ0Q4bz4hBv X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=KNl/yApK; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kob6558@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kob6558@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.70 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::229:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::229:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::229:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 19:35:18 -0000 On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 9:41 AM Janos Dohanics wrote: > Hello, > > The Handbook says "As needed, update /usr/ports after the initial Git > checkout: > > # git -C /usr/ports pull" > > [root@frigg ~]# portversion -v | grep -c "<" > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 294 packages found - done] > 7 > > [root@frigg ~]# git -C /usr/ports pull > [...] > 855 files changed, 8990 insertions(+), 7435 deletions(-) > > [root@frigg ~]# portversion -v | grep -c "<" > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 294 packages found - done] > 7 > > However, you also need to 'make index' which the Handbook does not mentio= n: > > [root@frigg /usr/ports]# make index > > [root@frigg /usr/ports]# portversion -v | grep -c "<" > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 294 packages found - done] > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 31205 port > entries found > .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000........= .6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000.........11000...= ......12000.........13000.........14000.........15000.........16000........= .17000.........18000.........19000.........20000.........21000.........2200= 0.........23000.........24000.........25000.........26000.........27000....= .....28000.........29000.........30000.........31000.. > ..... done] > 12 > > -- > Janos Dohanics > If you don't mind being a couple of hours out of date, "make -C /usr/ports feetchindex.". The index file is generated every 3 hours (I think), and it's a lot faster than making it yourself. Also, the grep is not needed. 'pkg version -vl<" (or, "-vL=3D" to catch orphaned ports) will do the same thing. Don't worry if you are not using ports. pkg does exactly the same things for both ports and packages except for actually building ports. I thought that portversion was long gone. It's not on either v12 or 13 on my systems. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 24 10:31:45 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BE4632305 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 10:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wangwei19@ios.ac.cn) Received: from EX01.ios.ac.cn (mail.ios.ac.cn [124.16.137.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.ios.ac.cn", Issuer "GeoTrust CN RSA CA G1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FpYRL4RJhz3FlL for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 10:31:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wangwei19@ios.ac.cn) Received: from EX01.ios.ac.cn (192.168.1.17) by EX01.ios.ac.cn (192.168.1.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 24 May 2021 18:31:29 +0800 Received: from EX01.ios.ac.cn ([::1]) by EX01.ios.ac.cn ([::1]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.012; Mon, 24 May 2021 18:31:29 +0800 From: =?gb2312?B?zfXOsA==?= To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: compile kernel error Thread-Topic: compile kernel error Thread-Index: AQHXUIXW2+plKvUxOEm3u24WzJcbPg== Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 10:31:29 +0000 Message-ID: <1621852288837.86407@ios.ac.cn> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [192.168.9.51] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FpYRL4RJhz3FlL X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wangwei19@ios.ac.cn designates 124.16.137.54 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wangwei19@ios.ac.cn X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.19 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[124.16.137.54:from]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:124.16.137.54]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/related,multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ios.ac.cn]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT_BOGUS(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[124.16.137.54:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.991]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~,4:~,5:~,6:~,7:~]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7497, ipnet:124.16.136.0/22, country:CN]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 24 May 2021 19:58:14 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 10:31:45 -0000 SGk6DQoNCiAgICB3aGVuIEkgY29tcGlsZSBmcmVlYnNkIGtlcm5lbCAgd2l0aCB0aGVzZSBjb21t YW5kOg0KDQpbY2lkOmQ4N2E3YzUwLWM0ZGEtNDJhNS05NjIxLWE2YTQyOGJiNTdhZl0NCg0KW2Np ZDo1ODRiZmIxOC02YmFhLTRhYzQtYTEzMi05N2Q1Mzc3YmIxNWVdDQoNCmFuZCB0aGlzIHdheSBy ZXBvcnQgYW4gZXJyb3IsaSBkb24ndCBrbm93IGhvdyB0byBmaXggaXQuDQoNCltjaWQ6MWQ2YTY0 YjUtZmZlNC00ZjFjLThiMmItOWJiNGFiYjJhNTM3XQ0KDQoNCnRoaXMgaXMgbXkgZnJlZWJzZCB2 bSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbjoNCg0KW2NpZDo4ZDM3YmE1MS1kN2I3LTQ3OGQtOTljYy1hYTIxZTM2M2Rh YzVdDQoNCg0K From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 24 16:22:02 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090C06381A5 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 16:22:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Darius.Bell@netapp.com) Received: from NAM02-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm3nam07on2083.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.95.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "DigiCert Cloud Services CA-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FpjCY0Bsbz3sXk for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 16:22:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Darius.Bell@netapp.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=hfOxpZ6FlGKBvWPEmUJzLJTrmu0+7Pe6992xWvqwUqzr9toVEifpxUqmxyyF5QmVo8LOSII5lljpZao2V7AvxvQVt0jc/rajtQaZhPCwkP2Qg/E5uUqZyQxCJ7bbp1rvsgzu+KCx2M+qzwhvvP7IWFkYlHi8dScUOhILoOgcKSxJE2RUEId/SlgCrM1yUQTQFw9zjTluybNia5r7L4Ho2tmifg4Yh959Zs6Tm8k8mTiINKnpIBvjLFM2md0f/sCYpDOswziUxkOJMP9uBRQz2KR9NYPha1BkvvQ/963OjiHlMWy2D/OtehA2BEToYMu9k2/Ng75MbFE/0K1w2nZyxg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=45Nvquja1zSXzfOLjyDeT0STAYNRIjnv/M9fYqdufP0=; b=b50c1qLA7wFgEwdADJRQrsCRSIKZONHl0l9EpqqPXuQuZJCZXvtIpOET2RvUMmb2sKtVt3YgQs/eeDKWRtadT/wiVeS0thbQevWH+zMY5OaMgO2FkGqANsC3Hv53ZfguXin2TL2y6kFbvoKJm7jcJrnB1/QoaypCLbztXt3orleSEhzNQ6L8XU39Ufvgn4Nv5W+yP35NPGUD/WApCGTXatAstHegc/FVlmds9EUQwxIgzoV2L1KmEEqwLG9IrI3552TAeABdz1oQX6b/HdXcklGw24cl5r8Eduolc75OlQy9N/f9GXgPEyLrsV72AbRcDRbjlF7Jn8mEUl9HccULcw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netapp.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=netapp.com; dkim=pass header.d=netapp.com; arc=none Received: from BN8PR06MB5780.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:c3::17) by BN8PR06MB5779.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:c9::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4150.26; Mon, 24 May 2021 16:21:59 +0000 Received: from BN8PR06MB5780.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e551:949d:215e:4671]) by BN8PR06MB5780.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e551:949d:215e:4671%7]) with mapi id 15.20.4150.027; Mon, 24 May 2021 16:21:59 +0000 From: "Bell, Darius" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: FreeBSD on a Fujitsu Server Thread-Topic: FreeBSD on a Fujitsu Server Thread-Index: AddQuOsH5p7QOk01TXialqJ5DpNxdw== Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 16:21:59 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [216.240.30.5] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9766ba56-ca45-445e-df25-08d91ed00e60 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN8PR06MB5779: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN8PR06MB5780.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(376002)(136003)(366004)(26005)(86362001)(186003)(2906002)(66946007)(66476007)(6506007)(66556008)(33656002)(64756008)(66446008)(7696005)(478600001)(83380400001)(38100700002)(71200400001)(316002)(8936002)(5660300002)(9686003)(122000001)(76116006)(8676002)(52536014)(6916009)(55016002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: =?us-ascii?Q?U0B15VEAwCo5oIGXiHYIIZV4RymAFZAFfp61xQZtdwvFq6a0sCtj2r8ukM11?= =?us-ascii?Q?JPxoBuiG04QKzF73V2KbAQjEMrYGyE47aS4pdZGTdLQ6Uwsl06lz/oNDxqUw?= =?us-ascii?Q?MVOGohZmElwT35hO7ZmP2YRXgN/sLMGCA1/a49jLo2CvNfhiVMMIXm56YbLr?= =?us-ascii?Q?k0NQY0zn9DJ6cI5NDw67KMFsMAgkTPXbyxo8oJvh5qfHxSV++/WiMHqNtt/2?= =?us-ascii?Q?GNg9kjNy4wXaxVvpSQZNCCYtKVSsqgHaSCAU7rRW6CH644G0C/YCRraosgPm?= =?us-ascii?Q?f5XQvJj+7YN5c5QvTqVgZosSFIF1+jA6cednQ2vmfM7Qe4zG7X/jUuI+T8Xp?= =?us-ascii?Q?5KwPgQeZWh+xAdNtBi4lhFI86sW9bKZTGOrnLFXmv5zvnLrWSf41kALSwzIR?= =?us-ascii?Q?iV4H9gZM653FWXKfVgknTEHhAu3TIqvvXnSjmqA1Q51OyjS4FFStKKKQl1QC?= =?us-ascii?Q?t4SFerG3PNNut4H4I0YRsOYqJEuCAAVg2Ep3LIm91gS5cDgegR/ISOwRc1Eo?= =?us-ascii?Q?U6e1+HDDdAlQuQX3PHQW4lhq5WEv63TqBSJWezwFHDKk5Q7srK+r6MRLNPhj?= =?us-ascii?Q?j/77FBw4zIPFV1pNmUzr0hlthmeNM7CegnIiOcyKL9Vui7qSBuqGSUFCS2cn?= =?us-ascii?Q?Ld8Xm1Omt5A5NWDDUl5POmkkkmwyc4JCmZUSllU8W97l5Io4L0pOMofhzknM?= =?us-ascii?Q?F8fWzBO5h9lP6BjSkvgbg0uIC0iZE3B4y8KGPN9c6dxSlLc0YzkYGlCm6bC5?= =?us-ascii?Q?mpJq75uCcVFrsey296uw+GcICFl6XpMfPvyJI/ZkbB3gdbV5bSFMn5BoW3Tw?= =?us-ascii?Q?a6cFNaRX4c1SLfZNhCq72YMMFylqGE/TKYPa4Jc4D0CyeCS8qtcy+avRfYxU?= =?us-ascii?Q?WpvoMRGAWEH21OXZHJARyZ6fOPrjKTsvlpqBF3Ky1UI5qvG9HLzos8tINg+O?= =?us-ascii?Q?zbhHO8SptIdOEr40vGs7jQHUjM2Zg3FWnEr+TOxT18/6VtW4A7puxj2bobsP?= =?us-ascii?Q?mvlbALiprdFZr+olCSuR3MYUjqSpHzaep1+SrUKmeamnYLcQeSGgcCL5Z+SQ?= =?us-ascii?Q?KvqANb2Gt3qxBi9IRvntk/dy/o2GbbYpOxeRyGFMEqs5/XGox0TUKcfcr9sQ?= =?us-ascii?Q?NoloN5f3P7GttDz2g6HlliyzPfQVcuo9Kx9OcQYlt0WSvq6FzjMkyZVjO36y?= =?us-ascii?Q?MlQAFw5+THW2ZrP1FBRtkefPNSEXXcl6u7LqG+n6V2BofkuUMiY4o1UXg6Mf?= =?us-ascii?Q?Um/U/a7PkHHT98ZjLQcekAYIr+FTZXB6nCYyi+ea7EcYUfF8QEbw1uECrOqq?= =?us-ascii?Q?CpU=3D?= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: netapp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN8PR06MB5780.namprd06.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9766ba56-ca45-445e-df25-08d91ed00e60 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 May 2021 16:21:59.0917 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4b0911a0-929b-4715-944b-c03745165b3a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: K03IVVi29s/PvDMo6CAaww5vGLfFtASbt1g9gte3RLQzDJRZyhenxP3Bim3fo9o1llur5IQ6MW5aLK8w+T4tdg== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8PR06MB5779 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FpjCY0Bsbz3sXk X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[40.107.95.83:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netapp.com:s=selector1]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.107.0.0/16]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[netapp.com:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[40.107.95.83:from:127.0.2.255]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netapp.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netapp.com,quarantine]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[40.107.95.83:from]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.104.0.0/14, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[40.107.95.83:from] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 24 May 2021 19:58:53 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 16:22:02 -0000 Hello, I am attempting to install FreeBSD 13 on a Fujitsu Primergy CX400 M4= (MAMA003110) and I have not be successful and I wanted to ask if someone f= rom FreeBSD can verify if FreeBSD will work or will on our Fujitsu server C= X400 M4. If it will work what version do I need to use and are there any sp= ecial installation requirements or is there a particular way that I need to= install the FreeBSD. Another colleague has worked on this as well and the following is her updat= e: I have tried the below versions of FreeBSD with no success in getting the i= nstaller to complete loading the kernel. I did not go back further than Spe= ctre/Meltdown FreeBSD Release 13.0 (April 13, 2021) - AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT issue FreeBSD Release 12.2 (October 27, 2020) - AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT issue FreeBSD Release 11.4 (June 23, 2020) - Kernel load stops after identifying = the Mouse Interface (pictured below) FreeBSD Release 11.3 (July 9, 2019) - Kernel load stops after identifying t= he Mouse Interface (pictured below) I was able to update the BIOS and iRMC firmware on the server. BIOS - V1.0.0.0 R1.33.0 --->V1.0.0.0 R1.42.0 iRMC - D3854_01.26P_sdr03.39--->D3854_03.06P_sdr03.52 Thank you for help. Darius M. Bell System Administrator 1 Darius.Bell@netapp.com From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 24 21:06:25 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6BF63D1EF for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 21:06:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from mail.nomadlogic.org (mail.nomadlogic.org [66.165.241.226]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.nomadlogic.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FpqWh2qhzz3lTV for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 21:06:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from [192.168.1.160] (cpe-24-24-163-126.socal.res.rr.com [24.24.163.126]) by mail.nomadlogic.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 153d059d (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 24 May 2021 21:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: FreeBSD on a Fujitsu Server To: "Bell, Darius" , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" References: From: Pete Wright Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 14:06:15 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FpqWh2qhzz3lTV X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[nomadlogic.org:s=04242021]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[66.165.241.226:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[nomadlogic.org:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[nomadlogic.org,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[66.165.241.226:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29802, ipnet:66.165.240.0/22, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 21:06:25 -0000 On 5/24/21 9:21 AM, Bell, Darius via freebsd-questions wrote: > Hello, I am attempting to install FreeBSD 13 on a Fujitsu Primergy CX400 M4 (MAMA003110) and I have not be successful and I wanted to ask if someone from FreeBSD can verify if FreeBSD will work or will on our Fujitsu server CX400 M4. If it will work what version do I need to use and are there any special installation requirements or is there a particular way that I need to install the FreeBSD. I don't have this hardware myself, but it might be interesting to see where in the boot process the kernel hangs on these systems. Can you share that info here? -pete -- Pete Wright pete@nomadlogic.org @nomadlogicLA From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 24 21:29:38 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726C763D258 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 21:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from kicp.uchicago.edu (kicp.uchicago.edu [128.135.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Fpr2T5TXhz3sdn for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 21:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from point.uchicago.edu (point.uchicago.edu [128.135.52.6]) (Authenticated sender: galtsev) by kicp.uchicago.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36D7C4E6B5; Mon, 24 May 2021 16:29:31 -0500 (CDT) Subject: RESOLVED: pilot error: After upgrade to 13.0-RELEASE ipfw locks the boxes To: Karl Dunn , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1e9112d7-2b86-568c-86b4-ee44e4cfd6c@illiac.kad-hg.org> From: Valeri Galtsev Message-ID: <3feb9704-02bf-3ba4-de7f-8248e36354e9@kicp.uchicago.edu> Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 16:29:31 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1e9112d7-2b86-568c-86b4-ee44e4cfd6c@illiac.kad-hg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fpr2T5TXhz3sdn X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=uchicago.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.135.20.70) smtp.mailfrom=galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.16 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.37)[0.372]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[128.135.20.70:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.69)[0.689]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[128.135.20.70:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:160, ipnet:128.135.0.0/16, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[uchicago.edu : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 21:29:38 -0000 On 5/24/21 9:54 AM, Karl Dunn wrote: > On 5/23/21 11:36 AM CDT, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > Dear All, > > as a lazy person, before I start rewriting all my ipfw scripts I decided > to ask somebody?s else wisdom. It is possible that I mi > ssed something I have to do related to ipfw in this particular upgrade: > from 12.2-RELEASE to 13.0-RELEASE > > I have a bunch of boxes that I have rather similar (though not > identical) ipfw scripts on, these were written a while back (arou > nd 8.x-RELEASE), and were just slightly modified on some occasions. None > of previous upgrades 8 ?> 9; 9 ?> 10,.. 11 ?> 12 led to >  any problems as far as ipfw is concerned. I was just rebooting the > machine after kernel upgrade, and after userland upgrade and >  all pkg reinstallation, I was testing things as usually, no problem > with ipfw. > > After this upgrade: to 13.0-RELEASE, ipfw effectively locks any remote > access to the box (except for ping). My first guess was I >  just missed relevant part in release notes (which I must confess I > rarely read carefully), but I don?t find anything special re > lated to ipfw. > > I hope, someone points me too obvious ?pilot error? I made. Before I > start re-creating ipfw scripts, and testing every line in t > hem as did when I was learning it when first started playing with ipfw. > > Thanks in advance for all your answers. > > Valeri > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Valeri Galtsev > Sr System Administrator > Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics > Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics > University of Chicago > Phone: 773-702-4247 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Valeri: > > A wild and unlikely guess (because ping works and nothing else does): > > Interfaces name(s) have changed, e.g. what was em0 is now em1. > > It might help to post relevant parts (or all) of dmesg, rc.conf and > loader.conf, and the (sanitized) ipfw rules. > > I am on the digest for freebsd-auestions, so I will get your response > quicker if you copy me at kdunn@acm.org. > Thank you, Karl! Once I started collecting information Karl offered to look into, I had to reboot machine(s) with ipfw enabled, and I discovered that all works and ipfw does not lock the machine(s) off. So, I figure my pilot error was: I did not disable ipfw for the duration of all upgrade steps, namely: freebsd-update upgrade -r 13.0-RELEASE freebsd-update install reboot freebsd-update install pkg update pkg upgrade -y -f freebsd-update install and I discovered I'm locked off somewhere before last step (removing unnecessary leftovers of previous system release on new system). All is well on a bunch of systems, - on all systems I upgraded so far. Bottom line: disable ipfw before starting upgrade; enable ipfw after ALL STEPS of upgrade are accomplished. Thanks a lot Karl! Valeri > -- Karl Dunn kdunn@acm.org > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 24 22:08:13 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FFA63E116 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 22:08:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Fprv02jN0z4YKk for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 22:08:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from lowell-desk.be-well.ilk.org (router.lan [172.30.250.2]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6DC33C06; Mon, 24 May 2021 18:08:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3B43B1680901; Mon, 24 May 2021 18:07:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: FreeBSD Questions Cc: Janos Dohanics Subject: Re: Updating /usr/ports References: <20210524124023.6372a3383876a1196cf81705@3dresearch.com> Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 18:07:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Kevin Oberman's message of "Mon, 24 May 2021 12:35:00 -0700") Message-ID: <44wnrnbxaf.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fprv02jN0z4YKk X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org has no SPF policy when checking 23.30.133.173) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.00 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[23.30.133.173:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ilk.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.997]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[23.30.133.173:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:23.30.0.0/15, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 22:08:13 -0000 Kevin Oberman writes: > If you don't mind being a couple of hours out of date, "make -C /usr/ports > feetchindex.". The index file is generated every 3 hours (I think), and > it's a lot faster than making it yourself. And a lot faster than running without the index, but the index isn't really required for most operations. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 24 22:18:44 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F8863E804 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 22:18:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xxjack12xx@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fps771g3vz4ctC for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 22:18:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xxjack12xx@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id v8so28608190qkv.1 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 15:18:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TDLVWGqUnLSZikRMoTQGHqXOuzNRu1jBVntqGfFapRk=; b=cyBHmqmHz5LYo0nLIlxboGVguClkC+cJ8SyhWXSVzcLJ7YHgHKJN5HEgh8CQPYFNg3 NB3Yizkb5oxBypu+16l5NHnqQUGsTvPZsu+cuLY+r2JEl43Ynew8YbdUIgz/vm8S2Vbq DnvbB6NIMHe7OEAsHxsu9gLd012xR6FcZbj10SxkU/fuq06RGkxe+YCA97HEQha7nA5m MuV+1GoRfiMmOkkpillU1e4KPwkNkkoE39+z4kdaqYc0Pk5CYTO2NFmm23QL3U1kJlkV QxaR+B7W9yA4tkva5tLuzvAW/U9U+ry83TwlyKM9ggMhZp7zBzQAoUte0TVJA3ZNjFWn U9BA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TDLVWGqUnLSZikRMoTQGHqXOuzNRu1jBVntqGfFapRk=; b=aHITa+bdO39C9wVo7rWYzhU+czt77RxtAWEyqgiOHBdHC0+alcQza62Ry/Ns5wJWG9 X9L1ZUi9sfaczCJpvu7VdenN7r66eDigEXmzlBzII7XrOFsaLGzFp5RUn9mSAVqkedd6 N0HN1vB/98kw4R37IxqAFQTf1+eGnAs72/d+TA346S+fl5pD2HVp51bLBl77TgvPWPrG jFXRcJmE7SuAZjcM+QJ0DVJuRTdtuwyNi5d57iH6+XTWbC2rQlHvyG9ba0Yh+pZDso2o KwwqEwjQxGxkGmevjxKXgqKK028AAD7hSAMtZb6c2SzRAuhx4sce19/T09rRZMd/77Hh 0lJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530KwHpNBefGV+tCXLt68bfPenRkzoLQmp7+8MSmkQIVCTyxa5Xo MIBWG6hD8yczJC+S6oaTAXAJ1hEzhivFGVgvSIXGmSJt X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxa3d0FxL6jicGlMZ1WLbNbvYANXw5Y4eaI5WM1vIshvlkOrNUphkCcGKuAomfS4Jh69/bg/4OeOWNdh0bOlGE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:210e:: with SMTP id l14mr8986910qkl.1.1621894722257; Mon, 24 May 2021 15:18:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1621852288837.86407@ios.ac.cn> In-Reply-To: <1621852288837.86407@ios.ac.cn> From: "Jack L." Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 15:18:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: compile kernel error To: =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lyf?= Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fps771g3vz4ctC X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=cyBHmqmH; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of xxjack12xx@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=xxjack12xx@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.98 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.987]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.990]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 22:18:44 -0000 What is the error? On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 12:58 PM =E7=8E=8B=E4=BC=9F w= rote: > > Hi: > > when I compile freebsd kernel with these command: > > [cid:d87a7c50-c4da-42a5-9621-a6a428bb57af] > > [cid:584bfb18-6baa-4ac4-a132-97d5377bb15e] > > and this way report an error,i don't know how to fix it. > > [cid:1d6a64b5-ffe4-4f1c-8b2b-9bb4abb2a537] > > > this is my freebsd vm information: > > [cid:8d37ba51-d7b7-478d-99cc-aa21e363dac5] > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 25 03:04:29 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF866426D1 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 03:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FpzSr3LsPz3Pwy for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 03:04:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id q5so30477318wrs.4 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 20:04:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=1VOc93knZc/9kxfaTPBAc5qCDWiWDO88vMznqUxwxvw=; b=DizH6AFPUt5ubmRYW17ByvxPahExQ6MVD8H3DvVy3kkQ8s6hsPeSFN7BRhYJqHk6yl 4xGCB1W9D5Zpnhibs+y9ao+b9qMvAJnVzaFcHh3jNmSxeysAbEOV5LsteGZjuxKGAXLV NQdVKSOmwIM5oxZLmHbm9LiYxW8IWhCBcmsDKxdAf5gwxlIJ2dByAJvSiGsOE2pp2IPR /rF4Z9j9Am+yg4DyNjISKabp0k1n0bOZBuCD1xGyEhD1T2VyD5hiF0tUJ2iaTaQKAUjs 42kPcVIuXVSGm0cs4MKFewe57lom37mLIQ0UmhsIaisPoAOJo01N9VxeiB+Z/spcpYwR uVgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=1VOc93knZc/9kxfaTPBAc5qCDWiWDO88vMznqUxwxvw=; b=T2/yBKt4r92QcUq+WpA6Z5xUkF+Egyd68AUTeJStT4s/B/3p5G7vgfpOTcYmenGMST oG+yABwrG1beZQBK81Oz+c+5hzoPgCX3wVpforwFHFAueAmaZEO6TPzDnODgN18e5Ifp b2t6Yup5IzM7sjUUST+kbpwZ00qUdKHbQEkDjEIyxrFzX+kR3FCXTtD+9HI+4FV3kdBo c2qHWB8umI0Yum/z/swzvLoy2DakuwsRiV2bE90mQT67n+BW9jV4RByTbGUxNsdPAtWQ aVxNsN+VLoyjTPoBCqT1R3BQNeX1UygnSHT3XpdTdgxo+7kK+rwVvR7XWqrIgpiUoCWd Jb3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531jxk56Sj+5spcDNCvhsLoXlT1aIezQqPqloWZQS+GdAz3P0up3 oykyjf5r2iiVnva7qt6q8sPvHf9948QTdA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztFAkYhANsfobeFCQOR3Wxioe0FAWj/dmAbG7gB8e7+2yvI+JFIaBHd7a1KSgNeEGfC22+Cw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:b356:: with SMTP id k22mr21214954wrd.80.1621911866089; Mon, 24 May 2021 20:04:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (88-105-96-80.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com. [88.105.96.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k11sm1121005wmj.1.2021.05.24.20.04.25 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 May 2021 20:04:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Upgrade from 12.2-RELEASE-p2 to 13.0-RELEASE To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Graham Perrin Message-ID: <69093042-8a79-0666-1834-0128b21a120c@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 04:04:25 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FpzSr3LsPz3Pwy X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=DizH6AFP; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grahamperrin@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::42e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=grahamperrin@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.20 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.995]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::42e:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[88.105.96.80:received]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.21)[-0.207]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::42e:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::42e:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 03:04:29 -0000 On 23/05/2021 14:06, Roman Serbski wrote: > Hello, > > I've just finished upgrading a server running 12.2-RELEASE-p2 to > 13.0-RELEASE using "Updating FreeBSD from Source" section from > https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/cutting-edge/#makeworld > > Everything went well except that now, when I try to build a new kernel … … Do you now aim to update to 14.0-CURRENT? If you're still on 13.0-RELEASE, you could try a (binary) pkg-update routine before attempting to build a new kernel. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 25 06:24:56 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE97F645877 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:24:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4d2000195d810.d29d59936b01f5522f20bf0087448fc6@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.176.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fq3w76wnWz3lBD for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:24:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4d2000195d810.d29d59936b01f5522f20bf0087448fc6@email-od.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=email-od.com;i=@email-od.com;s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; t=1621923896; x=1624515896; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-thread-info; bh=V4ko9O4sD/HzaPe3uLt4XMiSM+Liws9fVqWPcoikfaU=; b=DpDMfVYZBTVEFw+V7laNA/Y2VdCqFgj6NCCNLyj6wZErabuozP8kCeUXBVzzV7YJsH5F9h1KOUl9gdYRR1PNbqvZ/D3QWzaqgenZjbw4TYWCkSkFMsyD5tSIhNU5+uDwQK0Co4bEnlBrPJBWjPP2oTaJueyTAwYDVhlGQOwNlp4= X-Thread-Info: NDI1MC4xMi4xZDRkMjAwMDE5NWQ4MTAuZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnM9ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Received: from r3.h.in.socketlabs.com (r3.h.in.socketlabs.com [142.0.180.13]) by mxsg2.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Tue, 25 May 2021 02:24:34 -0400 Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (EMTPY [185.202.17.215]) by r3.h.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Tue, 25 May 2021 02:24:30 -0400 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1llQUP-000AG8-1m; Tue, 25 May 2021 07:24:29 +0100 Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 07:24:28 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Roman Serbski Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade from 12.2-RELEASE-p2 to 13.0-RELEASE Message-Id: <20210525072428.032c3e4c716287c430a6bbfd@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fq3w76wnWz3lBD X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=email-od.com header.s=dkim header.b=DpDMfVYZ; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 4250.82.1d4d2000195d810.d29d59936b01f5522f20bf0087448fc6@email-od.com designates 142.0.176.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=4250.82.1d4d2000195d810.d29d59936b01f5522f20bf0087448fc6@email-od.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.70 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[email-od.com:s=dkim]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sohara.org]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[142.0.176.198:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[142.0.176.198:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[email-od.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4d2000195d810.d29d59936b01f5522f20bf0087448fc6@email-od.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7381, ipnet:142.0.176.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4d2000195d810.d29d59936b01f5522f20bf0087448fc6@email-od.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 06:24:56 -0000 On Sun, 23 May 2021 15:06:25 +0200 Roman Serbski wrote: > /usr/src/sys/rpc/rpcsec_tls/rpctlscd.x | grep -v pthread.h > > rpctlscd.h > ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgnuregex.so.5" not found, required by > "grep" That's the version used in 12.2 can someone with 13.0 use ldd to find out what version of libgnuregex is used by grep in 13.0. > # find / -name libgnuregex.so.5 -print > /usr/lib32/libgnuregex.so.5 That's the 32 bit compatibility version the one grep is looking for lives in /usr/lib. You seem to be running 12.2 grep - I don't know why. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 25 09:21:45 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D176483FD for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:21:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mefystofel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fq7r82103z3mZF for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:21:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mefystofel@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id d78so22254991pfd.10 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 02:21:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ddVPxItR2V9uXMDBGACJsFFTgb5IsJaioXAR+lgQTkk=; b=lV6RKv/1HJe5X1OyWvpMxxu8HnnMl8xX9ZLwjsOlbjE4bqVK2aCStKPbgjGKV6gqyR qyEAdHgWN0Sx43q/HBGbeT+Q02etcz+mw9Wgew3rJuI5gdakc1hJZzGNad4pSGBA3ViF o+tItkMPwCjCvrGAqnphm2g4mpspV1KqCvvNqDPAYdWB2gvR8e4WMHuPSKWmQl/tr3g2 /w+YSSIpcmm5U8awSWvytI28mQgW06QdiN7meEKNOMH85rpa4Avc9Mxav9H6TZVdsY/Q raenr2bh+dByj4HGqDAUutGirT5pfBZRm97OO2Ypn7/Ul91Gqjhc98zWN7sS0tN7FjNx dYgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ddVPxItR2V9uXMDBGACJsFFTgb5IsJaioXAR+lgQTkk=; b=ZUg58wivb59+vHTvpfsW6+nxaomBwdqDA76ME98u4PT+BYuD8d7SIDcPBv4ASxdXV2 leNR27FWBxidMBsxXknnI3Cka/DRqWUxMc70ZF6lsqX2QQZgSA/oUd1M7vWECGxVLvBN mQpxorGwAVUTQ3yT6JXI6cxUQlQEwowoaMYZH/OKoDBe74VqLahL0Tx+I84t7c0Whbzl loe59s20ES0OoJR1Y5jfUOVvMe+y3xtPTNwNnrvg1IshbQXlilcztUXJjOy5Nf6EQ0l5 wlWEil6k0qSZUCo9UxqfueDN5Bw1FPxbR1E4gbQzDuLKQr4Hj6f72kmJ+YP1Xv7PqHoW ODEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KLk8QW6MeAc6A8RbHjIBT9OlT6Z2fDC6vKN5hmlggyWKRJT2E lBLljlcm0HrsP9NfgChLIuBYSu4Sv76VeA+IkiGwAT5xBAitDw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwxiskr3xE//ENYNzheip6+E5Akx7QiYRGzc4Ql9+mFRy3jS1HuPgkYULJXS6cJSmNH/8mpNfzFxyjRMjqmCY= X-Received: by 2002:a62:15cd:0:b029:2e6:cfaa:4291 with SMTP id 196-20020a6215cd0000b02902e6cfaa4291mr16011708pfv.24.1621934502638; Tue, 25 May 2021 02:21:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210525072428.032c3e4c716287c430a6bbfd@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20210525072428.032c3e4c716287c430a6bbfd@sohara.org> From: Roman Serbski Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 11:21:31 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Upgrade from 12.2-RELEASE-p2 to 13.0-RELEASE To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fq7r82103z3mZF X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=lV6RKv/1; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mefystofel@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::434 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mefystofel@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.54 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::434:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::434:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.46)[0.459]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::434:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 09:21:45 -0000 On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 8:24 AM Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > > That's the version used in 12.2 can someone with 13.0 use ldd to > find out what version of libgnuregex is used by grep in 13.0. > > > # find / -name libgnuregex.so.5 -print > > /usr/lib32/libgnuregex.so.5 > > That's the 32 bit compatibility version the one grep is looking for > lives in /usr/lib. > > You seem to be running 12.2 grep - I don't know why. I'm not sure I'm running 12.2 grep. Here is grep from 12.2-RELEASE-p2 (r369053): # grep --version grep (GNU grep) 2.5.1-FreeBSD # ldd /usr/bin/grep /usr/bin/grep: libgnuregex.so.5 => /usr/lib/libgnuregex.so.5 (0x800263000) libbz2.so.4 => /usr/lib/libbz2.so.4 (0x80027c000) libz.so.6 => /lib/libz.so.6 (0x800292000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x8002ae000) And here is grep from 13.0-RELEASE (ea31abc26): # grep --version grep (BSD grep, GNU compatible) 2.6.0-FreeBSD # ldd /usr/bin/grep /usr/bin/grep: libregex.so.1 => /usr/lib/libregex.so.1 (0x80024b000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80025f000) Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 25 10:16:48 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A54649BC1 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 10:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from styczen_andrzej@o2.pl) Received: from mx-out.tlen.pl (mx-out.tlen.pl [193.222.135.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fq93g3Tzgz4ZJy for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 10:16:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from styczen_andrzej@o2.pl) Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.tlen.pl 28380 invoked from network); 25 May 2021 12:09:24 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=o2.pl; s=1024a; t=1621937364; bh=ccdC5EulCj6224Bumwl7CqNJTtvlRAvXBCXdd6gIqCY=; h=Subject:To:From; b=d0qrxLHz0HCdQq2fn2cr78WwUoiWjDXevLBR/GAWaJII/3Rs/nm00lXKbIDcMXtmG B4jGKaYiVIAD7VjcpPEWL7FdsYIvZwJnueODIsEg5jmUB4YRu8x3xLPmytDoMtAT7o K1AiVi/Pan26vSSwAexb7xCqfnMmcgt0Rago5d+c= Received: from 77-254-223-53.adsl.inetia.pl (HELO [192.168.100.3]) (styczen_andrzej@o2.pl@[77.254.223.53]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.tlen.pl (WP-SMTPD) with ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted SMTP for ; 25 May 2021 12:09:24 +0200 Subject: Re: Bouncing messages from freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (and other FreeBSD lists) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20210522.173850.983604927754686335.yasu@utahime.org> From: Andrzej Styczen Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 12:09:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210522.173850.983604927754686335.yasu@utahime.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: pl-PL Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WP-MailID: 827a3658d952017ce5f94db666bc178c X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy Poczty o2 X-WP-SPAM: NO 0000000 [QTNB] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fq93g3Tzgz4ZJy X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=o2.pl header.s=1024a header.b=d0qrxLHz; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=o2.pl; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of styczen_andrzej@o2.pl designates 193.222.135.140 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=styczen_andrzej@o2.pl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [7.00 / 15.00]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[193.222.135.140:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+ip4:193.222.135.0/24:c]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[o2.pl:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(0.00)[o2.pl,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[193.222.135.140:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:31080, ipnet:193.222.135.0/24, country:PL]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(0.00)[o2.pl:s=1024a]; RBL_NIXSPAM(4.00)[193.222.135.140:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[193.222.135.140:from:127.0.2.255]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 10:16:48 -0000 On 22.05.2021 10:38, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote: > From: "Thomas Mueller" > Subject: Re: Bouncing messages from freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (and other FreeBSD lists) > Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 08:31:52 +0000 > >> I have been getting messages on various FreeBSD lists and would like to know if others have been having problems like this. >> >> I want to see if the bug is with FreeBSD mailing-list servers or with my server. >> >> I seem to do OK with other lists I am on. >> >> Do other FreeBSD list members get this problem? >> >> Tom > > I also have been getting same massage. And in my case, it is because > spamish message is sent to ML and spam filter on my mail server > refuses to recieve it. > > --- > Yasuhiro Kimura Hello, I also get this message from time to time. I do not use my own mail server. I relay on o2.pl portal. Best wishes, Andrzej _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 25 11:00:29 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD0864A548 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4d20001995dc1.c1504d138e2bea078d1a0870ff27c219@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.176.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FqB241lYwz4ngK for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:00:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4d20001995dc1.c1504d138e2bea078d1a0870ff27c219@email-od.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=email-od.com;i=@email-od.com;s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; t=1621940428; x=1624532428; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-thread-info; bh=lAyzlAyTDyUapJuuxt4yps5hl4spo+10F0hIpvVH6ao=; b=f5h8ZnQvjSqoYDFlypDqzA2BzaG7yEvX3cML7uYsX50fC203i4nTnlBMpCi3PzzoqCuGDooStwYGGwBhw1LhSom4OG4qRRDiYVdtYyGLp+Wm968AGfeXd1ouYeZsOr9SadHxcEC6huHXu5IozKu/SnYZx+JE1tDq5oD0iti2FQo= X-Thread-Info: NDI1MC4xMi4xZDRkMjAwMDE5OTVkYzEuZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnM9ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Received: from r2.us-west-2.aws.in.socketlabs.com (r2.us-west-2.aws.in.socketlabs.com [142.0.190.2]) by mxsg2.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Tue, 25 May 2021 07:00:22 -0400 Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (EMTPY [185.202.17.215]) by r2.us-west-2.aws.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Tue, 25 May 2021 07:00:17 -0400 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1llUnG-000C6O-TU; Tue, 25 May 2021 12:00:15 +0100 Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 12:00:14 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Roman Serbski Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade from 12.2-RELEASE-p2 to 13.0-RELEASE Message-Id: <20210525120014.405004c66998c990dc224912@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20210525072428.032c3e4c716287c430a6bbfd@sohara.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FqB241lYwz4ngK X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=email-od.com header.s=dkim header.b=f5h8ZnQv; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 4250.82.1d4d20001995dc1.c1504d138e2bea078d1a0870ff27c219@email-od.com designates 142.0.176.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=4250.82.1d4d20001995dc1.c1504d138e2bea078d1a0870ff27c219@email-od.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.70 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[email-od.com:s=dkim]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sohara.org]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[142.0.176.198:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[142.0.176.198:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[email-od.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4d20001995dc1.c1504d138e2bea078d1a0870ff27c219@email-od.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7381, ipnet:142.0.176.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4d20001995dc1.c1504d138e2bea078d1a0870ff27c219@email-od.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 11:00:29 -0000 On Tue, 25 May 2021 11:21:31 +0200 Roman Serbski wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 8:24 AM Steve O'Hara-Smith > wrote: > > > > That's the version used in 12.2 can someone with 13.0 use ldd to > > find out what version of libgnuregex is used by grep in 13.0. > > > > > # find / -name libgnuregex.so.5 -print > > > /usr/lib32/libgnuregex.so.5 > > > > That's the 32 bit compatibility version the one grep is looking > > for lives in /usr/lib. > > > > You seem to be running 12.2 grep - I don't know why. > > I'm not sure I'm running 12.2 grep. The error message you quoted shows that 12.2 grep was being used during the kernel build. Your ldd output confirms that 13.0 grep is not linked to libgnuregex.so.5 and so would not have produced that error message. Next problem - figure out why the kernel build was using an old grep and how. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 26 04:13:16 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885F0632FB3 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 04:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@3dresearch.com) Received: from smtpg.telissant.net (smtpg.telissant.net [104.225.1.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fqcxl3XYGz3Q0n for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 04:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@3dresearch.com) Received: from sacada.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpg.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Fqcxc4z8Fz2D1r6 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 00:13:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at telissant.net Received: from smtpg.telissant.net ([127.0.0.1]) by sacada.3dresearch.com (sacada.3dresearch.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QvUqHtBb1d_I for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 00:13:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from elettra.3dresearch.com (unknown [71.112.242.160]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: elettra@sacada.3dresearch.com) by smtpg.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Fqcxc1wmgz2D1r8 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 00:13:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from elettra.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elettra.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CDDC18081B for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 00:13:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 00:11:53 -0400 From: Janos Dohanics To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Updating /usr/ports Message-Id: <20210526001153.e668d925df825e3486c5f7b9@3dresearch.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20210524124023.6372a3383876a1196cf81705@3dresearch.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fqcxl3XYGz3Q0n X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of web@3dresearch.com designates 104.225.1.73 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=web@3dresearch.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ENVFROM_SERVICE_ACCT(1.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[104.225.1.73:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:104.225.1.0/24, country:US]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[71.112.242.160:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[3dresearch.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[104.225.1.73:from:127.0.2.255]; FROM_SERVICE_ACCT(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 04:13:16 -0000 On Mon, 24 May 2021 12:35:00 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 9:41 AM Janos Dohanics > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > The Handbook says "As needed, update /usr/ports after the initial > > Git checkout: > > > > # git -C /usr/ports pull" > > > > [root@frigg ~]# portversion -v | grep -c "<" > > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 294 packages found - done] > > 7 > > > > [root@frigg ~]# git -C /usr/ports pull > > [...] > > 855 files changed, 8990 insertions(+), 7435 deletions(-) > > > > [root@frigg ~]# portversion -v | grep -c "<" > > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 294 packages found - done] > > 7 > > > > However, you also need to 'make index' which the Handbook does not > > mention: > > > > [root@frigg /usr/ports]# make index > > > > [root@frigg /usr/ports]# portversion -v | grep -c "<" > > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 294 packages found - done] > > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 31205 > > port entries found > > ......... > > 1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000.........11000.........12000.........13000.........14000.........15000.........16000.........17000.........18000.........19000.........20000.........21000.........22000.........23000.........24000.........25000.........26000.........27000.........28000.........29000.........30000.........31000.. ..... > > done] 12 > > > > -- > > Janos Dohanics > > > If you don't mind being a couple of hours out of date, "make > -C /usr/ports feetchindex.". The index file is generated every 3 > hours (I think), and it's a lot faster than making it yourself. Thanks, I know about 'make fetchindex' - this happens to be a reasonably fast machine. My point is though that 'git -C /usr/ports pull' apparently doesn't update the port index, and the Handbook doesn't say you need to do 'make index' or 'make fetchindex'. Also, 'portsnap fetch' && 'portsnap update' did update the index. My reading of the Handbook was that 'git -C /usr/ports pull' alone gave the same result as 'portsnap fetch' && 'portsnap update'. > Also, the grep is not needed. 'pkg version -vl<" (or, "-vL=" to catch > orphaned ports) will do the same thing. Don't worry if you are not > using ports. pkg does exactly the same things for both ports and > packages except for actually building ports. I thought that > portversion was long gone. It's not on either v12 or 13 on my systems. My bad habit, thank you for the reminder! -- Janos Dohanics From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 27 14:12:52 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B0563E5DA for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 14:12:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FrVC74pLZz3lBH for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 14:12:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.1.86] (host86-165-180-99.range86-165.btcentralplus.com [86.165.180.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 14RECnqY025910 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 15:12:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Frank Leonhardt Subject: Apache Spark startup - address of master Message-ID: <5b5ef9fe-6a9e-83d7-ce49-12fbd224a92a@fjl.co.uk> Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:12:47 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FrVC74pLZz3lBH X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk designates 84.45.41.196 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.40 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:84.45.41.196]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[fjl.co.uk]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[84.45.41.196:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:25577, ipnet:84.45.0.0/17, country:GB]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[86.165.180.99:received] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 14:12:52 -0000 The rc.d/spark_worker service script points the program to a master using the current hostname, which rather defeats the whole point of a cluster. I don't really want to edit the startup script if I can avoid it. Is there a clean way of making look at the actual master? There's not a lot of FreeBSD-specific documentation around, but if there is any a pointer to that would be great. Thanks, Frank. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 28 00:02:12 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3502A6482BC for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 00:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-x22e.google.com (mail-oi1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FrlH573Gjz3JXG for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 00:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id t24so2571066oiw.3 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 17:02:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=b3ICzfDI0Ii/1cF17Vo3kzO5MtVe7twfFzUchufzV9s=; b=PhElvXlzDbrDYbJWwqV5vpwGbLAf0Ws9bzMgt82jOrXJHCkSwSGmCzfqNydjo19qSZ MnHycC7/Ba2TWPJGVvdFOqBpaUWGClSGgrQLd6YqWQft/4/SbrFEtd1SfuaJ8CKprQtW HoX5ZBOEpRnBzvUbI3jS4YUphuJR5DCNTFRw/0c5NNdPqyShVSNed9z4IKgJ1f7Wsjcu DO3CvqaV/vPWEeqzMWWm4aLeBbPl5jUfvpEmdx5WT+4i08nFKPJWBiBzMCsARgtZoOCM AZUjLUYTtcZxDVsBp50zKOAspYr8vIRfw0fFXPzyrUobyzZNlw8VAuhKWsN4Cu/tdNG5 Aj+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=b3ICzfDI0Ii/1cF17Vo3kzO5MtVe7twfFzUchufzV9s=; b=ZYp2DctuvsIV5sncrUvhLgt7iOr5QRojz1Kjc86MeIJsrxly4D5F1If76I5qvZtAT7 lVr8xUzXZDvVSsjffrKfIs91+HxZ2q06fZB8ITMYDoFn+Es5JArGeA7rFUA9fF7DICv8 YcztohczIx5ONbhcvFYJTUOJC6nf+2i4Q8x9p0z9cz+sDSLJ5eywOMIOzOGFsn6NbsTN 48U84JZp2Fq8Fc7vofW8TW9mKvKpmGwSY61kWK99/Of6Ut+t9rF6j+onm+YH4xaJ4cf/ FISivFgTbYDoNGJIkE28M7IWBebPZWy3aN1C2VJUf70OVXZbZSVseB/NUXPte0wT0Cpv 5/AQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Y9wdm3qRWTf9o6dtz6O2XD55JED3xaMGWN/2YxiCF/8enyihG t3H/SV8cHW8dijiWwYWQrPI1BukrX+yBOHt/qSUqoKZg+IY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxOOIghSgLwmUqKFEwDDUs9NiV/Bk5XiqterYU/yBxQIMBrd5p+fEM2n0CSaBv/7c+m2561Y2d990+yNj7ZVyM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2c3:: with SMTP id a3mr7453521oid.99.1622160128498; Thu, 27 May 2021 17:02:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210524124023.6372a3383876a1196cf81705@3dresearch.com> <20210526001153.e668d925df825e3486c5f7b9@3dresearch.com> In-Reply-To: <20210526001153.e668d925df825e3486c5f7b9@3dresearch.com> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 17:01:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Updating /usr/ports To: Janos Dohanics Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FrlH573Gjz3JXG X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=PhElvXlz; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kob6558@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kob6558@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.70 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 00:02:12 -0000 On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 9:13 PM Janos Dohanics wrote: > On Mon, 24 May 2021 12:35:00 -0700 > Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 9:41 AM Janos Dohanics > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > The Handbook says "As needed, update /usr/ports after the initial > > > Git checkout: > > > > > > # git -C /usr/ports pull" > > > > > > [root@frigg ~]# portversion -v | grep -c "<" > > > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 294 packages found - done] > > > 7 > > > > > > [root@frigg ~]# git -C /usr/ports pull > > > [...] > > > 855 files changed, 8990 insertions(+), 7435 deletions(-) > > > > > > [root@frigg ~]# portversion -v | grep -c "<" > > > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 294 packages found - done] > > > 7 > > > > > > However, you also need to 'make index' which the Handbook does not > > > mention: > > > > > > [root@frigg /usr/ports]# make index > > > > > > [root@frigg /usr/ports]# portversion -v | grep -c "<" > > > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 294 packages found - done] > > > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 31205 > > > port entries found > > > ......... > > > > 1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000....= .....7000.........8000.........9000.........10000.........11000.........120= 00.........13000.........14000.........15000.........16000.........17000...= ......18000.........19000.........20000.........21000.........22000........= .23000.........24000.........25000.........26000.........27000.........2800= 0.........29000.........30000.........31000.. > ..... > > > done] 12 > > > > > > -- > > > Janos Dohanics > > > > > If you don't mind being a couple of hours out of date, "make > > -C /usr/ports feetchindex.". The index file is generated every 3 > > hours (I think), and it's a lot faster than making it yourself. > > Thanks, I know about 'make fetchindex' - this happens to be a > reasonably fast machine. > > My point is though that 'git -C /usr/ports pull' apparently doesn't > update the port index, and the Handbook doesn't say you need to do > 'make index' or 'make fetchindex'. > > Also, 'portsnap fetch' && 'portsnap update' did update the index. My > reading of the Handbook was that 'git -C /usr/ports pull' alone gave > the same result as 'portsnap fetch' && 'portsnap update'. > > > Also, the grep is not needed. 'pkg version -vl<" (or, "-vL=3D" to catch > > orphaned ports) will do the same thing. Don't worry if you are not > > using ports. pkg does exactly the same things for both ports and > > packages except for actually building ports. I thought that > > portversion was long gone. It's not on either v12 or 13 on my systems. > > My bad habit, thank you for the reminder! > > -- > Janos Dohanics > If you are trying to replace portsnap, I think the answer is net/gitup. This only requires a single command, "gitup ports", and you get your index updated along with updating all ports. I believe that the plan is to put gitup into the base system fairly soon. I have not looked at whether 14-current has gitup, yet. And, yes, it looks like the handbook needs some work as gitup is not yet even mentioned. Like portsnap, gitup is for people who want to maintain an up to date ports tree, but not good for developers. They do need to use git and either generate the index or fetch it. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 28 07:30:00 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B422E64D8FB for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 07:30:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FrxCq2q0nz4XMN for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 07:29:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f23d985a for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 09:29:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 11b3447e for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 09:29:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a98fc945 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 09:29:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6af0cf81 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 09:29:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 03:29:51 -0400 From: LuMiWa To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating /usr/ports Message-ID: <20210528032951.25d33aff@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20210524124023.6372a3383876a1196cf81705@3dresearch.com> <20210526001153.e668d925df825e3486c5f7b9@3dresearch.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FrxCq2q0nz4XMN X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[78.46.223.134:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[78.46.223.134:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de:dkim]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[78.46.223.134:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 07:30:00 -0000 On Thu, 27 May 2021 17:01:52 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 9:13 PM Janos Dohanics > wrote: >=20 > > On Mon, 24 May 2021 12:35:00 -0700 > > Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 9:41 AM Janos Dohanics > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > The Handbook says "As needed, update /usr/ports after the > > > > initial Git checkout: > > > > > > > > # git -C /usr/ports pull" > > > > > > > > [root@frigg ~]# portversion -v | grep -c "<" > > > > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 294 packages found - done] > > > > 7 > > > > > > > > [root@frigg ~]# git -C /usr/ports pull > > > > [...] > > > > 855 files changed, 8990 insertions(+), 7435 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > [root@frigg ~]# portversion -v | grep -c "<" > > > > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 294 packages found - done] > > > > 7 > > > > > > > > However, you also need to 'make index' which the Handbook does > > > > not mention: > > > > > > > > [root@frigg /usr/ports]# make index > > > > > > > > [root@frigg /usr/ports]# portversion -v | grep -c "<" > > > > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 294 packages found - done] > > > > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - > > > > 31205 port entries found > > > > ......... > > > > > > 1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000..= .......7000.........8000.........9000.........10000.........11000.........1= 2000.........13000.........14000.........15000.........16000.........17000.= ........18000.........19000.........20000.........21000.........22000......= ...23000.........24000.........25000.........26000.........27000.........28= 000.........29000.........30000.........31000.. > > ..... > > > > done] 12 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Janos Dohanics > > > > > > > If you don't mind being a couple of hours out of date, "make > > > -C /usr/ports feetchindex.". The index file is generated every 3 > > > hours (I think), and it's a lot faster than making it yourself. > > > > Thanks, I know about 'make fetchindex' - this happens to be a > > reasonably fast machine. > > > > My point is though that 'git -C /usr/ports pull' apparently doesn't > > update the port index, and the Handbook doesn't say you need to do > > 'make index' or 'make fetchindex'. > > > > Also, 'portsnap fetch' && 'portsnap update' did update the index. My > > reading of the Handbook was that 'git -C /usr/ports pull' alone gave > > the same result as 'portsnap fetch' && 'portsnap update'. > > > > > Also, the grep is not needed. 'pkg version -vl<" (or, "-vL=3D" to > > > catch orphaned ports) will do the same thing. Don't worry if you > > > are not using ports. pkg does exactly the same things for both > > > ports and packages except for actually building ports. I thought > > > that portversion was long gone. It's not on either v12 or 13 on > > > my systems. > > > > My bad habit, thank you for the reminder! > > > > -- > > Janos Dohanics > > > If you are trying to replace portsnap, I think the answer is > net/gitup. This only requires a single command, "gitup ports", and > you get your index updated along with updating all ports. I believe > that the plan is to put gitup into the base system fairly soon. I > have not looked at whether 14-current has gitup, yet. >=20 > And, yes, it looks like the handbook needs some work as gitup is not > yet even mentioned. Like portsnap, gitup is for people who want to > maintain an up to date ports tree, but not good for developers. They > do need to use git and either generate the index or fetch it. > -- I am using "gitup ports" and it works without problem. --=20 =E2=80=9CThinking is difficult, that=E2=80=99s why most people judge.=E2=80= =9D Carl Jung From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 28 10:53:12 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A717565124A for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 10:53:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qk1-x72b.google.com (mail-qk1-x72b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fs1kH68n0z4mkD for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 10:53:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: by mail-qk1-x72b.google.com with SMTP id o27so3604576qkj.9 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 03:53:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:mime-version; bh=3zQ6fev+WTdIt5G1UR+GXiaWLAqyD/N7FUginRB7JK8=; b=mmeQFgoWmx9EQzBKwH598dxek7k1WpPy651CVzxEOn1bcIc/T5g5431Qtfn3Gfrc/2 fFYpF5uW4UvDLvaVjsYbK1Zo1k7T4v4eUA6kT8/xTP1eyNSvvjLXZ3vFhi1n079xwY3p YwjhYqW86r8Tr7v+QxTZK/rjculyHxoOGTY+I= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:mime-version; bh=3zQ6fev+WTdIt5G1UR+GXiaWLAqyD/N7FUginRB7JK8=; b=incGJpCVAYNt3oiFF2Ay7+lxTF8Lu60jW3jShfOPM77TVpn4SbHvDheoEYO38/x20g 5EI+TryujAywMZOUbe3G6ltYeWJ6ueQzZ3jf0gPWALaR7f3vINMVZWmON3FL/mb27TF+ N64zJHT7MOhxKZlWqQFcWaOBqYGIe+hbGUFOxnuPKJWZUwewxAOWkX5U8aVfvuyie86S SVWWPFZ9pzX+F8uzit1MvRyvlAsoUF1zVJHZP3/zUfP/7njIaGsU7WvVzFm5uVe9e5sM TwA/LMO+ti1T1PX0gWso1BDVoHb5MltT21AMxDDaDXhd9xCVN+8g3YqmOjvgURtPoCs/ cCVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533wF97j5NoiaTQVWvDU9G86MlgXinqMlHZlhzAKZiN5v3SrQEhD NPk55GfvCQ3WcWx4ymS4kVb34xArSrpixA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7/dUyW+9nnvlzDRVGuqByBsKtZGU81iSce8Gb5LVbjalPis5e3/z8/RLnwo8M39e+kRmyAQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1265:: with SMTP id b5mr3298322qkl.208.1622198729984; Fri, 28 May 2021 03:45:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-174-109-231-236.nc.res.rr.com. [174.109.231.236]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i5sm3196355qki.115.2021.05.28.03.45.29 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 May 2021 03:45:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (zeus.seibercom.net [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Fs1YN4Bx0z1FSZ for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 06:45:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 06:45:25 -0400 From: Jerry To: User questions Subject: Re: Updating /usr/ports Message-ID: <20210528064525.000029cf@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20210524124023.6372a3383876a1196cf81705@3dresearch.com> <20210526001153.e668d925df825e3486c5f7b9@3dresearch.com> Reply-To: User questions Organization: seibercom.NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/8CV.Dm+vmich1IMp7nq3J2C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fs1kH68n0z4mkD X-Spamd-Bar: +++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=seibercom.net header.s=google header.b=mmeQFgoW; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jerry@seibercom.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [7.37 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[seibercom.net:+]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[174.109.231.236:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[seibercom.net:s=google]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.97)[0.975]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[seibercom.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.998]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 10:53:12 -0000 --Sig_/8CV.Dm+vmich1IMp7nq3J2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 27 May 2021 17:01:52 -0700, Kevin Oberman stated: >If you are trying to replace portsnap, I think the answer is net/gitup. >This only requires a single command, "gitup ports", and you get your >index updated along with updating all ports. I believe that the plan >is to put gitup into the base system fairly soon. I have not looked at >whether 14-current has gitup, yet. > >And, yes, it looks like the handbook needs some work as gitup is not >yet even mentioned. Like portsnap, gitup is for people who want to >maintain an up to date ports tree, but not good for developers. They >do need to use git and either generate the index or fetch it. If "gitup" can fetch the "index" file, why can "git" not also accomplish that feat? Is it a technical reason? Asking for a friend. --=20 Jerry "A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking." --Sig_/8CV.Dm+vmich1IMp7nq3J2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAEBCAAdFiEELeCiu2K+9VmEYYgTgHBP8gv9FXcFAmCwycYACgkQgHBP8gv9 FXdgVgwAmpi8ahP2Wpqc+mONWN1NdlwNdckNzCfZxNKry2GoKuVxlbiKao9EDRYl rwilu9iCgRRTLCs3NODqKyEERajuLv0n156FXpxE53hx0WBVFom3sRgozXKFj16D 7XXHuvKexLfW6r/mrF4pkMXRyeMzFr9ZI6ffHEJQw4QmngX2la3TKqsXz7TndkVa BsGqhSq6Iuky0MTpNVSisiUtO4Afe4svAYMqie/JpPbEgea1IYo/v0S4ACtu7dkM fl6nGjcdJ4KKP1NRvBEd72Qudz1LO2ophJY2V/fzlU+p2exo6PDciOUM9JMY9tbM 9SrzfeBiPF56KmChhgQvd5S2ebU8sDl0oCVgq9DVxniYd7SWCVAdk0CbL9u7cK+R U9MgjcR6avKGPtCB8Y9iwsg+55evHXUwB1WLQWVEGioYrepNt8ZvrKF4V0sKJfv2 1EWL7rDGTQanP/3N//ErTtDJnSCZbYLtjpCmvXtHXbWlK/0gxbsLFBP082b5gnom xKJlv37N =H93k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/8CV.Dm+vmich1IMp7nq3J2C-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 28 12:12:49 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C0265291A for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:12:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Fs3V8625Dz3CNm for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:12:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from lowell-desk.be-well.ilk.org (router.lan [172.30.250.2]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9782433C0B; Fri, 28 May 2021 08:12:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 955F41680901; Fri, 28 May 2021 08:12:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Jerry Cc: User questions Subject: Re: Updating /usr/ports References: <20210524124023.6372a3383876a1196cf81705@3dresearch.com> <20210526001153.e668d925df825e3486c5f7b9@3dresearch.com> <20210528064525.000029cf@seibercom.net> Reply-To: User questions Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 08:12:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20210528064525.000029cf@seibercom.net> (jerry@seibercom.net's message of "Fri, 28 May 2021 06:45:25 -0400") Message-ID: <445yz383bj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fs3V8625Dz3CNm X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org has no SPF policy when checking 23.30.133.173) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.01 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[23.30.133.173:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ilk.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.995]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[23.30.133.173:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:23.30.0.0/15, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 12:12:49 -0000 Jerry writes: > On Thu, 27 May 2021 17:01:52 -0700, Kevin Oberman stated: >>If you are trying to replace portsnap, I think the answer is net/gitup. >>This only requires a single command, "gitup ports", and you get your >>index updated along with updating all ports. I believe that the plan >>is to put gitup into the base system fairly soon. I have not looked at >>whether 14-current has gitup, yet. >> >>And, yes, it looks like the handbook needs some work as gitup is not >>yet even mentioned. Like portsnap, gitup is for people who want to >>maintain an up to date ports tree, but not good for developers. They >>do need to use git and either generate the index or fetch it. > > If "gitup" can fetch the "index" file, why can "git" not also > accomplish that feat? Is it a technical reason? The index file isn't in the repository. Not sure if you'd call that a "technical" reason, but "gitup" has a number of bits of FreeBSD-specific knowledge. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 28 13:01:48 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE08653492 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:01:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@3dresearch.com) Received: from smtpg.telissant.net (smtpg.telissant.net [104.225.1.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fs4Zg20k1z3HC2 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:01:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@3dresearch.com) Received: from sacada.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpg.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Fs4ZX4Yjqz2D1r6 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 09:01:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at telissant.net Received: from smtpg.telissant.net ([127.0.0.1]) by sacada.3dresearch.com (sacada.3dresearch.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7t2SYz072pCz for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 09:01:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from elettra.3dresearch.com (unknown [71.112.242.160]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: elettra@sacada.3dresearch.com) by smtpg.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Fs4ZX1FQXz2D1r8 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 09:01:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from elettra.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elettra.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CD9A86F93 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 09:01:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 09:01:31 -0400 From: Janos Dohanics To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Updating /usr/ports Message-Id: <20210528090131.c77dc0007fc706bb91abe15c@3dresearch.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20210524124023.6372a3383876a1196cf81705@3dresearch.com> <20210526001153.e668d925df825e3486c5f7b9@3dresearch.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fs4Zg20k1z3HC2 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of web@3dresearch.com designates 104.225.1.73 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=web@3dresearch.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ENVFROM_SERVICE_ACCT(1.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:smtpg.telissant.net]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[71.112.242.160:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[104.225.1.73:from]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:104.225.1.0/24, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[3dresearch.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[104.225.1.73:from:127.0.2.255]; FROM_SERVICE_ACCT(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 13:01:48 -0000 On Thu, 27 May 2021 17:01:52 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote: > [...] > > > > Also, 'portsnap fetch' && 'portsnap update' did update the index. My > > reading of the Handbook was that 'git -C /usr/ports pull' alone gave > > the same result as 'portsnap fetch' && 'portsnap update'. > > > > > Also, the grep is not needed. 'pkg version -vl<" (or, "-vL=" to > > > catch orphaned ports) will do the same thing. Don't worry if you > > > are not using ports. pkg does exactly the same things for both > > > ports and packages except for actually building ports. I thought > > > that portversion was long gone. It's not on either v12 or 13 on > > > my systems. > > > > My bad habit, thank you for the reminder! > > > > -- > > Janos Dohanics > > > If you are trying to replace portsnap, I think the answer is > net/gitup. This only requires a single command, "gitup ports", and > you get your index updated along with updating all ports. I believe > that the plan is to put gitup into the base system fairly soon. I > have not looked at whether 14-current has gitup, yet. > > And, yes, it looks like the handbook needs some work as gitup is not > yet even mentioned. Like portsnap, gitup is for people who want to > maintain an up to date ports tree, but not good for developers. They > do need to use git and either generate the index or fetch it. > -- > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 Thank you again. -- Janos Dohanics From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 28 14:22:08 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBD1654240 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 14:22:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oo1-xc2e.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fs6MM5Fjtz3NsY for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 14:22:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oo1-xc2e.google.com with SMTP id s24-20020a4aead80000b02901fec6deb28aso956275ooh.11 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 07:22:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tcnm1t/ny89J5qdHfAyO2gBhF0+Q7n5AsvmkXH+ZjSc=; b=rYgJcnq0Sjt+/y6IodhOm9P5Wl2sDhRzrurdgwRuOP03Hr+e6kPedK0SDx+Gi0aIsw 2JSDpyRRdgqUei5wWNfTk8Q4c3dPvlfdbJB35DMgvfx+ttDyTfMQbwE/i+Ns6Qc3FgH8 gfTxh+wqiybLP7MxGAOfNNGr+bvvGNp5BgO0/jGPyOhzddO/CG3/VAtErShCDs/ExhEp Je1r4toiWIBgfufoRZR7cEQ1i9tvOnW58UEOeYFUfevZyRHQ/nZmFgFijTrT5eiCgZJ3 qj36RrAhooOmWGHGJEfp+50xu1DPbPXGQhSNLOjOtFu3q0/I+F2AomqCXM+Ks7vXuSuA ZLKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=tcnm1t/ny89J5qdHfAyO2gBhF0+Q7n5AsvmkXH+ZjSc=; b=FaFJaUDaEm1EOG3Vix7NobAFcu7BOp7YiIwe1haL/hwOG3899leM8kfHMcT46cw7bQ 3x2vETLjiVh881U/FeGjq5Kw+rb92Tyz38e/lDBXoPpq+BkpsPNkRkZaAHSC8qZL8XwW r5sSg7rnz8NZhZxctDepXKyge2fvL13zTDOAWUngCCtBVKrCSBrcbpiesnohZ1YDRLyx 4RYxBtgOpJJX/GTp0sT/EB8znyskdv+xYR4DliGFrJ/LmuT8ajpw+slGwieX2zUyvX1j 1jac8Obh0L4GFTAs2uJ3c8tbM9oH67LgY4G93QuoHaiyfc5vI5ROvYhWTrSy+tKindJQ P/RQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530RRaA35OWWHjuPbb4N/jJm+1XY1IX7eGfGzZvPcx9lsLP+zoif UnB3Z0cZnTY6P/FjY82j6ZJlg0yThnsCms9GmK0w6ZzX X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwyBRPSa+M6XXNtblaUVjLfuy2vDoDi22dwaeE/NgJCXI93TpKDMV3H/6uMqoL9AlYKfzaWfikxHO023UjqoiU= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:6142:: with SMTP id u2mr7108752ooe.9.1622211725827; Fri, 28 May 2021 07:22:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210524124023.6372a3383876a1196cf81705@3dresearch.com> <20210526001153.e668d925df825e3486c5f7b9@3dresearch.com> <20210528064525.000029cf@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20210528064525.000029cf@seibercom.net> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 07:21:53 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Updating /usr/ports To: User questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fs6MM5Fjtz3NsY X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=rYgJcnq0; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kob6558@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kob6558@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.73 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2e:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2e:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.97)[0.972]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2e:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 14:22:08 -0000 Git was written by Linus for use as the Linux kernel. It knows nothing about the FreeBSD specific index. getup is written for BSD with code that understands FreeBSD and the ports system. It's also licensed with a BSD license, not GPL. On Fri, May 28, 2021, 03:53 Jerry wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 2021 17:01:52 -0700, Kevin Oberman stated: > >If you are trying to replace portsnap, I think the answer is net/gitup. > >This only requires a single command, "gitup ports", and you get your > >index updated along with updating all ports. I believe that the plan > >is to put gitup into the base system fairly soon. I have not looked at > >whether 14-current has gitup, yet. > > > >And, yes, it looks like the handbook needs some work as gitup is not > >yet even mentioned. Like portsnap, gitup is for people who want to > >maintain an up to date ports tree, but not good for developers. They > >do need to use git and either generate the index or fetch it. > > If "gitup" can fetch the "index" file, why can "git" not also > accomplish that feat? Is it a technical reason? > > Asking for a friend. > > -- > Jerry > > "A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking." > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 28 15:01:19 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DF2654BC1 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 15:01:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Received: from lena.kiev.ua (lena.kiev.ua [185.45.113.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fs7DZ3RwSz3R2f for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 15:01:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lena.kiev.ua; s=3; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:From: Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=jVHzdpdjNke893XTrkZASOZHNbpRke6FXKWShhQ4oIs=; b=GfpO8Fmk0FDdM0lwDAnI7BFlwC 3PVSXGXC/yWgosZn9czvE3QdL4G4mNIyhfClCuI+qH4oBgdjA+HSngZb3MpEmbRqmXqvYB61LTVZG F17IarzEkCSdJw98DGpE3Af18T/Fbph1nlujodkN4el5ChGazUj1JPVHw6BwHM9wjFQQ=; Received: from ip-1926.rusanovka-net.kiev.ua ([94.244.25.38] helo=bedside.lena.kiev.ua) by lena.kiev.ua with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1lmdg6-000CSx-Hh for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:41:36 +0300 Received: from bedside.lena.kiev.ua (localhost.lena.kiev.ua [127.0.0.1]) by bedside.lena.kiev.ua (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 14SEfCgW008818 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:41:12 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Received: (from lena@localhost) by bedside.lena.kiev.ua (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 14SEfCGn008817 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 17:41:12 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 17:41:12 +0300 From: Lena@lena.kiev.ua To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating /usr/ports Message-ID: <20210528144112.GA961@lena.kiev> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fs7DZ3RwSz3R2f X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=lena.kiev.ua header.s=3 header.b=GfpO8Fmk; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=lena.kiev.ua; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Lena@lena.kiev.ua designates 185.45.113.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Lena@lena.kiev.ua X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.42 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[lena.kiev.ua:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[lena.kiev.ua,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.985]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[185.45.113.66:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29141, ipnet:185.45.112.0/22, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[lena.kiev.ua:dkim]; FAKE_REPLY(1.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[lena.kiev.ua:s=3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FAKE_REPLY_C(6.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[185.45.113.66:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.90)[0.901]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[185.45.113.66:from]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 15:01:19 -0000 > If you are trying to replace portsnap, I think the answer is net/gitup. > This only requires a single command, "gitup ports", and you get your index > updated along with updating all ports. No, `gitup ports` doesn't update index. It deletes INDEX-12 . From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat May 29 16:41:30 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8CE643F38 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 16:41:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FsnPj3ZDqz3q4h for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 16:41:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id h24-20020a9d64180000b029036edcf8f9a6so6637956otl.3 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 09:41:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GCbdlb0ZfffHqB+BNIRUCjr8UdFVxw4aL71NvmTOceY=; b=af3HdGevrm1y8RN7S/KGong6fOe4gIbTf3eV2RVU294UzK9PnA4TURucAvt78UTJXn 0gMkmWLUWB7lFdK4IURGg3CPJ9cJTIdZFgL3z3jgj5MJtkKqed5yEW0O/UjHy9G72f/a tzjx9ziyZZmpVrQxxWHGqZSOLTNbBcuBn7yK79Ven0FsSJQqQO6eWKu0lq9Llpdj2boP rPEtvSakA7Ox0yVOVSgVSlygvLKzHG87rUgdfTG+EST+FzMgGrQNtNQ9am7Z2MYsGFGr LQlU0Wk0t2OGqKQJGM/fb+BtMwHSwNXmaD7sYiIFj/KDqQzScHxgqzJ45t648O7ulAIx KhUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GCbdlb0ZfffHqB+BNIRUCjr8UdFVxw4aL71NvmTOceY=; b=AOeImV0e+wSe5rxOKBu2RBcGDJKMowbpQZMnAokb+tay2kQiLlBkKn34FG9DF2LcqG mnbsTdsnvPRtbxazM348/2vmvIh3iiT1J4Ogn33Dm9bB4uYcHDl0ScACw7/y0csA+5VV xRDrTNKEYmkek6L88R4OxY4CZjXMfLkl6iOrzCM109p8toaYNUwqh/svaP2f0m/4hlBH QIvJAdUOcBNtER5VQqrjKsdX3nSxLZi/ZwcC9izrq9OD2sKw0u2DqFc0oPgiifOrKAns Y65Kl8FGh42/Eva/DYS/m7LEhBd6Dea5v/L9PdoqZu96xWQGFjfyqX17pIgGaekfcotb Ijzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532bILVBJNnfUcgFaFBmoO8RK2NN2pTOLkl6xeqfxy8x70xQLZ8f ycPAlu5UQP98XHEZNd/0/FyE8lMw3gUuvp6rj1rW6ZEuyp4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx55Wdn26sVdj0NvJHsEp95RHP4epGhIXKRr/I5HmQWKICy5JgbFhCHA+loSfu5xP92eiCj2aEir+07LhQmqtA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:348c:: with SMTP id c12mr11202115otu.344.1622306488331; Sat, 29 May 2021 09:41:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210528144112.GA961@lena.kiev> In-Reply-To: <20210528144112.GA961@lena.kiev> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 09:41:11 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Updating /usr/ports To: Lena@lena.kiev.ua Cc: Mailinglists FreeBSD X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FsnPj3ZDqz3q4h X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=af3HdGev; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kob6558@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::333 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kob6558@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.70 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::333:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::333:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::333:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 16:41:30 -0000 On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:01 AM wrote: > > If you are trying to replace portsnap, I think the answer is net/gitup. > > This only requires a single command, "gitup ports", and you get your > index > > updated along with updating all ports. > > No, `gitup ports` doesn't update index. It deletes INDEX-12 . > Does "pkg version" use some other way of doing things than INDEX? I checked a system that I recently upgraded to 13.0 and it lacks INDEX-13 (or any INDEX-), but "pkg version -vL=" works fine. It is slower, though. It was almost instantaneous and now takes about 45 seconds. Not sure whether this is dependent on the number of installed ports. That system has only about 325 ports installed. My development system has around a thousand, but I use git and fetchindex there, so I can't easily compare. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat May 29 21:23:24 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B81647FF9 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 21:23:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fsvfz21PLz4dkX for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 21:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1b9f8cc8; Sat, 29 May 2021 23:23:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e1360cc5; Sat, 29 May 2021 23:23:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id cb07f897; Sat, 29 May 2021 23:23:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 41e93c70 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 29 May 2021 23:23:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 17:23:15 -0400 From: LuMiWa To: Kevin Oberman Cc: Lena@lena.kiev.ua, Mailinglists FreeBSD Subject: Re: Updating /usr/ports Message-ID: <20210529172315.26fd58f0@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20210528144112.GA961@lena.kiev> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fsvfz21PLz4dkX X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[78.46.223.134:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[78.46.223.134:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de:dkim]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[78.46.223.134:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 21:23:24 -0000 On Sat, 29 May 2021 09:41:11 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:01 AM wrote: >=20 > > > If you are trying to replace portsnap, I think the answer is > > > net/gitup. This only requires a single command, "gitup ports", > > > and you get your > > index > > > updated along with updating all ports. > > > > No, `gitup ports` doesn't update index. It deletes INDEX-12 . > > > Does "pkg version" use some other way of doing things than INDEX? I > checked a system that I recently upgraded to 13.0 and it lacks > INDEX-13 (or any INDEX-), but "pkg version -vL=3D" works fine. It is > slower, though. It was almost instantaneous and now takes about 45 > seconds. Not sure whether this is dependent on the number of > installed ports. That system has only about 325 ports installed. My > development system has around a thousand, but I use git and > fetchindex there, so I can't easily compare. -- > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" /var/db/gitup/ports is updated every time as you use gitup ports. I think it is an index. because when you run in /usr/ports make index are those in /var/db/gitup updated. --=20 =E2=80=9CThinking is difficult, that=E2=80=99s why most people judge.=E2=80= =9D Carl Jung From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat May 29 22:20:50 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CB76492EA for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 22:20:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (mail-wm1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FswxF62Fwz4jwc for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 22:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id g204so800089wmf.5 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 15:20:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MvqJHqlkhYx2ajESzJGYHZakpcN4cKxQ8v4zYG7qVWc=; b=cQ2JN0Pyx/Xy16Outqsle1/oXXahlfr2wLsPmNleZpCHcxKYLEfa+K58GF12qZfHXO CR+yeadj4eDEJYjuj5q4Y+2L76Vvn8rsEJxVgeFGvTyBaZVvATisMUwIZvTeMlcZsGlT z2DR25PV46+a2AFGcfIqjRmddmFX20yq5jDykF+sMWYawhzZn/3IdNb2hQB768mxJB/J TbVk79xq7kOwaHi5SvILxfTQexMTsvp+H/iF4339CFN2hexTupWv5JkhyLZrmYcpYYw9 4qg5GTxNYMcnX1zDRvDROkfHEdftpqhAyF1/IJwpcjqIrSZPrFv2QOOKnfdTg00U5Nu3 DcVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320trkSUXkGpkCZr40mhLgUPlIwJzKzYtQu6FWWUPwi/UlRdM0f 5szBSHt4bi2Ho04we29snbRDZyMZU8qIJg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxvPlO4xdH4Jacl6/8GQGJIYYgDM1UImdTzusyhw214HBXjrP2nYXKocaGMcxT3uyXAOeETAw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e90d:: with SMTP id q13mr14359328wmc.163.1622326847482; Sat, 29 May 2021 15:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (88-111-224-31.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com. [88.111.224.31]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r17sm18988494wmh.25.2021.05.29.15.20.46 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 29 May 2021 15:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 23:20:45 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating /usr/ports Message-ID: <20210529232045.1ce80e04@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20210528144112.GA961@lena.kiev> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FswxF62Fwz4jwc X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[googlemail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[googlemail.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[88.111.224.31:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::330:from]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[googlemail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[googlemail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::330:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::330:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 22:20:50 -0000 On Sat, 29 May 2021 09:41:11 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote: > Does "pkg version" use some other way of doing things than INDEX? I > checked a system that I recently upgraded to 13.0 and it lacks > INDEX-13 (or any INDEX-), but "pkg version -vL=" works fine. It is > slower, though. It was almost instantaneous and now takes about 45 > seconds. I was just reading the man page for pkg-version; by default the order it tries is INDEX, ports tree, package repository. This seems strange to me as I would have expected it to default to the repository.