From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 19 05:00:11 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA17336 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 05:00:11 -0700 Received: from zap.zap.qc.ca (zap.zap.qc.ca [198.168.127.8]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA17329 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 05:00:05 -0700 Received: (from fortin@localhost) by zap.zap.qc.ca (8.6.9/8.6.6) id HAA05376; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 07:59:41 -0400 From: Denis Fortin Message-Id: <199504191159.HAA05376@zap.zap.qc.ca> Subject: Re: invalid IPs To: nc@ain.charm.net (Network Coordinator) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 07:59:40 -0400 (EDT) Cc: jleppek@suw2k.ess.harris.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Network Coordinator" at Apr 18, 95 08:01:24 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 646 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > As a matter of fact. There is a system called zod.clark.net that is > completely announced to the whole world that has the address: > 192.245.235.1. > > And the 192 net is reserved completely and utterly. Nope. 192 isn't reserved. What is reserved by RFC1597 is: 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255 <- a single class A network 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 <- 16 class B networks 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255 <- 256 class C networks There are lots of valid addresses in 192.*.*.*! -- Denis Fortin fortin@acm.org DMR Group Inc, (514) 877-3301 These opinions are my own