Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 00:33:25 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/benchmarks/pathrate pkg-descr Message-ID: <20050526223325.GV39511@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <1117145959.30675.23.camel@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> References: <200505262024.j4QKORKs009115@repoman.freebsd.org> <1117145959.30675.23.camel@tomcat.kitchenlab.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--0TE6JTYfnDoP1Y15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 03:19:19PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: >=20 > Hmmm. Of the four "estimate the bandwidth along a path" programs I'm > aware of in the Ports Collection, two are in net (net/pathchar, > net/pchar) and two are in benchmarks (benchmarks/pathload, > benchmarks/pathrate). This seems suboptimal somehow. :-p >=20 Good you mention it. I'd like to get some more consistency here, and IMHO net would be the proper category. So unless anyone objects, I'll offer myself to move those two from benchmarks to net via the usual ways. -erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing DISCLAIMER: No electrons were harmed while sending this message. --0TE6JTYfnDoP1Y15 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFClk61qy9aWxUlaZARAuX5AJ9qBGi8PqRO94V3G9lYXzu9Z4poawCfZo4d vTn0j3dv4TQYfRegP9XOAh0= =WKJJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0TE6JTYfnDoP1Y15--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050526223325.GV39511>