From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 24 14:21:19 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9F116A417 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:21:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatman@crackmonkey.us) Received: from crackmonkey.us (crackmonkey.us [70.58.166.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B66C13C442 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatman@crackmonkey.us) Received: from [10.22.8.146] (cpc1-swin7-0-0-cust216.brhm.cable.ntl.com [::ffff:86.18.88.217]) (AUTH: PLAIN fatman, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by crackmonkey.us with esmtp; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:21:06 -0600 id 0017C5C3.46CEE958.0000020E Message-ID: <46CEE8B7.8030704@crackmonkey.us> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:18:31 +0100 From: Adam J Richardson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CyberLeo Kitsana References: <46CE09A8.2010304@crackmonkey.us> <46CE304E.3090500@cyberleo.net> In-Reply-To: <46CE304E.3090500@cyberleo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: VMware Player 2 Linux on 6.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:21:19 -0000 CyberLeo Kitsana wrote: > Unless the two machines have identical CPUs with identical capabilities, > this will likely end in failure. Operating systems aren't happy having > their CPUs switch capabilities or instruction sets between one cycle and > the next. I hadn't considered that. I assumed VMware "virtualised" the CPU, so that hot-swapping would be possible without a panic. You mean it allows direct access to the CPU? builder# dmesg | head | grep CPU: CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz (2008.36-MHz 686-c So it does. Didn't notice that. Oh well, I can just start the VM on the slower machine. :) Adam J Richardson