From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 30 20:38:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495D216A419 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from mx-outbound01.easydns.com (mailout.easydns.com [205.210.42.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DCD013C459 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:38:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (69-12-173-117.static.humboldt1.com [69.12.173.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx-outbound01.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02EE8086 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:38:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (slider.shadypond.com [192.168.1.11]) by slider.shadypond.com (postoffice) with ESMTP id D092BB65AD for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:38:04 +0000 (UTC) From: Pollywog To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:38:03 +0000 References: <4700052A.7050008@gracenpeace.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070930152732.02576438@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20070930152732.02576438@mail.computinginnovations.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709302038.03763.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> Subject: Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:38:10 -0000 On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:28:23 Derek Ragona wrote: > At 03:20 PM 9/30/2007, Joe in MPLS wrote: > >I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for > >mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for > >primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV > >scanning would be a plus too. > > > > ...jgm > > I use mailscanner with sendmail which uses spamassasin with clamav. All > from the ports. I used Mailscanner at one time, but it is not recommended for use with Postfix because mail can be lost. It never happened to me, but it has happened to others. I believe the Postfix website mentions these problems.