Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 01:21:48 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule Message-ID: <20120820232147.GD23607@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <CAL409KxPwGaCS-BL_tW7P1cX_Jk1V_h8wBdTUjbCWxU8fA_WtQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20120820194313.GC23607@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAL409KxPwGaCS-BL_tW7P1cX_Jk1V_h8wBdTUjbCWxU8fA_WtQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:09:46AM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Please [...] ask question about pkgng [...] >=20 > What would be the best practice of mixing ports with packages? >=20 > The use case I have in mind is compiling Xorg ports locally > WITH_NEW_XORG and WITH_KMS, and using packages from > pkgbeta.freebsd.org for everything else. Is there some mixture of pkg > and portmaster flags that allows this kind of setup? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" There is no best practice for that unfortunatly, (as actually) the best for= you is maybe to build your own pkgng repostories? http://wiki.freebsd.org/PkgPrimer#Using_poudriere for example? We are open to suggestion here :) regards, Bapt --rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlAyxosACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EznfACcDNCl6g9h871ULoA2M77yxBMe hE8An0JoF6y+cpZDDa42BZR9QaJMbDSu =mDeY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120820232147.GD23607>