From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 14 05:52:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40F716A41F for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:52:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335F343D45 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:52:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z31so483216nzd for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:52:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=J2igbbvc3faHENYHM9h90z7QQ3Pb5MMFCtkKJID+uceh0sljLZ0S/HLR7KW8EdCtkFjsGh/45s6UH8BMiO2FVy/tqHjNA7DKd4x32LnJ9jZPyZ6pOhTR8s9osHVxORAOl1YbeQSdcSi6yuePw0/o8wANpYDmuBN853kGnfma9Jo= Received: by 10.36.58.7 with SMTP id g7mr3249005nza; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.20.34 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:52:51 +0400 From: "Andrew P." To: k.makisupa@sbcglobal.net In-Reply-To: <1129245987.26134.24.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1129223753.26134.7.camel@localhost> <17230.42424.158733.144788@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <1129245987.26134.24.camel@localhost> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newbie ports question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:52:52 -0000 On 10/14/05, makisupa wrote: > What good will portupgrade it do here? Obviously I must not > properly understand what its doing...but in the error message I > have a newer version of the dependency than the port calls for > and the port misidentifies this. If there was a newer port of > say 'pan' that had newer dependencies .. ie. the one's i already > have than i'd be golden. But why wouldn't cvsup'ing take care > of that? Like i said...you're dealing with a newb here. I am > obviously missunderstanding something... > You'll want to look through ports manpage. It only takes a minute to read, but saves you a lifetime of questions. As I understand, you're dealing with "kind of" bug in glib20 port. You might be lucky enough so that portupgrade will get over it - and fix everything. By the way, did you update the INDEX files in /usr/ports? Run portsdb -uUF to fetch and install a fresh index. Do it every time after cvsupping your ports tree. For now, try: # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade # make install # cvsup -g -L 2 # portsdb -uUF # portversion -l\< # portupgrade -arR