From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 28 21:22:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556EB16A410 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8DC43E79 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:22:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (localhost.natserv.net [127.0.0.1]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376DEB896; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:22:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (zoraida.natserv.net [66.114.65.147]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C47B893; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:22:14 -0400 (EDT) References: <20060620060845.U1114@ganymede.hub.org> <20060628132222.Q1114@ganymede.hub.org> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Marc =?ISO-8859-1?B?Ry4=?= Fournier Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:22:14 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Are hardware vendors starting to bail on FreeBSD ... ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:22:18 -0000 Marc G. Fournier writes: > The other selling point for me on HP was the 2.5" SAS drives ... our new > servers have 4x72G SAS drives in a 1U space, which means I can do RAID1+0 How do those drives perform? They are too small for where I work. :-( At least for our "storage" servers.. Are those 10K RPM? > > Other point is leasability ... from an accounting perspective, its better > for me to lease servers Good point.