From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 3 13:35:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB8510656D2 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:35:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karl@denninger.net) Received: from FS.denninger.net (wsip-70-169-168-7.pn.at.cox.net [70.169.168.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5139C8FC17 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:35:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karl@denninger.net) Received: from [192.168.1.40] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by FS.denninger.net (8.14.3/8.13.1) with SMTP id n23DZskE010073 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 07:35:54 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from karl@denninger.net) Received: from [192.168.1.40] [192.168.1.40] by Spamblock-sys (LOCAL); Tue Mar 3 07:35:54 2009 Message-ID: <49AD3237.2050208@denninger.net> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 07:35:51 -0600 From: Karl Denninger User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20090302220729.GN14832@boiteameuh.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------030807090200050901030902" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: IPC Sys5 for amd64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:35:55 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030807090200050901030902 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ivan Voras wrote: > nicolas@boiteameuh.org wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to install a PostgreSQL db on FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE amd64. >> It's seems I can't allocate a shared memory segment more than 2GB. >> I tune sysctl ipc.shm* values but without effects. >> >> IPC Sys5 isn't "64bit-aware" or the problem is elsewhere? >> > > Yes, SYSVSHM is limited to 2 GB in 7.1. It has recently been extended in > -CURRENT, it will probably be MFC-ed to 7-STABLE (7.2) soon. > Aha! Well, that makes sense :) I was wondering why I could tune up the sysctls but the call to allocate still failed :) For those of us who have complex dbms installations that would be VERY useful, as RAM is cheap nowdays. -- -- Karl Denninger karl@denninger.net --------------030807090200050901030902--