From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Mar 17 07:29:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA01336 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Tue, 17 Mar 1998 07:29:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from jmb@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA01258; Tue, 17 Mar 1998 07:29:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmb) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" Message-Id: <199803171529.HAA01258@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Sendmail going commercial, and ? In-Reply-To: <350E95C6.C58D662D@ibm.net> from Don Wilde at "Mar 17, 98 07:24:54 am" To: dwilde1@ibm.net Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 07:29:17 -0800 (PST) Cc: jmb@FreeBSD.ORG, shimon@simon-shapiro.org, molter@logic.it, chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Don Wilde wrote: > FWIR, the free track is _still_ free, isn't it? I thought source of 8.9 > would be available, just not the so-called 'Pro' enhancements. As > Jonathan says, it serves me well, although certainly a .cf-rule-writing > front end would be a blessing. the .cf-rule-writing front end is the m4 preprocessor and the example .mc files in ..../sendmail/cf/cf its much better than in the days before using m4 ;) (i remember when real programmers used butterfly switches to hammer in the code........;) > I might suggest that the same comments about 'abomination' have run > through my mind about the C language itself... ;) gawd....dont go there.....we start talking about C++ and "whee lets add yet another meaning for the keyword static". jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message