Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 04:16:50 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: morten@hotpost.dk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs OpenBSD Message-ID: <20010322041650.B2141@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20010322071957.A5319@hotpost.dk>; from morten@hotpost.dk on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 07:19:57AM %2B0100 References: <5515358965.20010322121835@iname.com> <20010322071957.A5319@hotpost.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 07:19:57AM +0100, morten@hotpost.dk wrote: > OpenBSD is a more "full" UNIX, it has OpenSSH, sudo kerberos and such > installed in the base system. I take exception to this statement. FreeBSD has those things either in the base system or the ports collection where they're a command away from being installed on your system (sudo). It doesn't make it any more or less a "full" UNIX, IMO. > OpenBSD have the best manpages I've ever seen, I love them. Could you explain in what ways you think they're better than the FreeBSD manpages? Kris --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD4DBQE6ue0xWry0BWjoQKURAiJ4AKDJ5x99eWQs6L5Om4XzKbHohtsd9gCYwSO/ DhFifi+rBRQDYd/nvFx2oQ== =M9uz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010322041650.B2141>