From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Apr 12 07:53:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95B3B0DDEA for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:53:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asv@inhio.eu) Received: from cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.eu (mail.inhio.eu [178.238.36.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29041AEF; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asv@inhio.eu) Received: from titanio.inhio.eu (unknown [172.16.0.30]) by cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 226ABB9822; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1460447625.2173.14.camel@inhio.eu> Subject: Re: upgrade to 10.3 from 10.1 From: asv To: Lowell Gilbert , Matthew Seaman Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:53:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <44k2k3hfrv.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <1460399864.2173.11.camel@inhio.eu> <570C2819.7070900@FreeBSD.org> <44k2k3hfrv.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:53:49 -0000 Thanks guys for your inputs. I'll try to dig more on this prior to proceed. Have a good day. On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 19:44 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Matthew Seaman writes: > > > On 11/04/2016 19:37, asv wrote: > > > I don't feel confident to proceed with > > > > > > # freebsd-update upgrade -r 10.3-RELEASE > > > > > > from my 10.1-RELEASE-p31. > > > I read on the FreeBSD website: "Systems running 9.3-RELEASE,10.3 > > > -RC[12] > > > can upgrade as follows" but usually releases in the middle are > > > included. > > > I've tried to search a bit about it but I didn't find much. > > > > > > Am I just paranoid for not seeing 10.1 and 10.2 in the list? > > > Did anybody try this operation already? > > > I also have jails there, I want to be very prudent on this > > > machine. > > > > Other release versions usually aren't listed explicitly, unless > > there is > > something special that needs to be done to upgrade them. The fact > > that > > 10.1 and 10.2 aren't listed is a sign that there's not going to be > > any > > great difficulty upgrading from those versions. > > > > We haven't seen any horror stories about upgrades on the lists > > since > > 10.3-RELEASE came out. That silence is what should give you > > confidence: > > people just don't talk about things that work routinely. The > > minute > > there's a problem though... > > I'm thinking there's a problem with setting refentrytitle, as at > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.3R/installation.html#upgrade-bina > ry > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"