From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 8 07:34:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8163216A4E1; Sun, 8 May 2005 07:34:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890BC43D91; Sun, 8 May 2005 07:34:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j487Yk5E044675; Sun, 8 May 2005 09:34:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j487Ykut021568; Sun, 8 May 2005 09:34:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j487Ykps021567; Sun, 8 May 2005 09:34:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb) Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 09:34:46 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: Michael Nottebrock Message-ID: <20050508073446.GA21550@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20050504.185153.78707420.imp@bsdimp.com> <6dc0162f9029defe6980a9ae28bb5175@mac.com> <200505080425.24495.lofi@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200505080425.24495.lofi@freebsd.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: boot banner project X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 07:34:49 -0000 On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 04:25:20AM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote.. > On Thursday, 5. May 2005 04:16, Charles Swiger wrote: > > > Data point: I've been running /bin/sh as root's shell on a bunch of > > machines with zero issues since 4.0. > > You got lucky then, because there's some actual footshooting potential in > doing that. Use toor. Interesting, I have been running /bin/sh since 1.0R (yes..) for root and it never bit me. Where is that footshooting potential? I dislike csh. A lot.. -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org