From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 18 08:27:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A62CBA69 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63A0B261A for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [80.67.16.118] (helo=webmailfront01.ispgateway.de) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1WxB6u-000891-TI for freebsd-python@freebsd.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:20:48 +0200 Received: from his1.his.de (his1.his.de [192.124.237.237]) by webmail.df.eu (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:20:48 +0200 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:20:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20140618102048.Horde.w1CivWZQea2qzyDdsxrb4w1@webmail.df.eu> From: Marcus von Appen To: freebsd-python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wrong python_CMD in shebangfix? References: <0AE311F0-87F8-4376-8E24-742C6C54F564@gmail.com> <20140515053140.GA920@medusa.sysfault.org> <9A0AFE0A-8150-41F9-962F-274D2C7A5694@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9A0AFE0A-8150-41F9-962F-274D2C7A5694@gmail.com> Reply-to: mva@freebsd.org User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.0.4) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Df-Sender: ZnJlZWJzZEBzeXNmYXVsdC5vcmc= X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:27:50 -0000 Dmitry Sivachenko : > Well, so what is the consensus on this? > > May I commit the proposed patch? > Sorry, I missed the mail completely. The patch should be checked against those ports, which currently use the shebangfix for python files, but do not set python_CMD explicitly. Otherwise, we may break things in a pretty bad way, since the behaviour changes. Cheers Marcus